(Circulation. 2000;101:2539.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Laboratorio di Fisiologia, Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia di Novara, Università del Piemonte Orientale A. Avogadro, and the Servizio di Chirugia Sperimentale, Azienda Sanitaria Ospedaliera "Maggiore della Carita," Novara, Italy.
Correspondence to Dr Claudio Molinari, Facoltà di Medicina e Chirurgia, via Solaroli 17, I-28100 Novara, Italy. E-mail molinari{at}scimed1.med.no.unipmn.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsIn 34
-chloraloseanesthetized
pigs, balloons positioned within the gallbladder were distended for 30
minutes with volumes of Ringers solution equal to those of withdrawn
bile. In 19 pigs, gallbladder distension at constant heart rate,
arterial pressure, and renal flow increased PRA in the
absence of changes in urinary sodium excretion. This increase was
abolished by cervical vagotomy, section of renal nerves, or blockade of
ß-adrenergic receptors. In another 15 pigs, blockade of
angiotensin II receptors significantly attenuated the
pressor and coronary, mesenteric, and iliac vasoconstriction
responses to gallbladder distension.
ConclusionsThe present study showed that innocuous gallbladder distension primarily caused a reflex increase in PRA. This increase, which involved afferent vagal pathways and efferent sympathetic mechanisms related to ß-adrenergic receptors, contributed significantly to the pressor and coronary, mesenteric, and iliac vasoconstriction responses to gallbladder distension.
Key Words: gallbladder renin reflex blood pressure vasoconstriction
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Recently, innocuous gallbladder distension in anesthetized pigs
was shown to cause reflex tachycardia, pressor responses,
and renal and coronary vasoconstriction that involved afferent
vagal pathways.13 14 The efferent limb of these responses
involved sympathetic pathways. The tachycardia involved
ß-adrenergic effects, whereas pressor and renal and coronary
vasoconstrictive responses were mediated by
-adrenergic effects.14 15 16 It is possible that this
widespread sympathetic activation might affect renin release from
kidneys17 and the liberated angiotensin
hormone, which can have a potent vasoconstrictor
effect.18
Therefore, the present study was planned to determine the primary reflex effect of innocuous distension of the gallbladder on plasma renin activity (PRA) and the mechanisms involved. Also, the study planned to assess the possible contribution of the hormone angiotensin to the observed pressor and regional vasoconstrictive responses, which include that of the coronary circulation.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
15 minutes by a bolus of
-chloralose (100 mg/kg IV,
Sigma) and were artificially ventilated with oxygen-enriched air by
respiratory pump (Harvard 613, Harvard Apparatus).
Anesthesia was maintained by continuous infusion (0.5 to
1.0 mg · kg-1 ·
min-1 IV) of 1%
-chloralose in saline
solution. Pressures in the ascending aorta and right atrium were obtained through right femoral artery and right external jugular vein catheters connected to pressure transducers (Statham P23 XL, Gould). Through left-sided thoracotomy,14 the heart was paced via the left atrial appendage by a stimulator (model S8800, Grass Instruments; 3 to 5 V, 2 ms). Through a midline abdominal incision, an electromagnetic flowmeter probe (model BL 613, Biotronex Laboratory Inc) was positioned around the left renal artery, and in some pigs, a probe was also positioned either around the anterior descending coronary artery or superior mesenteric and left external iliac arteries. A plastic snare was placed distal to each probe for zero blood flow assessment. Each probe was calibrated in vitro at the end of experiments. The ureters were catheterized to collect urine and measure its sodium concentration with a flame photometer (model System E2A, Beckman). As previously described in detail,14 a balloon catheter was used to distend the gallbladder slowly with Ringers solution maintained at 38°C and to measure the pressure in the balloon. The volume of bile withdrawn was measured for use as the distending volume, and distending transmural pressure was calculated as the difference between balloon pressure inside and outside the gallbladder.
In preliminary experiments, aortic blood pressure responses were prevented without changing cardiac pressures by a pressurized reservoir as previously described.14 19 Coagulation of blood was avoided by intravenous injection of heparin (Parke-Davis; initially 500 IU/kg, subsequently 50 IU · kg-1 · 30 min-1). Arterial blood samples were used to measure the pH, PO2, PCO2 (IL 1304, IL Instrumentation Laboratory), and hematocrit. The acid-base status and rectal temperature were monitored and kept within normal limits, as previously reported.20
PRA was assessed by a method previously described.21 Briefly, left renal vein blood samples (5 mL) were obtained to measure PRA (ng Ang I · mL-1 · h-1) by radioimmunoassay with an antibody supplied by Sorin Biomedica. Each sample was split to provide duplicates for assessment of variability of measurement in terms of individual differences.
Mean ABP and right atrial blood pressure, pressure in the balloon, and mean and phasic blood flows were monitored and recorded together with HR by an electrostatic strip chart recorder (Gould ES 2000, Gould). HR was obtained from the ECG with a ratemeter (ECG/Biotach amplifier, model 13-4615-65A, Gould). Regional vascular resistance was calculated from ABP and blood flow.
At the end of the experiments, each animal was killed by injection of 90 mg/kg sodium pentobarbitone IV (Siegfried).
Experimental Protocol
The experiments were performed after
30 minutes at
steady state with respect to measured hemodynamic
variables. In each pig, gallbladder distension was performed by
distending the intravisceral balloon by a volume of Ringers solution
equal to that of bile withdrawn.
Initially, 2 preliminary distensions, each lasting 1 minute, were performed in each animal without controlling any hemodynamic variable and while preventing changes in ABP. In all subsequent experiments, HR changes were prevented by atrial pacing, and the gallbladder was distended for 30 minutes. PRA was assessed during the last minute of the control period before distension, during the last minute of distension, and 30 minutes after release of distension. The volume and sodium concentrations of collected urine were measured during the last 10 of the 30 minutes. The response to distension was calculated as the difference between values during distension and the average of those obtained before and after distension. Any change in PRA caused by gallbladder distension was considered a response only when it was reversed by release of the distension.
The 34 pigs were divided into 2 main groups. In the first (19 pigs),
the effect of distension on PRA was studied after a control period of
30 minutes at steady state after blockade of
-adrenergic receptors
with phentolamine (Ciba-Geigy; 1 mg/kg IV). In the same
experimental model, this dose abolished pressor and renal
vasoconstrictor responses to gallbladder distension.15 16
In 4 of these pigs, the gallbladder was distended in 3 steps by volumes
the highest of which corresponded to that of the aspirated bile.
The reflex nature of PRA response to gallbladder distension was examined by repeating the distension after 30 minutes at steady state in 15 of the 19 pigs after bilateral cervical vagotomy (5 pigs), bilateral section of the renal nerves (5 pigs), or after ß-adrenergic blockade by propranolol (0.5 mg/kg IV, Sigma; 5 pigs).
In the second group of 15 pigs, the influence of changes in PRA on
hemodynamic responses to gallbladder distension was
investigated. Distension experiments were performed before and after
blockade of angiotensin II receptors with losartan
(bolus of 0.1 mg/kg followed by IV infusion of 0.1 mg ·
kg-1 · min-1,
Merck). This dose has been shown to block the pressor effect of
renovascular hypertension22 and pressor response to
angiotensin II in salt-depleted dogs,23 and is
twice that used to attenuate the pressor effect of
angiotensin II in anesthetized dogs.24
The blocking effect was confirmed in preliminary experiments by
reducing pressor responses to angiotensin II infusion by
50% without a drastic effect on baseline blood pressure levels.
Experiments of gallbladder distension were repeated after steady-state
values of hemodynamic variables were attained after
40 minutes of losartan infusion. RBF changes were avoided by
injection of phentolamine into the renal arteries (7 mg for
each artery), and a secondary influence of baroreceptor activity was
minimized by denervation of carotid sinuses.
We examined the effect of gallbladder distension on ABP (5 pigs), on CBF (5 pigs), and on MBF and IBF (5 pigs). In these experiments, changes in regional perfusion pressure were minimized by an aortic constriction with a plastic snare placed around the thoracic aorta close to the diaphragm. Blood pressures proximal and distal to the constriction were measured.
Statistical Analyses
Students paired t test was used to examine changes
in measured variables caused by gallbladder distension. The
relationship between gallbladder transmural pressure and changes in PRA
was examined by the least-squares procedures for linear correlation
analysis. A value of P<0.05 was considered
statistically significant. Group data are presented as mean±SD
(range).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
5 hours after the
induction of anesthesia. The pH,
PO2, and
PCO2 of arterial blood
were 7.39±0.02 (7.36 to 7.42), 120±9.1 (103 to 137), and 39.3±1.2
(37 to 42) mm Hg, respectively, and the hematocrit was
37.7±1.8% (33% to 41%). The distending volume of Ringers solution
used was 63.4±16.3 (35 to 105) mL, and the transmural pressure was
13.2±3.7 (8 to 21) mm Hg. This value of transmural pressure was
not significantly different (P>0.40) from that measured
inside the gallbladder before it was emptied. The initial gallbladder distension increased mean aortic blood pressure (ABP) by 11.6±2.7 (6 to 17, P<0.0005) mm Hg and heart rate (HR) by 6.6±1.9 (4 to 12, P<0.0005) bpm from control values of 102.3±11.6 (80 to 128) mm Hg and 110.4±11.5 (89 to 130) bpm. At constant ABP, HR increased by 11.1±2.5 (8 to 18, P<0.0005) bpm, and renal blood flow (RBF) decreased by 44±11 (24 to 67, P<0.0005) mL/min from control values of 412±44 (310 to 510) mL/min. These responses were as previously described15 16 and determined HR responses for use with atrial pacing.
First Group of Experiments
In the first group, phentolamine decreased ABP by
24.4±9.1 (10 to 46, P<0.0005) mm Hg. This was
accompanied by HR increases of 15.7±5.3 (8 to 27,
P<0.0005) bpm and RBF decreases of 15±33 (-91 to 35,
P<0.05) mL/min.
Response of PRA
In 15 pigs in which distending transmural pressure was 12.5±4.1
(8 to 22) mm Hg, changes in hemodynamic
variables and in urinary sodium excretion (USE) were small and
insignificant (Table
). However, in
each pig, gallbladder distension increased PRA (Figure 1
); group increases were 2.50±1.61 (0.98
to 7.58, P<0.0005) ng angiotensin (Ang) I
· mL-1 · h-1
from control values of 4.83±2.57 (2.56 to 13.12) ng Ang I ·
mL-1 · h-1. Each
PRA response was greater than its measurement variability; group
variability was 0.45±0.24 (0.12 to 0.95) ng Ang I ·
mL-1 · h-1.
|
|
In the remaining 4 pigs, the gallbladder was distended in 3 steps by
volumes of 52.5±10.4 (40 to 65), 67.5±10.4 (55 to 80), and 82.5±10.4
(70 to 95) mL, which were attended by transmural pressures of 9.5±1.3
(8 to 11), 13.5±1.9 (11 to 15), and 16.3±2.8 (13 to 19) mm Hg,
respectively. Increasing the distending volume augmented the response
of PRA increase in each pig (Figure 2
).
The 3 group increases were 1.90±0.48 (1.21 to 2.24,
P<0.0025), 2.57±0.63 (1.64 to 3.02, P<0.0025),
and 3.07±0.74 (2.01 to 3.61, P<0.0025) ng Ang I ·
mL-1 · h-1,
respectively, from control values of 4.80±0.95 (3.91 to 6.12) ng Ang
I · mL-1 ·
h-1. Each PRA increase was greater than its
measurement variability; for each, this was 0.56±0.07 (0.48 to 0.65),
0.56±0.31 (0.24 to 0.93), and 0.27±0.08 (0.17 to 0.36) ng Ang I
· mL-1 · h-1.
Changes in measured hemodynamic variables and USE
were small and insignificant (
P>0.20). The responses of
PRA to the distending volumes were significantly different from each
other (P<0.0025). Also, there was a significant linear
trend (r=0.86, P<0.0005) between PRA responses
and gallbladder transmural pressure.
|
Experiments After Vagotomy
In 5 pigs, cervical vagotomy increased HR by 11.4±1.2 (7 to 15,
P<0.0005) bpm, without significantly changing ABP and RBF;
their changes were 1.2±7.8 (-11 to 8, P>0.35) mm Hg
and -2±18 (-31 to 15, P>0.40) mL/min. During subsequent
experiments, transmural pressure was 14.2±5 (8 to 20) mm Hg, and
changes in measured hemodynamic variables and USE
were small and insignificant (Table
).
Vagotomy abolished PRA responses to gallbladder distension, and any
resulting changes were within the variability of its measurement; this
variability was 0.49±0.16 (0.29 to 0.76) ng Ang I ·
mL-1 · h-1, and
PRA changes were -0.08±0.32 (-0.63 to 0.13, P>0.30) ng
Ang I · mL-1 ·
h-1 from control values of 4.63±0.73 (3.85 to
5.39) ng Ang I · mL-1 ·
h-1. In the same pigs, PRA responses before
vagotomy amounted to 2.14±0.89 (1.26 to 3.64, P<0.0025) ng
Ang I · mL-1 ·
h-1 from control values of 4.12±0.78 (3.46 to
5.41) ng Ang I · mL-1 ·
h-1. A comparison between individual responses
of PRA before and after vagotomy is shown in Figure 3
.
|
Experiments After Section of the Renal Nerves
In 5 pigs, renal nerve section decreased RBF by 37±26 (10 to 71,
P<0.025) mL/min without significantly affecting HR and ABP;
their changes were 1.8±4.9 (-3 to 10, P>0.20) bpm and
0.4±5.9 (-7 to 5, P>0.40) mm Hg. During experiments
after renal nerve section, the heart was paced to the same frequency as
that before section. Transmural pressure was 11.6±2.1 (9 to 14)
mm Hg, and changes in measured hemodynamic
variables and USE were small and insignificant (Table
).
Renal nerve section abolished PRA responses to gallbladder distension,
and any resulting changes were within the variability of its
measurement; this was 0.63±0.25 (0.30 to 1.05) ng Ang I ·
mL-1 · h-1, and
PRA changes were 0.03±0.16 (-0.19 to 0.22, P>0.30) ng Ang
I · mL-1 ·
h-1 from control values of 2.59±0.62 (1.71 to
3.22) ng Ang I · mL-1 ·
h-1. In the same pigs, PRA responses before the
intervention were 2.39±0.84 (0.98 to 3.17, P<0.0025) ng
Ang I · mL-1 ·
h-1 from control values of 3.91±1.48 (2.56 to
6.35) ng Ang I · mL-1 ·
h-1. A comparison between individual responses
of PRA before and after renal nerve section is shown in Figure 4
.
|
Experiments With Propranolol
In 5 pigs, propranolol decreased HR by 27.4±8.7 (18
to 38, P<0.0025) bpm and increased ABP by 10±2.9 (7 to 14,
P<0.0025) mm Hg. RBF decreased by 27±11 (15 to 41,
P<0.005) mL/min. Transmural pressure was 11.4±3.5 (8 to
17) mm Hg. Changes in measured hemodynamic
variables and USE were small and insignificant (Table
).
Blockade of ß-adrenergic receptors abolished PRA responses to
gallbladder distension, and any resulting changes were within the
variability of its measurement; this was 0.44±0.25 (0.15 to 0.80) ng
Ang I · mL-1 ·
h-1, and PRA changes were -0.01±0.20 (-0.20
to 0.32, P>0.45) ng Ang I ·
mL-1 · h-1 from
control values of 3.61±1.75 (2.36 to 6.65) ng Ang I ·
mL-1 · h-1. In the
same pigs, PRA responses to gallbladder distension before blockade
amounted to 2.96±2.67 (1.05 to 7.58, P<0.05) ng Ang I
· mL-1 · h-1
from control values of 6.48±3.89 (3.74 to 13.12) ng Ang I ·
mL-1 · h-1. A
comparison between individual responses of PRA before and after
blockade of ß-adrenergic receptors is shown in Figure 5
.
|
Second Group of Experiments
In the second group, gallbladder transmural pressure was 13.4±3.3
(9 to 20) mm Hg. Losartan did not significantly change
measured hemodynamic variables
(
P>0.15) during the steady state, but it reduced all
observed hemodynamic responses caused by gallbladder
distension (Figure 6
). In all these
experiments, injection of phentolamine into the renal arteries
prevented RBF from changing significantly (
P>0.25).
|
Response of ABP
In 5 pigs, gallbladder distension at constant HR before
losartan increased ABP by 13.8±2.4 (11 to 17,
P<0.0005) mm Hg from a control value of 101.6±7.7
(93 to 112) mm Hg. After losartan, the same distension
increased ABP by 7.8±1.8 (6 to 10, P<0.0005) mm Hg
from control values of 101.4±6.1 (95 to 110) mm Hg, with a
reduction in pressor response of 43.8±4.7% (39.4 to 51.2
mm Hg · mL-1 ·
min-1, P<0.0005).
Response of Coronary Blood Flow
In 5 pigs, gallbladder distension at constant HR and ABP decreased
coronary blood flow (CBF) by 9.9±2 (6.9 to 12.2,
P<0.0005) mL/min from control values of 54.4±4.3 (48.6 to
60.3) mL/min and increased coronary resistance by 0.43±0.13
(0.33 to 0.66, P<0.0025) mm Hg ·
mL-1 · min-1 from
control values of 1.93±0.39 (1.49 to 2.47) mm Hg ·
mL-1 · min-1.
After losartan, the same distension decreased CBF by 5.3±1.9
(2.9 to 7.7, P<0.0025) mL/min from control values of
55.2±5 (47 to 60.5) mL/min and increased coronary resistance
by 0.20±0.08 (0.13 to 0.33, P<0.005) mm Hg ·
mL-1 · min-1 from
control values of 1.91±0.41 (1.49 to 2.55) mm Hg ·
mL-1 · min-1; the
vasoconstrictive response was reduced by 53.5±6.5%
(47.2 to 60.5 mm Hg · mL-1 ·
min-1, P<0.0005). Changes in
coronary perfusion pressure were small and insignificant
(P>0.30). An example of these coronary effects is
shown in Figure 7
.
|
Response of Mesenteric and Iliac Circulations
In 5 pigs, gallbladder distension at constant HR and ABP decreased
mesenteric (MBF) and iliac (IBF) blood flow by 111±36 (68 to 153,
P<0.0025) and 18±7 (11 to 29, P<0.0025) mL/min
from control values of 902±128 (750 to 1091) and 102±14 (85 to 121)
mL/min, respectively. These corresponded to increases in vascular
mesenteric and iliac resistance of 15.5±5.8% (7.7 to 22.2,
P<0.0025) and 20.6±7.4% (12 to 31.9,
P<0.0025) mm Hg ·
mL-1 · min-1 from
control values of 0.11±0.03 (0.09 to 0.15) and 0.99±0.14 (0.88 to
1.20) mm Hg · mL-1 ·
min-1. After losartan, the same
distension decreased MBF and IBF by 60±20 (40 to 82,
P<0.0025) and 9±3 (7 to 15, P<0.0025) mL/min
from control values of 898±137 (752 to 1103) and 103±16 (89 to 125)
mL/min. Mesenteric and iliac resistance increased by 8±2.4% (5.6 to
11.1, P<0.0025) and 9.7±2.5% (6.9 to 13.6)
mm Hg · mL-1 ·
min-1 from control values of 0.11±0.02 (0.09 to
0.15) and 0.98±0.12 (0.87 to 1.16) mm Hg ·
mL-1 · min-1, with
a reduction of the vasoconstrictive responses by
46.1±10.6% (27.3 to 53.5, P<0.0005) and 51.4±6% (42.5
to 57.4, P<0.0005) mm Hg ·
mL-1 · min-1,
respectively. Changes in blood pressure distal to the aortic
constriction were small and insignificant (P>0.20). An
example of these effects is shown in Figure 8
.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adrenergic mechanisms,14 15 a reflex mesenteric and
iliac vasoconstriction also occurred in response to gallbladder
distension. Furthermore, this reflex activation of the
renin-angiotensin system (RAS) contributed significantly to
the pressor and regional vasoconstriction responses to gallbladder
distension.
Response of PRA
In the present study, the observed PRA increase was a primary
effect caused by gallbladder distension and not by other interfering
factors. The reflex changes in hemodynamic
variables that could secondarily affect PRA were
prevented,15 16 17 and there were no changes in cardiac
filling pressures, which may activate atrial receptors and
change PRA.21 Furthermore, the urinary bladder was
emptied and ureters were cannulated to prevent activation of bladder
receptors and its resulting effect of changing
hemodynamic variables, efferent renal nerve
activity, and renin release.25 The supposition that PRA
increase was primarily related to gallbladder distension was supported
by the ability to augment this increase by incrementing the level of
gallbladder distension.
Reflex Mechanisms
The afferent pathway of PRA response to gallbladder
distension involved the vagus nerves; the response was abolished by
bilateral cervical vagotomy. It has been shown that the gallbladder and
the biliary ducts are innervated by afferent vagal and
splanchnic nerve fibers,26 although mechanoreceptors that
discharge in the splanchnic nerves are believed to subserve nociception
or reflexes related to gastrointestinal function.7 8 9 11
We used distending volumes and transmural pressures that were similar
to those measured in the gallbladder before it was emptied and were
considered unlikely to elicit nociceptive responses.11 As
previously found by the same methods, such an innocuous gallbladder
distension caused reflex hemodynamic responses that
involved the vagus nerves.13 14
The present study showed that the efferent pathways of PRA response to gallbladder distension involved the renal nerves. Previously, we showed that such a distension can cause a widespread sympathetic activation.14 15 16 The present results showed that the latter has included activation of the RAS through ß-adrenergic mechanisms. We prevented this reflex response by blockade of ß-adrenergic receptors with propranolol at a dose that has previously been shown in the same experimental model to prevent the reflex HR response to gallbladder distension15 and has been used to block vascular ß-adrenergic receptors.14 16
Significance of Findings
Angiotensin II receptor blockade with
losartan significantly reduced the pressor and regional
vasoconstriction responses to gallbladder distension, indicating a
contribution to these responses from concomitant RAS activation. Given
that sympathoexcitation and liberation of angiotensin may
each result in increases in resistance and ABP, our findings indicated
that
44% of the pressor response to gallbladder distension could be
attributed to the RAS. This contribution amounted to
54%, 46%, and
51% with regard to the vasoconstriction in the coronary,
mesenteric, and iliac regions, respectively. It is possible, however,
that a coronary vasoconstrictor effect of
angiotensin18 could have enhanced the
sympathetic vasoconstrictor responses in the pig, a species known to
have few coronary
-adrenergic
receptors.27 28
These considerations have important implications with regard to gallbladder distension and pathology in relation to coronary artery disease. The observed responses may be argued to provide a mechanism for the association between gallbladder and coronary artery disease or angina pectoris1 2 3 in that gallbladder distension, with its vasoconstrictor effect, may aggravate myocardial ischemia. This is possible because such an effect was elicited by innocuous distension of the viscus and also because the responses of PRA and CBF were related to increases in the distension.14 However, we did not examine the effect of chronic gallbladder distension, but chronic liberation of the hormone angiotensin may result in structural changes in the coronary blood vessels or other regions of the circulation.29
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 25, 1999; revision received November 30, 1999; accepted December 10, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Clark WE. Gastrointestinal conditions simulating or
aggravating cardiovascular disease. JAMA. 1945;128:352356.
3. Ravdin IS, Fitz-Hugh T, Wolferth CC, Barbieri EA, Ravdin RG. Relation of gallstone disease to angina pectoris. Arch Surg. 1955;70:333342.
4. Bettman RB, Rubinfeld SH. Gallbladder-heart reflexes in man under spinal anesthesia. Am Heart J. 1935;10:550552.
5. McArthur SW, Wakefield H. Observations on the human electrocardiogram during experimental distension of the gallbladder. J Lab Clin Med. 1945;30:349351.
6. Newman PP. Changes in arterial blood pressure following stimulation of the gallbladder. In: Newman PP, ed. Visceral Afferent Functions of the Nervous System. London, England: Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd; 1974:3537.
7. Crousillat J, Ranieri F. Mécanorécepteurs splanchniques de la voie biliare et de son péritoine. Exp Brain Res. 1980;40:146153.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Morrison JFB. The spinal afferent innervation of the liver, biliary tract and portal vein. In: Popper H, Bianchi L, Gudat F, Reutter W, eds. Communications of Liver Cells. Lancaster, Pa: MTP Press Ltd; 1980:139149.
9.
Cervero F. Sensory innervation of the viscera:
peripheral basis of visceral pain. Physiol Rev. 1994;74:95138.
10.
Cullen ML, Reese HL. Myocardial circulatory changes
measured by clearance of Na24: effect of common duct distension on
myocardial circulation. J Appl Physiol. 1952;5:281284.
11. Cervero F. Afferent activity evoked by natural stimulation of the biliary system in the ferret. Pain. 1982;13:137151.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12.
Ordway GA, Longhurst JC. Cardiovascular
reflexes arising from the gallbladder of the cat: effects of capsaicin,
bradykinin, and distension. Circ Res. 1983;52:2635.
13. Vacca G, Mary DASG, Battaglia A, Grossini E, Molinari C. Role of vagal afferents in the reflex haemodynamic responses caused by gallbladder distension in anaesthetised pigs. Med Sci Res. 1996;24:4143.
14.
Vacca G, Battaglia A, Grossini E, Mary DASG, Molinari
C. Reflex coronary vasoconstriction caused by gallbladder
distension in anesthetized pigs. Circulation. 1996;94:22012209.
15. Vacca G, Battaglia A, Grossini E, Papillo B. Tachycardia and pressor responses to distension of the gallbladder in the anaesthetised pig. Med Sci Res. 1994;22:697699.
16. Vacca G, Battaglia A, Grossini E, Mary DASG, Molinari C. Reflex renal vasoconstriction caused by distension of the gallbladder in anaesthetised pigs. Med Sci Res. 1997;25:457460.
17.
Hackenthal E, Paul M, Ganten D, Taugner R. Morphology,
physiology and molecular biology of renin secretion. Physiol
Rev. 1990;70:10671116.
18. Heyndrickx GR, Boettcher DH, Vatner SF. Effects of angiotensin, vasopressin, and methoxamine on cardiac function and blood flow distribution in conscious dogs. Am J Physiol. 1976;231:15791587.
19. Vacca G, Mary DASG, Battaglia A, Grossini E, Molinari C. The effect of distension of the stomach on peripheral blood flow in anaesthetized pigs. Exp Physiol. 1996;81:385396.[Abstract]
20. Linden RJ, Mary DASG. The preparation and maintenance of anaesthetized animals for the study of cardiovascular function. In: Linden RJ, ed. Techniques in the Life Sciences: Cardiovascular Physiology. County Clare, Ireland: Elsevier Science Publishers Ireland Ltd; 1983:122.
21.
Drinkhill MJ, Hicks MN, Mary DASG, Pearson MJ. The
effect of stimulation of the atrial receptors on plasma renin activity
in the dog. J Physiol (Lond). 1988;398:411421.
22. Massart P, Hodeige DG, Van Mechelen H, Charlier AA, Ketelslegers J, Heyndrickx GR, Donckier JE. Angiotensin II and endothelin-1 receptor antagonists have cumulative hypotensive effects in canine Page hypertension. J Hypertens. 1998;16:835841.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. MacFadyen RJ, Tree M, Lever AF, Reid JL. Effects of the angiotensin II receptor antagonist losartan (DuP 753/MK 954) on arterial blood pressure, heart rate, plasma concentrations of angiotensin II and renin and the pressor response to infused angiotensin II in the salt-deplete dog. Clin Sci. 1992;83:549556.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
24. Lambert C. Mechanisms of angiotensin II chronotropic effect in anaesthetized dogs. Br J Pharmacol. 1995;115:795800.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
25. Mary DASG. The urinary bladder and cardiovascular reflexes. Int J Cardiol. 1989;23:1117.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
26. Alexander WF. The innervation of the biliary system. J Comp Neurol. 1940;72:357370.
27.
Heusch G.
-Adrenergic mechanisms in myocardial
ischemia. Circulation. 1990;81:113.
28.
Schultz R, Oudiz RJ, Guth BD, Heusch G. Minimal
1 and
2-adrenoceptor
mediated coronary vasoconstriction in the anaesthetized swine.
Arch Pharmacol. 1990;342:422428.
29. Matsukawa T, Ichikawa I. Biological functions of angiotensin and its receptors. Annu Rev Physiol. 1997;59:395412.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Seewoodhary and L. Griffin Trifascicular block and a raised Troponin 'T' in acute cholecystitis QJM, October 21, 2009; (2009) hcp156v1. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |