(Circulation. 2000;101:611.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
Diastolic Blood Pressure Changes During Exercise Positively Correlate With Serum Cholesterol and Insulin Resistance
From the Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Cardiovascular Biology and Medicine, King’s College, St Thomas’ Hospital, London SE1 7EH, UK.
Correspondence to S.E. Brett, Department of Clinical Pharmacology, St Thomas’ Hospital, Lambeth Palace Rd, London, UK SE1 7EH. E-mail s.brett{at}umds.ac.uk
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Background—Metabolic factors, including plasma concentrations of cholesterol and insulin resistance, may influence blood pressure through effects on vascular reactivity. Such effects might influence blood pressure during exercise more strongly than at rest.
Methods and Results—We examined whether there is an association between serum cholesterol or insulin resistance and change in blood pressure during mild exercise. Blood pressure was measured at rest and during fixed low-workload bicycle ergometry (50, 75, and 100 W, each for 3 minutes) in 75 healthy active men (age, 18 to 66 years). Blood pressure at rest was not significantly correlated with serum cholesterol or insulin resistance (estimated from the fasting glucose–insulin product). The change from resting values in diastolic but not systolic blood pressure during exercise was correlated with serum cholesterol (R>0.47, P<0.0001 for each workload) and insulin resistance (R>0.38, P<0.01 for each workload). Serum cholesterol and insulin resistance were the only independent predictors of the change in diastolic blood pressure during exercise in a stepwise regression model incorporating age, body mass index, serum cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, insulin resistance, and heart rate during exercise. In a further study, the change in diastolic blood pressure during exercise was greater in men with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes (13.6 mm Hg [95% CI, 8.5 to 18.8]; n=10) than in nondiabetic control men (2.7 mm Hg [95% CI, -2.0 to 7.3]; n=10; P=0.002).
Conclusions—Changes in diastolic blood pressure during gentle exercise are strongly associated with serum concentrations of total cholesterol and insulin resistance. This may contribute to development of hypertensive complications in dyslipidemic and/or insulin-resistant patients.
Key Words: blood pressure • diabetes mellitus • exercise • hypercholesterolemia
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Endothelium-dependent relaxation of resistance vessels by such agonists as acetylcholine is impaired in hypercholesterolemia,1 2 3 4 and it has been hypothesized that an influence of cholesterol on vascular tone may affect blood pressure.4 Reviewing recent lipid-lowering trials, Goode et al5 have provided evidence for an association between plasma concentrations of cholesterol and resting blood pressure. The association, however, is relatively weak, and cholesterol-lowering therapy results in only a modest reduction in blood pressure.5 Hypercholesterolemia may influence vascular reactivity to a greater degree than basal tone.1 2 3 Such an effect might influence blood pressure during exercise more strongly than blood pressure at rest. In this present investigation, we therefore examined the relation between changes in blood pressure during exercise and serum cholesterol. This additionally revealed a relationship between changes in blood pressure during exercise and insulin resistance (assessed from the fasting glucose–insulin product). In a second study, we compared changes in blood pressure during exercise in severely insulin-resistant normotensive men with uncomplicated type 2 diabetes mellitus with those in age-matched, nondiabetic control men. We also compared changes in blood pressure during exercise with serum total homocysteine, a factor known to influence vascular reactivity.6
|
Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Subjects
In study 1, healthy active men were recruited consecutively in response to an advertisement for cardiovascular screening. All were asymptomatic with no past history of cardiovascular disease, and no subject was on drug therapy. Diabetes was excluded by measurement of fasting plasma glucose concentrations. A physical activity score7 based on the frequency and type (intensity) of regular activity was determined for each subject. Subject characteristics are shown in Table 1
. In study 2, men with type 2
diabetes were recruited from the diabetic clinic at St Thomas’
Hospital. None had evidence of macrovascular or microvascular
complications other than mild background retinopathy.
All had urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratios within
the normal range. None was taking drugs other than oral hypoglycemic
agents. Five subjects received sulfonylureas (glibenclamide, n=3;
gliclazide, n=1) and/or metformin (n=2). These drugs were omitted on
the morning of the study. The mean duration of diabetes from diagnosis
was 3 years. Nondiabetic control men age matched to within 2 years were
recruited concurrently. These control subjects were included in the
analysis for study 1. Characteristics of diabetic and control
men are shown in Table 2. Additional
healthy volunteers were recruited to examine the reproducibility and
accuracy of diastolic blood pressure measurements during
exercise. Approval for each protocol was obtained from St Thomas’
Hospital Research Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was
obtained from all subjects.
|
|
Metabolic Measurements
Subjects attended a quiet, temperature-controlled clinical
laboratory in the morning after an overnight fast. A fasting blood
sample was taken for measurement of serum concentrations of total
cholesterol, HDL cholesterol,
triglycerides, glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c),
and insulin. LDL cholesterol was calculated from the
Friedewald equation.8 Insulin resistance was estimated by
homeostasis model assessment from fasting glucose and insulin
values.9 Serum total homocysteine was measured by
high-performance liquid chromatography
according to the method of Fiskerstrand et al10 in 30
healthy volunteers.
Exercise Blood Pressure Responses
After resting for 30 minutes, subjects performed a
submaximal exercise test on a bicycle ergometer (Seca Cardiotest 100,
Cardiokinetis). Subjects rested seated for 9 minutes to establish
baseline readings and then cycled for 9 minutes (3 minutes at 50 W, 3
minutes at 75 W, and 3 minutes at 100 W). Subjects then rested for a
9-minute recovery period. Pulse and blood pressure were recorded at
3-minute intervals before, during, and after exercise. Blood pressure
was measured by mercury sphygmomanometry with an appropriately sized
cuff by a single trained observer who had no knowledge of the
biochemical data at the time of the exercise study.
Diastolic blood pressure was measured at Korotkoff phase IV
according to American Heart Association guidelines for measurement
during exercise.11
Mercury sphygmomanometry was used in preference to automated
methods or intra-arterial monitoring following preliminary
studies that demonstrated sphygmomanometry to be more reproducible
provided measurements were made by the same trained observer. Agreement
between sphygmomanometric (obtained by the same trained observer) and
intra-arterial diastolic blood pressure
measurements was assessed in 6 healthy men. A 22-gauge cannula was
inserted into the left radial artery and attached to a pressure
transducer (Baxter BV). The mean difference between
diastolic blood pressure measured by the 2 methods was 5.3
(95% CI, -1.7 to 12.4), 4.2 (95% CI, -6.1 to 14.5), and 2.7
mm Hg (95% CI, -7.3 to 12.6) at 50, 75, and 100 W, respectively. The
reproducibility of sphygmomanometric blood pressure measurements during
exercise was assessed in 8 healthy volunteers who exercised on 3
occasions separated by 
24 hours. The mean within-subject SD values of
diastolic blood pressures were 4.1, 2.7, and 3.6
mm Hg at 50, 75, and 100 W, respectively.
Statistical Analysis
Results are presented as mean±SEM or means with 95%
CIs. Univariate and multivariate stepwise
regression analyses were used to examine the association
between blood pressure and the following potential
cardiovascular risk factors: age, body mass index
(BMI), smoking status, fitness score, serum cholesterol,
triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, and insulin
resistance. This analysis was performed for the change from
resting values in blood pressure during exercise and for absolute
values of blood pressure at rest and during exercise. Because
homocysteine was measured in a subset of subjects, the association of
blood pressure changes with homocysteine was examined only by
univariate analysis. ANOVA for repeated measures
was used to test for differences in blood pressures between diabetic
and control subjects. P<0.05 was considered
significant.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Study 1: Relation Between Blood Pressure and Metabolic Characteristics in Healthy Nondiabetic Men
During exercise, heart rate increased from 69±1.3 bpm at rest to 93±1.4, 106±1.5, and 118±1.62 bpm at 50, 75, and 100 W, respectively. Blood pressure increased from 122±1.0/80±0.2 mm Hg at rest to 139±1.4/81±1.0, 151±1.8/81±1.0, and 164±1.9/81±1.0 mm Hg at 50, 75, and 100 W. Resting values of systolic and diastolic blood pressures were not significantly correlated with serum cholesterol. Changes from resting values in systolic blood pressure during exercise were not significantly correlated with any of the risk factors examined.
Changes from resting values in diastolic blood pressure at
all workloads were positively correlated with serum total
cholesterol (R>0.47, P<0.0001 for
each workload; Figure 1) and LDL
cholesterol (R>0.37, P<0.002 for
each workload). For each subject, the change from baseline in
diastolic blood pressure remained approximately constant
over the range of workloads studied, so values at 50 and 100 W were
similar for subjects in both the highest and lowest quartiles of the
distribution of serum cholesterol (6.0±1.4 and
5.5±2.0 mm Hg at 50 and 100 W, respectively, for subjects in the
top quartile versus -1.4±1.1 and -2.8±1.5 mm Hg at 50 and 100
W for subjects in the bottom quartile; Figure 2). The mean increase in
diastolic blood pressure on exercise for all workloads was
2.9 mm Hg (95% CI, 1.8 to 4.1) per 1-mmol/L increase in total
cholesterol. Univariate analysis also
demonstrated a significant correlation between the change in
diastolic blood pressure on exercise and insulin resistance
(R>0.38, P<0.002), age (R>0.27,
P<0.02), and BMI (R>0.27, P<0.02).
There was no correlation with smoking status. The correlation with
physical fitness score failed to reach significance at all levels of
exercise but was weakly correlated at 50 W (R=0.25,
P<0.05). In the subset of 30 men in whom homocysteine was
measured, univariate analysis demonstrated a
significant association between the change in diastolic
blood pressure on exercise and serum total homocysteine at 50 W
(R=0.47, P<0.01) and 75 W (R=0.38,
P<0.05) but not at 100 W (R=0.33,
P<0.08). Overall, across all workloads, the association
with homocysteine was significant (R=0.40,
P<0.05).
|
|
Stepwise multiple regression analysis demonstrated changes in diastolic blood pressure at all workloads to be independently correlated with serum cholesterol and insulin resistance but not with age, BMI, heart rate, fitness score, triglycerides, or HDL cholesterol. The correlation coefficient for the final model incorporating total cholesterol and insulin resistance was R=0.58 (P<0.0001) for the mean change in diastolic blood pressure from resting values at all workloads, with partial correlation coefficients of 0.43 and 0.37 for the correlations with serum cholesterol and insulin resistance, respectively. Absolute values of diastolic blood pressure at all workloads were also significantly correlated with serum cholesterol (R=0.36, P<0.01).
Study 2: Comparison of Blood Pressure Responses in Men With Type 2
Diabetes and Nondiabetic Control Men
Absolute values of systolic blood pressure at rest and the
change from resting values in systolic blood pressure (at all
workloads) did not differ significantly between diabetic and
nondiabetic men. At all levels of exercise, the change from resting
values in diastolic blood pressure was significantly
greater in diabetic than in nondiabetic men (11.8±1.6 versus
2.4±2.1 mm Hg at 50 W, 14.4±2.8 versus 2.0±2.3 mm Hg at
75 W, and 16.7±3.3 versus 3.6±2.1 mm Hg at 100 W;
P=0.002 by ANOVA; Figure 3).
The change from resting values in diastolic blood pressure
was similar in the diabetic subjects treated with diet alone and those
treated by diet plus oral hypoglycemic drugs. There was no significant
correlation between the change in diastolic blood pressure
and total cholesterol in the diabetic group.
|
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Most studies on blood pressure during exercise have focused on systolic blood pressure. An exaggerated increase in systolic blood pressure predicts development of future hypertension12 and is an independent predictor of mortality.13 Interpretation of systolic blood pressure measured at the brachial artery during exercise is complex because during exercise systolic pressure is greater than central aortic blood pressure by
80 mm Hg.14 This
occurs as a result of the frequency-dependent transmission
characteristics of the upper limb.15 The main findings in
the present study relate to diastolic blood pressure
during exercise. Unlike systolic blood pressure,
diastolic pressure remains similar in brachial and central
arteries during exercise. Diastolic blood pressure
measurements during exercise, however, are rarely reported, perhaps
because of concern about the accuracy of such measurements. Our
verification studies demonstrate that diastolic blood
pressure measurements taken at Korotkoff phase IV (as recommended by
AHA guidelines11 ) by a trained observer are reproducible
and in acceptable agreement with intra-arterial
measurements. Resting diastolic (or systolic) blood pressure in the healthy active men participating in this study was not significantly correlated to serum concentrations of total cholesterol or other lipids. This finding does not conflict with previous reports of a weak association between resting blood pressure and cholesterol, because our study had insufficient power to detect such an association. In contrast, the change in diastolic blood pressure on exercise was closely related to serum total cholesterol (and to LDL cholesterol), with diastolic blood pressure increasing during exercise in subjects with the highest concentrations of cholesterol and decreasing in those with the lowest concentrations. The strength of the association is striking considering the limited range of cholesterol values (3.0 to 7.7 mmol/L) in the subjects under study and the limited accuracy with which diastolic blood pressure can be determined during exercise. There is no possibility that observer bias was responsible for the observed association, because the observer was unaware of cholesterol values at the time of blood pressure measurement.
Diastolic blood pressure is determined mainly by cardiac
output and peripheral vascular resistance.16
During exercise, cardiac output increases and peripheral
vascular resistance decreases in response to vasodilation of resistance
vessels within exercising skeletal muscle.16 An increase
in diastolic blood pressure during exercise could therefore
result from an inappropriately high cardiac output or impaired
vasodilation of resistance vessels within skeletal musculature.
Hypercholesterolemia is strongly associated
with impaired reactivity to endothelium-dependent and,
to a lesser extent, endothelium-independent
vasodilators.1 2 3 4 Vasodilation of resistance vessels in
muscle during exercise is influenced by several
endothelium-derived and
endothelium-independent mediators, including nitric
oxide, prostaglandins, adenosine, and other
metabolically linked vasodilators, such as potassium and
hydrogen ions.17 18 19 20
Hypercholesterolemia may inhibit 1 of these
vasodilator mechanisms and thus result in elevated
diastolic blood pressure during exercise in
hypercholesterolemic subjects. Effects of
hypercholesterolemia on vascular reactivity
have been demonstrated in small groups of subjects in whom basal
vascular tone has not been elevated compared with
normocholesterolemic control subjects.1 2 3
Thus, effects of hypercholesterolemia on basal
tone, if any, may be less than those on vascular reactivity. This is
consistent with the association we observed between serum
cholesterol and the change in diastolic blood
pressure during exercise rather than resting blood pressure.
Serum concentrations of triglycerides and HDL cholesterol were not associated with blood pressure changes during exercise. Insulin resistance, as measured simply by the fasting glucose–insulin product, was the only other factor besides total cholesterol that was independently associated with the change in diastolic blood pressure during exercise in the healthy nondiabetic men. Associations with BMI and age, which may be surrogates for insulin resistance, were nonsignificant when insulin resistance was included in the regression model. Although the correlation of the change in diastolic blood pressure on exercise with the fasting insulin–glucose product was not as strong as that with cholesterol, this may reflect the limited accuracy of the fasting glucose–insulin product as an estimate of insulin resistance. In patients with type 2 diabetes who were normotensive at rest, diastolic blood pressure increased to a greater extent during exercise than in nondiabetic control subjects. These patients were markedly insulin resistant compared with control subjects. Although an effect of sulfonylurea treatment on vasodilation mediated by ATP-dependent potassium channels is possible, it is unlikely in the present study, because sulfonylurea treatment was stopped 24 hours before the exercise study and blood pressure responses were similar in patients treated with and without sulfonylureas. It is also possible that physical changes in resistance arteries produced, for example, by advanced glycosylation end products could contribute to exercise diastolic hypertension in the diabetic patients. However, insulin resistance and the presence of type 2 diabetes are, like hypercholesterolemia, associated with markedly impaired vascular reactivity,21 22 23 which alone could account for the abnormal exercise blood pressure response we observed in these conditions. Hyperhomocysteinemia is also associated with impaired vascular reactivity,6 and it is notable that in a subset of 30 healthy volunteers, we found a significant association between the increase in diastolic blood pressure on exercise and serum total homocysteine. This association occurred despite the fact that most subjects had homocysteine levels within the accepted normal range. Thus, the association of exercise diastolic hypertension with conditions in which vascular reactivity is impaired supports the concept that impaired vascular reactivity influences changes in systemic vascular resistance and hence diastolic blood pressure during exercise. Brachial artery systolic blood pressure during exercise is likely to be influenced primarily by stiffness of the aorta and frequency-dependent amplification in the upper limb.15 It will therefore be affected by changes in peripheral vascular resistance to a much lesser extent than diastolic pressure, consistent with the relative lack of association between changes in systolic blood pressure and metabolic factors influencing vascular reactivity observed in this study.
Insulin resistance is influenced by physical training and fitness.24 A difference in physical fitness between subjects could therefore be postulated to explain some or all of the associations we observed between changes in diastolic blood pressure during exercise and insulin resistance. However, we did not observe a significant association between changes in diastolic blood pressure and physical fitness score. Furthermore, the positive associations were observed at low workloads (mean heart rate at the lowest load, 93±1.4 bpm) and were not explained by differences in heart rate between subjects. It is unlikely that the association of the increase in diastolic blood pressure on exercise with total and LDL cholesterol results from an influence of physical fitness both because of the lack of association with fitness score and because total cholesterol shows little relation to physical fitness.7 An influence of physical fitness arising from a mismatch between workload and workload graded according to fitness is effectively excluded by our observation that the increase in diastolic blood pressure on exercise was largely independent of workload and heart rate. Thus, the diastolic pressure increase at 50 W in those subjects in the highest quartile of the cholesterol distribution was greater than that at 100 W in subjects in the lowest quartile. Similarly, in diabetic subjects, the diastolic pressure increase at 50 W was greater than the diastolic pressure rise at 100 W in nondiabetic control subjects. Thus, although cycling at fixed workloads represents different levels of maximal aerobic capacity for different individuals, the observed changes in diastolic blood pressure were similar regardless of the percentage of the maximal aerobic capacity or workload for each individual.
The increase in diastolic blood pressure during mild exercise with increasing serum cholesterol or insulin resistance is likely to be of clinical relevance. The increase in diastolic blood pressure on exercise in our group of healthy active men ranged from -12 to 16 mm Hg at the lowest workload when heart rates ranged from 71 to 136 bpm. Many adults spend much of their working day exercising at levels that result in heart rates within this range,25 so the change in diastolic blood pressure associated with mild increases in serum cholesterol predicted from our data could be sufficient to have an important influence on the development of hypertensive complications, such as cerebrovascular or coronary artery disease.
In conclusion, we have demonstrated a strong association between physiological regulation of diastolic blood pressure during low-workload exercise and metabolic factors, serum cholesterol and insulin resistance, which influence vascular reactivity. This may contribute to the development of hypertensive complications in dyslipidemic insulin-resistant subjects.
Received July 6, 1999; revision received September 2, 1999; accepted September 20, 1999.
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
1. Creager MA, Cooke JP, Mendelsohn ME, Gallagher SJ, Coleman SM, Loscalzo J, Dzau VJ. Impaired vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolemic humans. J Clin Invest. 1990;86:228–234.
2. Chowienczyk PJ, Watts GF, Cockcroft JR, Ritter JM. Impaired endothelium-dependent vasodilation of forearm resistance vessels in hypercholesterolaemia. Lancet. 1992;340:1430–1432.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Casino PR, Kilcoyne CM, Quyyumi AA, Hoeg JM, Panza JA.
The role of nitric oxide in endothelium-dependent
vasodilation of hypercholesterolemic patients.
Circulation. 1993;88:2541–2547.
4.
Goode GK, Heagerty AM. In vitro responses of
human peripheral small arteries in
hypercholesterolemia and effects of therapy.
Circulation. 1995;91:2898–2903.
5. Goode GK, Miller JP, Heagerty AM. Hyperlipidaemia, hypertension and coronary heart disease. Lancet. 1995;345:362–364.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6.
Tawakol A, Omland T, Gerhard M, Wu JT, Creager MA.
Hyperhomocyst(e)inemia is associated with impaired
endothelium-dependent vasodilation in humans.
Circulation. 1997;95:1119–1121.
7.
Shaper AG, Wannamethee G. Physical activity and
ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged British men. Br Heart
J. 1991;66:384–394.
8. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of serum low density lipoprotein cholesterol without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18:499–502.[Abstract]
9. Mathews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28:412–419.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Fiskerstrand T, Refsum H, Kvalheim G, Ueland PM. Homocysteine and other thiols in plasma and urine: automated determination and sample stability. Clin Chem. 1993;39:263–271.[Abstract]
11. Frolich ED, Grim C, Labarth DR, Maxwell MH, Perloff B, Weidman WH. Recommendations for human blood pressure determination by sphygmomanometers: report of special task force appointed by the steering committee, American Heart Association. Hypertension. 1988;11(suppl A):210A–222A.
12. Manolio TA, Burke GL, Savage PJ, Sidney S, Gardin JM, Oberman A. Exercise blood pressure response and 5-year risk of elevated blood pressure in a cohort of young adults: the CARDIA study. Am J Hypertens. 1994;7:234–241.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13.
Mundal R, Kjeldsen S, Sandvik L, Erikssen G, Thaulow E,
Erikssen J. Exercise blood pressure predicts
cardiovascular mortality in middle-aged men.
Hypertension. 1994;24:56–62.
14.
Rowell LB, Brenglemann GL, Blackmon JR, Bruce RA,
Murray JA. Disparities between aortic and peripheral pulse
pressures induced by upright exercise and vasomotor changes in man.
Circulation. 1968;37:954–964.
15. Nichols WW, MF O’Rourke. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. London, UK: Arnold; 1998.
16. Rowell LB. Human Cardiovascular Control. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1993:268.
17.
Gilligan DM, Panza JA, Kilcoyne CM, Waclawiw MA, Casino
PR, Quyyumi AA. Contribution of endothelium-derived
nitric oxide to exercise-induced vasodilation. Circulation. 1994;90:2853–2858.
18.
Wilson JR, Kapoor SC. Contribution of
prostaglandins to exercise-induced vasodilation in humans.
Am J Physiol. 1993;265:H171–H175.
19.
Poucher SM, Nowell CG, Collis MG. The role of
adenosine in exercise hyperaemia of the gracilus muscle in
anaesthetized cats. J Physiol (Lond). 1990;427:19–29.
20.
Haddy FJ, Scott JB. Metabolically linked
vasoactive chemicals in local regulation of blood flow. Physiol
Rev. 1968;48:688–707.
21. Steinberg HO, Chaker H, Leaming R, Johnson A, Brechtel G, Baron AD. Obesity/insulin resistance is associated with endothelial dysfunction: implications for the syndrome of insulin resistance. J Clin Invest. 1996;97:2601–2610.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. McVeigh GE, Brennan GM, Johnston GD, McDermott BJ, McGrath LT, Henry WR, Andrews JW, Hayes JR. Impaired endothelium-dependent and independent vasodilation in patients with type 2 (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia. 1992;35:771–776.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Williams SB, Cusco JA, Roddy MA, Johnstone MT, Creager MA. Impaired nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:567–574.[Abstract]
24. Rosenthal M, Haskell WL, Solomon R, Widstrom A, Reaven GM. Demonstration of a relationship between level of physical training and insulin-stimulated glucose utilization in normal humans. Diabetes. 1983;32:408–411.[Abstract]
25.
Pickering TG, Harshfield GA, Kleinert HD, Blank S,
Laragh JH. Blood pressure during normal daily activities, sleep, and
exercise. JAMA. 1982;247:992–996
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  T. E. Vanhecke, B. A. Franklin, K. C. Zalesin, R. B. Sangal, A. T. deJong, V. Agrawal, and P. A. McCullough Cardiorespiratory Fitness and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in Morbidly Obese Patients Chest, September 1, 2008; 134(3): 539 - 545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. Brassard, A. Ferland, V. Gaudreault, N. Bonneville, J. Jobin, and P. Poirier Elevated peak exercise systolic blood pressure is not associated with reduced exercise capacity in subjects with Type 2 diabetes J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2006; 101(3): 893 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. G. Foy, K. L. Foley, R. B. D'Agostino Jr., D. C. Goff Jr., E. Mayer-Davis, and L. E. Wagenknecht Physical Activity, Insulin Sensitivity, and Hypertension among US Adults: Findings from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2006; 163(10): 921 - 928. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A.C. Sposito Emerging insights into hypertension and dyslipidaemia synergies Eur. Heart J. Suppl., December 1, 2004; 6(suppl_G): G8 - G12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. A. S. Barreto-Filho, F. M. Consolim-Colombo, G. M. Guerra-Riccio, R. D. Santos, A. P. Chacra, H. F. Lopes, S. H. Teixeira, T. Martinez, J. E. Krieger, and E. M. Krieger Hypercholesterolemia Blunts Forearm Vasorelaxation and Enhances the Pressor Response During Acute Systemic Hypoxia Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., September 1, 2003; 23(9): 1660 - 1666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. C. Goff Jr, D. J. Zaccaro, S. M. Haffner, and M. F. Saad Insulin Sensitivity and the Risk of Incident Hypertension: Insights from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study Diabetes Care, March 1, 2003; 26(3): 805 - 809. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. P. Whelton, A. Chin, X. Xin, and J. He Effect of Aerobic Exercise on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials Ann Intern Med, April 2, 2002; 136(7): 493 - 503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||