Circulation. 1999;100:II-17-II-23
(Circulation. 1999;100:II-17.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease |
Aortic Valve Replacement With the Freestyle Stentless Bioprosthesis
Five-Year Experience
Kwok L. Yun, MD;
Colleen F. Sintek, MD;
Alden D. Fletcher, MD;
Thomas A. Pfeffer, MD;
Gary S. Kochamba, MD;
Manly R. Hyde, MD;
Jesus O. Torpoco, MD;
Siavosh Khonsari, MD
From the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Medical Center,
Los Angeles, Calif.
Correspondence to Kwok L. Yun, MD, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, 1526 N Edgemont St, 3rd Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90027. E-mail Kwok.L.Yun{at}KP.org
 |
Abstract
|
|---|
BackgroundStentless aortic
valves were designed to provide
a more
physiological flow pattern and lower
transvalvular gradient,
which may have an important bearing on
postoperative left ventricular
function and remodeling. In
this study, we prospectively analyzed
the 5-year clinical
results with the Freestyle valve (Medtronic,
Inc) and its
hemodynamic performance by serial
echocardiography.
Methods and ResultsBetween January 1993 and August 1997, 95
patients with a mean age of 75 years underwent aortic valve replacement
with the Freestyle prosthesis. Sixty-four percent of patients
received valves
23 mm, and 37% had concomitant coronary
artery bypass grafting. Average follow-up was 44±18 months (mean±SD),
and echocardiography was performed preoperatively,
at discharge, at 3 to 6 months, and annually thereafter. The 30-day
operative mortality rate was 3%, with an overall actuarial survival
rate of 80±6% (mean±SEM) at 5 years. Of the 10 late deaths, only 2
were cardiac related, thereby yielding a freedom from cardiac mortality
of 94±3% after 5 years. No patient required reoperation on the aortic
valve for any reason, including structural degeneration, nonstructural
dysfunction, or prosthetic valve endocarditis. There were 9
thromboembolic and 3 anticoagulant-related bleeding events, none of
which was fatal. The actuarial freedom from valve-related morbidity and
mortality was 79±4% at 5 years. Hemodynamically, the
mean transvalvular gradient significantly decreased after valve
replacement and was reduced further by 41% by 6 months with a
corresponding increase in effective orifice area. Left
ventricular mass index fell to 75% of the preoperative
value by 2 years.
ConclusionsThe Freestyle stentless valve can be implanted safely
in the elderly with excellent midterm clinical results. It has superb
hemodynamics in terms of residual transvalvular
gradient, effective orifice area, and regression of left
ventricular hypertrophy.
Key Words: valves hemodynamics echocardiography survival
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Despite >30 years of investigations and clinical
applications,
the ideal aortic valve substitute remains elusive.
Although
conventional stented bioprostheses avoid the hazards of
embolization
and anticoagulation, the rigid stent design increases the
likelihood
of structural failure and reoperation.
1 2
Furthermore, the
obstructive nature of the stent leads to a
nonphysiological
flow pattern and residual pressure
gradient,
3 which may have
an important bearing on
postoperative left ventricular function
and clinical
outcome,
4 5 particularly in small valves. Although
the
aortic homograft, first introduced by Ross
6 in 1962, is
an
excellent alternative to the stented biologic prosthesis
in
terms of performance,
7 8 its clinical use is
severely restricted
by its limited availability.
Another option is the stentless aortic xenograft, which was first
introduced into the clinical arena by Binet and
associates9 in 1965 and OBrien and
Clareborough10 in 1966. Despite excellent initial results,
early enthusiasm waned because of premature structural deterioration as
a consequence of the poor preservation methods. This concept of using
the aortic root as a physiological stent for the
valve prosthesis was revived by David et al11 in
1987 when they initiated a new trial using a stentless porcine aortic
valve. Since then, several stentless bioprosthetic valves have
been introduced by various manufacturers with reports of superior
hemodynamics and excellent clinical outcome by several
major centers.12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Since 1993, our institution has been 1 of the study centers in the
United States for the Freestyle aortic root bioprosthesis
(Medtronic, Inc). Initial results for the first 64 patients were
reported previously.19 In the present study, we
prospectively evaluated the hemodynamic
performance of the Freestyle valve by serial
echocardiography and the clinical outcome of 95
patients in the last 5 years.
 |
Methods
|
|---|
Between January 1993 and August 1997, 95 patients underwent
aortic
valve replacement (AVR) with the Freestyle aortic root
prosthesis.
All candidates for bioprosthetic aortic
valve implantation were
considered for the Freestyle valve. Those
requiring concomitant
procedures other than coronary
revascularization were excluded.
The study cohort
was part of a multicenter trial for the Medtronic
Freestyle stentless
xenograft, and the protocol was approved
by the investigational review
board of our institution.
All patients were followed up prospectively with serial
echocardiography performed preoperatively, at
discharge, at 3 to 6 months, at 1 year, and annually thereafter. Mean
values for each echocardiographic measurement were
derived from 3 consecutive heart beats in patients in sinus rhythm and
from 5 beats in those in atrial fibrillation or a VVI pacemaker. The
effective orifice area (EOA) of the aortic valve was calculated by the
continuity equation, and the mean transvalvular gradient at
rest was derived from the simplified Bernoulli equation accounting for
the flow velocity across the left ventricular outflow
tract.20 Left ventricular mass was calculated
according to Devereux and Reichek21 and then indexed to
body surface area (LVMI). Echocardiographic
classification of aortic insufficiency (AI) was in accordance with the
criteria described by Perry and associates.22
Selected preoperative patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1
. The surgical procedure consists
of a modified subcoronary technique, which has been described
previously19 and remained relatively constant throughout
the study period. Pertinent intraoperative variables, including
aortic cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and valve
sizes, are listed in Table 2
. Typically,
warfarin therapy was continued for 3 months unless there was a major
contraindication to anticoagulation. Follow-up was 98% complete and
averaged 44±18 months (4162 patient-months).
Morbid and fatal valve-related events were categorized as structural
valve deterioration, nonstructural valve dysfunction, thromboembolism,
anticoagulant-related hemorrhage, prosthetic valve
endocarditis, reoperation, valve-related mortality, and all
valve-related morbidity and mortality (VRMM), according to the
framework devised by the American Association for Thoracic Surgery and
the Society for Thoracic Surgeons ad hoc committee.23
Statistical Analysis
Variability of continuous data is expressed as ±SD and that of
important ratios as ±70% confidence limits. Repeated-measures ANOVA
was used to detect any significant changes in mean
transvalvular gradient across the aortic valve
prosthesis, EOA, and LVMI over time. If statistically
significant, Students paired t test was then performed,
with Bonferronis method used to correct for multiple comparisons.
Actuarial life table data were calculated by the
Cutler-Ederer24 method. The actuarial estimates were
used to describe the time-related event-free rates from death and other
valve-related complications, and the variability of these estimates is
indicated by ±SEM. The actuarial curves were compared with the use of
the log-rank or Wilcoxon test. A 2-tailed value of
P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
 |
Results
|
|---|
Operative Mortality and Late Survival Rates
The 30-day operative mortality rate was 3±2% (in-hospital
mortality
rate, 2±2%), with no death being directly valve related.
One
patient with associated coronary artery disease sustained a
right
ventricular infarct and died on postoperative day 2.
Another
patient had sudden death on postoperative day 6, which was most
likely
related to an arrhythmic event. Postmortem examination revealed
only
the presence of coronary artery disease but no evidence of
myocardial
infarction. The suture lines on the Freestyle
bioprosthesis
were intact, and the valve was well positioned.
The last death
occurred after discharge on postoperative day 14. The
patient
had been readmitted to another hospital and treated for pleural
effusions.
She developed hypotension and could not be resuscitated.
Autopsy
demonstrated evidence of bilateral adrenal hemorrhage,
suggesting
possible adrenal insufficiency, which possibly could have
contributed
to the patients death. Six patients required permanent
pacemakers;
4 patients had tachycardia-bradycardia
syndrome, and the other
2 developed complete heart block.
The overall actuarial survival rates were 96±2% and 80±6% after 1
and 5 years, respectively (Figure 1
). The
causes of late deaths, determined by autopsies, death certificates,
hospital records, and family communications, are listed in Table 3
. Of the 10 late deaths, only 2 were
cardiac related. One patient suffered a fatal myocardial infarction 4
years after AVR, and another had sudden death 6 months after hospital
discharge. When noncardiac deaths were excluded, freedom from cardiac
mortality was 96±2% and 94±3% after 1 and 5 years, respectively
(Figure 2
). At last follow-up, 98% of
patients were in NYHA class I or II, with a mean of 1.17±0.43 (versus
3.02±0.7 preoperatively, P=0.001).
Valve-Related Complications
During follow-up, there was no single incidence of structural
degeneration or nonstructural dysfunction as indicated by clinical
examination or echocardiographic evaluation. Five
patients presented with spiking fever at 2, 4, 41/2, 9,
and 11 months postoperatively. Blood cultures were positive with
coagulase-negative Staphylococcus epidermis in 3 patients
and Enterococcus in another patient, and 1 patient had no
growth on blood cultures. Although no vegetations were seen on
echocardiography and the Freestyle valves were
functioning normally, all patients were treated empirically for
presumed prosthetic valve endocarditis with a 6-week course of
intravenous antibiotics and have subsequently done well.
Consequently, the estimated freedom from reoperation at 5 years is
100%.
The actuarial estimates of freedom from thromboembolism were 93±3%
and 91±3% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. There were 9 documented
thromboembolic events, none of which was fatal. Of these, 5 occurred in
the perioperative period (3 strokes and 2 transient
ischemic attacks). During follow-up, there were 2 strokes and 2
transient ischemic attacks at 9 and 16 months and at 7 months
and 5 years, respectively. Two of the patients had developed atrial
arrhythmias close to the time of the events.
A total of 3 patients developed a clinically important
anticoagulant-related bleeding event. One patient required vagotomy and
pyloroplasty for a bleeding ulcer 9 days after surgery. Another patient
had an upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage on postoperative day
18 that resolved with conservative treatment. The third patient
developed melena and coffee-ground emesis 4 months postoperatively and
required readmission and medical management. Estimated freedom from
anticoagulant-related hemorrhage at 1 and 5 years was
97±2%.
All VRMM
Twenty-two patients fell into this composite category, which
included all morbid and fatal events that were clearly or possibly
valve related (including all 30-day operative deaths and late cardiac
mortality). As shown in Figure 3
, the 1-
and 5-year actuarial estimates of freedom from valve-related morbidity
and mortality were 82±4% and 79±4%, respectively.
Valve Hemodynamics and Left Ventricular
Mass
The mean aortic transvalvular gradient and EOA according
to valve size and for all patients preoperatively, at discharge, at 6
months, and at yearly intervals up to 4 years are summarized in Tables 4
and 5
,
respectively. Because of the small number of echocardiograms available
at 5 years (n=3) and the relatively fewer patients in the 19-, 25-, and
27-mm valve categories, repeated-measures ANOVA was performed only for
all patients combined regardless of valve sizes and up to 4 years. As
shown, mean transvalvular gradient decreased significantly
after AVR and was reduced further by 41% at 3 to 6 months. Thereafter,
the gradient remained relatively stable. Correspondingly, there was a
significant increase in EOA in the immediate postoperative period and
again at 3 to 6 months.
As shown in Table 6
, LVMI had
fallen by 8.3% by the time of hospital discharge. By 2 years, this
figure was further reduced to 75% of the preoperative value. However,
at the 3- and 4-year follow-ups, there was an increase in LVMI toward
that measured during the 3- to 6-month study; nevertheless, this was
still significantly lower than before surgery.
At the time of discharge, 71 patients (76%) had no AI, 12 patients
(13%) had trace AI, and 9 patients (10%) had 1+ or mild AI. During
follow-up, prosthetic valve incompetence resolved in 4 of the 9
patients with 1+ AI, whereas 8 patients with no or trace
regurgitation progressed to mild insufficiency.
Interesting, of the 13 patients with 1+ AI during follow-up, 6 had
received 27-mm valves.
 |
Discussion
|
|---|
Clinical Outcome
The Freestyle stentless valve was designed to have superior
hemodynamic
performance compared with the
standard stented porcine or bovine
pericardial bioprostheses. Despite
the relative greater complexity
of implantation and longer aortic
cross-clamp time compared
with stented aortic valves, we have
demonstrated that AVR with
the Freestyle xenograft can be performed
safely in the elderly
population with a low operative mortality rate of
3%. This figure
is comparable to those previously reported in other
large series
involving the use of stentless aortic
prostheses.
12 14 16 17 18 25 26 27 28 29 Furthermore, none of the
perioperative deaths
was directly valve related. The
1-year actuarial survival rate
of 96% compares favorably to the 88%
reported by Westaby and
associates
12 at the John Radcliffe
Hospital in Oxford, United
Kingdom, 1 of the centers with vast
experience using the Freestyle
valve. Similar short-term results have
been reported with the
Prima Edwards,
16 Toronto
SPV,
17 and Biocor PSB
14 stentless
xenografts.
At 5 years, the actuarial survival rate had declined
to 80%. Although
commendable, this figure is lower than that
for the Toronto SPV
valve (93% at 5 years) as reported by David
and
colleagues.
27 However, there are substantial differences
between
the 2 study populations. The patients in the present series
were
older (mean age, 75 versus 62 years), were in a higher
preoperative
NYHA functional class (87% versus 51% in NYHA class III
or IV),
and received smaller valves (mean size, 23.2 versus 26.5
mm).
However, different sizing methodologies between manufacturers
may
account for the valve size discrepancy. Of the 10 late deaths,
only 2
were cardiac related, yielding a freedom from cardiac
death at 5 years
of 94%, including perioperative deaths. This
is
comparable to a later case-match study reported by the same
group,
29 in which the 8-year late freedom from cardiac
mortality (excluding
operative deaths) after 43 months of follow-up was
95%.
There were no cases of structural valve degeneration or nonstructural
valve dysfunction as indicated by clinical symptoms or serial
echocardiographic evaluations. Although 5 individuals
developed fever and positive blood cultures within the first year, a
definitive diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis could not
be documented by echocardiography. All patients
were treated successfully with a 6-week course of
intravenous antibiotics. Thus, repeated AVR had not been
required with the Freestyle valve in our follow-up. These figures are
comparable to the 10-year experience with the Toronto SPV
stentless valve recently reported by David and
associates.27 It should be noted that there were 4
incidences of primary tissue degeneration with the Toronto SPV
valve after the first 5 years, yielding an actuarial freedom from
structural valve degeneration of 85% at 9 years. It is possible that
we may encounter some structural failures in the next 5 years.
There were 5 early and 4 late neurological events. Three
perioperative episodes occurred early in our experience
when anticoagulants were not routinely administered after AVR with the
Freestyle valve. Stroke occurred postoperatively in 2 patients with
known carotid atherosclerotic occlusive disease. Another 2 patients who
sustained late transient ischemic attacks had developed
new-onset atrial arrhythmias before their events. Thus, it is
unclear whether these 4 episodes were directly valve related. The
number of anticoagulant-related hemorrhages was relatively low
and occurred early during a time of frequent adjustment of
anticoagulant dosage. As expected, most episodes of
anticoagulant-related hemorrhage and thromboembolism occurred
within the first year, possibly reflecting the time required for
healing and endothelialization of the suture lines.
To evaluate the overall clinical performance of the Freestyle
bioprosthesis, actuarial estimates of freedom from VRMM were
calculated. At 5 years, the freedom rate was 79%, which compares
favorably to a study from New York University Medical
Center5 of a similar-age patient cohort after AVR with
conventional stented aortic prostheses (61% freedom from VRMM at 5
years). Additionally, we have taken a conservative estimate of VRMM by
including events that may not have been directly valve related.
Hemodynamics
Clinical reports have demonstrated that the residual
transprosthetic pressure gradient after AVR for aortic
stenosis is a major risk factor for impaired left
ventricular diastolic dysfunction and
incomplete regression of left ventricular
hypertrophy postoperatively.4 5 30 This, in
turn, has important implications in terms of late onset of congestive
heart failure and fatal arrhythmia events. The Freestyle
stentless xenograft was designed to simulate the superior
hemodynamics of the cryopreserved aortic allograft
compared with the conventional stented
bioprosthesis.6 7
In this series, the mean transvalvular gradient for all
patients decreased significantly after AVR. This was reduced by another
41% in the first 3 to 6 months but remained stable thereafter. The
explanation for this initial improvement is unclear but is probably
related to resolution of tissue edema secondary to surgical trauma and
reabsorption of any thrombus between the native aortic root and the
bioprosthesis. As a result, there was a corresponding increase
in EOA at 3 to 6 months compared with the time of discharge. These
findings corroborate those previously noted by other
investigators.12 15 26 27 31 32 33 When the data are
tabulated according to valve size, the mean transvalvular
gradient and EOA are similar to those reported for the Toronto
SPV valve15 26 27 but compare favorably to the
Biocor31 and Prima13 16 stentless
prostheses.
In terms of ventricular remodeling, there was a significant
reduction of 8.3% in LVMI by the time of discharge. In a prospective
study of 57 patients at Sunnybrook Health Science Center, Christakis
and associates34 demonstrated a 9.8% decrease in
echocardiographically measured LVMI 4 days after
isolated AVR. In this series, LVMI continued to decrease by another
18% by 2 years. However, there was an upswing at the 3- and 4-year
study. This finding is in agreement with that reported by Westaby and
colleagues12 of 200 patients who underwent AVR with the
Freestyle stentless valve. The reason for this is probably
multifactorial, but it may partially be related other coexisting
morbidities, such as hypertension (68% of patients).
Finally, we did not observe any significant AI or progression of
trivial regurgitation during late follow-up. It is
interesting to note that 6 of 13 patients with mild AI had received
27-mm valves. Whether this is of any significance is unclear and
requires further echocardiographic follow-up.
In summary, this prospective analysis demonstrates that the
Freestyle stentless valve can be implanted safely with excellent
midterm clinical results. It has superb hemodynamics in
terms of residual transvalvular gradient, EOA, and regression
of left ventricular hypertrophy. It is a
valuable alternative for those with a small aortic root, particularly
in the elderly patient. The question of durability compared with
conventional stented bioprostheses remains unanswered and requires
longer follow-up.
 |
References
|
|---|
-
Cohn LH, Allred EN, DiSesa VJ, Sawtelle K, Shemin
RJ, Collins JJ Jr. Early and late risk of aortic valve replacement: a
12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and
tilting disc prosthetic aortic valves. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 1984;88:695705.[Abstract]
-
Jamieson WR. Modern cardiac valve devices:
bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses: state of the art. J
Cardiac Surg. 1993;8:8998.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Barratt-Boyes BG, Christie GW. What is the best
bioprosthetic operation for the small aortic root? Allograft,
autograft, porcine, pericardial? Stented or unstented? J
Card Surg. 1994;9:158164.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jaffe WM, Coverdale HA, Roche AHG, Whitlock RML,
Neutze JM, Barratt-Boyes BG. Rest and exercise
hemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic
Intact (porcine), and St. Jude Medical valves in the aortic position.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;100:167174.[Abstract]
-
Galloway AC, Colvin SB, Grossi EA, Baumann FG, Sabban
YP, Esposito R, Ribakove GH, Culliford AT, Slater JN, Glassman E, Harty
S, Spencer FC. Ten-year experience with aortic valve replacement in 482
patients of 70 years of age or older: operative risk and long-term
results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990;49:8493.[Abstract]
-
Ross DN. Homograft replacement of the aortic valve.
Lancet. 1962;2:487488.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Bodnar E, Wain WH, Martelli V, Ross DN. Long term
performance of 580 homograft and autograft valves used for
aortic valve replacement. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1979;27:3138.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Kirklin JK, Smith D, Novick W, Naftel DC, Kirklin JW,
Pacifico AD, Nanda NC, Helmcke FR, Bourge RC. Long-term function of
cryopreserved aortic homografts: a ten-year study. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:154166.[Abstract]
-
Binet JP, Duran CG, Carpentier A, Langlois J.
Heterologous aortic valve transplantation. Lancet. 1965;2:1275.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
OBrien MF, Clareborough JK. Heterograft aortic valve
replacement. Lancet. 1967;1:929930.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
David TE, Pollick C, Bos J. Aortic valve replacement
with stentless porcine aortic bioprosthesis. J
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1990;99:113118.[Abstract]
-
Westaby S, Jin XY, Katsumata T, Arifi A, Braidley P.
Valve replacement with a stentless bioprosthesis: versatility
of the porcine aortic root. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;116:477484.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jin XY, Dhital K, Bhattacharya K, Pieris R, Amarasena
N, Pillai R. Fifth-year hemodynamic performance
of the Prima stentless aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;66:805809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bertolini P, Luciani GB, Vecchi B, Pugliese P, Mazzucco
A. Aortic valve replacement with the Biocor PSB stentless xenograft.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;66:425430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Del Rizzo DF, Goldman BS, Christakis GT, David TE.
Hemodynamic benefits of the Toronto stentless
valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112:14311446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dossche K, Vanermen H, Daenen W, Pillai R, Konertz W.
Hemodynamic performance of the PRIMA Edwards
stentless aortic xenograft: early results of a multicenter clinical
trial. Thorac Cardiovasc Surgeon. 1996;44:1114.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Mohr FW, Walther T, Baryalei M, Falk V, Autschbach R,
Scheidt A, Dalichau H. The Toronto SPV bioprosthesis:
one-year results in 100 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:171175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hvass U, Chatel D, Assayag P, Ouroudji M, Pansard Y,
Lenormand C, Laperche T, Depoix JP. The OBrien-Angell stentless
porcine valve: early results with 150 implants. Ann Thorac
Surg. 1995;60:S414S417.
-
Sintek CF, Fletcher AD, Khonsari S. Stentless porcine
aortic root: valve of choice for the elderly patient with small aortic
root? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:871876.[Abstract]
-
Chambers J, Shah PM. Recommendations for the
echocardiographic assessment of replacement heart
valves. J Heart Valve Dis. 1995;4:913.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Devereux RB, Reichek N.
Echocardiographic determination of left
ventricular mass in man: anatomic validation of the method.
Circulation. 1977;55:613618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Perry GJ, Helmcke F, Nanda NC, Byard C, Soto B.
Evaluation of aortic insufficiency by color flow mapping. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 1987;9:952959.[Abstract]
-
Edmunds LH Jr, Clark RE, Cohn LH, Miller DC, Weisel RD.
Guidelines for reporting morbidity and mortality after cardiac
valvular operations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988;46:257259.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Cutler SJ, Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life
table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis. 1958;46:699712.
-
Sidiropoulos A, Hotz H, Tschesnow J, Konertz W.
Stentless porcine bioprostheses for all types of aortic root pathology.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;11:917921.[Abstract]
-
Del Rizzo DF, Goldman BS, David TE. Aortic valve
replacement with a stentless porcine bioprosthesis: multicentre
trial. Can J Cardiol. 1995;11:597603.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
David TE, Feindel CM, Scully HE, Bos J, Rakowski H.
Aortic valve replacement with stentless porcine aortic valves: a
ten-year experience. J Heart Valve Dis. 1998;7:250254.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Vrandecic MP, Gontijo BF, Fantini FA, Gutierrez C,
Paula e Silva JA, Oliveira OC, Barbosa JT, Oliveira RM, Avelar SOS,
Miotto HC, Barbosa MR, Vrandecic E, Vrandecic EC. The new stentless
aortic valve: clinical results of the first 100 patients.
Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;2:407414.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
David TE, Puschmann R, Ivanov J, Bos J, Armstrong S,
Feindel CM, Scully HE. Aortic valve replacement with stentless and
stented porcine valves: a case-match study. J Thorac
Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:236241.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lindblom D, Lindblom U, Qvist J, Lundstrom H. Long term
survival rates after heart valve replacement. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1990;15:566573.[Abstract]
-
Walther T, Falk V, Diegeler A, Gummert J, Autschbach R,
Mohr FW. Stentless valve replacement in the small aortic root.
Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;5:229234.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Eriksson MJ, Brodin LA, Dellgren GN, Radegran K. Rest
and exercise hemodynamics of an extended stentless
aortic bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis. 1997;6:653660.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-
Jin XY, Westaby S, Gibson DG, Pillai R, Taggart DP.
Left ventricular remodelling and improvement in Freestyle
stentless valve haemodynamics. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1997;12:6369.[Abstract]
-
Christakis GT, Joyner CD, Morgan CD, Fremes SE, Buth
KJ, Sever JY, Rao V, Panagiotopoulos KP, Murphy PM, Goldman BS. Left
ventricular mass regression early after aortic valve
replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:10841089.[Abstract/Free Full Text]