Circulation. 2000;101:e209
(Circulation. 2000;101:e209.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation Electronic Pages |
Trends in Antihypertensive Drug Treatment
Lionel H. Opie
Cape Heart Center Cape Town, South Africa
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
To the Editor:
It is disappointing to read once again that "ß-blockers and
thiazide diuretics are the only antihypertensive agents that
have been shown to reduce cardiovascular
mortality."1 In these days of evidence-based medicine,
we must ask: where is the evidence for this statement? The basic data
referenced by Wang et al1 are those of the
meta-analysis of Psaty et al,2 which are also
shown in the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on
Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood
Pressure. Yet, Figure 6 in the report shows very clearly that
cardiovascular and total mortality are not reduced by
ß-blockade; the confidence intervals in both cases clearly overlap
unity and are therefore not significant. Likewise, coronary
heart disease is also not reduced by ß-blockade, although stroke and
congestive heart failure are. In contrast, all these end points are
clearly reduced by low-dose diuretics. In another
meta-analysis that focused on the elderly, diuretics
but not ß-blockers reduced cardiovascular
mortality.3 It is difficult to understand why Wang et al
included the Metoprolol Atherosclerosis Prevention in
Hypertension (MAPHY) study as evidence for the benefits of
ß-blockade. This was an open-label, unblinded study without placebo
control.
A further implication of the article by Wang et al is that
calcium-channel blockers do not reduce cardiovascular
mortality. However, in the Systolic Hypertension in Elderly in
Europe (SYST-EUR) study of elderly patients with systolic
hypertension, the dihydropyridine nitrendipine was
particularity efficacious in diabetic patients, in whom
cardiovascular mortality was strikingly reduced (odds
ratio, 0.24; P=0.02); their total mortality was also reduced
(odds ratio, 0.45; P=0.04).4 Less strong
is the evidence from the Systolic Hypertension in Elderly
Chinese Trial (SYST-CHINA), in which nitrendipine reduced both
all-cause and cardiovascular mortality by 39% in
elderly Chinese patients with systolic
hypertension.5 Here, the protocol had a flaw. Although
blinded and placebo-controlled, there was sequential rather than random
allocation of treatment. Thus, the blinding was single rather than
double.
In my view, claims for the proposed positive effects of
ß-blockers on cardiovascular mortality in
hypertensives should be made with greater caution, and they should
satisfy the criteria of evidence-based medicine.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Wang TJ, Ausiello JC, Stafford RS. Trends in
antihypertensive drug advertising, 19851996. Circulation. 1999;99:20552057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, et al. Health
outcomes associated with antihypertensive therapies uses as first-line
agents: a systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 1997;277:739745.[Abstract]
-
Messerli FH, Grossman E, Goldbourt U. Are
ß-blockers efficacious as first-line therapy for hypertension in the
elderly? JAMA.. 1998;279:19031907.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tuomilehto J, Rastenyte D, Birkenhager WH, et
al. Effects of calcium-channel blockade in older patients with diabetes
and systolic hypertension. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:6776844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu L, Wang JG, Gong L, et al, for the
Systolic Hypertension in China (Syst-China) Collaborative
Group. Comparison of active treatment and placebo in older Chinese
patients with isolated systolic hypertension. J
Hypertens. 1998;16:18231829.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
Response
Thomas J. Wang, MD;
John C. Ausiello, BA;
Randall S. Stafford, MD, PhD
Institute for Health Policy,
Massachusetts General Hospital,
Boston, Mass
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Our studys objective was to investigate the journal advertising
of
antihypertensive medications as a potential reason that physicians
adhere
poorly to existing clinical guidelines. We think that
discrepancies
between current prescribing practices and the
recommendations
of the Joint National Committee on Prevention,
Detection, Evaluation,
and Treatment of High Blood Pressure deserve an
explanation.
Although the synthesis of comparative information on drug
selection
is an admittedly complex undertaking, this group continues to
advocate
diuretics and ß-blockers as first-line
therapy.
R1 Our
finding that advertising for calcium-channel
blockers increased
during a time period when physicians prescribed
fewer diuretics
and ß-blockers raises questions about the
relative impact
of drug promotion and clinical guidelines.
Dr Opie correctly notes that in the meta-analysis by
Psaty et alR2 cardiovascular mortality was
reduced by diuretics but not by ß-blockers. In one of the
trials included in this meta-analysis, however, treatment
consisting primarily of ß-blockers as first-line therapy was
associated with significant reductions in the primary
cardiovascular end points, as well as overall
mortality.R3
Psaty et alsR2 meta-analysis dealt solely
with placebo-controlled trials. Several trials directly comparing
diuretics with ß-blockers were excluded; these trials were
performed after it was known that diuretics lowered total
mortality in patients with hypertension. The Metoprolol
Atherosclerosis Prevention in Hypertension (MAPHY)
study, for instance, showed reductions in both total and
cardiovascular mortality with ß-blockers compared
with diuretics.R4 No trial showed ß-blockers to
be inferior to diuretics. Although the MAPHY
results have been questioned because of its open-label design, it seems
reasonable to conclude that ß-blockers are at least equivalent to
diuretics in terms of clinical outcome.
With respect to calcium-channel blockers, Dr Opie notes that
nitrendipine was efficacious in diabetic patients in the
Systolic Hypertension in Elderly in Europe (SYST-EUR) study.
Neither total mortality nor cardiovascular mortality
were reduced in the overall study population, however. Furthermore,
another long-acting dihydropyridine was possibly
associated with a higher incidence of fatal and nonfatal myocardial
infarctions in diabetics in the Appropriate Blood Pressure Control in
Diabetics (ABCD) study.R5
Completion of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institutes
Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack
Trial (ALLHAT) may help resolve the uncertainty regarding drug
selection in hypertension treatment. Until that time, current national
guidelines suggest diuretics and ß-blockers as first-line
therapy.R1 Our study grew from an attempt to explain why
physicians fail to adhere to these guidelines. We noted that
advertising for calcium-channel blockers increased contemporaneously
with the declining use of diuretics and ß-blockers, a finding
consistent with an influence of drug promotion on
prescribing.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection,
Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The sixth report of
the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and
Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:24132446.[Abstract]
-
Psaty BM, Smith NL, Siscovick DS, et
al. Health outcomes associated with antihypertensive
therapies used as first-line agents. a systematic review and
meta-analysis. JAMA. 1997;277:739745.
-
Dahlof B, Lindholm LH, Hansson L, et al.
Morbidity and mortality in the Swedish Trial in Old Patients with
Hypertension (STOP-Hypertension). Lancet. 1991;338:12811285.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Wikstrand J, Warnold I, Olsson G, et al. Primary
prevention with metoprolol in patients with hypertension: mortality
results from the MAPHY study. JAMA. 1988;259:19761982.[Abstract]
-
Estacio RO, Jeffers BW, Hiatt WR, et al. The
effect of nisoldipine compared with enalapril on
cardiovascular outcomes in patients with
non-insulin-dependent diabetes and hypertension. N Engl
J Med. 1998;338:645652.[Abstract/Free Full Text]