Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:1586-1593

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strawn, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrario, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strawn, W. B.
Right arrow Articles by Ferrario, C. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrow Lipid and lipoprotein metabolism
Right arrow Mechanism of atherosclerosis/growth factors
Right arrow Other Vascular biology
Right arrow ACE/Angiotension receptors
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Pathophysiology

(Circulation. 2000;101:1586.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Inhibition of Early Atherogenesis by Losartan in Monkeys With Diet-Induced Hypercholesterolemia

William B. Strawn, DVM, PhD; Mark C. Chappell, PhD; Richard H. Dean, MD; Salah Kivlighn, PhD; Carlos M. Ferrario, MD

From Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (W.B.S., M.C.C., R.H.D., C.M.F.), and Merck & Co, West Point, Pa (S.K.).

Correspondence to William B. Strawn, DVM, PhD, Hypertension and Vascular Disease Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157. E-mail bstrawn{at}wfubmc.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—Angiotensin II may contribute to atherogenesis by facilitating the proliferative and inflammatory response to hypercholesterolemia. This study determined, in a primate model of diet-induced atherosclerosis, the effect of AT1 blockade on fatty-streak formation, plasma lipids, and surrogate markers of vascular injury.

Methods and Results—Male cynomolgus monkeys fed a diet containing 0.067 mg cholesterol/kJ for 20 weeks were given losartan (180 mg/d, n=6) or vehicle (n=8) for 6 weeks starting at week 12 of the dietary regimen. Arterial pressure, heart rate, plasma total and lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, and lipoprotein particle sizes and subclass distributions were unaffected by treatment. Losartan caused significant (P<0.05) increases in plasma angiotensin II and angiotensin-(1–7). Compared with vehicle-treated controls, losartan reduced the extent of fatty streak in the aorta, the coronary arteries, and the carotid arteries by {approx}50% (P<0.05). A significant (P<0.05) reduction in the susceptibility of LDL to in vitro oxidation, serum levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, and circulating monocyte CD11b expression were also associated with losartan treatment. In addition, serum levels of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 and E-selectin did not change during treatment but increased after discontinuation of losartan. Serum C-reactive protein, platelet aggregability, and white cell counts were not modified by losartan.

Conclusions—This study demonstrates for the first time an antiatherogenic effect of AT1 receptor blockade in nonhuman primates. Losartan inhibited fatty-streak formation through mechanisms that may include protection of LDL from oxidation and suppression of vascular monocyte activation and recruitment factors.


Key Words: atherosclerosis • angiotensin • cell adhesion molecules • hypercholesterolemia • lipoproteins


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The evolution of atherosclerosis may be influenced by actions of angiotensin II (Ang II) on endothelial function,1 2 monocyte activation and binding,3 vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration,4 and oxidation of LDL.5 Detection of ACE and Ang II in human atheroma suggests a role for angiotensin peptides in atherogenesis.6 Arterial deposition of oxidized LDL is stimulated by Ang II, and compared with native LDL, Ang II–modified LDL interacts with macrophage scavenger receptors at an enhanced rate.7 Furthermore, Ang II activates circulating monocytes, adhesion molecules, and cytokines.3 These findings suggest that Ang II may contribute to the vascular inflammatory response observed in early diet-induced atherosclerosis.

Hypercholesterolemia-induced atherosclerosis in cynomolgus monkeys, which bears marked similarities to the disease in humans,8 is inhibited by the administration of ACE inhibitors.9 To more directly evaluate the role of Ang II in atherogenesis, we investigated whether AT1 receptor blockade retards atherogenesis in this species by measuring the extent of fatty-streak formation, lipoprotein atherogenicity, the activation status of circulating monocytes and platelets, and levels of circulating adhesion molecules.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Animals and Experimental Protocol
Twenty adult male cynomolgus (Macaca fascicularis) monkeys (weight, 4 to 7 kg) were fed an atherogenic diet containing 0.067 mg cholesterol/kJ for 20 weeks. The diet was prepared on site and given to the animals once daily at the same time each day. Water was available ad libitum. Surgical procedures were done under sterile conditions after induction of anesthesia with ketamine hydrochloride (40 mg/kg IM, Fort Dodge Laboratories). All procedures were performed in accordance with the standards of the Department of Health and Human Resources and were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Monkeys were randomized by plasma total cholesterol (TC) concentrations at week 12 of the dietary regimen to receive a 6-week infusion of either losartan or vehicle (50% dimethylsulfoxide/50% distilled H2O, vol/vol) via osmotic minipumps (model 2 ML4, Alza Corp) inserted into the interscapular tissue. Losartan, dissolved in vehicle to a final concentration rate of 1.0 mg/µL, was administered at a rate of 2.5 mg/h. Two weeks after cessation of treatment, monkeys were deeply anesthetized with a mixture of ketamine hydrochloride (40 mg/kg IM) and pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg IV). Whole-body perfusion with lactated Ringer’s solution was initiated via a left ventricular cannula at a pressure of 100 mm Hg. The heart was isolated, and coronary arteries were perfused in situ with 10% phosphate-buffered formalin (pH 7.4) for 1 hour. The epicardial segments of the left anterior descending (LAD), circumflex (LCx), and right (RCA) coronary arteries were removed and immersed in 10% phosphate-buffered formalin. Iliac and carotid arteries were placed in the same fixative for determination of TC concentrations. The aorta (from the aortic arch to the iliac bifurcation) was removed, cut open along the longitudinal axis, pinned flat, and immersed in fixative.

Physiological Studies
Variables were determined at week 12 of the dietary regimen (baseline), again at weeks 3 and 6 of treatment, and at the end of the recovery period. Triplicate measurements of arterial pressure were obtained with an automatic sphygmomanometer in animals lightly anesthetized with ketamine (10 mg/kg IM). Heart rates were calculated from the average number of pulse waves per time.

Laboratory Procedures
Samples of venous blood were drawn and, unless noted below, collected into tubes with or without EDTA (Vacutainer, Becton Dickinson) before the regular morning feeding for measurements of plasma lipids, angiotensin peptides, hematological variables, and serum markers.

Blood Cell Counts
Automated cell counts were determined in a cell counter (series 9000, Serono Baker Diagnostics) with the cell-size discriminator optimized for this species. Leukocyte differential counts were performed by counting 100 white blood cells on a Wright’s-stained blood smear.

Monocyte CD11b Assays
Whole-blood immunophenotyping was performed in 50-µL samples of venous blood diluted in 100 µL of PBS/0.1% BSA by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis using mouse-derived monoclonal antibodies to human CD14 (PE-conjugated, clone My4, Beckman Coulter), CD45 (FITC-conjugated, clone 2B11, Dako), and CD11b (FITC-conjugated, clone ICRF44, Pharmingen) receptors. The monocyte acquisition gate was determined by 2-color analysis of cells expressing high levels of CD14+/CD45+ and by forward- and side-scatter properties previously determined to discriminate monocytes from granulocytes and lymphocytes in this species.10 Expression of CD11b was assessed by single-color analysis of fluorescence intensity of cells within the gate established for monocyte acquisition. Monoclonal antibodies were added at room temperature for 20 minutes. Cells were washed once with 1 mL of PBS. Red blood cells were lysed (Whole Blood Lysing Kit, Beckman Coulter), and after 2 additional washings, they were resuspended in 500 µL of PBS/2% paraformaldehyde and refrigerated until analysis. Cell suspensions were analyzed within 24 hours of labeling on an EPICS (Beckman Coulter) flow cytometer using EXPO cytometer software (Beckman Coulter). For each sample, a minimum of 5000 cells were analyzed within the monocyte acquisition gate. Results are reported as the mean fluorescence intensity of cells expressing CD11b.

Platelet Thrombin Receptor Activation
Platelet-rich plasma prepared as previously described11 was incubated at 37°C for 2 minutes and stirred for 1 minute at 1100 rpm in an aggregometer (PAP 4-C, Biodata). The thrombin receptor agonist SFLRRN-NH2 (5 to 1000 µmol/L) was added at various doses to stimulate platelet aggregation. Results are reported as the concentration of agonist that produced a half-maximal response (C50).

Circulating Markers
ELISA kits were used to determine serum concentrations of soluble monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1 (Cytoscreen Immunoassay Kit, Biosource International), vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, and E-selectin (R&D Systems, Inc). Serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations were determined by turbidimetric immunoassay (ALPCO).

Biochemical Procedures
Plasma Cholesterol and Lipoprotein Profiles
Plasma TC was determined by enzymatic procedures, whereas HDL cholesterol, LDL, VLDL, lipoprotein subclass distributions, and particle sizes were determined by proton NMR spectroscopy.12 A 360-MHz proton NMR spectrum (Siemens Medical Systems; reconfigured by Analogic) of plasma specimens was obtained at 45°C. Deconvolution of the lipid methyl group signal envelope yielded the derived signal amplitudes broadcast for 14 modeled lipoprotein subclasses. Particle size index (mass-weighted-average size of particles within each lipoprotein class) was calculated by weighting each subclass concentration by a numerical size designation, with large values representing larger particle subclasses.

The susceptibility of LDL to in vitro oxidation was assessed by modification of the technique described by Esterbauer et al.13 Auto-oxidation was studied at 37°C in quartz cuvettes containing 3 mL of air-saturated 25 mmol/L phosphate buffer, pH 7.2, and 0.1 mol/L NaCl. The solution was mixed with 10 µg/mL LDL protein containing 3.6 µmol/L Cu+2 (PolyScience). EDTA and salts were removed by 48 hours of dialysis at 4°C against 25 mmol/L PBS containing 10 µmol/L DTPA with continuous nitrogen sparging. Conjugated diene formation was measured at 236 nm with a diode array spectrometer (model 8452, Hewlett Packard). Concentrations were calculated assuming e236 nm=26 000 mol/L per cm. The rates of oxidation and lag times were determined as previously described for LDL.14 Protein was measured with BSA (No. 4503, Sigma-Aldrich) as the standard.15 The lag phase is the interval between the intercept of the tangent of the slope of the absorbance curve during the diene conjugation phase with the time-scale axis, expressed in minutes. The oxidation rate was calculated from the slope of the absorbance curve during the propagation phase, expressed as pmol diene · min-1 · mg LDL protein-1.

Plasma Angiotensin Peptides
Plasma concentrations of Ang II and Ang-(1–7) were determined as described previously.16 Samples of blood were placed in tubes containing EDTA (25 mmol/L final concentration) and a mixture of protease inhibitors (0.44 mmol/L o-phenanthroline, 0.12 mmol/L pepstatin A, 1 mmol/L 4-chloromercuribenzoic acid) to prevent peptide degradation. After centrifugation at 4°C, the plasma was frozen on dry ice and stored at -20°C until analysis.

Plasma Losartan and EXP 3174
Plasma concentrations of losartan and the metabolite EXP 3174 were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) separation/UV detection. The solvent system consisted of 0.1% phosphoric acid (Phos, mobile phase A) and 80% acetonitrile (ACN)/0.1% Phos (mobile phase B). The gradient was 25% B isocratic for 5 minutes, 25% to 50% B linear for 30 minutes, and 50% B isocratic for 10 minutes at a flow rate of 0.35 mL/min at ambient temperature. Analysis was performed on an HPLC (ABI) equipped with a narrow-bore Nova-Pak C18 column (Waters 2.1x150 mm) and an Aquapore C8 guard column (ABI, 3.2x15 mm). Compounds were monitored at a wavelength of 254 nm (ABI 783 Spectroflow detector), identified by comparison of their retention times with those of standards. Peak areas were determined with a PC Chrom 24-bit data acquisition system (H&S Scientific). The sensitivity of the HPLC analysis was {approx}10 pmol of losartan. Losartan eluted at 19.9 minutes and EXP 3174 at 29.8 minutes. Before HPLC analysis, plasma samples were extracted and concentrated on Sep-Pak C18 columns (200 mg, Waters). Plasma (2 mL) was acidified with 0.1 Phos, applied to an activated column (5 mL 80% ACN/0.1% Phos, 5 mL 0.1 Phos), and washed with 0.1% Phos and 20% ACN/0.1% Phos. The compounds were eluted in 5 mL 80% ACN/0.1% Phos, and the eluate was completely evaporated in a Savant vacuum centrifuge.

Fatty-Streak Measurements
Aortas were stained by immersion for 24 hours in Sudan IV (in 38% isopropanol, optical density 0.220). Luminal surfaces were digitally imaged by scanning (ScanJet 6200C, Hewlett Packard), and the percentage of fatty-streak surface area was determined by digitizing color images. The histological characteristics of fatty streaks were confirmed by immunological detection.

Fifteen consecutive segments of the LAD, LCx, and RCA ({approx}5 mm in length) were embedded in paraffin, cut, mounted on glass slides, and stained with Verhoeff–van Gieson stain. Measurements of the intima thickness and media cross-sectional areas were determined with an imaging system (MCID, Imaging Research, Inc). The intima area was determined by digitizing the area between the internal elastic lamina (IEL) and the luminal surface of each coronary artery. Media area size was calculated by use of the area within the external elastic lamina and IEL.

Monoclonal antibodies to monocyte-macrophages (HAM-56, Boehringer Mannheim) and smooth muscle cells ({alpha}-actin, Dako) delineated cell types within vascular cross sections. The immunoperoxidase-avidin-biotin complex system with nickel chloride (NiCl) color modification was used on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections. Five-micrometer sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated with PBS. Sections were preincubated with 3% normal horse serum for 10 minutes. Diluted primary antibodies (HAM56, 1:6000; {alpha}-actin, 1:8000) were applied to the sections and incubated for 30 minutes. Sections were serially incubated with 1:200 dilutions in PBS of biotinylated horse antimouse IgG (Vector Laboratories) for 30 minutes; avidin–biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex (Vector Laboratories) at 1:1 ratio, diluted 1:100 each in PBS for 30 minutes; 0.05% 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich) in 200 mL 0.05 mol/L Tris buffer (pH 7.6) to which 2 mL of 3% hydrogen peroxide and 1.0 mL of 8% NiCl solution were added for 10 minutes. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin, dehydrated in graded series of alcohol concentrations, and covered with coverslips.

The carotid arteries were subjected to Folch extraction and detergent enzymatic digestion for determination of TC (Cholesterol/HP Kit, Boehringer-Mannheim) and free cholesterol (Free Cholesterol C Kit, Wako). Protein was determined as described.15

Statistics
ANOVA was used to determine within-group and between-group differences at baseline, treatment, and recovery. The paired Student’s t test was used where only baseline and treatment values are reported. Square-root transformation of the intimal area in coronary arteries was used to normalize the data before analysis. All tests were 2-tailed, and probability values of <0.05 were considered significant.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Studies were completed in 14 of 20 animals; 8 were randomized to vehicle treatment and 6 to losartan treatment. Experiments were interrupted in 4 animals because of aversion to the diet. Two additional animals were excluded from study because their plasma TC concentrations fell outside the 95% CI at week 12 of the dietary regimen.

Body weights in the vehicle (5.03±0.10 kg) and losartan (5.10±0.15 kg) groups were not different (P>0.05) at baseline and during the treatment and recovery periods (Figure 1Down). Plasma TC concentrations at week 12 of the dietary regimen averaged 8.12±1.03 and 8.04±0.78 mmol/L in animals randomized to vehicle or losartan treatment, respectively (P>0.05).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Body weights and plasma TC concentrations in monkeys randomized to either losartan ({circ}) or vehicle ({blacksquare}) before treatment (0 to 12 weeks), during treatment (weeks 13 to 19), and after interruption of treatment (week 20). Results are mean±SEM. *P<0.05, statistical difference in plasma cholesterol levels between monkeys randomized to either losartan or vehicle at week 12 of dietary regimen.

Hemodynamic and angiotensin peptide data are presented in Figure 2Down. Mean arterial pressures at week 12 of the diet and before randomization to vehicle or losartan treatments were 48±5 and 56±5 mm Hg, respectively (P>0.05). After 6 weeks of treatment, mean arterial pressures were 58±3 and 58±4 mm Hg (P>0.05) in losartan- and vehicle-treated animals, respectively. Although systolic and diastolic pressures were never different between treatment groups, systolic pressure in the losartan group was lower (P<0.05) than baseline values at week 4 of treatment. Cardiac rates were not different between vehicle- and losartan-treated animals throughout the study. Vehicle-treated monkeys had lower heart rates than at baseline at the completion of the treatment period and at week 2 of the recovery period. Plasma Ang II and Ang-(1–7) concentrations were significantly increased in animals given losartan. At weeks 3 and 6 of treatment, plasma levels of losartan averaged 377±67 and 464±82 ng/mL, respectively. EXP 3174, the active metabolite of losartan, was detected in the plasma at week 2 (24±6 ng/mL) but not at week 6 of treatment.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Effects of losartan ({circ}) or vehicle ({blacksquare}) on systolic and diastolic arterial pressure, heart rate, and plasma angiotensin peptide concentrations. Shaded area denotes 6-week period of intervention. Data are mean±SEM. *P<0.05, within-group differences from baseline. #P<0.05, between-group differences at corresponding time periods.

Losartan had no effect on plasma cholesterol concentrations, the size of lipoprotein particles, or their distribution within subclasses (TableDown). Figure 3Down illustrates that the susceptibility of LDL to lipid peroxidation (lag time to diene formation and rate of oxidation) in the presence of CuSO4 was not different at baseline between vehicle- and losartan-treated animals. In contrast, the lag time of the CuSO4-induced LDL oxidation was significantly increased (P<0.05) compared with vehicle-treated monkeys at week 6 of losartan treatment. The rate of oxidation was unaffected by treatment.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Plasma Lipoprotein Profile



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Effect of treatment on lag phase and rate of in vitro LDL oxidation (Ox Rate) at week 6 of initiation of infusion of either vehicle (solid bars) or losartan treatment (open bars). Data are mean±SEM. *P<0.05, within-group differences from baseline. #P<0.05, between-group differences at corresponding time periods.

Effect of Losartan on Atherosclerosis
Figure 4Down shows representative examples of fatty-streak distribution in the aorta of vehicle- and losartan-treated monkeys. In vehicle-treated monkeys (Figure 4Down, a and b), sudanophilic areas encompassed both branching and nonbranching areas of the thoracic aorta, whereas fatty streaks were sparse and more prevalent in branching areas of the abdominal aorta. The extent of sudanophilic areas was markedly less in losartan-treated animals (Figure 4Down, c and d). Figure 5aDown shows that the layer of foam cells in aortic lesions consistently stopped at the internal elastic lamina (IEL) and that fatty streaks were composed primarily of lipid-loaded HAM-56–positive macrophages (Figure 5bDown). The histological features of aortic lesions were comparable between vehicle- and losartan-treated monkeys. In contrast, Figure 6Down illustrates the differential effect of losartan treatment on the histological characteristics of fatty streaks in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Whereas in vehicle-treated animals, intimal foam cell accumulation was associated with IEL disruption (Figure 6aDown) and a predominance of cells immunopositive for {alpha}-actin (Figure 6cDown), a comparable section from a losartan-treated monkey showed a reduction of fatty streak composed of macrophage-derived foam cells and no disruption of the IEL (Figure 6Down, b and d).



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Representative examples in distribution of sudanophilia within aortas of 4 cholesterol-fed monkeys randomized to either vehicle (a and b) or losartan treatment (c and d).



View larger version (75K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Representative histological and immunostained sections of thoracic aorta from a vehicle-treated monkey fed an atherogenic diet. a, Intimal accumulation of hematoxylin-eosin–stained foam cells in aorta. b, HAM-56–positive macrophage foam cell accumulation in hematoxylin-counterstained sections. a, Magnification x100, bar=0.07 mm; b, magnification x400, bar=0.01 mm.



View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Sections of most proximal segment of an LAD from vehicle- (a) and losartan-treated (b) monkeys stained with Verhoeff–van Gieson stain. Fatty streak in vehicle-treated monkeys was characterized by deposition of {alpha}-actin–positive foam cells in both intima and media (c), associated with disruption of IEL. A reduction of foam cell accumulation with preservation of IEL and absence of {alpha}-actin–positive foam cells (d) characterized fatty streak in a losartan-treated monkey. a and b, Magnification x100, bar=0.07 mm; c and d, corresponding sections from boxed regions of a and b, magnification x400, bar=0.01 mm.

Losartan had a pronounced effect on the extent of fatty streak (Figure 7Down). Administration of losartan was associated with significantly (P<0.05) less fatty streak in the arch (48%), thoracic (52%), and abdominal (54%) aorta than in vehicle-treated monkeys. The intimal area was less (P<0.05) in the LAD and left circumflex coronary artery (LCx), whereas media area was smaller (P<0.05) only in the LAD (vehicle, 0.220±0.020 mm2; losartan, 0.170±0.020 mm2). Furthermore, the inhibition of fatty-streak formation by losartan was associated with a comparatively lower (P<0.05) carotid artery content of TC and esterified cholesterol.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Extent of dietary hypercholesterolemia-induced fatty-streak lesions determined by percentage of aorta intimal surface areas stained for lipid by Sudan IV, coronary artery intima areas, and cholesterol contents within carotid arteries from monkeys treated for 6 weeks with either vehicle (solid bars) or losartan (open bars). Aorta areas are divided into Arch, thoracic (Thor), and abdominal (Abdo) sections. FC and CE indicate free and esterified cholesterol contents of carotid arteries, respectively. *P<0.05 vs vehicle.

Effect of Losartan on Immune Status and Circulating Markers
Monocyte cell count was not different between vehicle (2.32±0.57x106/mL) and losartan (3.1±0.43x106/mL) groups at baseline and remained unaltered during treatment and recovery periods. Baseline, treatment, and recovery values for monocyte and platelet activation along with levels of soluble monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, E-selectin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) are shown in Figure 8Down. Surface expression of CD11b by circulating monocytes was unaffected by vehicle but was significantly (P<0.05) reduced in losartan-treated monkeys both at week 6 of treatment and at the end of the recovery period. Platelet aggregability did not differ between vehicle- and losartan-treated animals. Serum MCP-1 was significantly (P<0.05) reduced at week 6 of losartan treatment, with values returning to pretreatment levels during the recovery period. Baseline concentrations of VCAM-1 and E-selectin were higher in the group randomized to losartan than in vehicle-treated monkeys (P<0.05). The difference persisted during the period of infusion. Within each treatment group, however, VCAM-1 and E-selectin concentrations were not different at baseline and week 6 of the infusion period. Conversely, VCAM-1 and E-selectin concentrations showed a significant increase 2 weeks after discontinuation of the infusion in the group of monkeys given losartan. CRP concentrations were not different in vehicle- and losartan-treated animals throughout the study.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Changes in monocyte CD11b expression, platelet aggregation (C50), and levels of circulating serum-soluble inflammatory factors (MCP-1, E-selectin, VCAM-1, CRP) at baseline, during treatment with losartan ({circ}) and vehicle ({blacksquare}), and after discontinuation of treatment. *P<0.05, comparison within groups with baseline value. #P<0.05 vs vehicle at weeks indicated.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
The data presented here represent the first demonstration of Ang II AT1 receptor–mediated fatty-streak formation in a primate model of human atherosclerosis. Plasma concentrations of losartan achieved by the method of continuous subcutaneous infusion used in this study were within the range reported in human subjects given the standard dose of 50 to 100 mg once daily.17 The extent of hypercholesterolemia-induced fatty streak in aorta and coronary arteries of losartan-treated monkeys was significantly less than in vehicle-treated monkeys and was associated with comparatively lower carotid artery content of TC and esterified cholesterol. These findings agree with results in rabbits18 19 and monkeys9 chronically treated with ACE inhibitors. In these studies, however, blood pressure and plasma lipid concentrations were reduced by the treatments. The inverse relationship between losartan and atherogenesis found in the present study suggests that AT1 receptor–mediated fatty-streak formation is unrelated to changes in blood pressure or lipid subclass concentrations and distributions, because these variables were unaffected by the treatment. These findings differ from observations in rabbits, in which only the dose of irbesartan that lowered blood pressure inhibited atherosclerosis.20

Evidence for antiatherogenic mechanisms related to the pronounced fatty-streak inhibition by losartan include a reduced susceptibility of LDL to in vitro CuSO4-induced oxidation, deactivation of circulating monocytes, and suppression of serum soluble MCP-1 levels. Keidar et al21 showed that losartan reduced LDL peroxidation and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E–deficient mice. Although there is no definitive proof that the resistance of LDL to in vitro oxidation reflects the peroxidation potential in vivo, our findings concur with other studies showing that the susceptibility of LDL for oxidation is related to the severity of atherosclerosis.21 Because CD11b expression is elevated by hypercholesterolemia,22 it reflects not only monocyte activation but also the propensity for adhesion to endothelium. The deactivation of monocytes by losartan may thus inhibit one of the cardinal events in atherogenesis. We showed previously that losartan inhibited the activation and adhesion of monocytes to the vascular endothelium of [mRen-2]27 transgenic hypertensive rats by a mechanism that is independent of blood pressure.23 Although the soluble adhesion molecules measured in this study are not yet completely defined as surrogate markers of atherogenesis, the significant reduction in MCP-1 levels and its rebound along with VCAM-1 and E-selectin after discontinuation of treatment in losartan-treated monkeys suggests that the antagonist had an inhibitory effect on monocyte recruitment factors. The antiatherogenic effect of losartan was not due to blockade of an acute inflammatory response. Our studies showed that losartan had no effect on serum CRP, platelet aggregability, and white cell counts. These findings suggest that losartan selectively inhibited atherogenesis, in part through protection of LDL from oxidation and suppression of AT1-mediated monocyte activation and recruitment. The increase in plasma Ang II and Ang-(1–7) may also contribute to the antiatherogenic actions of losartan, especially when injury-induced vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation is involved, because AT2 receptor stimulation and Ang-(1–7) administration mediate antiproliferative responses.24

In summary, losartan inhibited the development of fatty streak and reduced media area of coronary arteries by a mechanism that was independent of arterial pressure and plasma lipids. The reduction in the extent of fatty streak was accompanied by decreases in the carotid artery content of TC and esterified cholesterol, measures of LDL peroxidation, and monocyte activation. We conclude that the novel effects of losartan on early atherogenesis may extend the therapeutic profile of Ang II antagonists in the prevention of human vascular disease, an interpretation that agrees with the observation that atherogenesis is associated with upregulation of AT1 receptors.25


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported by grants PO1-HL-51952 and HL-56973 from the NHLBI and a Medical School Grant from Merck & Co. We thank Dr Ron Smith of Merck Inc for his efforts in procuring losartan potassium and Sam Rankin of the Section of Comparative Medicine for technical assistance.

Received July 19, 1999; revision received October 12, 1999; accepted October 21, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 

  1. Ferrario CM, Deitch JS, Dean RH, Strawn WB. Hypertension and atherosclerosis: a mechanistic understanding of disease progression. Cardiovasc Risk Factors. 1996;6:299–310.
  2. Clozel M, Kuhn H, Hefti F, Baumgartner HR. Endothelial dysfunction and subendothelial monocyte macrophages in hypertension. Hypertension. 1991;18:132–141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kim JA, Berliner JA, Nadler JL. Angiotensin II increases monocyte binding to endothelial cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;226:862–868.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Kubo A, Fukuda N, Soma M, Izumi Y, Kanmatsuse K. Inhibitory effect of an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist on growth of vascular smooth muscle cells from spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1996;27:58–63.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Yanagitani Y, Rakugi A, Okamura A, Moriguchi K, Takiuchi S, Ohishi M, Suzuki M, Suzuki K, Higaki J, Ogihara T. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor–mediated peroxide production in human macrophages. Hypertension. 1999;33(pt II):II-335–II-339.
  6. Potter DD, Sobey CG, Thompkins PK, Rossen JD, Heistad DD. Evidence that macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions contain angiotensin II. Circulation. 1998;98:800–807.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Keidar S, Kaplan M, Aviram M. Angiotensin II–modified LDL is taken up by macrophages via the scavenger receptor, leading to cellular cholesterol accumulation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1996;16:97–105.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Masuda J, Ross R. Atherogenesis during low-level hypercholesterolemia in the nonhuman primate, I: fatty streak formation. Arteriosclerosis. 1990;10:164–177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Song K, Shiota N, Takai S, Takashima H, Iwasaki H, Kim S, Miyazaki M. Induction of angiotensin converting enzyme and angiotensin II receptors in the atherosclerotic aorta of high-cholesterol fed Cynomolgus monkeys. Atherosclerosis. 1998;138:171–182.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Otani I, Akari H, Nam K-H, Mori K, Suzuki E, Shibata H, Doi K, Terao K, Yosikawa Y. Phenotypic changes in peripheral blood monocytes of cynomolgus monkeys acutely infected with simian immunodeficiency virus. AIDS Res Hum Retrovir. 1998;14:1181–1186.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Hale LP, Craver KT, Berrier AM, Sheffield MV, Case LD, Owen J. Combination of fosinopril and pravastatin decreases platelet response to thrombin receptor agonist in monkeys. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1643–1646.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Freedman DS, Otvos JD, Jeyarajah EJ, Barboriak JJ, Anderson AJ, Walker JA. Relation of lipoprotein subclasses as measured by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy to coronary artery disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1046–1053.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Esterbauer H, Striegl G, Puhl H, Rotheneder M. Continuous monitoring of in vitro oxidation of human low density lipoprotein. Free Radic Res Commun. 1989;6:67–75.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Thomas MJ, Rudel LL. Dietary fatty acids, low density lipoprotein composition and oxidation and primate atherosclerosis. J Nutr. 1996;126:1058S–1062S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Lowry OH, Rosenbrough MJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1999;259:4177–4182.
  16. Kohara K, Brosnihan KB, Ferrario CM. Angiotensin-(1–7) in the spontaneously hypertensive rat. Peptides. 1993;14:883–891.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Ohtawa M, Takayama F, Saitoh K, Yoshinaga T, Nakashima M. Pharmacokinetics and biochemical efficacy after single and multiple oral administration of losartan, an orally active nonpeptide angiotensin II receptor antagonist, in humans. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;35:290–297.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Chobanian AV, Haudenschild CC, Nickerson C, Drago R. Antiatherogenic effect of captopril in the Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbit. Hypertension. 1990;15:327–331.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hernandez A, Barberi L, Ballerio R, Testini A, Ferioli R, Bolla M, Natali M, Folco G, Catapano AL. Delapril slows the progression of atherosclerosis and maintains endothelial function in cholesterol-fed rabbits. Atherosclerosis. 1998;137:71–76.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Hope S, Brecher P, Chobanian AV. Comparison of the effects of AT1 receptor blockade and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition on atherosclerosis. Am J Hypertens. 1999;12:28–34.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Keidar S, Attias J, Smith J, Breslow J, Hayek T. The angiotensin-II receptor antagonist, losartan, inhibits LDL lipid peroxidation and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1997;236:622–625.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Weber C, Erl W, Weber KSC, Weber PC. HMF-CoA reductase inhibitors decrease CD11b expression and CD11b-dependent adhesion of monocytes to endothelium and reduce increased adhesiveness of monocytes isolated from patients with hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:1212–1217.[Abstract]
  23. Strawn WB, Gallagher PE, Tallant EA, Ganten D, Ferrario CM. Angiotensin II AT1-receptor blockade inhibits monocyte activation and adherence in transgenic (mRen2)27 rats. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1999;33:341–351.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Strawn WB, Ferrario CM, Tallant EA. Angiotensin-(1–7) reduces smooth muscle growth after vascular injury. Hypertension. 1999;33:207–211.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Yang BC, Phillips MI, Mohuczy D, Meng H, Shen L, Mehta P, Mehta JL. Increased angiotensin II type 1 receptor expression in hypercholesterolemic atherosclerosis in rabbits. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:1433–1439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
J. Sendra, V. Llorente-Cortes, P. Costales, C. Huesca-Gomez, and L. Badimon
Angiotensin II upregulates LDL receptor-related protein (LRP1) expression in the vascular wall: a new pro-atherogenic mechanism of hypertension
Cardiovasc Res, June 1, 2008; 78(3): 581 - 589.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
J. Nussberger, J.-F. Aubert, K. Bouzourene, M. Pellegrin, D. Hayoz, and L. Mazzolai
Renin Inhibition by Aliskiren Prevents Atherosclerosis Progression: Comparison With Irbesartan, Atenolol, and Amlodipine
Hypertension, May 1, 2008; 51(5): 1306 - 1311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
A. Vinh, R. E. Widdop, G. R. Drummond, and T. A. Gaspari
Chronic angiotensin IV treatment reverses endothelial dysfunction in ApoE-deficient mice
Cardiovasc Res, January 1, 2008; 77(1): 178 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular DiseaseHome page
K. O. Stumpe, E. Agabiti-Rosei, T. Zielinski, D. Schremmer, J. Scholze, P. Laeis, P. Schwandt, and M. Ludwig
Original Research: Carotid intima-media thickness and plaque volume changes following 2-year angiotensin II-receptor blockade. The Multicentre Olmesartan atherosclerosis Regression Evaluation (MORE) study
Therapeutic Advances in Cardiovascular Disease, December 1, 2007; 1(2): 97 - 106.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
I. Hernandez Schulman, M.-S. Zhou, and L. Raij
Cross-Talk Between Angiotensin II Receptor Types 1 and 2: Potential Role in Vascular Remodeling in Humans
Hypertension, February 1, 2007; 49(2): 270 - 271.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
I. Imayama, T. Ichiki, K. Inanaga, H. Ohtsubo, K. Fukuyama, H. Ono, Y. Hashiguchi, and K. Sunagawa
Telmisartan downregulates angiotensin II type 1 receptor through activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor {gamma}
Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2006; 72(1): 184 - 190.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
N. A.J. van der Linde, E. J.G. Sijbrands, F. Boomsma, and A. H. van den Meiracker
Effect of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol on Angiotensin II Sensitivity: A Randomized Trial With Fluvastatin
Hypertension, June 1, 2006; 47(6): 1125 - 1130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
M.-S. Zhou, I. H. Schulman, P. J. Pagano, E. A. Jaimes, and L. Raij
Reduced NAD(P)H Oxidase in Low Renin Hypertension: Link Among Angiotensin II, Atherogenesis, and Blood Pressure
Hypertension, January 1, 2006; 47(1): 81 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
F. C. Hall and N. Dalbeth
Disease modification and cardiovascular risk reduction: two sides of the same coin?
Rheumatology, December 1, 2005; 44(12): 1473 - 1482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. L. Sales, G. K. Sukhova, M. A. Lopez-Ilasaca, P. Libby, V. J. Dzau, and R. E. Pratt
Angiotensin Type 2 Receptor Is Expressed in Murine Atherosclerotic Lesions and Modulates Lesion Evolution
Circulation, November 22, 2005; 112(21): 3328 - 3336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
S. Takai, D. Jin, M. Muramatsu, K. Kirimura, H. Sakonjo, and M. Miyazaki
Eplerenone Inhibits Atherosclerosis in Nonhuman Primates
Hypertension, November 1, 2005; 46(5): 1135 - 1139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
D M Shavelle
Are angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors beneficial in patients with aortic stenosis?
Heart, October 1, 2005; 91(10): 1257 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Williams
Recent hypertension trials: Implications and controversies
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 15, 2005; 45(6): 813 - 827.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Sola, M. Q.S. Mir, F. A. Cheema, N. Khan-Merchant, R. G. Menon, S. Parthasarathy, and B. V. Khan
Irbesartan and Lipoic Acid Improve Endothelial Function and Reduce Markers of Inflammation in the Metabolic Syndrome: Results of the Irbesartan and Lipoic Acid in Endothelial Dysfunction (ISLAND) Study
Circulation, January 25, 2005; 111(3): 343 - 348.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Daugherty, D. L. Rateri, H. Lu, T. Inagami, and L. A. Cassis
Hypercholesterolemia Stimulates Angiotensin Peptide Synthesis and Contributes to Atherosclerosis Through the AT1A Receptor
Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): 3849 - 3857.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone SystemHome page
R. S Richmond, E A. Tallant, P. E Gallagher, C. M Ferrario, and W. B Strawn
Angiotensin II stimulates arachidonic acid release from bone marrow stromal cells
Journal of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System, December 1, 2004; 5(4): 176 - 182.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Wassmann, T. Czech, M. van Eickels, I. Fleming, M. Bohm, and G. Nickenig
Inhibition of Diet-Induced Atherosclerosis and Endothelial Dysfunction in Apolipoprotein E/Angiotensin II Type 1A Receptor Double-Knockout Mice
Circulation, November 9, 2004; 110(19): 3062 - 3067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. T. Johnstone, A. S. Perez, I. Nasser, R. Stewart, A. Vaidya, F. Al Ammary, B. Schmidt, G. Horowitz, J. Dolgoff, J. Hamilton, et al.
Angiotensin Receptor Blockade With Candesartan Attenuates Atherosclerosis, Plaque Disruption, and Macrophage Accumulation Within the Plaque in a Rabbit Model
Circulation, October 5, 2004; 110(14): 2060 - 2065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
L. Mazzolai, M. A. Duchosal, M. Korber, K. Bouzourene, J. F. Aubert, H. Hao, V. Vallet, H. R. Brunner, J. Nussberger, G. Gabbiani, et al.
Endogenous Angiotensin II Induces Atherosclerotic Plaque Vulnerability and Elicits a Th1 Response in ApoE-/- Mice
Hypertension, September 1, 2004; 44(3): 277 - 282.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
B. Schieffer, C. Bunte, J. Witte, K. Hoeper, R. H. Boger, E. Schwedhelm, and H. Drexler
Comparative effects of AT1-antagonism and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on markers of inflammation and platelet aggregation in patients with coronary artery disease
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 21, 2004; 44(2): 362 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]