(Circulation. 2000;101:137.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Clinic for Cardiac Surgery (C.B., N.B., J.F.M.B., R.L., H.-H.S.) and Institute of Medical Microbiology (M.M.), University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany. Dr Bein currently is at the Institute of Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Correspondence to C. Bartels, MD, Clinic for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538 Lübeck, Germany.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsAntibody titers against C pneumoniae (microimmunofluorescence) and cytomegalovirus (ELISA) in patients undergoing primary (coronary desobliterates, n=80) or repeated CABG (occluded vein grafts, n=45) were correlated with the endovascular presence of the 2 microorganisms. C pneumoniae was detected by means of a nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and by culturing. Both conventional PCR and quantitative PCR were applied for detection of cytomegalovirus. C pneumoniae (PCR/culture) was detected in 19/9% (15/80 and 7/80) of coronary desobliterates and in 18/11% (8/45 and 5/45) of occluded vein grafts. There was no statistical evidence that IgG values differed between patients with or without C pneumoniae detection who were undergoing primary CABG. In contrast, repeated-CABG patients with a positive PCR (P=0.0027) or C pneumoniae culture (P=0.0018) had distinctly elevated IgG titers compared with patients in whom C pneumoniae was not detected. Cytomegalovirus could not be detected in the examined specimens.
ConclusionsCytomegalovirus infection does not seem to be associated with advanced coronary artery lesions. C pneumoniae antibody titers are not associated with the endovascular presence of C pneumoniae in patients with coronary artery disease. The observed strong association between elevated IgG titers and the detection of C pneumoniae in occluded vein grafts warrants further investigation.
Key Words: Chlamydia pneumoniae viruses coronary disease
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pathological and Control Specimens
Occluded vein grafts from 45 patients undergoing reoperation
were collected. Only occluded vein grafts showing typical thickening of
the venous wall indicative of late graft occlusion were selected for
further investigation.8 The mean interval from initial
surgery to reoperation was 112±53 months. In 80 patients,
coronary desobliterates (dissecting the atherosclerotic
cylinder from the adventitial layer of the coronary artery)
were obtained from occluded or severely stenotic
coronary arteries. Patient characteristics are given in the
Table
. There was no evidence of a difference between patients
undergoing primary or repeated CABG with regard to epidemiological
parameters or risk factors.
|
Twenty native saphenous veins served as controls: 16 veins collected during primary surgery and 4 veins obtained during reoperation. Macroscopically normal coronary arteries (n=15) from patients with primary cardiomyopathy undergoing heart transplantation were chosen as control samples.
Serology
Sera were tested for C pneumoniaespecific
antibodies by use of a commercially available
microimmunofluorescence assay (IgG, IgM;
Labsystem). Sera were screened for CMV antibodies (ELISA; IgG, IgM;
Enzygnost, Dade-Behring). An antiC pneumoniae IgG titer
16 was considered to indicate previous C pneumoniae
infection. For CMV, IgG titers
230 were considered indicative of
previous CMV infection.
C pneumoniae Detection
Tissue was cut into 0.3-cm segments, ground, and suspended in
cell culture medium. The suspensions were then divided for polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) and culture.
C pneumoniae PCR
Genomic C pneumoniae DNA was detected by a nested PCR
protocol, as described elsewhere.6 7 Briefly, DNA was
purified from the plaque suspensions by proteinase K digestion and
cetyltrimethylammonium bromide treatment. The DNA extraction protocol
has been optimized to provide very pure DNA preparations with minimal
inhibitory activity in the amplification procedure, as
previously described.9 Furthermore, 2 types of
inhibitor controls to detect potential PCR
inhibitors in the samples were used: addition of the
extracted DNA of 10 inclusion-forming units or addition of
1x105 copies of a plasmid containing the PCR
target sequence, a PstI fragment of C
pneumoniae genomic DNA (kindly provided by T. Miethke, Medical
Microbiology, Technical University of Munich). Nested PCR was then
performed by use of the species-specific HL-1/HR-1 primer pair for the
first round of 32 amplifications. The nested primer pair IN-1/2, which
yields a 128-bp product, was then used in the subsequent 32
amplification cycles. For confirmation, nonradioactive DNA
hybridization was performed with oligonucleotide
HM-13' labeled with digoxigenin-ddUTP (Boehringer) used as
the probe.
C pneumoniae Culture
Serum-free cell culture was performed as previously
described.6 7 Briefly, suspensions were
centrifuged onto HEp-2 host-cell monolayers and incubated for 3
days at 35°C in 5% CO2 in isolation medium
(Eagles minimal essential medium, GIBCO/BRL) supplemented with 1
µg/mL cycloheximide (Sigma) in
10 serial passages. Productive
C pneumoniae growth was identified by staining inclusions
with FITC-conjugated C pneumoniaespecific mouse monoclonal
antibody (Cellabs). The strains were first identified in the second to
fifth subculture. The cell culture monolayer of the first passage could
not be judged by immunofluorescence staining
because it contained too much autofluorescent material from the
homogenized tissue. Because staining kills C
pneumoniae, a substantial portion of the monolayer had to be
retained for subsequent cultures until growth was established. In a
compromise between early visualization of C pneumoniae and
establishment of culture growth, about one third of the monolayer was
used for staining purposes; the rest was used for subsequent
cultures.
CMV Detection
Oligonucleotide primers (TIB MOLBIOL) and probes
(PE Applied Biosystems) complementary to the pp65 gene were used.
Conventional CMV PCR
PCR was performed in a total volume of 50 µL consisting of 1x
PCR buffer, 2.5 U AmpliTaq Gold (PE Applied Biosystems), 200
µmol/L of each dNTP, and 50 pmol of each primer. PCR was performed
for 40 cycles after activation of AmpliTaq Gold. The reaction mixture
was then subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis, Southern blotting,
and nonradioactive hybridization with a digoxigenin-labeled
oligonucleotide probe, as previously
described.6 10
Quantitative CMV PCR
To obtain PCR conditions with reduced variability and
contamination, quantitative PCR was performed by use of a real-time
Taqman PCR system (ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector Systems, PE Applied
Biosystems).6 11 12 The hybridization probe that binds to
both PCR products was labeled with a reporter dye, FAM, on the 5'
nucleotide and a quenching dye, TAMRA, on the 3'
nucleotide.13 The following composition of PCR
assay (total volume, 50 µL) was used: 100 ng purified sample DNA, 15
pmol of each primer, 10 pmol probe, and 200 µmol/L of each dNTP.
This PCR protocol had a sensitivity of 10 CMV DNA copies, as determined
by serial dilution.
To exclude false-negative PCR results, the following inhibitor control for both CMV PCR assays was applied. Each single CMV PCR assay consisted of 3 parallel PCR experiments: (1) PCR mix and 100 ng sample DNA; (2) PCR mix and water (negative control); and (3) PCR mix, 100 ng sample DNA, and 0.5 ng leukocyte DNA from a known CMV-infected patient (positive control). The test was valid only if the negative control was negative and the positive control revealed a clear positive signal.
Statistical Analysis
Except as otherwise stated, variables are reported as
geometric mean (GM) and 95% CI or total numbers and relative
frequencies (in the case of dichotomous variables). For comparison
between groups, Students t test or Mann-Whitneys
U rank-sum test and the
2 test or
Fishers exact test (for case of dichotomous variables) were used
as appropriate. All tests were 2 tailed. A value of P<0.05
was considered statistically significant. The analyses were
performed with Minitab software (release 10).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Except for a single native saphenous vein (collected during reoperation in a patient with C pneumoniae in the occluded vein grafts), all control specimens were negative for C pneumoniae.
CMV Detection
Pathological and control specimens were negative for CMV DNA in
both conventional and quantitative PCR.
Serology
Cytomegalovirus
IgG CMV antibody titers
230, indicating prior CMV infection,
were determined in 58.3% of the patients. Elevated IgM titers were not
detected.
C pneumoniae
No elevated C pneumoniae IgM antibodies were observed
in any patients. With the raw data, there was no statistical evidence
that the IgG values differed in relation to a positive or negative
C pneumoniae PCR or culture result (P=0.63 and
P=1.0, respectively) for patients undergoing primary
revascularization. In detail, in negative
cultures, the GM was 56.0 (95% CI, 36.0 to 87.4); in positive
cultures, the GM was 32.1 (95% CI, 2.2 to 464.0); in negative PCRs,
the GM was 53.2 (95% CI, 32.5 to 87.1); and in positive PCRs , the GM
was 53.2 (95% CI, 16.6 to 170.5).
In contrast, patients with repeated CABG and a positive PCR (P=0.0018), C pneumoniae culture (P=0.0027) result had distinctly elevated IgG titers compared with patients in whom C pneumoniae was not detected. Because of the limited number of positive specimens, a cutoff titer (IgG value) that would predict the vascular presence of C pneumoniae with reasonable CIs could not be calculated. In detail, in negative cultures, the GM was 32.0 (95% CI, 16.2 to 63.4); in positive cultures, the GM was 294.1 (95% CI, 95.8 to 903.3); in negative PCRs, the GM was 29.1 (95% CI, 13.9 to 61.1); and in positive PCRs, the GM was 181.1 (95% CI, 71.5 to 458.5).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CMV was not associated with advanced coronary artery or vein graft disease in this study.
C pneumoniae
We observed a C pneumoniae PCR positivity rate of 19%
in patients undergoing first-time CABG and 18% for patients undergoing
reoperation. Only a few studies have examined coronary arteries
by means of PCR; the C pneumoniae rates were 2%, 16%,
17%, and 32%, respectively, in 4 studies.14 15 16 17
Therefore, our positivity rates are within the expected range. We used
nested PCR, a modification of PCR that is optimized for specificity.
However, there is an obvious difference between C pneumoniae
PCR positivity rates and the positive results seen when immunological
procedures are applied. Studies using immunocytochemistry demonstrated
positive detection ranges from 39% to 45%.15 16 17
Two authors compared PCR methods with immunocytochemistry; they
observed a higher rate of C pneumoniae detection with
immunocytochemistry compared with PCR.15 16 The
difference in C pneumoniae detection by PCR compared with
immunocytochemistry is underlined by the rare concordant detection of
C pneumoniae by both methods. In a report by Jackson and
coworkers,16 only 1 specimen was positive in both
immunocytochemistry and PCR (overall number positive in PCR and/or
immunocytochemistry, 13 of 34 coronary arteries).
The highest positivity rate (79%) was reported in a study using direct immunofluorescence staining of atherosclerotic tissue.18 However, this result and the technique have not been reproduced by others. The other immunohistochemical studies have provided reproducible data, and it is difficult to explain the variations in the positivity rate other than by the methodological differences. However, immunohistochemical procedures may lead to some unspecific reactivity compared with PCR because unexpected antibody reactivity might occur. This has been discussed in a Circulation editorial.19
Only a few studies have focused on the relation between elevated antiC pneumoniae antibodies and the detection of the pathogen in the vessel wall. Campbell and associates17 did not observe an association between the frequency of C pneumoniae detection in native or restenosed coronary artery lesions and C pneumoniaespecific antibodies. Puolakkainen et al20 reported more frequent detection of C pneumoniae genome in coronary artery lesions in subjects with low IgG titers (GM titers, 13.6±4.2) than in those with no C pneumoniae in the atherosclerotic tissue (53.4±4.3). In contrast to these findings, Blasi et al21 detected an association between elevated antiC pneumoniae antibodies and C pneumoniae genome in 51 specimens obtained from infrarenal aortic aneurysms. Davidson and coworkers22 examined whether elevated C pneumoniae antibodies precede development of atherosclerotic changes and detection of C pneumoniae by immunocytochemistry and PCR. The authors reported a significant relationship (P=0.024) between C pneumoniae detection and high levels of C pneumoniaespecific IgG antibodies (GM titers, 94.9 versus 54.9 for negative C pneumoniae results). However, they correlated high IgG levels with the combined detection of C pneumoniae by immunocytochemistry and PCR (n=12) despite a substantial discordant C pneumoniae detection by immunocytochemistry and PCR (in 10 patients: positive C pneumoniae detection by immunocytochemistry; n=8; PCR alone, n=2).
For patients with vein graft disease, a significant association between elevated antiC pneumoniae antibodies and the presence of the bacterium in occluded vein grafts versus negative specimens was demonstrated. Our results demonstrate that saphenous veins not infected by C pneumoniae in their native location can acquire infection with viable, culturally retrievable C pneumoniae when used as a bypass graft. From a pathogenetic point of view, this finding might indicate that venous grafts in some patients can acquire an acute C pneumoniae infection that is possibly relevant for the development of vein graft disease. More recently, Tiran and coworkers23 reported that PTCA induces stimulation of the humoral response to C pneumoniae. Whether manipulation of atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries or the ascending aorta colonized by C pneumoniae might make hidden chlamydial antigens accessible to the immune system remains to be determined. Further studies should investigate whether patients undergoing CABG may profit from antibiotic therapy to prevent vein graft disease. Our data do not support the use of elevated antiC pneumoniae antibodies as rationale for initiating antibiotic treatment in patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease. Whether elevated unspecific systemic inflammatory markers, eg, C-reactive protein, can identify patients for chemotherapeutic treatment remains to be investigated.24
Cytomegalovirus
In this study, no CMV DNA was detected in the control or
pathological specimens. This negative result is surprising because of
the reported high prevalence of CMV DNA in atherosclerotic
tissues.1 2 However, reports of CMV genome detection in
atherosclerotic and nonatherosclerotic tissue are inconsistent
and vary considerably.1 2 Small differences in CMV DNA
detection rates between atherosclerotic and control specimens were
reported by most contributors (57% versus 36%) (for review, see
References 1 and 251 25 through 28). Two groups reported failure to detect
CMV genome in atherosclerotic lesions. Benditt et al29 did
not detect CMV viral mRNA by means of in situ hybridization in
atherosclerotic arterial wall tissue. It has been suggested
that active CMV replication is responsible for plaque
instability.30 Thus, Kol et al30 investigated
whether CMV major immediate early gene mRNA could be identified by PCR
in tissues obtained from 20 patients with unstable angina undergoing
coronary atherectomy. Because the CMV major immediate early
gene is indicative of replicative CMV and the authors did not observe a
single positive PCR result, they concluded that CMV replication is not
a cause of unstable angina. More recently, the association between
prior CMV infection and the risk of restenosis after balloon
PTCA has been investigated.31 The authors did not observe
an association between prior CMV infection and restenosis.
Their results do not support a possible benefit from antiviral therapy
in patients with symptomatic coronary artery
disease. To date, no report of successful culture of CMV from
atherosclerotic tissue has been published. In this study, we did not
investigate the detection of CMV gene products indicating viral
replication but rather the presence of CMV DNA itself.
Quantitative PCR technology reduces the possibility of contamination and background amplification, thus increasing specificity compared with conventional PCR.12 32 Serial dilution curves for CMV DNA detection threshold revealed excellent sensitivity of our protocol. The applied PCR procedures ruled out the presence of PCR inhibitors. Our results indicate that CMV is not associated with coronary artery or vein graft disease.
Conclusions
CMV does not appear to be associated with advanced
coronary artery or vein graft disease. Elevated C
pneumoniae antibody titers do not seem to be a relevant indicator
for macrolide therapy in patients with coronary artery disease,
considering the observed endovascular presence of C
pneumoniae. The significant association between elevated IgG
antiC pneumoniae titers and the detection of this pathogen
in occluded vein grafts warrants further investigation.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received April 29, 1999; revision received July 30, 1999; accepted August 11, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Libby P, Egan D, Skarlatos S. Roles of infectious
agents in atherosclerosis and restenosis.
Circulation. 1997;96:40954103.
3. Gurfinkel E, Bozovich G, Daroca A. Randomised trial of roxithromycin in non-Q-wave coronary syndromes: ROXIS pilot study. Lancet. 1997;350:404407.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4.
Gupta S, Leatham EW, Carrington D, Mendall MA, Kaski
JC, Camm AJ. Elevated Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies,
cardiovascular events, and Azithromycin in male
survivors of myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1997;96:404407.
5.
Grayston JT. Antibiotic treatment of Chlamydia
pneumoniae for secondary prevention of
cardiovascular events. Circulation. 1998;97:16691670.
6.
Bartels C, Maass M, Bein G, Brill N, Bechtel JFM, Leyh
R, Sievers HH. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae but not
cytomegalovirus in occluded saphenous vein coronary artery
bypass grafts. Circulation. 1999;99:879882.
7.
Maass M, Bartels C, Engel PM, Mamat U, Sievers HH.
Endovascular presence of viable Chlamydia pneumoniae is a
common phenomenon in coronary artery disease. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:827832.
8. Kockx MM, Cambier BA, Bortier HE, Meyer GRD, Declercq SC. Foam cell replication and smooth muscle cell apoptosis in human saphenous vein grafts. Histopathology. 1994;25:365371.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
9.
Maass M, Dalhoff K. Comparison of sample preparation
methods for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in
bronchoalveolar lavage fluid by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 1994;32:26162619.
10. Bitsch A, Kirchner H, Dupke R, Bein G. Failure to detect human cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral blood leukocytes of healthy blood donors by the polymerase chain reaction. Transfusion. 1992;32:612617.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
11.
Holland PM, Abramson RD, Watson R, Gelfand DH.
Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by
utilizing the 5'- 3'-endonuclease activity of Thermus
aquaticus DNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:72767280.
12.
Heid CA, Stevens J, Livak KJ, Watson R. Real time
quantitative PCR. Genome Res. 1996;6:986994.
13.
Lee LG, Connell CR, Bloch W. Allelic discrimination by
nick-translation PCR with fluorogenic probes. Nucleic Acids
Res. 1993;21:37613766.
14. Weiss SM, Roblin PM, Gaydos CA, Cummings P, Patton DL. Failure to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae in coronary atheromas of patients undergoing atherectomy. J Infect Dis. 1996;173:957962.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15.
Kuo C-C, Grayston JT, Campbell LA, Goo YA, Wissler RW,
Benditt EP. Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR) in coronary
arteries of young adults (1534 years old). Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1995;92:69116914.
16. Jackson LA, Campbell LA, Schmidt RA, Kuo CC, Cappuccio AL, Lee M, Grayston JT. Specificity of detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae in cardiovascular atheroma: evaluation of the innocent bystander hypothesis. Am J Pathol. 1997;150:17851790.[Abstract]
17. Campbell LA, OBrien ER, Cappucino AL, Kuo C-C, Wang S-P, Stewart D, Patton DL, Cummings PK, Grayston JT. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae TWAR in human coronary atherectomy tissues. J Infect Dis. 1995;172:585588.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Muhlestein JB, Hammond E, Carlquist JF, Radicke E, Thomson MJ, Karagounis LA, Woods ML, Anderson JL. Increased incidence of chlamydia species within the coronary arteries of patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic versus other forms of cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Card. 1996;27:15551561.[Abstract]
19.
Wissler RW. Significance of Chlamydia
pneumoniae (TWAR) in atherosclerotic lesions.
Circulation. 1995;92:3376.
20.
Puolakkainen M, Kuo C-C, Shor A, Wang S-P, Grayston JT,
Campbell LA. Serological response to Chlamydia pneumoniae in
adults with coronary arterial fatty streaks and
fibrolipid plaques. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:22152217.
21. Blasi F, Denti F, Erba M, Cosentini R, Raccanelli R. Detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae but not Helicobacter pylori in atherosclerotic plaques of aortic aneurysms. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:27662769.[Abstract]
22.
Davidson M, Kuo C-C, Middaugh JP, Campbell LA, Wang
S-P, Newman WP, Finley JC, Grayston JT. Confirmed previous infection
with Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR) and its presence in early
coronary atherosclerosis.
Circulation. 1998;98:628633.
23.
Tiran A, Tio RA, Ossewaarde JM, Tiran B, Den Heijer P,
The TH, Wilders-Truschnig MM. Coronary angioplasty induces rise
in Chlamydia pneumoniae-specific antibodies. J
Clin Microbiol. 1999;37:10131017.
24.
Mendall MA, Patel P, Ballam L, Strachan D, Northfield
TC. C-reactive protein and its relation to
cardiovascular risk factors: a population based cross
sectional study. BMJ. 1996;312:10611065.
25. Yamashiroya HM, Ghosh L, Yang R, Robertson AL. Herpesviridae in the coronary arteries and aorta of young trauma victims. Am J Pathol. 1988;130:7179.[Abstract]
26. Melnick JL, Hu C, Burek J, Adam E, DeBakey ME. Cytomegalovirus DNA in arterial walls of patients with atherosclerosis. J Med Virol. 1994;42:170174.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
27. Hendrix MGR, Salimans MMM, van Bowen CPA, Bruggemannn CA. High Prevalence of latently present cytomegalovirus in arterial walls of patients suffering from grade III atherosclerosis. Am J Pathol. 1990;136:2328.[Abstract]
28. Hendrix MGR, Dormans PHJ, Kitslaar P, Bosman F, Bruggemannn CA. The presence of cytomegalovirus nucleic acids in arterial wall of atherosclerotic and nonatherosclerotic patients. Am J Pathol. 1989;134:11511157.[Abstract]
29.
Benditt EP, Barrett T, McDougall JK. Viruses in the
etiology of atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci
U S A. 1983;80:63866389.
30.
Kol A, Sperti G, Shani J, Schulhoff N, van de Greef W,
Landini MP, La Placa M, Maseri A, Crea F. Cytomegalovirus replication
is not a cause of instability in unstable angina.
Circulation. 1995;91:19101913.
31.
Manegold C, Alwazzeh M, Jablonski H, Adams O, Medve M,
Seidlitz B, Heidland U, Häussinger D, Strauer B-E, Heintzen MP.
Prior cytomegalovirus infection and the risk of restenosis
after percutaneous transluminal coronary
balloon angioplasty. Circulation. 1999;99:12901294.
32. Porter-Jordan K, Rosenberg EI, Keiser JF, Gross LD. Nested polymerase chain reaction assay for the detection of cytomegalovirus overcomes false positives caused by contamination with fragmented DNA. J Med Virol. 1990;30:8591.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Bunk, I. Susnea, J. Rupp, J. T. Summersgill, M. Maass, W. Stegmann, A. Schrattenholz, A. Wendel, M. Przybylski, and C. Hermann Immunoproteomic Identification and Serological Responses to Novel Chlamydia pneumoniae Antigens That Are Associated with Persistent C. pneumoniae Infections J. Immunol., April 15, 2008; 180(8): 5490 - 5498. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Xiao, K. Mandal, G. Schett, M. Mayr, G. Wick, F. Oberhollenzer, J. Willeit, S. Kiechl, and Q. Xu Association of Serum-Soluble Heat Shock Protein 60 With Carotid Atherosclerosis: Clinical Significance Determined in a Follow-Up Study Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2571 - 2576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mitusch, J. Luedemann, W. G. Wood, K. Berger, U. Schminke, M. Suter, C. Kessler, U. John, J. Rupp, M. Kentsch, et al. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Is Associated With Circulating Chlamydia pneumoniae DNA in Younger Normotensive Subjects in a General Population Survey Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., February 1, 2005; 25(2): 386 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Ieven and V. Y. Hoymans Involvement of Chlamydia pneumoniae in Atherosclerosis: More Evidence for Lack of Evidence J. Clin. Microbiol., January 1, 2005; 43(1): 19 - 24. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Maraha, H. Berg, M. Kerver, S. Kranendonk, J. Hamming, J. Kluytmans, M. Peeters, and A. van der Zee Is the Perceived Association between Chlamydia pneumoniae and Vascular Diseases Biased by Methodology? J. Clin. Microbiol., September 1, 2004; 42(9): 3937 - 3941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ludewig, P. Krebs, and E. Scandella Immunopathogenesis of atherosclerosis J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2004; 76(2): 300 - 306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Jabs, E. Theissing, M. Nitschke, J.F. M. Bechtel, M. Duchrow, S. Mohamed, B. Jahrbeck, H.-H. Sievers, J. Steinhoff, and C. Bartels Local Generation of C-Reactive Protein in Diseased Coronary Artery Venous Bypass Grafts and Normal Vascular Tissue Circulation, September 23, 2003; 108(12): 1428 - 1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Porqueddu, R. Spirito, A. Parolari, M. Zanobini, G. Pompilio, G. Polvani, F. Alamanni, D. Stangalini, E. Tremoli, and P. Biglioli Lack of Association Between Serum Immunoreactivity and Chlamydia pneumoniae Detection in the Human Aortic Wall Circulation, November 19, 2002; 106(21): 2647 - 2648. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Boman and M. R. Hammerschlag Chlamydia pneumoniae and Atherosclerosis: Critical Assessment of Diagnostic Methods and Relevance to Treatment Studies Clin. Microbiol. Rev., January 1, 2002; 15(1): 1 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |