(Circulation. 2000;101:152.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University Hospital, Naples.
Correspondence to Dr Giovanni de Simone, Echocardiography Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University Hospital, via S. Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy. E-mail simogi{at}unina.it
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsTo address this issue, 159 consecutive hypertensive patients (44±11 years, 78 obese, 96 women) and 165 normotensive subjects (32±11 years, 84 obese, 110 women) were studied with the use of Doppler echocardiography. After adjustment for age, body mass index (BMI), and sex, we found that ejection fraction (EF; M-mode, z-derived) was higher in hypertensive (66.6±5.2%) than in normotensive (63.9±4.4%, P<0.0001) subjects, whereas midwall shortening (MS) was lower (hypertensive patients 16.9±2.0%, normotensive subjects 17.8±2.2%, P<0.02), even after correction for end-systolic wall stress (P<0.05). Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) was greater in hypertensive patients (103±14 ms) than in normotensive subjects (78±19 ms), as was deceleration time of E velocity and peak A velocity (all P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, IVRT was unrelated to EF, but a negative relation was found with MS (P<0.001), independent of age, BMI, presence of arterial hypertension, LV geometry, and load (multiple R2=0.58). For comparable age, sex distribution, BMI, and blood pressure values, hypertensive patients with lower afterload-adjusted MS exhibited longer IVRT than patients with normal MS (P<0.005). However, IVRT remained higher than in normotensive control subjects after control for LV geometry and load.
ConclusionsDoppler indices of delayed LV relaxation can be detected in the presence of normal or supranormal EF but are independently related to impaired MS. A less severely abnormal relaxation, however, can be also detected in the presence of normal midwall function, independent of LV geometry and load. Thus, diastolic abnormalities may occur before systolic dysfunction even when it is measured at the midwall.
Key Words: echocardiography hypertension ventricles diastole systole
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 weeks after providing formal
informed consent. One hundred sixty-five normotensive subjects (32±11
years, 81 obese, 110 women) served as the control group. After
providing informed consent, most of the 81 obese normotensive subjects
had been enrolled in the Outpatient Clinic of the Nutrition Unit of the
DCEM.17 These subjects came to the unit with the sole
purpose of losing weight for aesthetic reasons without any signs or
symptoms of disease, including diabetes, hypertension, or renal
disease. The remaining normotensive subjects were volunteers involved
in a screening program of the department staff, as previously
reported.17 Obesity was defined as a body mass index of >27.8 kg/m2 in men and >27.3 kg/m2 in women.18 Coronary artery disease was excluded in all participants on the basis of a normal standard 12-lead ECG, a negative family history, the absence of symptoms, and the evidence of normal wall motion at the 2-dimensional echocardiographic examination.
Echocardiography
Doppler echocardiography was performed
in a dimly light room with patients in the partial left decubitus
position with the use of commercially available machines
(SIM7000/Challenge or AU3; ESAOTE) equipped with 2.5- to 3.5-MHz
annular-array transducers. M-mode tracings and Doppler signals were
recorded and the measurements performed as previously reported in
detail.14 16 17 19 20 LV mass was measured according to
Penn convention21 and normalized for height to the power
of 2.7 and LV diastolic dimension for the first power of
height.22 LV hypertrophy was defined as values
of LV mass index of
47 g/m2.7 in women or
50
g/m2.7 in men.22
LV systolic function was evaluated as midwall shortening as both an absolute value and a percent of the value predicted from the corresponding circumferential end-systolic wall stress14 16 (afterload-adjusted midwall shortening). Ejection fraction was calculated from M-mode echocardiograms with the use of a recently validated computation of LV volumes.23 LV diastole was evaluated by measuring isovolumic relaxation time, peak early transmitral flow velocity (E), peak late transmitral flow velocity (A), and deceleration time of E velocity, as previously reported.17 19 The reliability of Doppler measurements was assessed by calculating between-observer (GdS and GFM) interval of agreements24 of main direct measures used in this study in a different group of 20 subjects (10 hypertensive).
Statistical Analysis
Two-factor ANOVA was used to compare normal-weight or obese
normotensive control subjects with body sizematched hypertensive
patients generated on the basis of values of normal or low
afterload-adjusted midwall shortening. A full factorial model was used,
and multiple simple contrasts were obtained after adjustment of the
confidence intervals with Bonferronis method. When appropriate,
variables were adjusted for potential confounders (age, sex, body
mass index, relative wall thickness, end-systolic stress, LV
internal dimension, blood pressure, and LV mass) with the use of
hierarchical designs with priority entrance of covariates. One-factor
ANOVA and Bonferroni-adjusted simple contrasts were also used for
subgroup analysis. The
2 statistic and
Monte-Carlo estimation of exact P value were used for
categorical variables. Least-squares linear regression, partial
correlation, and multiple linear regression analysis (stepwise
procedure) were used to evaluate relations. A 2-tailed value of
P
0.05 was used to reject the null hypothesis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An interobserver reliability analysis of the primary
Doppler measures is presented in Table 1
.
|
LV Diastolic Characteristics in Relation to
Midwall Performance
Diastolic parameters were examined in 117
patients whose afterload-adjusted midwall shortening was >85%, a
value corresponding to the normal mean-1 SD, giving a mean value
(96.80±8.38%) identical to the average value in normotensive control
subjects (96.36±11.56%) (Table 2
).
These patients were compared with the 42 hypertensive patients who had
values of afterload-adjusted midwall shortening of
85%
(78.76±4.70%).
|
Normotensive control subjects were significantly younger than
both hypertensive subgroups but had a comparable sex distribution and
body mass index (Table 2
). After adjustment for age and sex and
in consideration of the differences related to the presence or absence
of obesity, patients with low afterload-adjusted LV midwall shortening
exhibited higher relative wall thickness (P<0.0001) but a
similar increased LV mass index compared with patients with normal LV
midwall performance. Their ejection fraction was identical to
that of the normotensive group and lower than that of patients with
normal afterload-adjusted midwall shortening (P<0.0001),
who indeed exhibited supranormal ejection fraction values
(P<0.0001). Patients with low afterload-adjusted LV midwall
shortening exhibited prolonged isovolumic relaxation time and
deceleration time of E flow velocity and higher peak A velocity than
normotensive control subjects (all P<0.01). Even in the
presence of supranormal ejection fraction, isovolumic relaxation time
and deceleration time of E velocity remained higher in hypertensive
patients with normal afterload-adjusted midwall shortening than in
normotensive individuals (P<0.0001). Moreover, peak A
velocity and the E/A ratio were similarly higher in both subgroups of
patients than in normal control subjects (all P<0.005).
Although slightly attenuated, the difference in isovolumic relaxation
time among normal control subjects and both groups of hypertensive
patients with different levels of afterload-adjusted midwall shortening
remained statistically significant even when controlling for relative
wall thickness, end-systolic stress, LV
end-diastolic dimension, and LV mass in addition to the
demographic covariates (age and sex). In particular, the adjusted mean
values were 81 ms for control subjects, 99 ms for hypertensive patients
with normal afterload-adjusted midwall shortening, and 102 ms for
hypertensive patients with low afterload-adjusted midwall shortening
(P<0.001).
Effect of Obesity on Relation of LV Chamber and Midwall Function to
LV Diastolic Properties
Obese hypertensive patients with low afterload-adjusted midwall
shortening (n=24) exhibited similar blood pressure and LV mass index
but higher relative wall thickness and ejection fraction (0.47% and
64.8%) than normal-weight patients in the same midwall function
subgroup (n=18; 0.42% and 61.1%, P<0.007 and <0.002,
respectively). For comparable clusters of LV midwall function,
isovolumic relaxation time was longer in obese (88 ms in normotensives,
102 and 111 ms in patients with normal [n=55] or low
afterload-adjusted midwall shortening, respectively) than in
normal-weight subjects (68, 100, and 104 ms; P<0.0001), a
difference that did not achieve statistical significance for
deceleration time of E velocity, peak E or A flow velocities, and the
ratio of E to A velocity. The differences in isovolumic relaxation time
between obese and normal-weight individuals remained unchanged even
after the addition of relative wall thickness, end-systolic
stress, and LV diastolic dimension in the model of ANCOVA
(P<0.0001).
The univariate correlation of LV diastolic
parameters to ejection fraction was evaluated in separate
normal-weight (80 hypertensive, or 49%) or obese (79 hypertensive, or
49%, P=NS) individuals. Late peak A flow velocity and
isovolumic relaxation time were positively related to ejection fraction
in both normal-weight and obese individuals (all P<0.01),
whereas no relations were found with early peak E flow velocity and
time of deceleration of E velocity (Table 3
).
|
In contrast, in both normal-weight and obese subjects, isovolumic
relaxation time was negatively related to midwall shortening either as
an absolute value or as a percent of predicted from
end-systolic stress (afterload adjusted), whereas a positive
relation was found with peak E velocity and E/A velocity ratio (all
P<0.01, Table 3
). In normal-weight individuals,
midwall shortening was also negatively related to the time of
deceleration of E velocity (P<0.005).
Effect of LV Hypertrophy on Relation Between LV
Systolic and Diastolic Performance
After control for systolic and diastolic
blood pressure, no significant associations were detected between
ejection fraction and relative wall thickness, LV mass. or LV mass
index in normal-weight individuals, whereas in obese individuals,
ejection fraction was directly related to relative wall thickness
(partial r=0.25, P<0.001). In contrast, midwall
shortening was more closely and negatively related to relative wall
thickness in both normal-weight (partial r=-0.50,
P<0.0001) and obese (partial r=-0.55,
P<0.0001) individuals. In the presence of obesity, midwall
shortening was also weakly and negatively related to LV mass (partial
r=-0.19, P<0.02) or LV mass index (partial
r=-0.17, P<0.03). Thus, LV
diastolic properties were also evaluated in the subgroups
of hypertensive patients without LV hypertrophy.
This analysis was carried out in 78 of 117 patients with normal (67%; 38 women, 32 obese, age 40.3±10.4 years) and 21 of 42 patients with low afterload-adjusted midwall shortening (50%; 10 women, 8 obese, age 43.4±7.7 years) who did not have clear-cut LV hypertrophy. Average body mass index was similar in the 2 hypertensive subgroups (27.6 and 27.9 kg/m2, respectively), as were heart rate (both 75 bpm), blood pressure (150/97 and 150/99 mm Hg), and LV mass index (40 and 41 g/m2.7). In contrast, after control for age, sex, and body mass index, relative wall thickness was substantially higher (0.43±0.07) and ejection fraction was lower (62±4%) in patients with low than in patients with normal afterload-adjusted midwall shortening (0.35±0.05% and 67±5%) or normotensive control subjects (all 0.03>P<0.0001). Similarly, isovolumic relaxation time was higher in the subgroup of patients with low (105±11 ms) than in patients with normal afterload-adjusted midwall shortening (98±14 ms) or in normotensive control subjects (both P<0.0001). However, even patients with normal midwall function and normal LV geometry exhibited substantially prolonged isovolumic relaxation times compared with control subjects (P<0.0001). These differences remained unchanged even after further control for relative wall thickness, end-systolic stress, LV end-diastolic dimension, and LV mass, in addition to demographic covariates (age, sex, and body mass index). The adjusted mean values were 80 ms for normal control subjects, 96 ms for hypertensive patients with normal afterload-adjusted midwall shortening, and 99 ms for hypertensive patients with low afterload-adjusted midwall shortening (all P<0.0001).
The differences among groups reported for isovolumic relaxation time were also confirmed for the time of deceleration of E velocity (all P<0.02).
Independent Correlates of Isovolumic Relaxation Time
Models of multiple linear regression analysis were
generated to highlight independent correlates of isovolumic relaxation
time with the use of significant univariate correlates
(age, sex, body mass index, end-systolic stress,
end-diastolic dimension, relative wall thickness, presence
of hypertension) and, alternatively, ejection fraction or midwall
shortening as measures of LV systolic function. Isovolumic
relaxation time increased in the presence of arterial
hypertension, with increasing age, body mass index, relative wall
thickness, and LV chamber dimension and with decreasing
end-systolic stress (multiple
r2=0.57, P<0.0001),
whereas no significant effect was detected for ejection fraction
(partial r=-0.10, P>0.06). In contrast, when
midwall shortening was used instead of ejection fraction, a negative
relation with isovolumic relaxation time was detected (partial
r=-0.16, P<0.004), independent of the
significant effect of the other covariates (multiple
r2=0.58, P<0.0001).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results of this study show that when measurements of LV systolic function are taken at the level of endocardium (LV chamber function), a number of diastolic abnormalities can be demonstrated in hypertensive patients in the presence of normal or supranormal systolic function. In this relatively large population, delayed relaxation (ie, prolongation of both isovolumic relaxation time and E deceleration time) was indeed associated with normal-to-high ejection fraction. In addition, ejection fraction was positively related to peak A velocity, a measure of late LV filling. Thus, the pattern emerging from those findings is an association between abnormal LV diastolic properties with normal or supranormal LV systolic function.
In contrast, when LV systolic function was measured at the midwall level, abnormalities of LV diastolic properties paralleled abnormalities of LV systolic performance, a correspondence suggested many years ago in a pioneering work by Shimizu et al.31 This discrepancy was fundamentally due to the influence of relative wall thickness, which amplified LV chamber function, while matching a depressed midwall function.10 11 12 13 14 32 33 . Abnormalities of the diastolic properties of the LV are indeed more pronounced in patients with clear-cut midwall systolic abnormalities. This relation indicates that there is a continuum in the progressive appearance of these abnormalities, suggesting that changes in systolic and diastolic function may occur concomitantly. However, some degree of diastolic abnormalities could also be detected in the absence of systolic dysfunction even if measured at the midwall level, suggesting that abnormalities of LV diastolic properties might precede the appearance of LV systolic dysfunction.
The reasons for the early appearance of impairment of active relaxation in hypertensive patients with supranormal LV chamber function and normal LV midwall performance were not directly appreciable in our analysis but could be related to the changes in LV geometry, with midwall shortening negatively related to LV mass and relative wall thickness. To address this issue, an analysis of the subgroup of patients with normal LV mass index, which confirmed that LV concentric geometry is associated to depressed midwall performance, also showed that active relaxation was prolonged in the group of hypertensive patients with normal LV midwall performance and normal LV geometry. Thus, no geometric or hemodynamic reasons could be found in a number of multivariate procedures to explain the abnormally prolonged isovolumic relaxation time in patients with normal LV midwall performance and geometry, which might be due at least in part to metabolic abnormalities that directly affect the mechanism of inactivation, as recently proposed.34
The multiple regression analysis allowed us to generate a summary model that included all the measurable variables. Thus, isovolumic relaxation time was confirmed to increase in the presence of arterial hypertension, with aging, and with increasing body mass index. Isovolumic relaxation time was also found to be prolonged by increasing LV concentric geometry and LV cavity dimension, used as a raw measure of LV preload. Moreover, as already shown,17 end-systolic stress, a load applied at the beginning of relaxation (relaxation load), reduced isovolumic relaxation time.
Potential Study Limitations
The presence of a large proportion of obese individuals, which was
useful to expand the variability of many parameters
analyzed in this study, could represent a limitation
for the purpose of the study because of the abnormalities of LV
diastolic properties found in obese patients, even in the
absence of arterial hypertension.17 19 To
reduce the possibility of a bias, normotensive and hypertensive
subjects were examined with the use of a statistical procedure that
allowed separation of the effect of obesity from that of LV
systolic function measured at the midwall and, moreover, the
detection of the interactive influence of obesity and LV
systolic function on the different variables examined. This
procedure highlighted that the relation between diastolic
characteristics and midwall systolic function was substantially
independent of body size, information of potential importance given the
high prevalence of obesity in clinical populations of hypertensive
patients.
Although in this study isovolumic relaxation time was considered to be the key feature of diastolic function, there are limitations in the measurement of this index that should be taken into account when producing physiological inferences. Isovolumic relaxation time is indeed a rough index of LV active relaxation (which actually begins before the closure of aortic valve), sensitive to changes in load,19 and potentially influenced by technical variability. To partially overcome these limitations, in the present study, an analysis of isovolumic relaxation time was carried out that also took into account both wall stress (myocardial afterload) and LV internal dimension (as a crude measure of myocardial preload). In addition, reliability analysis performed with interobserver interval of agreement shows that the error is reasonably small to allow the use of this measure in epidemiological studies.
Conclusions
LV diastolic properties are abnormal in
arterial hypertension and are characterized by delayed
active relaxation. This abnormality is independent of LV chamber
systolic function but is associated with the extent of
systolic performance as measured by LV midwall
shortening, a more precise measure of wall mechanics. For comparable LV
midwall performance, obesity is associated with more severely
prolonged relaxation. This study demonstrated that abnormalities of the
diastolic properties of the LV are related to and progress
with systolic midwall dysfunction but might also precede
abnormalities of myocardial contraction. Metabolic
abnormalities, which directly influence the mechanism of inactivation,
might play a role in this primary diastolic
abnormality.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received June 2, 1999; revision received August 6, 1999; accepted August 13, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Gelsomino, R. Lorusso, C. Rostagno, S. Caciolli, G. Bille, G. De Cicco, S. Romagnoli, C. Porciani, P. Stefano, and G. F. Gensini Prognostic value of Doppler-derived mitral deceleration time on left ventricular reverse remodelling after undersized mitral annuloplasty Eur J Echocardiogr, March 11, 2008; (2008) jen034v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Agabiti-Rosei, M. L. Muiesan, and M. Salvetti Review: New approaches to the assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, December 1, 2007; 1(2): 119 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Cioffi, G. de Simone, G. Mureddu, L. Tarantini, and C. Stefenelli Right atrial size and function in patients with pulmonary hypertension associated with disorders of respiratory system or hypoxemia Eur J Echocardiogr, October 1, 2007; 8(5): 322 - 331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. de Simone, D. W. Kitzman, M. Chinali, A. Oberman, P. N. Hopkins, D. C. Rao, D. K. Arnett, and R. B. Devereux Left ventricular concentric geometry is associated with impaired relaxation in hypertension: the HyperGEN study Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2005; 26(10): 1039 - 1045. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. de Simone, M. J. Roman, M. H. Alderman, M. Galderisi, O. de Divitiis, and R. B. Devereux Is High Pulse Pressure a Marker of Preclinical Cardiovascular Disease? Hypertension, April 1, 2005; 45(4): 575 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kozakova, E. Ferrannini, and C. Palombo Relation Between Left Ventricular Midwall Function and Coronary Vasodilator Capacity in Arterial Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2003; 42(4): 528 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Iseki, Y. Ikemiya, C. Iseki, and S. Takishita Haematocrit and the risk of developing end-stage renal disease Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2003; 18(5): 899 - 905. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Kozakova, G. de Simone, C. Morizzo, and C. Palombo Coronary Vasodilator Capacity and Hypertension-Induced Increase in Left Ventricular Mass Hypertension, February 1, 2003; 41(2): 224 - 229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Schillaci, L. Pasqualini, P. Verdecchia, G. Vaudo, S. Marchesi, C. Porcellati, G. de Simone, and E. Mannarino Prognostic significance of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in essential hypertension J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 19, 2002; 39(12): 2005 - 2011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Galderisi, G. Vitale, G. Lupoli, M. Barbieri, G. Varricchio, C. Carella, O. de Divitiis, and G. Paolisso Inverse Association Between Free Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1 and Isovolumic Relaxation in Arterial Systemic Hypertension Hypertension, October 1, 2001; 38(4): 840 - 845. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. N. Bella, V. Palmieri, J. E. Liu, D. W. Kitzman, A. Oberman, S. C. Hunt, P. N. Hopkins, D.C. Rao, D. K. Arnett, and R. B. Devereux Relationship Between Left Ventricular Diastolic Relaxation and Systolic Function in Hypertension: The Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network (HyperGEN) Study Hypertension, September 1, 2001; 38(3): 424 - 428. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Silverberg, D. Wexler, D. Sheps, M. Blum, G. Keren, R. Baruch, D. Schwartz, T. Yachnin, S. Steinbruch, I. Shapira, et al. The effect of correction of mild anemia in severe, resistant congestive heart failure using subcutaneous erythropoietin and intravenous iron: a randomized controlled study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 1, 2001; 37(7): 1775 - 1780. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Dodic, C. Samuel, K. Moritz, E. M. Wintour, J. Morgan, L. Grigg, and J. Wong Impaired Cardiac Functional Reserve and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Adult Sheep After Prenatal Dexamethasone Exposure Circ. Res., September 28, 2001; 89(7): 623 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |