Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:II-139-II-144

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruengsakulrach, P.
Right arrow Articles by Buxton, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruengsakulrach, P.
Right arrow Articles by Buxton, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow CV surgery: other
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease

(Circulation. 1999;100:II-139.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Surgery for Coronary Artery Disease

Comparative Histopathology of Radial Artery Versus Internal Thoracic Artery and Risk Factors for Development of Intimal Hyperplasia and Atherosclerosis

Permyos Ruengsakulrach, MD, FRCST; Roger Sinclair, MB BS, MD, FRCPA, FRCPath; Masashi Komeda, MD, PhD; Jai Raman, MB BS, FRACS; Ian Gordon, MSc, PhD; Brian Buxton, MB, MS, FRACS

From the Departments of Cardiac Surgery (P.R., M.K., J.R., B.B.) and Pathology (R.S.), Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre and Department of Mathematics and Statistics (I.G.), The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Correspondence to Prof Brian Buxton, Cardiac Surgery Department, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Austin Campus, HSB-5, Studley Rd, Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia. E-mail bux{at}austin.unimelb.edu.au


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—In this study, we examined the comparative histopathology, morphometry, and risk factors for the development of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis in the radial artery (RA) and the internal thoracic artery (ITA).

Methods and Results—Paired specimens of RAs and ITAs, obtained from 150 patients who underwent CABG, were evaluated with histopathology; 110 pairs of arteries were suitable for morphometric analysis. The severity of disease was evaluated on the basis of percentage of luminal narrowing, intimal thickness index, and intima-to-media ratio. Risk factors were determined with stepwise linear regression. Intimal hyperplasia was seen in 141 RAs (94%) and 103 ITAs (69%) (P<0.001). Atherosclerosis was seen in 5% of RAs and 0.7% of ITAs (P=0.04). Medial calcification was found only in RAs (20 of 150, 13.3%) (P<0.001). Morphometric analysis showed that compared with ITAs, RAs had a significantly higher intimal area, medial area, percentage of luminal narrowing, intimal thickness index, and intima-to-media ratio (all P<0.001) Factors found to be significant (P<0.05) predictors of the 3 severity indices of intimal hyperplasia, including atherosclerosis, in RAs were peripheral vascular disease, smoking, age, and diabetes. Risk factors for intimal hyperplasia in ITAs were age and smoking.

Conclusions—The RA is more likely to have atherosclerosis, intimal hyperplasia, and medial calcification than the ITA. Morphometric analysis indices showed marked differences between the RA and the ITA. Care should be taken when selecting the RA as a conduit in CABG, particularly in patients who are elderly, diabetic, smoke, or have peripheral vascular disease.


Key Words: cardiovascular diseases • coronary disease • atherosclerosis • risk factors


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
The internal thoracic artery (ITA) graft is generally regarded as the standard conduit for CABG because of its excellent late patency and low prevalence of histopathologic changes. Favorable results from single and bilateral ITA grafting have led surgeons to pursue the use of other arteries for CABG, such as the radial artery (RA).

The RA was used initially as a conduit for CABG by Carpentier et al in 1973.1 Subsequently, Curtis et al2 reported that the failure rate of RA grafts was 64.7% in 79 patients at 6 to 12 months after surgery. This was significantly higher than the failure rate for saphenous vein and ITA grafts used in the same patients.2 One of the histologically normal RA grafts removed at reoperation revealed marked concentric intimal hyperplasia and proliferation of cells consistent with smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts. Fisk et al reported similar results in 48 RA grafts in 1976.3 After 1 to 24 weeks, only 50% of RA grafts were patent compared with 77% of saphenous vein grafts.3 The authors therefore suggested that the RA not be used.

In 1992, Acar et al4 reinvestigated the use of the RA for CABG after they found that some of the RAs that were thought to be occluded in the early series of Carpentier et al1 were functioning 15 years later. The patency rate of the RAs in the series of Acar et al4 was 93% at 9 months, which is better than the reported patency rate of free ITAs (69.3%). Several cardiac centers in Europe and North America confirmed these results.5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 This improvement was thought to be due to better harvesting techniques, the use of calcium channel–blocking agents, and the use of postoperative aspirin. More recently, Acar et al12 reported a patency rate of 84.5% for RAs at 5.6 years compared with a patency rate of 89.8% for ITA grafts.

The incidence of arteriosclerosis in the RA has not been widely investigated. Prospective population studies concerning the risk of coronary, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular events suggest that atherosclerotic manifestations in different arterial beds have different risk factor profiles.13 14 15

In this study, we compared the incidence of disease in the RA and the ITA in a group of patients in whom both arteries were harvested for CABG. Comparative histopathology and morphometric analyses were carried out, and the association between major clinical factors and intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis was examined.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Patients
Paired segments of RAs and ITAs were obtained from 150 patients who underwent CABG between May 1995 and October 1997. Informed consent was obtained from all patients. Their ages ranged from 42 to 83 years (average, 66 years). There were 132 men (88%) and 18 women (12%). All patients underwent myocardial revascularization with the use of ITAs and RAs. Initially, the specimens were obtained after intraluminal hydrostatic dilatation with papaverine in an attempt to maintain physiological distension before formalin fixation. This was abandoned because double clamping of short arterial segments, which is required in this technique, produced unacceptable distortion. Even single clamping, which is required for surgical excision, distorted some specimens, making them unsuitable for morphometry. The vessels used in this study were discarded distal segments of RA and ITA grafts. A total of 300 RAs and ITAs were evaluated. The potential risk factors for atherosclerosis considered were age, sex, diabetes mellitus, history of cigarette smoking, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), cerebrovascular disease (CVD), and hypercholesterolemia.

Histopathology
One hundred fifty paired distal segments of RA and ITA were fixed in 4% formaldehyde solution. Multiple transverse slices of the vessels were processed in paraffin wax. Sections were cut at 5 µm, and all were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Verhoeff Van Gieson’s elastin stain. The slides were examined by a pathologist blinded to the clinical data. Vessels were recorded as normal if there was no cellular or stromal tissue between the endothelium and the internal elastic lamina (IEL) (Figure 1ADown). Vessels with any fibrous tissue or any myointimal cells between the endothelium and the IEL were recorded as showing intimal thickening (Figure 1BDown and 1CDown). Medial calcification was recorded if present. An atherosclerotic lesion was defined by the presence of intimal lipid lying free as cholesterol clefts or in aggregates of foamy macrophages (Figure 1DDown and 1EDown). Any atherosclerotic lesion present was categorized according to the classification of vascular lesions of the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association.16



View larger version (71K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A, Normal RA with characteristic single IEL. Intima is a very thin layer consisting mainly of endothelium resting on IEL. (Verhoeff Van Gieson’s elastin; original magnification, x20.) B, RA with mild concentric nonatheromatous intimal thickening. Lumen of this large vessel is only slightly narrowed. (Verhoeff Van Gieson’s elastin; original magnification, x25.) C, ITA showing mild nonatheromatous intimal thickening. IEL is focally discontinuous. Multiple elastic laminae within media are characteristic of ITA. (Verhoeff Van Gieson’s elastin; original magnification, x32.) D, RA with severe atheromatous narrowing and focal medial calcification (filled arrow). Free lipid with cholesterol clefts is present in base of atheromatous plaque (open arrows). (Hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification, x25.) E, Detail of atheromatous plaque in intima of RA. Foam cells are present with scattered narrow cholesterol clefts in fibrous background. (Hematoxylin-eosin; original magnification, x70.)

Morphometric Analysis
For the purposes of quantitative measurement, we excluded 40 pairs of specimens that had been distorted by the surgical or pathological preparation or because of incomplete risk factor data (2 patients). One hundred ten pairs of arteries were suitable for morphometric analysis. The morphometric measurement of both arteries was analyzed with a color image analysis system (Video Pro 32; Leading Edge Pty Ltd). The IEL circumference (IELC), intimal area, medial area, width of the intima, and width of the media were measured. Diameter internal to the media (lumen plus intima; DLI) and the IEL area (luminal area plus intimal area; IEL area) were calculated (DLI=IELC/{pi} and IEL area=IELC2/4{pi}, respectively).

Previous investigators have suggested that the intima-to-media ratio is the most sensitive method available for grading atherosclerosis.17 18 19 20 In this study, 3 methods were used to evaluate the degree of intimal thickening and atherosclerosis: (1) percentage of luminal narrowing, (2) intimal thickness index (ITI), and (3) intima-to-media ratio (IMR) (Figure 2Down).17 18 19 20 The severity indices were calculated from the most severely diseased section of the specimens using the following formulas: percentage of luminal narrowing=100xintimal area/IEL area; ITI=intimal area/medial area; and IMR=width of intima at maximal intimal thickness/width of media at maximal intima thickness.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Schematic depicting indices used to evaluate severity of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis in RA and ITA. Morphometric measurements include IEL circumference (IEL separates intima from muscular media), medial area (area between IEL and external elastic lamina; external elastic lamina separates media from adventitia; width of media also measured), width of intima (distance between intima and IEL, usually a very thin layer). Calculated measurements include DLI=IELC/{pi} and IEL area=IELC2/4{pi}.

Statistical Analysis
The difference between the histopathology and the morphometric parameters for paired specimens of RAs and ITAs was with the use of McNemar’s test and paired t test, respectively. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant.

Correlations between pairs of continuous variables were evaluated using Spearman’s correlation coefficients ({rho}). The comparison of the severity of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis in the RA, with or without medial calcification, was evaluated with the use of 2-sample t tests.

Eight clinical risk factors for intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis (age, sex, smoking, diabetes, hypertension, PVD, CVD, and hypercholesterolemia) of the RA and the ITA were included in stepwise linear regression analyses as independent variables. The percentages of luminal narrowing, ITI, and IMR were analyzed as dependent variables. For each regression model, we calculated the percentage of variation in the dependent variable explained by the model, a standard measure of the usefulness of the model. If this percentage is high, the model can be used to predict most of the variation in the dependent variable; if it is low, although the model may be useful, a large part of the variation in the dependent variable is explained by other factors. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for medial calcification in RAs.


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Histopathology
In histopathology (n=150 paired segments), intimal hyperplasia was seen in 94% of RAs and 68.7% of ITAs (P<0.001, McNemar’s test). Atherosclerosis was found in 5.3% of RAs and 0.7% of ITAs (P=0.04). All of the atherosclerotic lesions were type V (fibroatheroma); pure lipid plaques were not seen. Medial calcification was found only in RAs (20 of 150, 13.3%).

Morphometric Analysis
Morphometric measurement (n=110 paired segments) showed that DLI, IEL area, intimal area, medial area, width of the intima, and width of the media were significantly greater in the RA than in the ITA (all P<0.001) (Table 1Down). The mean values of the indices of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis (percentage of luminal narrowing, ITI, and IMR) in the RA were statistically higher than those in the ITA (Table 2Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparative Morphometry of RAs and ITAs


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Severity Indices of Intimal Hyperplasia and Atherosclerosis of RAs and ITAs

The percentage of luminal narrowing of RAs correlated with the ITI (Spearman’s {rho}=0.67, P<0.01) and with the IMR ({rho}=0.56, P<0.001). The ITI of RAs correlated with the IMR ({rho}=0.74, P<0.01). The percentage of luminal narrowing of the ITA correlated with the ITI ({rho}= 0.59, P<0.01) and with the IMR ({rho}=0.54, P<0.01). The ITI of the ITA correlated with the IMR ({rho}=0.73, P<0.01).

There was a weak correlation between the percentage of luminal narrowing of the RA and the ITA from the same patients ({rho}=0.28, P<0.01).

Comparisons were made between RAs with (n=14) and without (n=96) medial calcification. For each of the 3 indices of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups (P>0.5 for all 3 indices). However, the median levels of hyperplasia were generally lower in the group with medial calcification (Table 3Down).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Comparison of Severity of Intimal Hyperplasia and Atherosclerosis in RAs With and Without Medial Calcification

Risk Factors
Table 4Down summarizes the clinical features that were investigated as risk factors for intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis (n=110 pairs). The results of stepwise regression analyses on risk factors of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis in RAs are shown in Table 5Down. For these analyses, smoking was categorized as "never smoked" or "other," and diabetes was categorized as "none" or "diabetes" (any type). The distributions of the dependent variables were all positively skewed, and better fits to the data were obtained by transforming to the logarithmic scale (base 10). PVD and history of smoking were independently associated with log (percentage of luminal narrowing) and together accounted for 11.4% of its variability. Age and diabetes were independently associated with log (ITI) and accounted for 14.1% of ITI variability. Log (IMR) was independently predicted by age, which accounted for 6.2% of variability.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Clinical Characteristics of 110 Patients


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Results of Stepwise Linear Regression Analysis of Dependent Variables: Log (Percentage of Luminal Narrowing of RA), Log (ITI of RA), and Log (IMR of RA)

Table 6Down shows the results of regression analyses on the risk factors of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis in the ITA. Age and history of smoking were independently associated with log (percentage of luminal narrowing) and together accounted for 15.8% of its variability. History of smoking and age were independently associated with log (ITI), which accounted for 13.3% of ITI variability. Log (IMR) was independently predicted by age, accounting for 5.7% of the variability.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Results of Stepwise Linear Regression Analysis of Dependent Variables: Log (Percentage of Luminal Narrowing of ITA), Log (ITI of ITA), and Log (IMR of ITA)

Logistic regression was used to model medial calcification in the RA using the same 8 risk factors that were used for the evaluation of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis. The only significant predictor was age (P=0.01); increased age was associated with a higher probability of medial calcification. The odds ratio corresponding to a difference in age of 10 years was 2.7 (95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 5.8).


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
Histopathology
Three arterial abnormalities were found in this study: intimal hyperplasia, atherosclerosis, and medial calcification.

Mild forms of intimal hyperplasia were found in the majority of conduits removed from patients undergoing CABG who were 42 to 83 years old. Intimal hyperplasia occurred more frequently in RA grafts than in ITA grafts.

Intimal hyperplasia occurs as a consequence of physiological stimuli, constituting an attempt by the tissue to maintain normal conditions of flow, wall tension, or both. Regions of the intima with adaptive increases in thickness differ functionally from adjacent, thinner regions. Excessive lipoprotein in the plasma tends to accumulate preferentially in the hyperplastic intima, causing atherosclerosis.21

In this series, the incidence of atherosclerosis in the RA was 5.3% compared with 0.7% in the ITA (P=0.04). The true incidence of the atherosclerosis in the RA was actually higher because some of the patients had severe macroscopic atherosclerosis of their RA, precluding its use as a bypass conduit. In addition, the prevalence of atherosclerosis in both the RA and the ITA was probably underestimated in our study because only the distal ends of arteries were examined, and atherosclerosis is a segmental disease. In 1976, Kay et al17 examined 215 ITAs from routine postmortem examinations and found a >25% reduction in lumen diameter in 4.2% of ITAs. No patient had a >50% narrowing. Other postmortem and angiographic studies have reported an incidence rate of ITA atherosclerosis ranging from 2.4% to 5%.22 23 24 25 According to the definitions and histological classification of atherosclerosis,16 we found only type V advanced atherosclerosis in this series; the age of the patients may explain why only advanced lesions were found.

The incidence of medial calcification (Monckeberg’s calcinosis) in the RA was 13.3% in our study. Medial calcification of an artery, even when extensive, is not necessarily associated with extensive intimal changes, and the lumen of the artery may not be compromised. On the contrary, vessels with marked calcification often show less intimal involvement than is average for that age.26 However, in our study, the RAs with medial calcification did not have less intimal hyperplasia or atherosclerosis. Monckeberg’s calcinosis is independent of and unrelated to the presence of atherosclerosis, but both are commonly found in patients older than 50 years and in patients with diabetes.27 Ninety-four percent of patients who have had diabetes for longer than 35 years will also have medial calcification.28 Renal failure and familial amyloidosis with polyneuropathy have been associated with medial calcification.29 In our study, however, age was the only risk factor for medial calcification. The effect of medial calcification on arteries used for CABG remains unknown.

Morphometric Analysis
Our morphometric analyses showed the RA to have a greater internal diameter and a thicker intima and media than the ITA. The severity indices were strongly correlated with each other, and all were significantly greater in the RA than in the ITA.

Percentage of luminal narrowing is a measure of the severity of intimal thickening, including atherosclerosis. The area rather than the thickness of the intima was measured to allow accurate evaluation of eccentric or irregular disease. Percentage of luminal narrowing is the most useful parameter for comparing intimal thickening in different vascular beds. Although the percentage of luminal area narrowing of the RA was statistically greater than that in the ITA, this may not be clinically significant because the internal luminal diameter of the RA was significantly greater than that of the ITA.

The ITI and the IMR are alternative methods of comparing intimal disease in different vascular beds.19 20 Of these 2, the ITI is more accurate because it uses areas of intima and media rather than width. However, when comparing the RA and the ITA, an assumption is made that any thickening of the media (the denominator in both ITI and IMR), as for example in hypertension, occurs to the same degree in both vascular beds. This assumption may not be valid. In addition, the greater thickness of the media of the RA compared with the ITA may invalidate the use of the ITI and the IMR as a comparative index in different vascular beds. In our opinion, the IMR should be used to compare the severity of atherosclerosis in the same artery among different patients but should not be used to compare atherosclerosis in 2 different arteries (eg, the RA and the ITA).

Kaufer et al20 reported on the pathology of RAs and ITAs used as bypass grafts; they used the IMR to grade atherosclerotic lesions. The mean RA grade was significantly greater than the mean ITA grade; however, the classification of lesions was not clear (ie, it was not clear whether the lesions represented intimal hyperplasia or true atherosclerosis), and the IMR may not have been a good indicator for comparative grading of vascular diseases. The greater thickness of the media in the RA may lead to a misleadingly low IMR compared with an ITA with the same severity of intimal disease.

Prediction of Intimal Hyperplasia and Atherosclerosis
Prospective studies have demonstrated that different arterial beds have different risk factors for the development of atherosclerosis. Smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertension are common risk factors for coronary artery disease, CVD, and PVD, but these factors appear to have different affects on arteries in different locations of the body.13 14 15

Kay et al17 found that intimal thickening of the ITA correlated with age, hypertension, diabetes, and PVD. Another autopsy series from Sisto and Isola in 198924 showed that only hypertension correlated with intimal thickness of the ITA in the 160 cadavers studied; age, cigarette smoking, body mass index, and diabetes were not associated with atherosclerosis.

Singh22 used angiography to study both ITAs in 150 patients with coronary artery disease; the incidence of atherosclerosis in ITAs was 2%. Atherosclerosis in the ITA did not appear to be influenced by age or PVD. Sons et al25 performed angiograms on 117 patients with cardiac disease. PVD and hyperlipidemia significantly increased the relative risk of atherosclerosis in the ITA.

Kaufer et al20 found that the degree of disease in the RA was related to sex, age, presence of diabetes, aortoiliac atherosclerosis, and femoropopliteal atherosclerosis. These factors accounted for 60.67% of the variance (P<0.001) with multivariate regression. None of the risk factors given correlated with the degree of ITA pathology.

In our study, the strongest predictors of intimal hyperplasia in the RA were PVD and cigarette smoking when using the percentage of luminal narrowing as the dependent variable. When ITI was used as the dependent variable, age and diabetes were the most important factors. When the IMR was used, the strongest predictor was age. In the ITA, age and smoking were risk factors of marked luminal narrowing and elevated ITI. Age was the only significant risk factor for a high IMR. However, unlike Kaufer et al,20 we found a large amount of unexplained variation. The predictive variables therefore cannot precisely indicate the risk of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis.

Conclusions
Our findings suggest that the RA has a significantly greater prevalence of intimal hyperplasia, atherosclerosis, and medial calcification than the ITA. Morphometric analyses of percentage of luminal area narrowing, ITI, and IMR led us to conclude that the RA also has a significantly higher degree of intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis than the ITA. However, all severity indices were fairly low in both the RA and the ITA.

Age, smoking, diabetes, and PVD correlated with intimal hyperplasia and atherosclerosis in the RA and the ITA. There was considerable unexplained variation in these predictive variables.

The left ITA is used almost exclusively as a pedicled graft to the left anterior descending coronary artery; however, the choice of the second graft varies widely among surgeons. We advocate caution in selecting the RA in favor of the right ITA as a bypass conduit in patients who are elderly, diabetic, smoke, or have PVD, especially if the patient has a combination of these characteristics. Doppler ultrasonography may be useful in evaluating these patients before surgery to select only disease-free RAs and to avoid an unnecessary incision.


*    Acknowledgments
 
We gratefully acknowledge Paul Martinello, BApSc, for his expert technical assistance in establishing the morphometric analysis.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Carpentier A, Guermonprez JL, Deloche A, Frechette C, Dubost C. The aorta-to-coronary radial artery bypass graft: a technique avoiding pathological changes in grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1973;16:111–121.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

2. Curtis JJ, Stoney WS, Alford WC Jr, Burrus GR, Thomas CS Jr. Intimal hyperplasia: a cause of radial artery aortocoronary bypass graft failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 1975;20:628–635.[Abstract]

3. Fisk RL, Brooks CH, Callaghan JC, Dvorkin J. Experience with the radial artery graft for coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1976;21:513–518.[Abstract]

4. Acar C, Jebara VA, Portoghese M, Beyssen B, Pagny JY, Grare P, Chachques JC, Fabiani JN, Deloche A, Guermonprez JL, Carpentier AF. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;54:652–660.[Abstract]

5. Dietl CA, Benoit CH. Radial artery graft for coronary revascularization: technical considerations. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60:102–110.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Chen AH, Nakao T, Brodman RF, Greenberg M, Charrney R, Menegus M, Johnson M, Grose R, Frame R, Hu EC, Choi HK, Safyer S. Early postoperative angiographic assessment of radial grafts used for coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;111:1208–1212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Brodman RF, Frame R, Camacho M, Hu E, Chen A, Hollinger I. Routine use of unilateral and bilateral radial arteries for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:959–963.[Abstract]

8. Manasse E, Sperti G, Suma H, Canosa C, Kol A, Martinelli L, Schiavello R, Crea F, Maseri A, Possati GF. Use of the radial artery for myocardial revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:1076–1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. da Costa FDA, da Costa IA, Poffo R, Abuchaim D, Gaspar R, Garcia L, Faraco DL. Myocardial revascularization with the radial artery: a clinical and angiographic study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:475–480.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Barner HB. Defining the role of the radial artery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;8:3–9.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Calafiore AM, Di Giammarco G. Complete revascularization with three or more arterial conduits. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;1:15–23.

12. Weinschelbaum EE, Gabe ED, Macchia A, Smimmo R, Suarez LD. Total myocardial revascularization with arterial conduits: radial artery combined with internal thoracic arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:911–916.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Salonen JT, Salonen R. Risk factors for carotid and femoral atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic men. J Intern Med. 1994;236:561–566.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Salonen JT, Puska P, Kottke TE. Smoking, blood pressure and serum cholesterol as risk factors of acute myocardial infarction and death among men in Eastern Finland. Eur Heart J. 1981;2:365–373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Salonen JT, Puska P, Tuomilehto J, Homan K. Relation of blood pressure, serum lipids and smoking to the risk of cerebral stroke: a longitudinal study in Eastern Finland. Stroke. 1982;13:327–333.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Stary HC, Chandler AB, Dinsmore RE, Fuster V, Glagov S, Insull W, Rosenfeld ME, Schwartz CJ, Wagner WD, Wissler RW. A definition of advanced types of atherosclerosis lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis: a report from the Committee on Vascular Lesions of the Council on Arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1995;92:1355–1374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Kay HR, Korns ME, Flemma RJ, Tector AJ, Lepley D Jr. Atherosclerosis of the internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1976;21:504–507.[Abstract]

18. Kobayashi H, Kitamura S, Kawachi K, Morita R, Konishi Y, Tsutsumi M. A pathohistological and biochemical study of arteriosclerosis in the internal thoracic artery, a vessel commonly used as a graft in coronary artery bypass surgery. Surg Today. 1993;23:697–703.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

19. Malhotra R, Bedi HS, Bazaz S, Jain S, Trehan N. Morphometric analysis of the right gastroepiploic artery and the internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:124–127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Kaufer E, Factor SM, Frame R, Brodman RF. Pathology of the radial and internal thoracic arteries used as coronary artery bypass grafts. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;63:1118–1122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Stary HC. Composition and classification of human atherosclerotic lesions. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1992;421:277–290.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

22. Singh RN. Atherosclerosis and the internal mammary arteries. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1983;6:72–77.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

23. Mestres CA, Rives A, Igual A, Vehi C, Murtra M. Atherosclerosis of the internal mammary artery: histopathological analysis and implications on its results in coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1986;34:356–358.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

24. Sisto T, Isola J. Incidence of atherosclerosis in the internal mammary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;47:884–886.[Abstract]

25. Sons HJ, Godehardt E, Kunert J, Losse B, Bircks W. Internal thoracic artery: prevalence of atherosclerotic changes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993;106:1192–1195.[Abstract]

26. Sappington SW, Horneff JA. Tibial artery changes in comparison with those of the radial and coronary arteries. Am J Med Sci. 1941;201:862–871.

27. Sappington SW, Cook HS. Radial artery changes in comparison with those of the coronary and other arteries. Am J Med Sci. 1936;192:822–839.

28. Goebel FD, Fuessl HS. Monckeberg’s sclerosis after sympathetic denervation in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Diabetologia. 1983;24:347–350.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

29. Everhart JE, Pettitt DJ, Knowler WC, Rose FA, Bennett PH. Medial arterial calcification and its association with mortality and complications of diabetes. Diabetologia. 1988;31:16–23.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ruengsakulrach, P.
Right arrow Articles by Buxton, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ruengsakulrach, P.
Right arrow Articles by Buxton, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Risk Factors
Right arrow CV surgery: other
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease