| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2000;101:2284.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the University of Tennessee College of Medicine, Memphis.
Correspondence to Bruce S. Alpert, MD, Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee at Memphis, 777 Washington Ave, Suite 215, Memphis, TN 38105. E-mail rkelsey{at}utmem.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe evaluated BP, heart rate, and impedance
cardiographic measures of preejection period (PEP) and total
peripheral resistance (TPR) in healthy black (n=76) and
white (n=60) adolescents (mean age, 14.8 years) during passive exposure
to a vasoconstrictive cold chamber (8°C to 10°C)
and a vasodilatory heat chamber (40°C to 42°C). Results indicated
greater decreases in PEP and increases in TPR in blacks than whites
during cold exposure (P<0.05) but no group differences
during heat exposure. Covariance analyses indicated
that the racial differences during cold exposure probably reflected
greater ß-adrenergic cardiac reactivity and
-adrenergic
vasoconstrictive reactivity in blacks than whites.
ConclusionsBlacks and whites exhibited comparable myocardial and vasodilatory responses to heat stress, but blacks exhibited heightened myocardial and vasoconstrictive reactivity to cold stress. These results suggest that the locus of racial differences in vascular reactivity involves vasoconstrictive rather than vasodilatory function. The pattern of racial differences during cold stress raises the possibility that both myocardial and vasoconstrictive mechanisms may contribute to the increased risk of hypertension in blacks.
Key Words: : stress vasoconstriction vasodilation cardiac output hemodynamics
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 times greater than that for white
Americans.1 2 Although the reasons for this increased risk
among blacks are largely unknown, cardiovascular
reactivity to stress has been identified as a possible mechanism,
because numerous studies of adults and children have demonstrated
racial differences in hemodynamic responses to a
variety of stressors.3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
One physical stressor frequently used in hypertension research is some
variation of the cold pressor task, a potent stimulus for
-adrenergic vasoconstriction, which typically involves immersion of
a limb in ice water or placement of a bag of ice water on the
forehead.11 12 13 14 15 A number of studies have shown that the
magnitude of cardiovascular responses during cold
pressor is related to future resting blood pressure (BP) and the
development of hypertension.16 17 18 Furthermore, studies of
both adults and children indicate that increases in total
peripheral resistance (TPR) during various limb and
forehead cold pressor tasks are greater in blacks than in whites,
suggesting a possible racial difference in vascular reactivity to cold
stress.5 6 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 To the best of our knowledge, there has
been no investigation of racial differences in
cardiovascular reactivity to whole-body cold exposure
(CE).
Racial differences in TPR reactivity are not restricted to cold pressor tasks. Studies of both adults and children have reported greater TPR increases, or smaller TPR decreases, in blacks than in whites during various stressors that typically elicit overall peripheral vasodilation, including dynamic exercise, video game challenge, public speaking, and competitive reaction time tasks.3 4 5 6 20 21 22 23 Consequently, it is not clear whether racial differences in vascular reactivity involve overzealous vasoconstriction, underzealous vasodilation, or both. Therefore, the present study investigated possible racial differences in cardiac and vascular reactivity during whole-body exposure to a vasoconstrictive cold environment and a vasodilatory hot environment, which elicit opposite changes in sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone.12 26
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cardiovascular Measures
Systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP)
were measured during each rest and task period with a SunTech automated
blood pressure monitor (model 4240, SunTech Medical Instruments, Inc)
with a cuff appropriate to the subjects arm size. Mean
arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as
(1/3xSBP)+(2/3xDBP). Preejection period (PEP), heart rate (HR), and
cardiac output (CO) were measured with a Minnesota impedance
cardiograph (model 304B, Instrumentation for Medicine, Inc) and a
tetrapolar band-electrode system in accordance with established
guidelines.27 Impedance cardiographic data were acquired,
processed, and scored with commercial software (COP 4.0, Bio-Impedance
Technology, Inc). TPR was derived from concurrent measures of CO and BP
by TPR=(MAP/CO)x80.
Thermal Stressors
A walk-in thermal chamber in a laboratory of the Adult Clinical
Research Center (A-CRC) served as the CE stimulus. A refrigerated
ventilation system maintained the cold chamber at a constant
temperature of 8°C to 10°C (85% to 95% humidity). The duration of
CE was 10 minutes. A second ventilated walk-in thermal chamber directly
opposite the cold chamber in the A-CRC laboratory served as the heat
exposure (HE) stimulus. An electric forced-air heater installed in the
ceiling, facing away from the subject, maintained the hot chamber at a
constant temperature of 40°C to 42°C (35% to 45% humidity). The
duration of HE was 20 minutes. The temperatures and exposure durations
in the cold and hot chambers were based on previous studies of healthy
children and children with chronic diseases during rest and strenuous
exercise in ambient temperatures between 5°C and
42°C.28 29 While in the chambers, subjects were
continuously observed through large observation windows.
Procedure
Informed consent and assent were obtained in the
cardiovascular laboratory of the Pediatric Clinical
Research Center (P-CRC). Subjects changed into a hospital gown after
removing their shoes, shirt, and other upper outer garments. They were
not required to remove lower garments. Height and weight were then
measured, and electrodes for
electrocardiography and impedance cardiography
were applied. After performing several laboratory tasks in the P-CRC,
subjects were taken by wheelchair to the laboratory of the A-CRC that
housed the thermal chambers. The order of presentation of
CE and HE was counterbalanced, with proportionate random assignment of
black and white male and female subjects to each order. The following
description is for CE followed by HE.
Subjects were connected to the automated BP monitor, an ECG, and the impedance cardiograph at the A-CRC and were seated in a euthermic laboratory area (22°C ambient temperature) where they rested quietly for a 20-minute baseline period. Minute-by-minute baseline values for all cardiovascular measures were recorded during the last 3 minutes of this period. Subjects were then seated in the cold chamber and instructed to rest quietly but remain awake during the 10-minute CE period. Cardiovascular measures were recorded during minutes 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, and 10 of CE. After CE, subjects returned to the euthermic laboratory area for another 20-minute baseline period. Cardiovascular baseline measures were again recorded during the last 3 minutes of this period. After the second baseline period, subjects were seated in the hot chamber and instructed to rest quietly but remain awake during the 20-minute HE period. Cardiovascular measures were recorded during minutes 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19, and 20 of HE. After HE, subjects returned to the euthermic laboratory area, where the electrodes were removed and any remaining questions by the subject and/or parent were answered. Once the subjects stated that they were again comfortable, they were escorted back to the P-CRC to complete the remainder of the study protocol.
Data Reduction and Analysis
Baseline means were computed for each
cardiovascular measure by averaging data from the last
3 minutes of each euthermic baseline period. For CE, 3 mean scores were
computed for each cardiovascular measure by averaging
values from contiguous pairs of minutes (minutes 1 and 2, minutes 5 and
6, etc). Similarly, 5 mean scores were computed for each
cardiovascular measure during HE.
Cardiovascular reactivity was evaluated by subtracting
the means for the appropriate pretask baseline period from the means
for each time block during CE and HE.
Preliminary analyses indicated that the order of
presentation of CE and HE had a negligible impact on
cardiovascular reactivity, so all analyses were
collapsed over order. The cardiovascular data were
analyzed in a series of multivariate
repeated-measures trend analyses.30 31 32 The first
set of analyses addressed baseline
cardiovascular activity in a
2(race)x2(sex)x2(baseline period) design. The second set addressed
cardiovascular reactivity during CE in a
2(race)x2(sex)x3(time block) design, and the third set addressed
cardiovascular reactivity during HE in a
2(race)x2(sex)x5(time block) design. We conducted separate
analyses for CE and HE because of the different number of time
blocks for the 2 tasks and because we were interested primarily in
racial differences in the patterns of cardiovascular
reactivity elicited by vasoconstrictive and
vasodilatory stimuli, rather than racial differences in the CE-HE
response differential implied by a race-by-task
interaction.31 For all analyses, the
cardiovascular measures were divided into 2 subsets for
separate analysis to control type I error while maximizing
statistical power and minimizing potential
multicollinearity.32 33 Two BP measures (SBP and DBP) made
up 1 subset, whereas 3 cardiovascular measures that are
under direct autonomic control (HR, PEP, and TPR) made up the second
subset. This latter subset provides information on possible
parasympathetic, ß-adrenergic, and
-adrenergic contributions to
group differences in cardiovascular
reactivity.30 As in previous research,8 9 all
analyses included age and body mass index (BMI) as covariates.
A value of P<0.05 (2-tailed) was considered
significant.
Significant multivariate effects in the CE and HE
analyses were followed by univariate F tests and
F-to-remove tests. The former tests permit comparisons with previous
research on cardiovascular reactivity to stress. The
latter tests, which are more appropriate in a
multivariate context,33 use ANCOVA
techniques to determine the unique contribution of each
cardiovascular measure to a
multivariate effect after controlling for the other
measures in the subset.32 33 For example, controlling for
HR and TPR in an F-to-remove test on PEP reactivity should control
statistically for preload and afterload effects on left
ventricular performance, leaving primarily residual
ß-adrenergic sympathetic effects.13 27 30 Conversely,
controlling for PEP and HR in an F-to-remove test on TPR reactivity
should control statistically for ß-adrenergic and indirect
parasympathetic effects on the vasculature, leaving primarily residual
-adrenergic vasoconstrictive effects.30
Finally, controlling for PEP and TPR in an F-to-remove test on HR
reactivity should control statistically for most sympathetic effects on
the heart, leaving primarily residual parasympathetic
effects.30
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Stress
Overall Reactivity
Table 2
presents the adjusted
means for overall cardiovascular reactivity during CE
and HE for each group, along with the adjusted pooled SD for each
cardiovascular measure. Both thermal stimuli elicited
significant decreases in PEP (both P<0.0005), but they had
opposite effects on SBP, DBP, and TPR, with CE eliciting increases and
HE eliciting decreases in each case (all P<0.0005). Thus,
as expected, CE elicited a vasoconstrictive response,
whereas HE elicited a vasodilatory response. Although HR decelerated
significantly during CE (P<0.0005), it did not deviate from
baseline during HE (P=NS). There were no significant group
differences in overall BP reactivity during either stressor.
|
There were significant racial differences in overall
cardiovascular reactivity during CE
(multivariate P<0.006).
Univariate tests indicated that PEP shortened significantly
more in blacks than in whites (P<0.005) and that blacks
showed marginally less HR deceleration and marginally greater TPR
elevation compared with whites (both P<0.09). Subsequent
F-to-remove tests revealed that the racial difference in PEP reactivity
remained significant after controlling for HR and TPR [F(1, 128)=6.79,
P<0.01] and that the racial difference in TPR reactivity
became stronger after controlling for HR and PEP [F(1, 128)=3.96,
P<0.05]. The racial difference in HR deceleration
disappeared after controlling for PEP and TPR [F(1, 128)<1,
P=NS]. As the adjusted means in the Figure
indicate, the overall reduction in PEP and elevation in TPR during CE
were significantly greater in blacks than in whites. Although the
multivariate test failed to reveal significant sex
differences in overall cardiovascular reactivity during
CE, there was a univariate effect for PEP reactivity
(P<0.05), which remained significant after controlling for
HR and TPR in the F-to-remove test (P<0.03). The shortening
of PEP during CE was greater in male (adjusted M=-6 ms)
than in female subjects (adjusted M=-3 ms).
|
In contrast, there were no significant racial differences in overall cardiovascular reactivity during HE, but there were significant sex differences (multivariate P<0.005). Univariate tests indicated that the reductions in PEP and TPR during HE were significantly greater in male than in female subjects (both P<0.05). F-to-remove tests revealed that the effect for PEP remained significant after controlling for HR and TPR (male adjusted M=-6 ms; female adjusted M=-2 ms; P<0.005), whereas the effect for TPR became marginal after controlling for PEP and HR (P<0.06). Thus, PEP reactivity was greater in male than in female subjects during both thermal stressors.
Polynomial Trends Over Time
There were significant multivariate linear trends
in BP reactivity over time during CE (P<0.005) and HE
(P<0.02), which were attributable in both cases to
progressive declines in DBP over time (both P<0.01).
Likewise, there were significant multivariate linear
trends in cardiovascular reactivity over time during CE
and HE (both multivariate P<0.0005). During
CE, there was a progressive linear increase in TPR but a linear
attenuation of PEP shortening and HR deceleration over time (all
P<0.0005). All 3 of these linear trends remained
significant in F-to-remove tests (all P<0.02). During HE,
HR increased over time (P<0.0005), whereas PEP and TPR
reactivity were stable (both P=NS). None of the
higher-order, nonlinear trends were significant for either stressor.
There were no significant group differences in any of the trends over
time.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
4°C), so it was unclear whether the
cardiovascular effects of such tasks would generalize
to whole-body CE. The results of this study, therefore, not only
demonstrate further racial differences in vascular reactivity to cold
stimuli but also help bridge the gap between traditional laboratory
cold pressor tasks and naturalistic environmental phenomena. The effects of whole-body CE on TPR and BP were similar to those for various limb and forehead cold pressor tasks, all of which evoke peripheral vasoconstriction.14 15 However, limb and forehead cold pressor tasks tend to evoke divergent cardiac responses. Hand and foot cold pressor tasks typically elicit HR acceleration and some increase in myocardial performance (eg, PEP shortening),11 12 13 14 15 whereas forehead cold pressor tasks tend to elicit HR deceleration, characteristic of the "dive reflex," with little change in myocardial performance.11 12 14 The cardiac effects of whole-body CE involved HR deceleration and PEP shortening, suggesting an amalgam of the cardiac effects of limb and forehead cold stimuli. Thus, the cardiovascular response pattern elicited by whole-body cooling may be a synthesis of the patterns evoked by the limited regional cooling of limb and forehead cold pressor tasks.
Our whole-body CE protocol allowed the duration of CE to be extended safely and ethically beyond what is acceptable with typical cold pressor tasks. This permitted a more thorough evaluation of the time course of cardiovascular reactivity during cold stress. Although TPR reactivity increased over time during CE, cardiac reactivity declined in a manner similar to the typical decline in cardiac reactivity during repeated psychological stress.30 34 Thus, the cardiac response during CE might have reflected the psychological stress of CE. In contrast, the myocardial and vasodilatory effects of HE were relatively stable over time.
The racial difference in overall PEP reactivity during CE remained
significant after controlling for HR and TPR in the F-to-remove test,
suggesting that ß-adrenergic effects, rather than preload or
afterload, were responsible for the heightened PEP reactivity in
Blacks. The marginal racial difference in overall HR reactivity during
CE disappeared after controlling for PEP and TPR in the F-to-remove
test, suggesting that sympathetic rather than parasympathetic effects
were primarily responsible for the diminished HR deceleration in
blacks. In contrast, the racial difference in overall TPR reactivity
during CE became stronger after controlling for PEP and HR in the
F-to-remove test, suggesting that ß-adrenergic vasodilation partially
masked
-adrenergic vasoconstriction in blacks. Taken together, these
results suggest that blacks exhibited both heightened ß-adrenergic
myocardial and
-adrenergic vasoconstrictive
reactivity to cold stress. This pattern is strikingly similar to the
results of a ß-adrenergic blockade study of undergraduate
men,3 which indicated that both ß-adrenergic myocardial
and
-adrenergic vasoconstrictive influences were
greater in blacks than in whites.
In contrast to CE, blacks and whites exhibited comparable myocardial
and vasodilatory responses to HE. Thus, our data indicate that the
locus of racial differences in vascular reactivity involves
vasoconstrictive rather than vasodilatory function.
Moreover, inasmuch as cold stress induces peripheral
vasoconstriction through an increase in sympathetic stimulation of
-adrenergic receptors12 26 and heat stress induces
peripheral vasodilation through a withdrawal of such
sympathetic stimulation,26 our findings imply a racial
difference in
-adrenergic receptor function rather than a difference
in sympathetic efferent discharge. Alternatively, these results may
reflect racial differences in nonadrenergic
vasoconstrictive mechanisms, involving substances such
as angiotensin II or endothelin-1.35 36
In addition to racial differences in cardiovascular
reactivity, we found sex differences in PEP and TPR reactivity. PEP
decreases during CE and HE were greater in male than in female
subjects, suggesting a general augmentation of ß-adrenergic
myocardial reactivity in male subjects. These results are
consistent with previous research indicating greater SBP and
epinephrine reactivity in male than in female
subjects.37 38 The decrease in TPR during HE was also
greater in male than in female subjects, suggesting either enhanced
ß-adrenergic vasodilation or enhanced withdrawal of
-adrenergic
vasoconstriction in male subjects. Consistent with evidence of
diminished vascular adrenergic receptor function in female
subjects,39 F-to-remove tests indicated that both
mechanisms probably contributed to the sex difference in TPR
reactivity.
There are important racial differences in morbidity and mortality from
essential hypertension, with a disproportionate incidence in black
Americans.1 2 Determining the causes of hypertension is
crucial to the design and implementation of improved primary prevention
and intervention strategies. The discovery of reliable early markers
for later-onset hypertension may clarify the mechanisms by which the
hemodynamics of established hypertension, normal
cardiac output with elevated TPR, develop between childhood and
adulthood. Classic physiological models have
postulated that a hyperdynamic myocardial phase precedes the
hypertensive state. The pattern of race and sex differences in PEP
reactivity that we observed during CE is consistent with such
models, because it indicates that the greatest PEP reactivity occurred
in black male subjects, who are at greatest risk for early development
of hypertension. On the other hand, the racial difference in TPR
reactivity that we observed during CE is consistent with
findings from other researchers20 21 22 23 24 who discovered
racial differences in TPR responses to various stressors in healthy
children and adolescents with a family history of
cardiovascular disease, as well as with a recent review
of adult studies19 that concluded that blacks tend to show
excessive BP responses to stressors that elicit predominantly
-adrenergic vascular responses. Thus, the racial differences in
cardiovascular reactivity that we observed during
whole-body CE raise the possibility that both myocardial and
vasoconstrictive mechanisms may contribute to the
increased risk of hypertension in blacks.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received August 19, 1999; revision received November 19, 1999; accepted December 13, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-adrenergic responsiveness in idiopathic Raynauds
disease. Arthritis Rheum. 1989;32:6165.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Catalano, T. Bruckner, and K. R. Smith Ambient temperature predicts sex ratios and male longevity PNAS, February 12, 2008; 105(6): 2244 - 2247. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kalra, C. Rambaran, E. Iveson, P. J. Chowienczyk, I. Hambleton, J. M. Ritter, A. Shah, R. Wilks, and T. Forrester The Role of Inheritance and Environment in Predisposition to Vascular Disease in People of African Descent J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 21, 2006; 47(6): 1126 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Kalra, C. Rambaran, P. Chowienczyk, D. Goss, I. Hambleton, J. Ritter, A. Shah, R. Wilks, and T. Forrester Ethnic Differences in Arterial Responses and Inflammatory Markers in Afro-Caribbean and Caucasian Subjects Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., November 1, 2005; 25(11): 2362 - 2367. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. D'Angelo, J. S. Pollock, and D. M. Pollock Endogenous endothelin attenuates the pressor response to acute environmental stress via the ETA receptor Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2005; 288(4): H1829 - H1835. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Cui, T. E. Wilson, and C. G. Crandall Phenylephrine-induced elevations in arterial blood pressure are attenuated in heat-stressed humans Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2002; 283(5): R1221 - R1226. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Kelsey, S. M. Patterson, M. Barnard, and B. S. Alpert Consistency of Hemodynamic Responses to Cold Stress in Adolescents Hypertension, December 1, 2000; 36(6): 1013 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |