Circulation. 2000;101:e73
(Circulation. 2000;101:e73.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation Electronic Pages |
Sudden Death in Myotonic Dystrophy: The Potential Role of Bundle-Branch Reentry
Jose L. Merino, MD;
Rafael Peinado, MD;
Jose A. Sobrino, MD
Hospital General Universitario La Paz,
Madrid, Spain
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
To the Editor:
We read with interest the recent report of Lazarus et al.1
This is an important study addressing the prevalence of His-Purkinje
conduction disturbances and ventricular
arrhythmia inducibility by a standard pacing protocol in a
large sample of patients with myotonic dystrophy (MD) and
asymptomatic conduction abnormalities. However, several
points of the discussion should be reviewed owing to possible
misinterpretation.
First, the authors found a high frequency of prolonged HV interval and
raised the issue of prophylactic pacing to limit the high
incidence of sudden death seen in MD. However, reports of sudden death
in patients with MD after pacemaker implantation (including 1 patient
in the present study) and of sudden death shortly after clinical
documentation of sustained monomorphic ventricular
tachycardia (VT)2 make VT in MD a potential
cause of sudden death likely enough to reconsider the authors
insinuation of prophylactic pacemaker implantation.
Furthermore, demonstration of HV-interval prolongation should not be
taken only as a risk factor of AV block, because VT in MD typically has
a bundle-branch reentrant mechanism,3 a mechanism that is
associated with slow conduction in the His-Purkinje system.
Second, the authors reported a higher inducibility of polymorphic
ventricular arrhythmias in younger patients than in
older patients, speculating that evolution to sudden death of patients
with positive inducibility in the former group could account for the
lower inducibility in the latter group. However, inducibility of
polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias is often
considered nonspecific, especially if induced with aggressive
ventricular stimulation, as in the present study
(200-ms coupled triple extrastimuli). In addition, sustained
monomorphic VT is the clinical ventricular
arrhythmia most frequently reported in MD.2 3 No
sustained monomorphic VT was induced in the present study, which
used a standard stimulation protocol. Standard protocols have proved
valuable in patients with myocardial reentrant VT but often fail to
induce bundle-branch reentrant VT, which may require the use of
specific pacing protocols (long-shortcoupled extrastimuli), infusion
of drugs (isoproterenol, procainamide), or
both.3 4 This factor could have accounted for the
noninducibility of monomorphic VT in the present study.
The authors may like to clarify these issues by reporting on any
patient with MD who developed sustained monomorphic VT that was not
induced during the electrophysiological
testing, such as the one already presented in the preliminary
report of this work.5
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Lazarus A, Varin J, Ounnoughene Z, Radvanyi H,
Junien C, Coste J, Laforet P, Eymard B, Becane HM, Weber S, Duboc D.
Relationships among electrophysiological
findings and clinical status, heart function, and extent of DNA
mutation in myotonic dystrophy. Circulation. 1999;99:10411046.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hiromasa S, Ikeda T, Kubota K, Hattori N, Coto H,
Maldonado C, Kupersmith J. Ventricular
tachycardia and sudden death in myotonic dystrophy.
Am Heart J. 1988;115:914915.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Merino JL, Carmona JR, Fernandez-Lozano I, Peinado R,
Basterra N, Sobrino JA. Mechanisms of sustained ventricular
tachycardia in myotonic dystrophy: implications for
catheter ablation. Circulation. 1998;96:541546.
-
Blanck Z, Dhala A, Deshpande S, Sra JS, Jazayeri M,
Akhtar M. Bundle branch reentrant tachycardia: cumulative
experience in 48 patients. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:253262.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Lazarus A, Varin J, Cazeau S, Ounnoughene Z, Eymard B,
Fardeau M, Coste J, Duboc D. Ventricular vulnerability is
higher in young myotonic patients. Pacing Clin
Electrophysiol. 1997;20:1662. Abstract.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Response
A. Lazarus, MD;
J. Varin, MD;
Z. Ounnoughene, MD;
H. Radvanyi, MD;
C. Junien, PharmD, PhD;
J. Coste, MD;
P. Laforet, MD;
B. Eymard, MD;
H.M. Becane, MD;
S. Weber, MD;
D. Duboc, MD
Service de Cardiologie,
Hôpital Cochin,
Paris, France
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
First of all, we would like to thank Dr Merino et al for the
interest
they expressed in our report, and in answer to their
letter, we wish to
make the following comments.
All our patients were not asymptomatic; 3 had a high degree
of AV block, 12 had presyncope/syncope, and 11 experienced
palpitations. However, none had documented spontaneous sustained
monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT)
before electrophysiological (EP)
testing.
Arrhythmic sudden deaths, attributed either to ventricular
arrhythmias or to AV block, have been described in myotonic
dystrophy (MD). For us, having a prolonged HV interval clearly raises
the problem of prophylactic pacing, because the risk of
subsequent spontaneous paroxysmal high-degree AV block is then clearly
higher than the risk of ventricular
tachyarrhythmia.R1 Sudden death can also be
nonarrhythmic in MD, as demonstrated by typical cases of sudden death
that occurred in MD patients equipped with pacemakers in whom extended
diagnostic capabilities could eliminate an arrhythmic
cause.R1
In our experience, which now includes 159 EP testing procedures in 137
myotonic patients, we never observed initiation of SMVT during
programmed ventricular stimulation, although we
systematically used short-long coupling extrastimuli (but without drug
infusion). Concerning the inducibility of polymorphic
ventricular arrhythmias, we agree that this is
often considered as nonspecific, but this remains to be demonstrated in
the peculiar MD population in which the arrhythmic risk is different
from the general population. To illustrate this, during the follow-up
of our MD population, we only observed the clinical occurrence of
spontaneous SMVT in 1 case, and this patient had a nonsustained
polymorphic VT previously induced during EP testing.R2
Under amiodarone treatment, VT did not recur after 35 months of
follow-up.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Lazarus A, Babuty A, Victor J, Anselme F, Mabo P,
Lamaison D, Bussillet H, Salvador-Mazenq M, Mansourati J, Varin J,
Duboc D. Multicentric study about sudden death in myotonic dystrophy:
results at two years. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:1981. Abstract.
-
Lazarus A, Varin J, Cazeau S, Ounnoughene Z, Eymard B,
Fardeau M, Coste J, Duboc D. Ventricular vulnerability is
higher in young myotonic patients. Pacing Clin
Electrophysiol. 1997;20:1162. Abstract.