(Circulation. 2000;101:1496.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tenn.
Correspondence to Douglas E. Vaughan, MD, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232.
Key Words: Editorials atherosclerosis angiotensin receptors
Angiotensin II (Ang II) is a potent vasoconstrictor, and apart from its effects on blood pressure, this short-lived peptide been strongly implicated in the pathogenesis of ischemic cardiovascular disease. At the molecular and cellular levels, Ang II promotes a complex array of effects that may promote the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis.
At each of the well-defined stages of atherosclerosis, Ang II has the potential to contribute to the vascular pathobiology. For example, type 1 atherosclerotic lesions are defined by the presence of increased numbers of macrophages in the vascular intima and by the formation of foam cells.1 At this early stage of atherosclerosis, Ang II facilitates the recruitment of monocytes/macrophages into the vessel wall by stimulating the production of monocyte chemoattractant protein2 and vascular cell adhesion molecule-13 by smooth muscle cells. Once monocytes are localized to the blood vessel wall, these cells undergo a phenotypic transformation and take up oxidized LDL, leading to foam cell formation. Ang II indirectly facilitates this step by activating membrane-based NADP/NADPH oxidase,4 which promotes the production of superoxide radicals (O2-). The oxidant stress triggered by Ang II may contribute to enhanced oxidation of LDL and degradation of nitric oxide (NO). The loss of NO has many vascular biological ramifications, because NO is widely considered a vascular protective molecule that retards the development of atherosclerosis.5 Within the last 2 years, a new receptor, biochemically distinct from the scavenger receptor, has been identified that mediates the binding and uptake of oxidized LDL (oxLDL) by vascular tissue.6 The expression of this oxLDL receptor has recently been shown to be regulated by Ang II,7 and this may contribute to endothelial dysfunction and to accumulation of lipid in atherosclerotic plaques. Later stages of atherosclerosis are characterized by increased smooth muscle cell content, increased matrix deposition, and the accumulation of fibrinogen and fibrin in the plaque.8 The pluripotent peptide Ang II likely contributes to all of these processes as well. Ang II is a well-characterized mitogen for vascular smooth muscle cells and stimulates the accumulation of extracellular matrix directly and indirectly by stimulating the production of transforming growth factor-ß.9 Studies from this laboratory and others have shown that Ang II can promote the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 in vascular tissue.10 11 This leads to reduced efficiency of the fibrinolytic system and likely contributes to the deposition of fibrin and fibrinogen typically seen in the late stages of atherosclerosis.
Many of the proatherosclerotic effects of Ang II are mediated by the
binding of the peptide to the type 1 angiotensin
(AT1) receptor. In this issue of
Circulation, Strawn and colleagues12
describe the effects of the AT1 receptor
antagonist losartan on the development of
atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed
cynomolgus monkeys. Animals were fed an atherogenic diet for a total of
20 weeks. Starting in week 12 of the study, animals were randomly
assigned treatment to losartan or vehicle control delivered by
osmotic minipumps implanted subcutaneously. At the end of the study
period (20 weeks), the animals were killed, and the extent of
atherosclerosis was determined by classic methods.
Losartan had a consistent effect on reducing the extent
of fatty streak formation by
50% in the aorta. The coronary
arteries of losartan-treated animals also exhibited reduced
arterial thickness. This reduction in the development of
vascular pathology was not attributable to a decrease in plasma
cholesterol. Furthermore, although losartan is
primarily used for the treatment of hypertension in humans, these
rather dramatic effects on the extent of fatty streak formation were
not accompanied by a reduction in blood pressure in
losartan-treated animals.
The present study confirms and extends prior observations made in a variety of experimental models indicating that interruption of the renin-angiotensin system can forestall the development of atherosclerosis. This was first shown with the ACE inhibitor captopril in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits.13 Subsequently, similar results have been reported in other animal models of atherosclerosis, including genetically modified mice,14 as well as rabbits15 and monkeys16 fed an atherogenic diet. The present study suggests that AT1 receptor blockade blunts the development of atherosclerosis in the absence of a blood pressurelowering effect. This finding contradicts prior studies in rabbits17 indicating that the antiatherosclerotic effects of ACE inhibition or AT1 receptor blockade were dependent on blood pressure reduction. The reasons for this discrepancy are unclear but may reflect differences in animal models, pharmacological properties of the agents used, or other unidentified factors. It suggests that in primates, Ang II plays a role in atherosclerosis in the absence of hypertension.
If the same relationship holds true in humans, then we might expect to see clinical benefits from ACE inhibitors and AT1 receptor blockers in the prevention of ischemic cardiovascular events. Certainly, the Survival And Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE)18 and Studies Of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD)19 trials suggested that the long-term administration of ACE inhibitors to patients with left ventricular dysfunction reduced the incidence of recurrent myocardial infarction. Whether or not interruption of the renin-angiotensin system reduces the incidence of myocardial infarction or cardiovascular death in normotensive subjects with preserved ventricular function is the subject of intense speculation at present. The recently reported results of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) trial demonstrate that ACE inhibition reduces the rates of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in a high-risk population.20 The study by Strawn and colleagues12 suggests that clinical trials designed to test the hypothesis that AT1 receptor blockade retards the development of atherosclerosis in humans deserve to be performed.
Footnotes
The opinions expressed in this editorial are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.
References
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
I. Imayama, T. Ichiki, D. Patton, K. Inanaga, R. Miyazaki, H. Ohtsubo, Q. Tian, K. Yano, and K. Sunagawa Liver X Receptor Activator Downregulates Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Expression Through Dephosphorylation of Sp1 Hypertension, June 1, 2008; 51(6): 1631 - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Martin, J. A. Buckenberger, J. Jiang, G. E. Malana, G. J. Nuovo, M. Chotani, D. S. Feldman, T. D. Schmittgen, and T. S. Elton The Human Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor +1166 A/C Polymorphism Attenuates MicroRNA-155 Binding J. Biol. Chem., August 17, 2007; 282(33): 24262 - 24269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Johnstone, A. S. Perez, I. Nasser, R. Stewart, A. Vaidya, F. Al Ammary, B. Schmidt, G. Horowitz, J. Dolgoff, J. Hamilton, et al. Angiotensin Receptor Blockade With Candesartan Attenuates Atherosclerosis, Plaque Disruption, and Macrophage Accumulation Within the Plaque in a Rabbit Model Circulation, October 5, 2004; 110(14): 2060 - 2065. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Fagan, D. C. Hess, E. J. Hohnadel, D. M. Pollock, and A. Ergul Targets for Vascular Protection After Acute Ischemic Stroke Stroke, September 1, 2004; 35(9): 2220 - 2225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Werner and G. Nickenig AT1 receptors in atherosclerosis: biological effects including growth, angiogenesis, and apoptosis Eur. Heart J. Suppl., January 1, 2003; 5(suppl_A): A9 - A13. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Nickenig and D. G. Harrison The AT1-Type Angiotensin Receptor in Oxidative Stress and Atherogenesis: Part I: Oxidative Stress and Atherogenesis Circulation, January 22, 2002; 105(3): 393 - 396. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Nickenig, F. Michaelsen, C. Muller, A. Berger, T. Vogel, A. Sachinidis, H. Vetter, and M. Bohm Destabilization of AT1 Receptor mRNA by Calreticulin Circ. Res., January 11, 2002; 90(1): 53 - 58. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2000 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |