| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2000;101:329.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Cardiology: New Frontiers |
From the Hypertension and Vascular Research Division, Heart and Vascular Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Mich (O.A.C.), and the Division of Cardiovascular Disease, Vascular Biology and Hypertension Program, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham (S.O.).
Correspondence to Oscar A. Carretero, MD, Hypertension and Vascular Research Division, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202. E-mail ocarret1{at}hfhs.org
Key Words: hypertension pathology diagnosis
Essential hypertension remains a major modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) despite important advances in our understanding of its pathophysiology and the availability of effective treatment strategies. High blood pressure (BP) increases the risk of CVD for millions of people worldwide, and there is evidence that the problem is only getting worse. In the past decade, age-adjusted rates of stroke incidence have risen, and the slope of the age-adjusted rate of decline in coronary disease has leveled off. The incidence of end-stage renal disease and the prevalence of heart failure have also increased. A major contributor to these trends is inadequate control of BP in the hypertensive population. This review of current concepts regarding the definition, etiology, and treatment of essential hypertension is intended to aid the clinician in identifying those individuals at high risk who need to undergo evaluation and treatment, as well as in selecting optimal treatment strategies for hypertensive patients with comorbid conditions and/or target organ damage. The part of the review that deals with the genetic basis of hypertension and the gene/environment interaction that may lead to elevated BP is still a work in progress. Information gained from the Human Genome Project and from ongoing studies of the genetic basis of hypertension both in animal models and human populations may revolutionize the treatment of hypertension by replacing current empirical therapy with more effective, targeted treatments based on the genotype of the patient. Concepts introduced in this review form the basis for such "pharmacogenomic" approaches to antihypertensive therapy.
Definition of Essential or Primary Hypertension
BP is a quantitative trait that is highly variable1 ; in population studies, BP has a normal distribution that is slightly skewed to the right. There is a strong positive and continuous correlation between BP and the risk of CVD (stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure), renal disease, and mortality, even in the normotensive range. This correlation is more robust with systolic than with diastolic BP.2 There is no specific level of BP where cardiovascular and renal complications start to occur; thus the definition of hypertension is arbitrary but needed for practical reasons in patient assessment and treatment.
The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention,
Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI)
defined and classified hypertension in adults, as shown in Table 1
.3 The diagnosis of
hypertension is made when the average of 2 or more
diastolic BP measurements on at least 2 subsequent visits
is
90 mm Hg or when the average of multiple systolic BP
readings on 2 or more subsequent visits is consistently
140 mm Hg. Isolated systolic hypertension is defined as
systolic BP
140 mm Hg and diastolic BP
<90 mm Hg. Individuals with high normal BP tend to maintain
pressures that are above average for the general population and are at
greater risk for development of definite hypertension and
cardiovascular events than the general population. With
the use of these definitions, it is estimated that 43 million people in
the United States have hypertension or are taking antihypertensive
medication, which is
24% of the adult population. This proportion
changes with (1) race, being higher in blacks (32.4%) and lower in
whites (23.3%) and Mexican Americans (22.6%); (2) age, because in
industrialized countries systolic BP rises throughout life,
whereas diastolic BP rises until age 55 to 60 years and
thus the greater increase in prevalence of hypertension among the
elderly is mainly due to systolic hypertension; (3) geographic
patterns, because hypertension is more prevalent in the southeastern
United States; (4) gender, because hypertension is more prevalent in
men (though menopause tends to abolish this difference); and (5)
socioeconomic status, which is an indicator of lifestyle attributes and
is inversely related to the prevalence, morbidity, and mortality rates
of hypertension.
|
Essential, primary, or idiopathic hypertension is defined as high BP in which secondary causes such as renovascular disease, renal failure, pheochromocytoma, aldosteronism, or other causes of secondary hypertension or mendelian forms (monogenic) are not present. Essential hypertension accounts for 95% of all cases of hypertension. Essential hypertension is a heterogeneous disorder, with different patients having different causal factors that lead to high BP. Essential hypertension needs to be separated into various syndromes because the causes of high BP in most patients presently classified as having essential hypertension can be recognized.
Known Etiological Factors in Essential Hypertension
Although it has frequently been indicated that the causes of essential hypertension are not known, this is only partially true because we have little information on genetic variations or genes that are overexpressed or underexpressed as well as the intermediary phenotypes that they regulate to cause high BP.4 A number of factors increase BP, including (1) obesity, (2) insulin resistance, (3) high alcohol intake, (4) high salt intake (in salt-sensitive patients), (5) aging and perhaps (6) sedentary lifestyle, (7) stress, (8) low potassium intake, and (9) low calcium intake.5 6 Furthermore, many of these factors are additive, such as obesity and alcohol intake.
In this review, variations in BP that are genetically determined will
be called "inherited BP," although we do not know which genes cause
BP to vary; we know from family studies that inherited BP can range
from low normal BP to severe hypertension. Factors that increase BP,
such as obesity and high alcohol and salt intake, will be called
"hyperten-sinogenic factors." Some of these factors have
inherited, behavioral, and environmental components. Inherited BP could
be considered core BP, whereas hypertensinogenic factors cause BP to
increase above the range of inherited BPs, thus creating 4 main
possibilities: (1) patients who have inherited BP in the optimal
category (<120/<80 mm Hg); if 1 or more hypertensinogenic
factors are added, BP would probably increase but remain in the normal
range (<135/<85 mm Hg) (Figure 1
, first 2 columns); (2) patients who have inherited BP in the normal
category (
130/
85 mm Hg); if 1 or more hypertensinogenic
factors are added, BP will probably increase to the high normal range
(130 to 139/85 to 89 mm Hg) or to stage 1 of the hypertensive
category (140 to 159/90 to 99 mm Hg) (Figure 1
, second 2
columns); (3) patients who have inherited BP in the high normal
category (130 to 139/85 to 89 mm Hg); if 1 or more
hypertensinogenic factors are added, BP will increase to the
hypertensive range (
140/
90 mm Hg) (Figure 1
, third 2
columns); and (4) patients who have inherited BP in the hypertensive
range; addition of 1 or more hypertensinogenic factors will make
hypertension more severe, changing it from stage 1 to stage 2 or 3
(Figure 1
, fourth to sixth 2 columns).
|
Theoretically, in a population unaffected by hypertensinogenic factors,
BP will have a normal distribution; it will be skewed to the right and
will have a narrow base or less variance (Figure 2
, continuous line). When 1
hypertensinogenic factor is added to this population, such as increased
body mass, one would expect the normal distribution curve to be further
skewed to the right; consequently the base will be wider (more
variance) and the curve will be flatter (Figure 2
, broken line).
If a second hypertensinogenic factor such as alcohol intake is added to
increased body mass, the curve will be skewed more to the right and the
variance will increase further, with more subjects classified as
hypertensive (Figure 2
, dotted line).
|
Discovering which genetic variations place BP on the left or right side
of the distribution curve is of both theoretical and practical
importance because it could help the physician to better treat or cure
hypertension.7 Recognition of the hypertensinogenic
factors may allow nonpharmacological prevention, treatment, or cure of
hypertension. Hypertensinogenic factors such as obesity, insulin
resistance, or high alcohol intake also have an important genetic
component. Furthermore, there are interactions between genetic and
environmental factors (Figure 2
) that influence intermediary
phenotypes such as sympathetic nerve activity, the
renin-angiotensin-aldosterone and renal
kallikrein-kinin systems, and endothelial factors,
which in turn influence other intermediary phenotypes such as
sodium excretion, vascular reactivity, and cardiac
contractility. These and many other intermediary
phenotypes determine total vascular resistance and cardiac
output and, consequently, BP. Recognition of the hypertensinogenic
factor(s) and establishing that the patients hypertension is the
result of obesity (either alone or combined with other factors such as
insulin resistance or high alcohol intake) or old age instead of
essential hypertension may help the physician as well as the patient
and his or her family to modify or eliminate these hypertensinogenic
and CVD risk factors when possible, which may cure the hypertension or
at least facilitate control of BP. When the hypertensinogenic factor
cannot be reduced or eliminated, as with systolic hypertension
induced by aging (arteriosclerosis), recognition of
the underlying cause of high BP will emphasize the need for (1) further
studies to determine whether the patient has
arteriosclerosis and/or
atherosclerosis, the magnitude of the disease, and
whether there are occlusive lesions; (2) treatment of the
atherosclerosis with lifestyle and dietary changes and
lipid-lowering agents if necessary; and (3) pharmacological treatment
of systolic hypertension to decrease passive stiffness
(arteriosclerosis) of the major central elastic
arteries and decrease morbidity and mortality rates. Thus recognition
of factors that induce hypertension is not only of theoretical but also
of practical importance. In conclusion, as stated by
Beilin,8 "it is no longer appropriate to define
essential hypertension as a rise in blood pressure without cause,"
since a number of causes can be clearly identified in most cases of
so-called "essential hypertension." As discussed later in more
detail, there is clear evidence that changes in lifestyle, including
dietary changes that reduce body weight, fat, and alcohol intake and
increase potassium and calcium intake,9 as well as
exercise,10 11 reduce or normalize BP in many
patients.
Inherited BP
The identification of variant (allelic) genes that contribute to the development of hypertension is complicated by the fact that the 2 phenotypes that determine BP, cardiac output and total peripheral resistance, are controlled by intermediary phenotypes, including the autonomic nervous system, vasopressor/vasodepressor hormones, the structure of the cardiovascular system, body fluid volume and renal function, and many others. Furthermore, these intermediary phenotypes are also controlled by complex mechanisms including BP itself.12 Thus there are many genes that could participate in the development of hypertension.
The influence of genes on BP has been suggested by family studies demonstrating associations of BP among siblings and between parents and children. There is a better association among BP values in biological children than in adopted children and in identical as opposed to nonidentical twins. BP variability attributed to all genetic factors varies from 25% in pedigree studies to 65% in twin studies. Furthermore, genetic factors also influence behavioral patterns, which might lead to BP elevation. For example, a tendency toward obesity or alcoholism will be influenced by both genetic and environmental factors; thus the proportion of BP variability caused by inheritance is difficult to determine and may vary in different populations.
Mutations in at least 10 genes have been shown to raise or lower BP through a common pathway by increasing or decreasing salt and water reabsorption by the nephron.13 14 The genetic mutations responsible for 3 rare forms of mendelian (monogenic) hypertensive syndromes-glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism (GRA), Liddles syndrome, and apparent mineralocorticoid excess-have been identified, whereas in a fourth, autosomal dominant hypertension with brachydactyly, the gene is not yet identified but has been mapped to chromosome 12 (12p). Subtle variations in one of these genes may also cause some forms of "essential" hypertension. For a review of the mutations that cause a decrease in BP, see Lifton.13
Glucocorticoid-Remediable Aldosteronism
This is an autosomal dominant form of monogenic hypertension in
which aldosterone secretion is regulated by
adrenocorticotropic hormone. Glucocorticoid treatment causes BP to
decrease and gives the syndrome its name. The genetic mutation that
causes GRA has been identified by Lifton14 as a chimeric
gene fusing nucleotide sequences of the promoter-regulatory
region of 11ß-hydroxylase (controlled by adrenocorticotropic hormone)
and the structural portion of the aldosterone synthase
gene. The chimeric gene results from a meiotic mismatch and unequal
crossing over. The patients are usually thought to have primary
aldosteronism because they exhibit volume expansion,
metabolic alkalosis with hypokalemia, low plasma renin, and
high aldosterone. Most of the patients first described as
having GRA showed severe hypertension and died prematurely from stroke.
However, with the development of direct genetic testing, the BP of
patients with this syndrome was found to cover a wide range, including
normotensive levels.15 16 In patients with GRA and normal
BP, expression of the chimeric gene may be variable, but because
steroid levels are similar in patients with severe and mild
hypertension, this seems unlikely. It is also possible that the genetic
background of the trait (other than the chimeric mutation), such as
high renal kallikrein, places the inherited BP of these subjects in the
low or ideal normal range and the mutation causes BP to increase to
high normal or hypertensive stage 1. Thus the final BP would be the
combined result of the inherited BP (including the genetic mutation)
and the increase in BP caused by hypertensinogenic factors such as
salt.
Liddles Syndrome
This is an autosomal dominant form of monogenic hypertension that
results from mutations in the amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium
channel, leading to increased channel activity.17 The
mutations reported to date result in the elimination of 45 to 75 amino
acids from the cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus of ß- or
-subunits of
the channel; thus Liddles syndrome is genetically
heterogeneous. It is characterized by the early onset of
hypertension with hypokalemia and suppression of both plasma renin
activity and aldosterone, the latter differentiating this
syndrome from primary aldosteronism. Both the hypertension and the
hypokalemia vary in severity, raising the possibility that some
patients classified as having salt-sensitive essential hypertension
actually have Liddles syndrome.18 It is also possible
that high BP in blacks, who are frequently salt-sensitive, is due to a
polymorphism in one of the sodium channel genes or in one of the
genes of systems that regulate it, causing its activity to
increase.
Apparent Mineralocorticoid Excess
This is an autosomal recessive form of monogenic juvenile
hypertension that results from a mutation in the renal-specific isoform
11ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase gene.19 Normally this
enzyme converts cortisol to the inactive metabolite cortisone. In the
distal nephron this is important because cortisol and
aldosterone have a similar affinity for the
mineralocorticoid receptor. The enzymatic deficiency allows the
mineralocorticoid receptors in the nephron to be occupied and
activated by cortisol, causing sodium and water retention,
volume expansion, low renin, low aldosterone, and more
importantly, a salt-sensitive form of hypertension. Thus this gene may
be a locus for salt-sensitive essential hypertension.
Autosomal Dominant Hypertension With Brachydactyly
In this monogenic syndrome, hypertension and brachydactyly are
always inherited together (100% cosegregation).4 Affected
persons are shorter than nonaffected relatives. The gene for
hypertension has been mapped to the short arm of chromosome 12 (12p) in
a large Turkish kindred. Two other families with this syndrome have
been reported, 1 in Canada and 1 in the United States. In addition, the
study of a Japanese child with hypertension and type E brachydactyly
has allowed the area on 12p containing the gene mutation to be
pinpointed further, although the gene responsible for this syndrome has
not yet been cloned. Unlike the other 3 autosomal forms of
hypertension, BP is not affected by volume expansion and the underlying
mechanism is not known. Thus identification of the gene responsible may
help clarify some of the genetic alterations in essential
hypertension.
Essential or Primary Hypertension
The genetic alterations responsible for inherited "essential"
hypertension remain largely unknown.4 Results from family
studies suggest several possible intermediary phenotypes
(genetic traits) that may be related to inherited high BP, such as high
sodium-lithium countertransport, low urinary kallikrein excretion, high
fasting plasma insulin concentrations, high-density LDL subfractions,
fat pattern index, and body mass index (BMI).12
Jeunemaitre et al20 21 first reported a polymorphism
in the angiotensinogen gene linked with essential
hypertension in hypertensive siblings from Utah and France. This
polymorphism consists of a substitution of thymidine for
cytosine in nucleotide 704, which causes
substitution of methionine for threonine at position 235 (M235T) and is
associated with increased concentrations of plasma
angiotensinogen. This variant appears to be in tight
linkage disequilibrium with a promoter mutation in which adenine
replaces guanine (-6A) upstream from the initiation side of
transcription.22 Tests of promoter activity suggest that
this nucleotide substitution increases the rate of gene
transcription, which may explain the higher angiotensinogen
concentration found in subjects with the variant M235T.22
Many studies have been published on various racial groups with regard
to the association between allelic variations in
angiotensinogen and hypertension.23 However,
these variations explain only a small part of the BP variation
(
6%). Furthermore, plasma angiotensinogen
concentrations, though higher in patients with the polymorphism,
clearly overlap with normotensive patients.
Polymorphisms and mutations in other genes such as
angiotensin-converting enzyme,
ß2-adrenergic receptor,
-adducin,
angiotensinase C, renin-binding protein, G-protein
ß3-subunit, atrial natriuretic
factor, and the insulin receptor have also been linked to the
development of essential hypertension; however, most of them show a
weak association if any, and most of these studies need further
confirmation. Thus these gene alterations will not be discussed here
because they go beyond the scope of this review (see
Luft4 ).
Hypertensinogenic Factors
There is evidence that obesity, insulin resistance, high alcohol intake, high salt intake, a sedentary lifestyle, stress, dyslipidemia, and low potassium or calcium intake increase BP in susceptible subjects. Here we will briefly discuss obesity and insulin resistance; other hypertensinogenic factors will be discussed in the section "Lifestyle Modification."
Obesity and Insulin Resistance
Obesity, and especially abdominal obesity, is the main
hypertensinogenic factor. It was estimated in the Framingham study that
each 10% weight gain is associated with a 6.5 mm Hg increase in
systolic BP.24 Obesity is also the cause of
insulin resistance, adult-onset diabetes mellitus, left
ventricular hypertrophy,
hyperlipidemia, and atherosclerotic disease. Thus
obesity is an important cardiovascular health problem;
its incidence and prevalence are rising in most industrialized
societies and in the United States has reached epidemic proportions.
The relationship between BP and body fat is not restricted to the
morbidly obese but is continuous throughout the entire range of body
weight. A direct association between hypertension and BMI (weight in
kilograms divided by the square height in meters) has been observed in
cross-sectional and longitudinal population studies from early
childhood to old age.25 A BMI of <25 is considered normal
or healthy, whereas a BMI of 26 to 28 (as compared with BMI <23)
increases the risk of high BP by 180% and the risk of insulin
resistance by >1000%. Thus insulin resistance is present in many
patients with obesity and hypertension.
The mechanism by which obesity raises BP is not fully understood, but increased BMI is associated with an increase in plasma volume and cardiac output; both these alterations and BP can be decreased by weight loss in both normotensive and hypertensive subjects,26 even when sodium intake is kept relatively constant.27 BP in obese adolescents is sodium-sensitive, and fasting insulin is the best predictor of this sensitivity.26 In these adolescents, mean BP dropped by 10 mm Hg after changing from 2 weeks on a high-sodium diet (>250 mmol sodium/d) to a low-sodium diet (<30 mmol/d). When some of these subjects lost weight by dieting, BP decreased by 10 mm Hg and salt sensitivity was no longer present. The variables that best predicted sodium sensitivity were fasting plasma insulin, plasma aldosterone, and plasma norepinephrine, supporting the hypothesis that BP is sensitive to dietary sodium and that this sensitivity may be due to the combined effect of hyperinsulinemia, hyperaldosteronism, and increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system. It is not clear whether body fat by itself is a factor because in overweight women, exercise for 1 hour per day, 3 times per week lowered BP, and this decrease was observed mainly in those who initially had high fasting insulin and whose insulin levels fell in response to exercise. In this study weight loss was not a factor because the subjects were on a free diet and actually gained an average of 2.6 pounds during the 6-month exercise trial,10 which suggests that exercise decreases plasma insulin by a different mechanism than loss of body weight. These studies can be interpreted as showing that high plasma insulin causes salt sensitivity and that decreasing insulin resistance by losing weight or exercising reduces BP. Furthermore, nonobese hypertensive subjects are much more likely to exhibit insulin resistance than normotensive individuals.28 On the other hand, insulin by itself has a vasodilator effect. In obese subjects with hypertension there is resistance to the effects of insulin on glucose uptake. However, in addition to this metabolic effect, insulin increases both sympathetic nerve activity and sodium and water retention, and it could be that the hypertension is due to the lack of resistance to these secondary effects of insulin.29 More recently, insulin-like growth factor I30 and leptin,31 a neuropeptide that regulates appetite, have also been implicated in the pathogenesis of obesity-induced hypertension. Thus, although the mechanisms by which obesity and insulin resistance increase BP remain undefined, it is clear that these increases in BP are overlain on the inherited BP.
Diagnosis of Hypertension
Initial Evaluation
The goals of the initial evaluation are to determine baseline BP;
assess the presence and extent of target organ damage and concomitant
CVD; screen for potentially curable specific causes of hypertension
(secondary hypertension); identify hypertensinogenic factors and other
CVD risk factors; and characterize the patient to facilitate the choice
of therapy (especially drug selection) and define prognosis.
BP Measurement
The accurate and reproducible measurement of BP by the cuff
technique is the most important part of the diagnostic
evaluation and follow-up of the patient and should be carried out in a
standardized fashion (Table 2
) with the
use of properly calibrated and certified equipment.3 32 33
A mercury sphygmomanometer is preferred; acceptable alternatives
include a recently calibrated aneroid manometer or a validated
electronic device attached to an arm cuff. Two or 3 measurements should
be taken at each visit, and at least 2 minutes should be allowed
between readings. The diastolic reading is taken at the
level when sounds disappear (Korotkoff phase V).
|
Measurement of BP by patients or family members and/or automated ambulatory BP monitoring often helps verify the diagnosis and assess the severity of hypertension. BP values obtained outside the clinical setting are lower and correlate better with target organ damage than BP measurements by healthcare personnel. Self-measurement of BP has several potential advantages, including distinguishing sustained hypertension from hypertension that occurs only in the healthcare setting ("white coat" hypertension); assessing the response to antihypertensive treatment; improving adherence to treatment by making the patient a "partner" in his or her own care; and lowering costs by reducing the need for frequent office BP checks. Accordingly, ambulatory or self-monitoring of BP is recommended for many patients with high BP, particularly those who appear to be resistant to antihypertensive treatment. A limitation of home or workplace BP measurements is that accurate and calibrated BP monitors must be used and that careful and repeated instruction in how to measure BP must be given.
Medical History and Physical Examination
A careful, complete history should be obtained and a physical
examination performed in all patients before beginning treatment. The
assessment should include the elements described in Table 3
. It should help to identify known,
remediable causes of high BP; establish the presence or absence of
target organ damage and CVD; and identify other CVD or comorbid
conditions that might affect prognosis or treatment.
|
Laboratory Tests and Other Diagnostic Procedures
Routine tests include only urinalysis, complete blood count, blood
chemistry (potassium, sodium, creatinine, fasting glucose,
total and high-density lipoprotein or HDL cholesterol), and
a 12-lead ECG. Optional tests indicated in selected patients for the
diagnosis of secondary hypertension and/or comorbid conditions include
creatinine clearance, 24-hour urinary protein, measurement
of microalbuminuria, uric acid, calcium, glycosylated
hemoglobin, fasting triglycerides, limited
echocardiography,34 and plasma renin
activity/aldosterone measurements.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant HL-28982.
Footnotes
This is Part I of a 2-part article. Part II of this article will be published in the February 1, 2000 issue of Circulation.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. T. Tuan, L. S. Adair, K. He, and B. M. Popkin Optimal Cutoff Values for Overweight: Using Body Mass Index to Predict Incidence of Hypertension in 18- to 65-Year-Old Chinese Adults J. Nutr., July 1, 2008; 138(7): 1377 - 1382. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E Judd, M. S Nanes, T. R Ziegler, P. W. Wilson, and V. Tangpricha Optimal vitamin D status attenuates the age-associated increase in systolic blood pressure in white Americans: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2008; 87(1): 136 - 141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. D. Smith, M. W. Brands, M.-H. Wang, and A. M. Dorrance Obesity-induced hypertension develops in young rats independently of the Renin-Angiotensin-aldosterone system. Experimental Biology and Medicine, March 1, 2006; 231(3): 282 - 287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Gurol, M. C. Irizarry, E. E. Smith, S. Raju, R. Diaz-Arrastia, T. Bottiglieri, J. Rosand, J. H. Growdon, and S. M. Greenberg Plasma {beta}-amyloid and white matter lesions in AD, MCI, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy Neurology, January 10, 2006; 66(1): 23 - 29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Blazer-Yost, J. C. Vahle, J. M. Byars, and R. L. Bacallao Real-time three-dimensional imaging of lipid signal transduction: apical membrane insertion of epithelial Na+ channels Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2004; 287(6): C1569 - C1576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Yang, F.-H. Lu, J.-S. Wu, C.-H. Wu, and C.-J. Chang The Protective Effect of Habitual Tea Consumption on Hypertension Arch Intern Med, July 26, 2004; 164(14): 1534 - 1540. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. A. Meckling, C. O'Sullivan, and D. Saari Comparison of a Low-Fat Diet to a Low-Carbohydrate Diet on Weight Loss, Body Composition, and Risk Factors for Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease in Free-Living, Overweight Men and Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2004; 89(6): 2717 - 2723. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Oparil, M. A. Zaman, and D. A. Calhoun Pathogenesis of Hypertension Ann Intern Med, November 4, 2003; 139(9): 761 - 776. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Lim and P. A. Cassano Homocysteine and Blood Pressure in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994 Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2002; 156(12): 1105 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. N. Diep, M. El Mabrouk, J. S. Cohn, D. Endemann, F. Amiri, A. Virdis, M. F. Neves, and E. L. Schiffrin Structure, Endothelial Function, Cell Growth, and Inflammation in Blood Vessels of Angiotensin II-Infused Rats: Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Circulation, May 14, 2002; 105(19): 2296 - 2302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Rafael, Y.-T. Lee, T.-C. Su, J.-S. Jeng, and F.-C. Sung Cerebral Atherosclerosis Causes Neurogenic Hypertension Stroke, May 1, 2002; 33(5): 1180 - 1181. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Aronson, D. Boisvert, and W. Lapp Isolated Systolic Hypertension Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes from Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Surgery Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2002; 94(5): 1079 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |