| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2000;101:2595.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Departments of Public Health and Caring Sciences (J.S., N.N., B.Z., H.O.L.) and Medical Sciences (L.L., B.A.), Uppsala University, Sweden, and the Department of Clinical Biochemistry (C.N.H.), University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Correspondence to Johan Sundström, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences/Geriatrics, PO Box 609, S-75125 Uppsala, Sweden (Kålsängsgränd 10D, S-75319 Uppsala, Sweden). E-mail Johan.Sundstrom{at}geriatrik.uu.se
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe investigated 475 men (157 hypertensives) 71 years of age who were attending a population-based health survey in Uppsala County with echocardiography, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, and lipid and 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. LV relative wall thickness was significantly related to clamp insulin sensitivity index (r=-0.14), fasting insulin, 32-33 split proinsulin, triglycerides, nonesterified fatty acids, OGTT glucose and insulin levels, waist-to-hip ratio, body mass index, 24-hour blood pressure, and heart rate (r=0.10 to 0.22). Only 24-hour systolic pressure (r=0.15), OGTT 2-hour insulin (r=-0.10), and heart rate (r=-0.14) were significantly related to LV mass index. Comparing subjects with various LV geometry (normal, concentric remodeling and concentric and eccentric hypertrophy) showed that 24-hour heart rate, OGTT glucose and insulin levels, waist-to-hip ratio, and body mass index were significantly higher (P<0.001 to 0.05) and clamp insulin sensitivity index was significantly lower (P<0.01) in the concentric remodeling geometry group than in the normal LV geometry group. The 24-hour blood pressure was significantly higher in the concentric hypertrophy group than in the normal LV geometry group (P<0.001).
ConclusionsSeveral components of the insulin resistance syndrome were related to thick LV walls and concentric remodeling but less to LV hypertrophy in this population-based sample of elderly men.
Key Words: hypertrophy insulin glucose risk factors
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Hypertension is traditionally regarded as the most important factor in the development of LVH, but the variation in 24-hour blood pressure explains only 25% to 30% of the variation in left ventricular mass.7 Thus, other factors must be of importance in the development of LVH. It is well known that important cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension, glucose intolerance, hyperinsulinemia, dyslipidemia, and obesity, often cluster in the same individuals. Therefore, the existence of a syndrome involving these disorders has been proposed8 9 10 in which insulin resistance has been suggested to be of particular importance. An association between this insulin resistance syndrome and LVH has recently been found.11 12 13 14 In 2 of these studies,12 14 insulin resistance determined by hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp was more closely related to thick left ventricular walls than to LVH. In addition, impaired glucose tolerance at an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) has been related to increased left ventricular RWT.15
Because most of the above-mentioned studies have comprised a limited number of middle-aged, predominantly hypertensive subjects and have shown somewhat inconsistent results, the purpose of this study was to further investigate the relationships between left ventricular geometry and the insulin resistance syndrome through the use of a large sample of elderly men attending a population-based health survey.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
95 mm Hg and/or treatment for hypertension. One hundred
sixty-seven subjects were regularly using antihypertensive medication:
6 were using
-receptor blockers; 60, calcium
antagonists; 24, ACE inhibitors; 57,
diuretics; and 88, ß-receptor blockers, as monotherapy or in
combination. The estimated duration of antihypertensive treatment in
the hypertensive subjects was 8.5±7.8 years. Only 17 subjects had
significant echocardiographic valvular disease
(aortic or mitral stenosis or regurgitation
grade 3 or 4). All analyses were also made on a subset (n=458)
without valvular disease, controlling for ischemic
heart disease (ICD-9 codes 410 to 414). A reproducibility study was
made of all investigations in 22 subjects
1 month after the original
investigations. The intraindividual coefficients of variation (CVs)
presented are from this reproducibility study. All subjects
gave written informed consent, and the study was approved by the Ethics
Committee of Uppsala University. All procedures were in
accordance with department guidelines.
Echocardiography
A comprehensive 2-dimensional and Doppler
echocardiography was performed as described
previously.16 Left ventricular mass was
determined from M-mode measurements by use of the cube formula
according to the recommendations of the American Society of
Echocardiography (ASE). This formula can easily be
transformed to reflect anatomic measurements: left
ventricular mass=0.80x(ASE mass)+0.6g.17 Left
ventricular mass was divided with body surface area to
obtain left ventricular mass index (LVMI).
LVH was defined as an LVMI >150 g/m2, according
to data from the Framingham Heart Study.18 A partition
value of 0.44 was used for RWT [RWT=(IVS+PW)/LVEDD, where IVS is
interventricular septum, PW is posterior wall, and LVEDD is
left ventricular end-diastolic
diameter].5 Thus, left ventricular geometry
was considered normal if RWT was <0.44 and LVMI was <150
g/m2. A normal LVMI with increased RWT was
denoted concentric remodeling,5 and a hypertrophic left
ventricle was denoted eccentric if the RWT was normal and concentric if
the RWT was increased. Stroke volume was calculated from Doppler
measurements of left ventricular outflow tract diameter
(LVOT) and the flow velocity integral (FVI) as
xLVOT2/4xFVI and was divided by body surface
area to obtain stroke index.16 Examinations and readings
of the images were done by an experienced physician (Dr Andrén)
who was unaware of other data of the subjects. The CVs were as follows:
for IVS, 8.8%; PW, 6.7%; LVEDD, 3.5%; RWT, 6.9%; and LVMI,
12.5%.
Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring
The ambulatory blood pressure measuring device Accutracker II
(Suntech Medical Instruments) was attached to the subjects
nondominant arm. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), DBP, and heart
rate were measured over 24 hours, every 30 minutes during daytime (6
AM to 11 PM) and every hour during nighttime.
Data were edited to a limited extent, omitting all readings of 0, all
heart rate readings <30 bpm, DBP readings >170 mm Hg, SBP
readings >270 and <80 mm Hg, and all readings for which the
difference between SBP and DBP was <10 mm Hg. The CV for 24-hour
mean arterial blood pressure [DBP+(SBP-DBP)/3] was
5.5%.
Oral Glucose Tolerance Test
Blood samples for determining fasting concentrations were drawn
in the morning after an overnight fast. An OGTT was performed by
measuring the concentrations of plasma glucose and "immunoreactive
insulin" immediately before and 30, 60, 90, and 120 minutes after
75 g anhydrous dextrose was ingested. In the present study,
fasting, 2-hour levels and the incremental areas under the curves (AUC)
of glucose and immunoreactive insulin were analyzed. Glucose
was measured by the glucose dehydrogenase method (Gluc-DH, Merck), and
immunoreactive insulin was analyzed by use of an
enzymatic-immunological assay (Enzymun, Boehringer Mannheim)
performed in an ES300 automatic analyzer (Boehringer
Mannheim). Fasting specific insulin and 32-33 split and intact
proinsulin concentrations were measured with a specific 2-site
immunoradiometric assay technique19 in Cambridge, UK, on a
Nuclear Enterprises 1600 gamma counter of 125I.
The CV for fasting plasma glucose was 5.8%, and for immunoreactive
insulin, it was 15.4%.
Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp
Insulin sensitivity was determined with the
hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp,
performed according to the method of DeFronzo et al20 with
a slight modification: insulin was infused at a constant rate of 56
instead of 40 mU/(minxm2). Insulin sensitivity
index was calculated by dividing glucose disposal (milligrams of
glucose infused divided by minutes times kilograms of body weight) by
the mean plasma insulin concentration times 100 (mU/L) during the last
60 minutes of the 2-hour clamp. The CV for insulin sensitivity index
was 13.9%.
Lipid and Lipoprotein Measurements
HDL was separated by precipitation with magnesium
chloride/phosphotungstate. Cholesterol and
triglyceride concentrations in serum and HDL were assayed
by enzymatic techniques (Instrumentation Laboratories) in a Monarch
2000 centrifugal analyzer. LDL cholesterol was
calculated with Friedewalds formula: LDL=serum
cholesterol-HDL-(0.45xserum triglycerides).
Serum nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) were measured by an enzymatic
colorimetric method (Wako Chemical GmbH) applied for
use in the Monarch 2000. CVs were as follows: for serum total
cholesterol, 5.7%; HDL cholesterol, 11.1%;
LDL cholesterol, 6.6%; serum triglycerides,
14.8%; and NEFA, 24.2%.
Statistical Analyses
Variables with a skewed distribution (fasting plasma
glucose, immunoreactive insulin, specific insulin, proinsulin, 32-33
split proinsulin, serum triglycerides and NEFA, 2-hour
glucose and immunoreactive insulin levels, and the AUC of
immunoreactive insulin at the OGTT) were logarithmically transformed to
achieve normal distribution, and these transformed variables were
used in all analyses. Factorial ANOVA was used to calculate
differences in means between subgroups. All ANOVAs were adjusted for
use of antihypertensive medication. Missing data were evenly
distributed over the geometric groups. Multiple regression
analysis, correlation coefficients, and partial correlation
coefficients were used to evaluate relationships between pairs of
variables, adjusted for possible confounders. Squared variables
and interaction terms between independent variables were tested in
all models. Scatter plots were visually examined for other nonlinear
associations. Relationships to LVMI but not to RWT were adjusted for
use of antihypertensive medication, because subjects using
antihypertensive medication had significantly higher LVMIs but did not
differ in RWT. Two-tailed significance values were given, with
P<0.05 regarded as significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In a subsample without valvular disease, controlling for ischemic heart disease, correlations between metabolic variables and RWT or LVMI were similar, but OGTT 2-hour immunoreactive insulin was also related to RWT (r=0.10, P=0.03), 24-hour DBP was related to LVMI (r=0.11, P=0.02), and the relationship between OGTT 2-hour immunoreactive insulin and LVMI lost significance (P=0.052). There was no relationship between RWT and LVMI (r=-0.05, P=0.2). Interaction terms or squared variables were not found to be significant in any model.
Metabolic and Other Characteristics of Subjects With
Various Left Ventricular Geometries
The levels of several components of the insulin resistance
syndrome24-hour SBP and DBP, 24-hour heart rate, clamp insulin
sensitivity index, 2-hour glucose level and the AUC of glucose at the
OGTT, waist-to-hip ratio, and body mass indexdiffered significantly
between the 4 left ventricular geometric groups (Table 2
). There was no significant difference
between the geometric groups regarding the levels of serum
triglycerides, NEFA, total cholesterol, LDL
cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, fasting plasma
glucose, fasting immunoreactive insulin, specific insulin, proinsulin,
32-33 split proinsulin, 2-hour immunoreactive insulin level, or the AUC
of immunoreactive insulin at the OGTT.
|
The values of 24-hour heart rate, waist-to-hip ratio, 2-hour glucose level, and the AUC of glucose at the OGTT were significantly higher and clamp insulin sensitivity index was significantly lower in the concentric remodeling geometry group compared with the group with normal left ventricular geometry. The 24-hour SBP and DBP were significantly higher in the concentric LVH group compared with the group with normal left ventricular geometry.
The difference in 24-hour heart rate between the groups remained significant (P=0.004) when adjusting simultaneously for the possible confounders ischemic heart disease, stroke index (mean, 38±8 mL/m2), and use of ß-receptor blockers and any other antihypertensive medication. The 24-hour heart rate was still significantly higher in the concentric remodeling geometry group (P=0.05) and lower in the eccentric LVH group (P=0.01) than in the normal geometry group.
In a subsample without valvular disease, controlling for ischemic heart disease, differences between groups were similar except that waist-to-hip ratio also was significantly higher in the eccentric LVH group than in the normal group (P=0.03), whereas differences between groups regarding body mass index and OGTT AUC of glucose lost significance (both P=0.07).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Insulin sensitivity index derived from the hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp, glucose tolerance at an OGTT, and fasting levels of specific insulin and 32-33 split proinsulin were all related to left ventricular RWT but not to LVMI in the present study. Insulin resistance and the accompanying hyperinsulinemia have often been suggested as a central derangement in the insulin resistance syndrome,10 and insulin has been regarded as a trophic factor responsible for the development of cardiovascular hypertrophy. Recent studies in the rat have shown that chronic moderate hyperinsulinemia, while maintaining control of hormones with effects opposing insulin, was followed by a pronounced hypertrophy of cardiac ventricles.21 In view of the results from the present study, the trophic effect might in humans mainly influence ventricular wall thickness, leaving cavity dimensions largely unaffected. This is also illustrated by the finding that subjects with left ventricular concentric remodeling had lower insulin sensitivity index and impaired glucose tolerance compared with subjects with normal left ventricular geometry. These findings are in accordance with another population study of men15 in which the insulin levels tended to be higher in subjects with concentric remodeling and concentric LVH and glucose and insulin levels correlated with RWT but not with LVMI. The negative correlation between LVMI and 2-hour insulin in the present study may be explained by the insulin resistance and glucose intolerance of the concentric remodeling group. The values of several insulin sensitivity variables were similar for concentric remodeling and concentric LVH, although significant only for the former. This may be due to a small concentric LVH group but may also reflect a real difference. The only significant differences between groups were in LVMI and 24-hour SBP and DBP. When the 2 groups were combined, results similar to those for the concentric remodeling group were obtained. In a subsample without valvular disease, controlling for ischemic heart disease, most relationships between metabolic variables and RWT or LVMI and differences between geometric groups were the same as in the main analysis. The finding that specific insulin and 32-33 split proinsulin but not intact proinsulin or immunoreactive insulin were related to RWT in this study may indicate that the first two have a more pronounced hypertrophic effect on the cardiac myocytes. However, at the low plasma levels detected in the present study, 32-33 split proinsulin should probably be seen as a correlate of insulin resistance rather than as having any significant metabolic effects of its own.22 The finding that OGTT glucose levels but not insulin levels were related to RWT and concentric remodeling probably reflects the higher precision of the glucose measurements.
LVH has formerly been proposed to partially be an adaptation to obesity, especially in women.11 In the same study, left ventricular mass indexed to body surface area was not correlated to body mass index in men. In the present study, waist-to-hip ratio and body mass index were related to RWT and not to LVMI and were highest in the concentric remodeling group.
Heart rate was significantly increased in the concentric remodeling group, in accordance with previous research.15 Tachycardia is proposed to be a reliable marker for an increased sympathetic activity in population studies.23 Raised plasma catecholamine levels have been found in subjects with LVH11 13 and have more specifically been related to an increased interventricular septum thickness.11 Further evidence that the sympathetic nervous system could affect left ventricular geometry comes from experimental studies in dogs in which repeated pressor episodes with elevated plasma norepinephrine levels24 or chronic infusion of norepinephrine25 resulted in LVH but did not induce a sustained elevation of blood pressure. The inverse relationship between LVMI and heart rate reflects the increased heart rate in the concentric remodeling group and decreased heart rate in the eccentric LVH group, the latter probably made up of both subjects with heart failure and subjects with a physiological LVH caused by exercise, with low sympathetic activity and normal metabolic status. An inverse relationship between LVMI and heart rate in men has been found in another population-based study.11
A deranged microcirculation with vascular hypertrophy and rarefaction of skeletal muscle blood vessels has been proposed as a central pathology in hypertension, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia.26 This leads to an increased peripheral resistance, which is believed to be of pathogenetic importance for left ventricular concentric remodeling.5 Vascular rarefaction and insulin resistance have been associated with sympathetic hyperactivity, illustrated by the increased heart rate often found in subjects with the insulin resistance syndrome.23 27 28
Left ventricular wall thickness and the prevalence of left ventricular concentric remodeling increase with age.29 This is mainly due to cardiac myocyte hypertrophy, for which an increased stroke work resulting from increased arterial stiffness has been proposed to be an etiological factor.30 Because insulin sensitivity also decreases with age, the described association between the insulin resistance syndrome and the growth of left ventricular walls could in part be a consequence of aging, a process proceeding faster in some subjects prone to both insulin resistance and cardiac remodeling.
This study has limited generalizability to women and other ethnic and age groups. Although a study in a younger population of men15 points toward the same conclusion, further studies in other groups are needed. The present cohort has been closely followed for 20 years and may therefore be healthier than average Swedish 70-year-old men. Thus, the associations found in this study may be weaker than in the general population. Confounding factors other than those adjusted for may also exist. Because many analyses were made, some chance associations may have been found. However, all components of the insulin resistance syndrome behaved in the same way in this study except for the cholesterol measurements. This might be due to chance or limits of the linear model but may also indicate that cardiac geometry is associated more with glucose and fatty acid metabolism than cholesterol metabolism.
In conclusion, several components of the insulin resistance syndrome were significantly related to thick left ventricular walls and concentric remodeling but less to LVH in this population-based sample of elderly men.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 20, 1999; revision received December 14, 1999; accepted December 22, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Kozakova, E. Muscelli, A. Flyvbjerg, J. Frystyk, C. Morizzo, C. Palombo, and E. Ferrannini Adiponectin and Left Ventricular Structure and Function in Healthy Adults J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., July 1, 2008; 93(7): 2811 - 2818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J Sundstrom, J Arnlov, K Stolare, and L Lind Blood pressure-independent relations of left ventricular geometry to the metabolic syndrome and insulin resistance: a population-based study Heart, July 1, 2008; 94(7): 874 - 878. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E Ingelsson, J Arnlov, L Lind, and J Sundstrom Metabolic syndrome and risk for heart failure in middle-aged men Heart, October 1, 2006; 92(10): 1409 - 1413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-M. Samuelsson, E. Bollano, R. Mobini, B.-M. Larsson, E. Omerovic, M. Fu, F. Waagstein, and A. Holmang Hyperinsulinemia: effect on cardiac mass/function, angiotensin II receptor expression, and insulin signaling pathways Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2006; 291(2): H787 - H796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ingelsson, J. Arnlov, J. Sundstrom, B. Zethelius, B. Vessby, and L. Lind Novel Metabolic Risk Factors for Heart Failure J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2005; 46(11): 2054 - 2060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Liao, S. Takashima, N. Maeda, N. Ouchi, K. Komamura, I. Shimomura, M. Hori, Y. Matsuzawa, T. Funahashi, and M. Kitakaze Exacerbation of heart failure in adiponectin-deficient mice due to impaired regulation of AMPK and glucose metabolism Cardiovasc Res, September 1, 2005; 67(4): 705 - 713. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ingelsson, J. Sundstrom, J. Arnlov, B. Zethelius, and L. Lind Insulin Resistance and Risk of Congestive Heart Failure JAMA, July 20, 2005; 294(3): 334 - 341. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Nielson and T. Lange Blood Glucose and Heart Failure in Nondiabetic Patients Diabetes Care, March 1, 2005; 28(3): 607 - 611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Rinder, R. J. Spina, L. R. Peterson, C. J. Koenig, C. R. Florence, and A. A. Ehsani Comparison of effects of exercise and diuretic on left ventricular geometry, mass, and insulin resistance in older hypertensive adults Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, August 1, 2004; 287(2): R360 - R368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M.A. Henry, O. Kamp, P. J. Kostense, A. M.W. Spijkerman, J. M. Dekker, R. van Eijck, G. Nijpels, R. J. Heine, L. M. Bouter, and C. D.A. Stehouwer Left Ventricular Mass Increases With Deteriorating Glucose Tolerance, Especially in Women: Independence of Increased Arterial Stiffness or Decreased Flow-Mediated Dilation: The Hoorn Study Diabetes Care, February 1, 2004; 27(2): 522 - 529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Fustinoni Editorial Comment--Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: An Unseemly Risk Factor for Stroke? Stroke, October 1, 2003; 34(10): 2385 - 2386. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Karason, L. Sjostrom, I. Wallentin, and M. Peltonen Impact of blood pressure and insulin on the relationship between body fat and left ventricular structure Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2003; 24(16): 1500 - 1505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Fesler, G. du Cailar, J. Ribstein, and A. Mimran Left Ventricular Remodeling and Renal Function in Never-Treated Essential Hypertension J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2003; 14(4): 881 - 887. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. K. Rutter, H. Parise, E. J. Benjamin, D. Levy, M. G. Larson, J. B. Meigs, R. W. Nesto, P. W.F. Wilson, and R. S. Vasan Impact of Glucose Intolerance and Insulin Resistance on Cardiac Structure and Function: Sex-Related Differences in the Framingham Heart Study Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 448 - 454. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sundstrom, L. Lind, J. Arnlov, B. Zethelius, B. Andren, and H. O. Lithell Echocardiographic and Electrocardiographic Diagnoses of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Predict Mortality Independently of Each Other in a Population of Elderly Men Circulation, May 15, 2001; 103(19): 2346 - 2351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Sundstrom, L. Lind, B. Vessby, B. Andren, A. Aro, and H. O. Lithell Dyslipidemia and an Unfavorable Fatty Acid Profile Predict Left Ventricular Hypertrophy 20 Years Later Circulation, February 13, 2001; 103(6): 836 - 841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |