Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:e9007

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.

(Circulation. 2000;101:e9007.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Cardiovascular News

Inspector General Wants to Curb Administrative Costs for Managed Care Organizations

Ruth SoRelle, MPH, Circulation Newswriter

Administrative costs for managed care organizations (MCOs) varied between 3% and 32% among 232 such groups reviewed by the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the US Department of Health and Human Services. The finding prompted the Inspector General, June Gibbs Brown, to recommend that the Health Care Financing Administration (HFCA) support legislation that would establish a ceiling for administrative costs of 15% of total revenues. This could result in $1 billion being passed to beneficiaries in the form of additional benefits or reduced payments.

"The 15% was suggested because it represented the average rate noted during the period of review," wrote Ms Brown in a letter to Nancy-Ann Minn DeParle, the HCFA administrator. "We believe a ceiling would result in beneficiaries being offered either more benefits or reduced premiums, co-pays, etc." Ms Brown estimated the savings from such a move at $1 billion. She said exceptions could be granted to start-up MCOs, which would have increased administrative costs during their first 2 years of operation.

"At a minimum, the HCFA should aggressively review any administrative rate >15% and require MCOs to justify the excessive administrative amounts," Ms Brown wrote.

In the Inspector General’s draft report, Ms Brown said that the HCFA agreed that more scrutiny should be directed to the adjusted community rate upon which such costs are based. However, she noted that the agency did not concur with the notion of establishing a ceiling on such costs. HCFA officials said a new methodology is in place for the adjusted community rate proposals and any plan to set a ceiling should be deferred until analysis of the new proposals is done.

"This review, similar OIG reviews, and other studies have shown that MCOs’ exorbitant administrative costs have been problematic and can be the source for abusive behavior," wrote Ms Brown. "Therefore, we believe that the HCFA should be more proactive than reactive in addressing issues related to administrative costs." The report is available at http://www.hhs.gov/progorg/oas/whatsnew.html.





This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by SoRelle, R.