(Circulation. 1999;100:1016-1030.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
ACC/AHA Practice Guidelines |
Key Words: AHA Scientific Statements reperfusion thrombolysis myocardial infarction angioplasty
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The guidelines, incorporating the update, are available on the Web sites of both the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org) and the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org). In the Web site version, deleted text is indicated by strikeout, and new/revised text is presented as double-underlined type. Reprints of the original document with the revised sections appended are available from both organizations (see information below).
| Recommendations |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Explanation of Classes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I: Conditions for which there is evidence for and/or general agreement that a given procedure or treatment is beneficial, useful, and effective.
Class II: Conditions for which there is conflicting evidence and/or a divergence of opinion about the usefulness/efficacy of a procedure or treatment.
Class IIa: Weight of evidence/opinion is in favor of usefulness/efficacy.
Class IIb: Usefulness/efficacy is less well established by evidence/opinion.
Class III: Conditions for which there is evidence and/or general agreement that a procedure/treatment is not useful/effective and in some cases may be harmful.
| Prehospital Issues |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Availability of 911 access. 2. Availability of an emergency medical services (EMS) system staffed by persons trained to treat cardiac arrest with defibrillation if indicated and to triage patients with ischemic-type chest discomfort.
Class IIa
1. Availability of a first-responder defibrillation
program in a tiered response system. 2. Healthcare providers
educate patients/families about signs and symptoms of AMI, accessing
EMS, and medications.
Class IIb
1. Twelve-lead telemetry. 2. Prehospital
thrombolysis in special circumstances (eg, transport
time greater than 90 minutes).
| Initial Recognition and Management in the Emergency Department |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Routine Measures
1. Supplemental oxygen, intravenous
access, and continuous electrocardiographic monitoring should be
established in all patients with acute ischemic-type chest
discomfort. 2. An ECG should be obtained and interpreted
within 10 minutes of arrival in the ED in all patients with suspected
acute ischemic-type chest discomfort.
| Oxygen |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
1. Routine administration to all patients with
uncomplicated myocardial infarction (MI) during the first 2 to 3
hours.
Class IIb
1. Routine administration of supplemental oxygen to
patients with uncomplicated MI beyond 3 to 6 hours.
| Intravenous Nitroglycerin |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
None.
Class IIb
1. For the first 24 to 48 hours in all patients with
AMI who do not have hypotension, bradycardia, or
tachycardia. 2. Continued use (beyond 48
hours)*1 in patients with a large or complicated
infarction.
Class III
1. Patients with systolic blood pressure less
than 90 mm Hg or severe bradycardia (less than 50
bpm).
| Aspirin |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Atropine |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
1. Symptomatic patients with
inferior infarction and type I second- or third-degree
heart block at the level of the AV node (ie, with narrow QRS complex or
with known existing bundle-branch block [BBB]).
Class IIb
1. Administration concomitant with (before or after)
administration of morphine in the presence of sinus
bradycardia. 2. Asymptomatic patients with
inferior infarction and type I second-degree heart block or
third-degree heart block at the level of the AV node.
3. Second- or third-degree AV block of uncertain mechanism when
pacing is not available.
Class III
1. Sinus bradycardia greater than 40 bpm without signs
or symptoms of hypoperfusion or frequent premature
ventricular contractions. 2. Type II AV
block and third-degree AV block and third-degree AV block with new wide
QRS complex presumed due to AMI.
| Thrombolysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 time to therapy 12 hours or
less,
3 age less than 75 years. 2. BBB
(obscuring ST-segment analysis) and history suggesting AMI.
Class IIa
1. ST elevation,*3 age 75 years or older.
Class IIb
1. ST elevation,
2 time to therapy greater
than 12 to 24 hours.*3 2. Blood pressure on
presentation greater than 180 mm Hg systolic
and/or greater than 110 mm Hg diastolic associated
with high-risk MI.
Class III
1. ST elevation,
2 time to therapy greater than 24
hours,*3 ischemic pain resolved. 2. ST-segment
depression only.
|
Primary Percutaneous Transluminal
Coronary Angioplasty (PTCA)
| Early Coronary Angiography in the ST-Segment Elevation or BBB Cohort Not Undergoing Primary PTCA |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
1. Patients with cardiogenic shock or persistent
hemodynamic instability.
Class IIb
1. Patients with evolving large or anterior infarcts
treated with thrombolytic agents in whom it is believed
that the artery is not patent and adjuvant PTCA is planned.
Class III
1. Routine use of angiography and subsequent PTCA
within 24 hours of administration of thrombolytic
agents.
| Emergency or Urgent Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
1. Cardiogenic shock with coronary
anatomy suitable for surgery.
Class IIb
1. Failed PTCA and small area of
myocardium at risk; hemodynamically
stable.
Class III
1. When the expected surgical mortality rate equals or
exceeds the mortality rate associated with appropriate medical
therapy.
|
Early Coronary Angiography and/or Interventional
Therapy in NonST-Segment Elevation Cohort
Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors![]()
|
| Hospital Management |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Selection of ECG monitoring based on infarct location and rhythm. 2. Bed rest with bedside commode privileges for initial 12 hours in hemodynamically stable patients free of ischemic-type chest discomfort. 3. Avoidance of Valsalva. 4. Careful attention to maximum pain relief.
Class IIb
1. Routine use of anxiolytics.
Class III
1. Prolonged bed rest (more than 12 to 24 hours) in
stable patients without complications.
| Identification and Treatment of the Patient at High Risk |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Aspirin for pericarditis. 2. ß-Adrenoceptor blockers intravenously, then orally for ischemic-type chest discomfort. 3. (Re)administration of thrombolytic therapy (alteplase) for patients with recurrent ST elevation. 4. Coronary arteriography for ischemic-type chest discomfort recurring after hours to days of initial therapy and associated with objective evidence of ischemia in patients who are candidates for revascularization.
Class IIa
1. Nitroglycerin
intravenously for 24 hours, then topically or orally for
ischemic-type chest discomfort.
Class IIb
1. Corticosteroids for
pericarditis. 2. Indomethacin for
pericarditis.
| Hemodynamic Monitoring |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Severe or progressive CHF or pulmonary edema. 2. Cardiogenic shock or progressive hypotension. 3. Suspected mechanical complications of acute infarction, ie, VSD, papillary muscle rupture, or pericardial tamponade.
Class IIa
1. Hypotension that does not respond promptly to fluid
administration in a patient without pulmonary congestion.
Class III
1. Patients with acute infarction without evidence of
cardiac or pulmonary complications.
| Intra-arterial Pressure Monitoring |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
1. Patients receiving intravenous sodium
nitroprusside or other potent vasodilators.
Class IIb
1. Hemodynamically stable patients
receiving intravenous nitroglycerin for
myocardial ischemia. 2. Patients receiving
intravenous inotropic agents.
Class III
1. Patients with acute infarction who are
hemodynamically stable.
| Intra-aortic Balloon Counterpulsation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
1. Signs of hemodynamic instability,
poor LV function, or persistent ischemia in patients with large
areas of myocardium at risk.
Class IIb
1. In patients with successful PTCA after failed
thrombolysis or those with three-vessel
coronary disease to prevent reocclusion. 2. In
patients known to have large areas of myocardium at risk
with or without active ischemia.
Rhythm Disturbances
Atrial Fibrillation
Class I
1. Electrical cardioversion for patients with severe hemodynamic compromise or intractable ischemia. 2. Rapid digitalization to slow a rapid ventricular response and improve LV function. 3. Intravenous ß-adrenoceptor blockers to slow a rapid ventricular response in patients without clinical LV dysfunction, bronchospastic disease, or AV block. 4. Heparin should be given.
Class IIa
1. Either diltiazem or verapamil
intravenously to slow a rapid ventricular
response if ß-adrenoceptor blocking agents are contraindicated or
ineffective.
| Ventricular Tachycardia/Ventricular Fibrillation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
1. Infusions of antiarrhythmic drugs may be used after
an episode of VT/VF but should be discontinued after 6 to 24 hours and
the need for further arrhythmia management assessed.
2. Electrolyte and acid-base disturbances should be
corrected to prevent recurrent episodes of VF when an initial episode
of VF has been treated.
Class IIb
1. Drug-refractory polymorphic VT should be
managed by aggressive attempts to reduce myocardial ischemia,
including therapies such as ß-adrenoceptor blockade, intra-aortic
balloon pumping, and emergency PTCA/CABG surgery. Amiodarone,
150 mg infused over 10 minutes followed by a constant infusion of 1.0
mg/min for up to 6 hours and then a maintenance infusion of 0.5
mg/min may also be helpful.
Class III
1. Treatment of isolated ventricular
premature beats, couplets, runs of accelerated
idioventricular rhythm, and nonsustained VT.
2. Prophylactic administration of antiarrhythmic therapy
when using thrombolytic agents.
| Bradyarrhythmias and Heart Block |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Symptomatic sinus bradycardia (generally, heart rate less than 50 bpm associated with hypotension, ischemia, or escape ventricular arrhythmia). 2. Ventricular asystole. 3. Symptomatic AV block occurring at the AV nodal level (second-degree type I or third-degree with a narrow-complex escape rhythm).
Class IIa
None.
Class III
1. AV block occurring at an infranodal level (usually
associated with anterior MI with a wide-complex escape rhythm).
2. Asymptomatic sinus bradycardia.
Temporary Pacing
Placement of Transcutaneous Patches*4 and
Active (Demand) Transcutaneous Pacing
5
Class I
1. Sinus bradycardia (rate less than 50
bpm) with symptoms of hypotension (systolic blood pressure less
than 80 mm Hg) unresponsive to drug therapy.
5
2. Mobitz type II second-degree AV block.
5
3. Third-degree heart block.
5 4. Bilateral BBB
(alternating BBB, or right BBB [RBBB] and alternating left anterior
fascicular block [LAFB], left posterior fascicular block [LPFB])
(irrespective of time of onset).*4 5. Newly acquired or
age-indeterminate LBBB, LBBB and LAFBa, RBBB, and LPFBa.*4
6. RBBB or LBBB and first-degree AV block.*4
Class IIa
1. Stable bradycardia (systolic blood pressure
greater than 90 mm Hg, no hemodynamic compromise,
or compromise responsive to initial drug therapy).*6 2. Newly
acquired or age-indeterminate RBBB.*6
Class IIb
1. Newly acquired or age-indeterminate first-degree AV
block.*6
Class III
1. Uncomplicated AMI without evidence of conduction
system disease.
Temporary Transvenous Pacing
7
Class I
1. Asystole. 2. Symptomatic
bradycardia (includes sinus bradycardia with hypotension and type I
second-degree AV block with hypotension not responsive to
atropine). 3. Bilateral BBB
(alternating BBB or RBBB with alternating LAFB/LPFB) (any age).
4. New or indeterminate-age bifascicular block (RBBB with LAFB or
LPFB, or LBBB) with first-degree AV block. 5. Mobitz type II
second-degree AV block.
Class IIa
1. RBBB and LAFB or LPFB (new or
indeterminate). 2. RBBB with first-degree AV block.
3. LBBB, new or indeterminate. 4. Incessant VT, for
atrial or ventricular overdrive pacing.
5. Recurrent sinus pauses (greater than 3 seconds) not responsive to
atropine.
Class IIb
1. Bifascicular block of indeterminate age.
2. New or age-indeterminate isolated RBBB.
Class III
1. First-degree heart block. 2. Type I
second-degree AV block with normal
hemodynamics. 3. Accelerated
idioventricular rhythm. 4. BBB or fascicular
block known to exist before AMI.
Permanent Pacing After AMI
Class I
1. Persistent second-degree AV block in the
His-Purkinje system with bilateral BBB or complete heart block after
AMI. 2. Transient advanced (second- or third-degree) AV block
and associated BBB.
8
3. Symptomatic AV block at any level.
Class IIb
1. Persistent advanced (second- or third-degree) block
at the AV node level.
Class III
1. Transient AV conduction disturbances in the
absence of intraventricular conduction
defects. 2. Transient AV block in the presence of isolated
LAFB. 3. Acquired LAFB in the absence of AV block.
4. Persistent first-degree AV block in the presence of BBB that is
old or age indeterminate.
| Other Surgical Interventions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Papillary muscle rupture with severe acute mitral
insufficiency.
|
Class III
1. Acute infarctectomy in hemodynamically stable
patients.
| Rationale and Approach to Pharmacotherapy |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class I
1. Patients undergoing percutaneous or surgical
revascularization.
|
Class IIb
1. Patients treated with nonselective thrombolytic
agents, not at high risk, subcutaneous heparin, 7500 U to 12 500 U
twice a day until completely ambulatory.
Class III
1. Routine intravenous heparin within 6 hours to
patients receiving a nonselective fibrinolytic agent (streptokinase,
anistreplase, urokinase) who are not at high risk for systemic
embolism.
|
ß-Adrenoceptor Blocking Agents
Early Therapy
.
|
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme
Inhibitors
|
Class IIa
1. All other patients within the first 24 hours of a
suspected or established AMI, provided significant hypotension or other
clear-cut contraindications are absent. 2. Asymptomatic patients
with mildly impaired LV function (ejection fraction 40% to 50%) and a
history of old MI.
Class IIb
1. Patients who have recently recovered from MI but
have normal or mildly abnormal global LV function.
| Calcium Channel Blockers |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
1. Verapamil or diltiazem may be given to
patients in whom ß-adrenoceptor blockers are ineffective or
contraindicated (ie, bronchospastic disease) for relief of ongoing
ischemia or control of a rapid ventricular response
with AF after AMI in the absence of CHF, LV dysfunction, or AV
block.
Class IIb
1. In nonST-elevation infarction, diltiazem may be
given to patients without LV dysfunction, pulmonary congestion,
or CHF. It may be added to standard therapy after the first 24 hours
and continued for 1 year.
Class III
1. Nifedipine (short acting) is generally
contraindicated in routine treatment of AMI because of its negative
inotropic effects and the reflex sympathetic activation,
tachycardia, and hypotension associated with its
use. 2. Diltiazem and verapamil are
contraindicated in patients with AMI and associated LV dysfunction or
CHF.
| Magnesium |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
1. Correction of documented magnesium (and/or
potassium) deficits, especially in patients receiving diuretics
before onset of infarction. 2. Episodes of torsade de
pointestype VT associated with a prolonged QT interval should be
treated with 1 to 2 g of magnesium administered as a bolus over 5
minutes.
Class IIb
1. Magnesium bolus and infusion in high-risk patients
such as the elderly and/or those for whom reperfusion therapy is not
suitable.
| Preparation for Discharge From the Hospital |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Stress ECG
a. Before discharge for prognostic assessment or
functional capacity (submaximal at 4 to 6 days or symptom limited at 10
to 14 days). b. Early after discharge for prognostic
assessment and functional capacity (14 to 21 days).
c. Late after discharge (3 to 6 weeks) for functional capacity
and prognosis if early stress was submaximal. 2. Exercise,
vasodilator stress nuclear scintigraphy, or exercise stress
echocardiography when baseline abnormalities of the
ECG compromise interpretation.*9
Class IIa
1. Dipyridamole or adenosine
stress perfusion nuclear scintigraphy or
dobutamine echocardiography before
discharge for prognostic assessment in patients judged to be unable to
exercise. 2. Exercise two-dimensional
echocardiography or nuclear
scintigraphy (before or early after discharge for
prognostic assessment).
Class III
1. Stress testing within 2 to 3 days of AMI.
2. Either exercise or pharmacological stress testing at any time to
evaluate patients with unstable postinfarction angina pectoris.
3. At any time to evaluate patients with AMI who have uncompensated
CHF, cardiac arrhythmia, or noncardiac conditions that severely
limit their ability to exercise. 4. Before discharge to
evaluate patients who have already been selected for cardiac
catheterization. In this situation, an exercise test
may be useful after catheterization to evaluate
function or identify ischemia in distribution of a
coronary lesion of borderline severity.
| Assessment of Ventricular ArrhythmiaRoutine Testing |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Class IIa
None.
Class IIb
1. Ambulatory (Holter) monitoring, signal-averaged
ECG, heart rate variability, baroreflex sensitivity monitoring, alone
or in combination with these or other tests, including functional tests
(ejection fraction, treadmill testing) for risk assessment after MI,
especially in patients at higher perceived risk, when findings might
influence management issues, or for clinical research purposes.
Invasive Evaluation
Coronary Angiography and Possible PTCA
Class I
1. Patients with spontaneous episodes of myocardial
ischemia or episodes of myocardial ischemia provoked by
minimal exertion during recovery from infarction. 2. Before
definitive therapy of a mechanical complication of infarction such as
acute mitral regurgitation, VSD,
pseudoaneurysm, or LV aneurysm. 3. Patients
with persistent hemodynamic instability.
Class IIa
1. When MI is suspected to have occurred by a
mechanism other than thrombotic occlusion at an atherosclerotic plaque.
This would include coronary embolism, certain
metabolic or hematological diseases, or coronary
artery spasm. 2. Survivors of AMI with depressed LV
systolic function (LV ejection fraction less than or equal to
40%), CHF, prior revascularization, or malignant
ventricular arrhythmias. 3. Survivors of
AMI who had clinical heart failure during the acute episode but
subsequently demonstrated well-preserved LV function.
Class IIb
1. Coronary angiography performed in all
patients after infarction to find persistently occluded infarct-related
arteries in an attempt to revascularize the artery or to identify
patients with three-vessel disease. 2. All patients after a
nonQ-wave MI. 3. Recurrent VT or VF or both, despite
antiarrhythmic therapy in patients without evidence of ongoing
myocardial ischemia.
Class III
1. Routine use of coronary angiography and
subsequent PTCA of the infarct-related artery within days after
receiving thrombolytic therapy. 2. Survivors
of MI who are thought not to be candidates for coronary
revascularization.
Routine Coronary Angiography and PTCA After Successful
Thrombolytic Therapy
Class I
None.
Class IIa
None.
Class III
1. Routine PTCA of the stenotic
infarct-related artery immediately after thrombolytic
therapy. 2. PTCA of the stenotic infarct-related
artery within 48 hours of receiving a thrombolytic
agent in asymptomatic patients without evidence of
ischemia.
Secondary Prevention
Management of Lipids
Class I
1. The AHA Step II diet, which is low in saturated fat
and cholesterol (less than 7% of total calories as saturated fat and
less than 200 mg/d cholesterol), should be instituted in all patients
after recovery from AMI.
2. Paties with LDL cholesterol levels greater than 125 mg/dL despite the AHA Step II diet should be placed on drug therapy with the goal of reducing LDL to less than 100 mg/dL.
3. Patients with normal plasma cholesterol levels who have a high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level less than 35 mg/dL should receive nonpharmacological therapy (eg, exercise) designed to raise it.
Class IIa
1. Drug therapy may be added to diet in patients with
LDL cholesterol levels less than 130 mg/dL but greater than 100 mg/dL
after an appropriate trial of the AHA Step II diet alone.*10
2. Patients with normal total cholesterol levels but HDL cholesterol less than 35 mg/dL despite diet and other non-pharmacological therapy may be started on drugs such as niacin to raise HDL levels.
|
Long-Term ß-Adrenoceptor Blocker Therapy in Survivors of
Myocardial Infarction
Class I
1. All but low-risk patients without a clear
contraindication to ß-adrenoceptor blocker therapy. Treatment should
begin within a few days of the event (if not initiated acutely) and
continue indefinitely.
Class IIa
1. Low-risk patients without a clear contraindication
to ß-adrenoceptor blocker therapy.
.
|
Anticoagulants
Long-Term Anticoagulation After AMI
Class I
1. For secondary prevention of MI in post-MI patients
unable to take daily aspirin.
11 2. Post-MI
patients in persistent AF. 3. Patients with LV thrombus.
Class IIa
1. Post-MI patients with extensive wall motion
abnormalities. 2. Patients with paroxysmal AF.
Class IIb
1. Post-MI patients with severe LV systolic
dysfunction with or without CHF.
Estrogen Replacement Therapy and Myocardial Infarction
|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Repeat ECGs recommended during medical observation in clinical settings when initial ECG is nondiagnostic of ST elevation. ![]()
3 Time of symptom onset is defined as beginning of continuous persistent discomfort that brought the patient to the hospital. ![]()
4 Transcutaneous patches applied; system may be attached and activated within a brief time if needed. Transcutaneous pacing may be very helpful as an urgent expedient. Because it is associated with significant pain, high-risk patients likely to require pacing should receive a temporary pacemaker. ![]()
5 Transcutaneous patches applied; system may be attached and activated within a brief time if needed. Transcutaneous pacing may be very helpful as an urgent expedient. Because it is associated with significant pain, high-risk patients likely to require pacing should receive a temporary pacemaker. ![]()
6 Apply patches and attach system; system is in either active or standby mode to allow immediate use on demand as required. In facilities in which transvenous pacing or expertise are not available to place an intravenous system, consideration should be given to transporting the patient to one equipped and competent in placing transvenous systems. ![]()
7 It should be noted that in choosing an intravenous pacemaker system, patients with substantially depressed ventricular performance, including right ventricular infarction, may respond better to atrial/AV sequential pacing than ventricular pacing. ![]()
8 An electrophysiology study should be considered to assess the site and extent of heart block in uncertain cases. ![]()
9 Marked abnormalities in the resting ECG such as LBBB, LV hypertrophy with strain, ventricular pre-excitation, or a ventricular paced rhythm render a displacement of ST segments virtually uninterpretable. For patients taking digoxin or who have less than 1 mm ST depression on their resting tracing who undergo standard stress ECG testing, it must be realized that further ST depression with exercise may have minimal diagnostic significance. ![]()
10 HMG-CoA reductase drugs produce the greatest lowering of LDL cholesterol. Niacin is less effective in lowering LDL, although it is more effective in raising HDL levels. Resins are rarely sufficiently effective to be used alone, but they may be used to supplement lowering LDL with either niacin or HMG-CoA reductase drugs. ![]()
11 See "Initial Recognition and Management in the Emergency Department," "Aspirin." ![]()
"1999 Update: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: Executive Summary and Recommendations: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction)" was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in June 1999 and by the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in July 1999.
When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association request that the following citation format be used: Ryan TJ, Antman EM, Brooks NH, Califf RM, Hillis LD, Hiratzka LF, Rapaport E, Riegel B, Russell RO, Smith EE III, Weaver WD. 1999 update: ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with acute myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 1999;100:10161030.
This document is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org) and the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org). A single reprint of the executive summary and recommendations is available by calling 800-242-8721 (US only) or writing the American Heart Association, Public Information, 7272 Greenville Ave, Dallas, TX 75231-4596. Ask for reprint No. 71-0169. To obtain a reprint of the complete guidelines update published in the September 1999 issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology, ask for reprint No. 71-0170. To purchase additional reprints (specify version and reprint number): up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342, or
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Shahangian and S. R. Snyder Laboratory Medicine Quality Indicators: A Review of the Literature Am J Clin Pathol, March 1, 2009; 131(3): 418 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Krishna and K. Zacharowski Principles of intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation CEACCP, February 1, 2009; 9(1): 24 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Nijveldt, M. B. M. Hofman, A. Hirsch, A. M. Beek, V. A. W. M. Umans, P. R. Algra, J. J. Piek, and A. C. van Rossum Assessment of Microvascular Obstruction and Prediction of Short-term Remodeling after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Cardiac MR Imaging Study Radiology, February 1, 2009; 250(2): 363 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Foraker, K. M. Rose, A. P. McGinn, C. M. Suchindran, D. C. Goff Jr, E. A. Whitsel, J. L. Wood, and W. D. Rosamond Neighborhood Income, Health Insurance, and Prehospital Delay for Myocardial Infarction: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study Arch Intern Med, September 22, 2008; 168(17): 1874 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. R. Bates and B. K. Nallamothu Commentary: The Role of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Circulation, July 29, 2008; 118(5): 567 - 573. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Katalinic, A. Waldmann, B. Schwaab, G. Richardt, A. Sheikhzadeh, and H. Raspe The TeleGuard trial of additional telemedicine care in CAD patients. 1 Utilization of the system J Telemed Telecare, April 1, 2008; 14(1): 17 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Waldmann, A. Katalinic, B. Schwaab, G. Richardt, A. Sheikhzadeh, and H. Raspe The TeleGuard trial of additional telemedicine care in CAD patients. 2 Morbidity and mortality after 12 months J Telemed Telecare, April 1, 2008; 14(1): 22 - 26. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Lichtman, J. A. Spertus, K. J. Reid, M. J. Radford, J. S. Rumsfeld, N. B. Allen, F. A. Masoudi, W. S. Weintraub, and H. M. Krumholz Acute Noncardiac Conditions and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): 1925 - 1930. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Schneider and B. E. Sobel Conundrums in the Combined Use of Anticoagulants and Antiplatelet Drugs Circulation, July 17, 2007; 116(3): 305 - 315. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Colucci, T. J. Kolias, K. F. Adams, W. F. Armstrong, J. K. Ghali, S. S. Gottlieb, B. Greenberg, M. I. Klibaner, M. L. Kukin, J. E. Sugg, et al. Metoprolol Reverses Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With Asymptomatic Systolic Dysfunction: The REversal of VEntricular Remodeling with Toprol-XL (REVERT) Trial Circulation, July 3, 2007; 116(1): 49 - 56. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Aronow Use of Antiplatelet Drugs in Secondary Prevention in Older Persons With Atherothrombotic Disease J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2007; 62(5): 518 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Ho, J. A. Spertus, F. A. Masoudi, K. J. Reid, E. D. Peterson, D. J. Magid, H. M. Krumholz, and J. S. Rumsfeld Impact of medication therapy discontinuation on mortality after myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med, September 25, 2006; 166(17): 1842 - 1847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Oudot, P G Steg, N Danchin, G Dentan, M Zeller, P Sicard, P Buffet, Y Laurent, L Janin-Manificat, I L'Huillier, et al. Impact of chronic oral anticoagulation on management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction: data from the RICO survey Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1077 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Jani, C. Montoye, R. Mehta, A. L. Riba, A. C. DeFranco, R. Parrish, S. Skorcz, P. L. Baker, J. Faul, B. Chen, et al. Sex Differences in the Application of Evidence-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Acute Myocardial Infarction: The American College of Cardiology's Guidelines Applied in Practice Projects in Michigan. Arch Intern Med, June 12, 2006; 166(11): 1164 - 1170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. McNamara, Y. Wang, J. Herrin, J. P. Curtis, E. H. Bradley, D. J. Magid, E. D. Peterson, M. Blaney, P. D. Frederick, H. M. Krumholz, et al. Effect of Door-to-Balloon Time on Mortality in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2180 - 2186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Armstrong, W.-C. Chang, L. Wallentin, P. Goldstein, C. B. Granger, K. Bogaerts, T. Danays, F. Van de Werf, and for the ASSENT-3 and ASSENT-3 PLUS Investigators Efficacy and safety of unfractionated heparin versus enoxaparin: a pooled analysis of ASSENT-3 and -3 PLUS data. Can. Med. Assoc. J., May 9, 2006; 174(10): 1421 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Curtis, E. L. Portnay, Y. Wang, R. L. McNamara, J. Herrin, E. H. Bradley, D. J. Magid, M. E. Blaney, J. G. Canto, and H. M. Krumholz The Pre-Hospital Electrocardiogram and Time to Reperfusion in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction, 2000-2002: Findings From the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4 J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 18, 2006; 47(8): 1544 - 1552. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. J. Witt, R. D. Brown Jr., S. J. Jacobsen, S. A. Weston, B. P. Yawn, and V. L. Roger A Community-Based Study of Stroke Incidence after Myocardial Infarction Ann Intern Med, December 6, 2005; 143(11): 785 - 792. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R C Welsh, W Chang, P Goldstein, J Adgey, C B Granger, F W A Verheugt, L Wallentin, F Van de Werf, P W Armstrong, and on behalf of the ASSENT-3 PLUS Investigators Time to treatment and the impact of a physician on prehospital management of acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: insights from the ASSENT-3 PLUS trial Heart, November 1, 2005; 91(11): 1400 - 1406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Rothberg, C. Celestin, L. D. Fiore, E. Lawler, and J. R. Cook Warfarin plus Aspirin after Myocardial Infarction or the Acute Coronary Syndrome: Meta-Analysis with Estimates of Risk and Benefit Ann Intern Med, August 16, 2005; 143(4): 241 - 250. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.G. Lindholm, S. Boesgaard, C. Torp-Pedersen, L. Kober, and on behalf of the TRACE registry study group Diabetes mellitus and cardiogenic shock in acute myocardial infarction Eur J Heart Fail, August 1, 2005; 7(5): 834 - 839. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T. Roe, L. S. Parsons, C. V. Pollack Jr, J. G. Canto, H. V. Barron, N. R. Every, W. J. Rogers, E. D. Peterson, and for the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction Quality of Care by Classification of Myocardial Infarction: Treatment Patterns for ST-Segment Elevation vs Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Arch Intern Med, July 25, 2005; 165(14): 1630 - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Egred, S. Shaw, B. Mohammad, P. Waitt, and E. Rodrigues Under-use of beta-blockers in patients with ischaemic heart disease and concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease QJM, July 1, 2005; 98(7): 493 - 497. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D. Sequist, T. K. Gandhi, A. S. Karson, J. M. Fiskio, D. Bugbee, M. Sperling, E. F. Cook, E. J. Orav, D. G. Fairchild, and D. W. Bates A Randomized Trial of Electronic Clinical Reminders to Improve Quality of Care for Diabetes and Coronary Artery Disease J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., July 1, 2005; 12(4): 431 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Schiele, N. Meneveau, M. F. Seronde, F. Caulfield, R. Fouche, G. Lassabe, D. Baborier, P. Legalery, J.-P. Bassand, and on behalf of the Reseau de Cardiologie de Franche Compliance with guidelines and 1-year mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a prospective study Eur. Heart J., May 1, 2005; 26(9): 873 - 880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Sabatine, D. A. Morrow, R. P. Giugliano, P. B.J. Burton, S. A. Murphy, C. H. McCabe, C. M. Gibson, and E. Braunwald Association of Hemoglobin Levels With Clinical Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndromes Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): 2042 - 2049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lam and C. M. Ruby Impact of an interdisciplinary team on drug therapy outcomes in a geriatric clinic Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 15, 2005; 62(6): 626 - 629. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Machecourt, E. Bonnefoy, G. Vanzetto, P. Motreff, S. Marliere, A. Leizorovicz, B. Allenet, J. M. Lacroute, J. Cassagnes, and P. Touboul Primary angioplasty is cost-minimizing compared with pre-hospital thrombolysis for patients within 60 min of a percutaneous coronary intervention center: The Comparison of Angioplasty and Pre-hospital Thrombolysis in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CAPTIM) cost-efficacy sub-study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 15, 2005; 45(4): 515 - 524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Spertus, R. Nerella, R. Kettlekamp, J. House, S. Marso, A. M. Borkon, and J. S. Rumsfeld Risk of Restenosis and Health Status Outcomes for Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Circulation, February 15, 2005; 111(6): 768 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Endorsed by the European Society of Intensive Care, Authors/Task Force Members, M. S. Nieminen, M. Bohm, M. R. Cowie, H. Drexler, G. S. Filippatos, G. Jondeau, Y. Hasin, J. Lopez-Sendon, et al. Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: The Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology Eur. Heart J., February 2, 2005; 26(4): 384 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bursi, M. Enriquez-Sarano, V. T. Nkomo, S. J. Jacobsen, S. A. Weston, R. A. Meverden, and V. L. Roger Heart Failure and Death After Myocardial Infarction in the Community: The Emerging Role of Mitral Regurgitation Circulation, January 25, 2005; 111(3): 295 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Silva, C. E. Rochitte, J. S. Junior, J. Tsutsui, J. Andrade, E. E. Martinez, P. J. Moffa, J. C. Menegheti, R. Kalil-Filho, J. F. Ramires, et al. Late coronary artery recanalization effects on left ventricular remodelling and contractility by magnetic resonance imaging Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2005; 26(1): 36 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. R. Gollapudi, P. S. Teirstein, D. D. Stevenson, and R. A. Simon Aspirin Sensitivity: Implications for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease JAMA, December 22, 2004; 292(24): 3017 - 3023. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Aronow Management of the Elderly Person After Myocardial Infarction J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2004; 59(11): 1173 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.L. Mehta, J. Chen, F. Yu, and D.Y. Li Aspirin inhibits ox-LDL-mediated LOX-1 expression and metalloproteinase-1 in human coronary endothelial cells Cardiovasc Res, November 1, 2004; 64(2): 243 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tran and S. S. Anand Oral Antiplatelet Therapy in Cerebrovascular Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, and Peripheral Arterial Disease JAMA, October 20, 2004; 292(15): 1867 - 1874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Snow, P. Barry, S. D. Fihn, R. J. Gibbons, D. K. Owens, S. V. Williams, C. Mottur-Pilson, K. B. Weiss, and for the American College of Physicians/American Co Primary Care Management of Chronic Stable Angina and Asymptomatic Suspected or Known Coronary Artery Disease: A Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med, October 5, 2004; 141(7): 562 - 567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Frossard, I. Fuchs, J. M. Leitner, K. Hsieh, M. Vlcek, H. Losert, H. Domanovits, W. Schreiber, A. N. Laggner, and B. Jilma Platelet Function Predicts Myocardial Damage in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11): 1392 - 1397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kettelkamp, J. House, M. Garg, R. S. Stuart, A. Grantham, and J. Spertus Using the Risk of Restenosis as a Guide to Triaging Patients Between Surgical and Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization Circulation, September 14, 2004; 110(11_suppl_1): II-50 - II-54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Menon, R. A. Harrington, J. S. Hochman, C. P. Cannon, S. D. Goodman, R. G. Wilcox, H. J. Schunemann, and E. M. Ohman Thrombolysis and Adjunctive Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy Chest, September 1, 2004; 126(3_suppl): 549S - 575S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Keeley and C. L. Grines Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Every Patient with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: What Stands in the Way? Ann Intern Med, August 17, 2004; 141(4): 298 - 304. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J E Udelson and E J Flint Radionuclide imaging in risk assessment after acute coronary syndromes Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(suppl_5): v16 - v25. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. J. Gluckman, B. Baranowski, M. D. Ashen, C. A. Henrikson, M. McAllister, J. B. Braunstein, and R. S. Blumenthal A Practical and Evidence-Based Approach to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Reduction Arch Intern Med, July 26, 2004; 164(14): 1490 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Franco, S. Oparil, and O. A. Carretero Hypertensive Therapy: Part II Circulation, June 29, 2004; 109(25): 3081 - 3088. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Kernis, K. J. Harjai, G. W. Stone, L. L. Grines, J. A. Boura, W. W. O'Neill, and C. L. Grines Does beta-blocker therapy improve clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction after successful primary angioplasty? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1773 - 1779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Faxon Beta-blocker therapy and primary angioplasty: What is the controversy? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 19, 2004; 43(10): 1788 - 1790. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. J DiDomenico, H. Y Park, M. R. Southworth, H. M Eyrich, R. K Lewis, J. M Finley, and G. T Schumock Guidelines for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Treatment Ann. Pharmacother., April 1, 2004; 38(4): 649 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Yang, M. Pu, D. Rodriguez, D. Underwood, B. P. Griffin, V. Kalahasti, J. D. Thomas, and R. C. Brunken Ischemic and viable myocardium in patients with Non-Q-Wave or Q-Wave myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction: A clinical study using positron emission tomography, echocardiography, and electrocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 592 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mukherjee, J. Fang, S. Chetcuti, M. Moscucci, E. Kline-Rogers, and K. A. Eagle Impact of Combination Evidence-Based Medical Therapy on Mortality in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Circulation, February 17, 2004; 109(6): 745 - 749. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Keeley and C. L. Grines Primary Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction JAMA, February 11, 2004; 291(6): 736 - 739. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Tsikouris, J. A. Suarez, G. E. Meyerrose, M. Ziska, D. Fike, and J. Smith Questioning a Class Effect: Does ACE Inhibitor Tissue Penetration Influence the Degree of Fibrinolytic Balance Alteration following an Acute Myocardial Infarction? J. Clin. Pharmacol., February 1, 2004; 44(2): 150 - 157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Everly, P. C Heaton, and R. J Cluxton Jr {beta}-Blocker Underuse in Secondary Prevention of Myocardial Infarction Ann. Pharmacother., February 1, 2004; 38(2): 286 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R Andrus, K. P Holloway, and D. B Clark Use of {beta}-Blockers in Patients with COPD Ann. Pharmacother., January 1, 2004; 38(1): 142 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Henrikson, E. E. Howell, D. E. Bush, J. S. Miles, G. R. Meininger, T. Friedlander, A. C. Bushnell, and N. Chandra-Strobos Chest Pain Relief by Nitroglycerin Does Not Predict Active Coronary Artery Disease Ann Intern Med, December 16, 2003; 139(12): 979 - 986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Lee, Y. Otsuji, S. Minagoe, S. Hamasaki, K. Toyonaga, M. Negishi, M. Tsurugida, H. Toda, and C. Tei Noninvasive Evaluation of Coronary Reperfusion by Transthoracic Doppler Echocardiography in Patients With Anterior Acute Myocardial Infarction Before Coronary Intervention Circulation, December 2, 2003; 108(22): 2763 - 2768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M Kramer, L.K. Newby, W.-C. Chang, R.J. Simes, F. Van de Werf, C. B Granger, K. L Lee, H. D White, L. S Piegas, E. J Topol, et al. International variation in the use of evidence-based medicines for acute coronary syndromes Eur. Heart J., December 1, 2003; 24(23): 2133 - 2141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. D. Aronow, G. M. Novaro, M. S. Lauer, D. M. Brennan, A. M. Lincoff, E. J. Topol, D. J. Kereiakes, and S. E. Nissen In-Hospital Initiation of Lipid-Lowering Therapy After Coronary Intervention as a Predictor of Long-term Utilization: A Propensity Analysis Arch Intern Med, November 24, 2003; 163(21): 2576 - 2582. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sanal and W. S. Aronow Effect of an Educational Program on the Prevalence of Use of Antiplatelet Drugs, Beta Blockers, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Lipid-Lowering Drugs, and Calcium Channel Blockers Prescribed During Hospitalization and at Hospital Discharge in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., November 1, 2003; 58(11): M1046 - 1048. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Silvet, F. Spencer, J. Yarzebski, D. Lessard, J. M. Gore, and R. J. Goldberg Communitywide Trends in the Use and Outcomes Associated With {beta}-Blockers in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Worcester Heart Attack Study Arch Intern Med, October 13, 2003; 163(18): 2175 - 2183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Morrison Counterintuitive contributionsto the care of myocardialinfarction and theneed for randomized trials J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 978 - 980. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. De Luca, H. Suryapranata, F. Zijlstra, A. W. J. van't Hof, J. C. A. Hoorntje, A. T. M. Gosselink, J.-H. Dambrink, M.-J. de Boer, and ZWOLLE Myocardial Infarction Study Group Symptom-onset-to-balloon time and mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary angioplasty J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 17, 2003; 42(6): 991 - 997. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Desideri, P. M. Fioretti, L. Cortigiani, D. Gregori, C. Coletta, C. Vigna, F. Tota, R. Rambaldi, J. Bax, L. Celegon, et al. Cost of strategies after myocardial infarction (COSTAMI): A multicentre, international, randomized trial for cost-effective discharge after uncomplicated myocardial infarction Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2003; 24(18): 1630 - 1639. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. I. Jugdutt and V. Menon Upregulation of Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor and Limitation of Myocardial Stunning by Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers during Reperfused Myocardial Infarction in the Rat Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, September 1, 2003; 8(3): 217 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lenfant Clinical Research to Clinical Practice -- Lost in Translation? N. Engl. J. Med., August 28, 2003; 349(9): 868 - 874. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Schulman Care of Patients Receiving Long-Term Anticoagulant Therapy N. Engl. J. Med., August 14, 2003; 349(7): 675 - 683. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Wallentin, P. Goldstein, P.W. Armstrong, C.B. Granger, A.A.J. Adgey, H.R. Arntz, K. Bogaerts, T. Danays, B. Lindahl, M. Makijarvi, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase in Combination With the Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Enoxaparin or Unfractionated Heparin in the Prehospital Setting: The Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of a New Thrombolytic Regimen (ASSENT)-3 PLUS Randomized Trial in Acute Myocardial Infarction Circulation, July 15, 2003; 108(2): 135 - 142. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Menon Cardiogenic shock: have we really found the magic potion? Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2003; 24(14): 1279 - 1281. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Buiatti, A. Barchielli, N. Marchionni, D. Balzi, N. Carrabba, S. Valente, I. Olivotto, C. Landini, M. Filice, M. Torri, et al. Determinants of treatment strategies and survival in acute myocardial infarction: a population-based study in the Florence district, Italy: Results of the acute myocardial infarction Florence registry (AMI-Florence), Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2003; 24(13): 1195 - 1203. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Psaty, T. Lumley, C. D. Furberg, G. Schellenbaum, M. Pahor, M. H. Alderman, and N. S. Weiss Health Outcomes Associated With Various Antihypertensive Therapies Used as First-Line Agents: A Network Meta-analysis JAMA, May 21, 2003; 289(19): 2534 - 2544. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Spertus, M. J. Radford, N. R. Every, E. F. Ellerbeck, E. D. Peterson, and H. M. Krumholz Challenges and opportunities in quantifying the quality of care for acute myocardial infarction: Summary from the acute myocardial infarction working group of the American heart association/American college of cardiology first scientific forum on quality of care and outcomes research in cardiovascular disease and stroke J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 7, 2003; 41(9): 1653 - 1663. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dulworth Commentary: Exploiting the Overlap: Using Utilization Management to Reduce Medical Malpractice American Journal of Medical Quality, May 1, 2003; 18(3): 128 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Spertus, M. J. Radford, N. R. Every, E. F. Ellerbeck, E. D. Peterson, and H. M. Krumholz Challenges and Opportunities in Quantifying the Quality of Care for Acute Myocardial Infarction: Summary From the Acute Myocardial Infarction Working Group of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology First Scientific Forum on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke Circulation, April 1, 2003; 107(12): 1681 - 1691. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Zimetbaum and M. E. Josephson Use of the Electrocardiogram in Acute Myocardial Infarction N. Engl. J. Med., March 6, 2003; 348(10): 933 - 940. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tu, M. M. Mamdani, R. M. Jacka, N. J. Forde, D. M. Rothwell, and J. V. Tu The striking effect of the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation (HOPE) on ramipril prescribing in Ontario Can. Med. Assoc. J., March 4, 2003; 168(5): 553 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. S. Rathore, K. P. Weinfurt, C. P. Gross, and H. M. Krumholz Validity of a Simple ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Risk Index: Are Randomized Trial Prognostic Estimates Generalizable to Elderly Patients? Circulation, February 18, 2003; 107(6): 811 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Vittinghoff, M. G. Shlipak, P. D. Varosy, C. D. Furberg, C. C. Ireland, S. S. Khan, R. Blumenthal, E. Barrett-Connor, S. Hulley, and for the Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement S Risk Factors and Secondary Prevention in Women with Heart Disease: The Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study Ann Intern Med, January 21, 2003; 138(2): 81 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F Burzotta, M Hamon, R Sabatier, F Prati, A Boccanelli, and G Grollier Large intracoronary thrombi with good TIMI flow during acute myocardial infarction: four cases of successful aggressive medical management in patients without angiographically detectable coronary atherosclerosis Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(5): e6 - 6. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Menon and J. S Hochman MANAGEMENT OF CARDIOGENIC SHOCK COMPLICATING ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION Heart, December 1, 2002; 88(5): 531 - 537. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P J Sheridan and D C Crossman Critical review of unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2002; 78(926): 717 - 726. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Psaty, T. A. Manolio, N. L. Smith, S. R. Heckbert, J. S. Gottdiener, G. L. Burke, J. Weissfeld, P. Enright, T. Lumley, N. Powe, et al. Time Trends in High Blood Pressure Control and the Use of Antihypertensive Medications in Older Adults: The Cardiovascular Health Study Arch Intern Med, November 11, 2002; 162(20): 2325 - 2332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-G. Chassot, A. Delabays, and D. R. Spahn Preoperative evaluation of patients with, or at risk of, coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery Br. J. Anaesth., November 1, 2002; 89(5): 747 - 759. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Mukherjee, P. Lingam, S. Chetcuti, P. M. Grossman, M. Moscucci, A. E. Luciano, and K. A. Eagle Missed Opportunities to Treat Atherosclerosis in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Insights From the University of Michigan Peripheral Vascular Disease Quality Improvement Initiative (PVD-QI2) Circulation, October 8, 2002; 106(15): 1909 - 1912. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Aronow Guest Editorial: What Is the Appropriate Treatment of Hypertension in Elders? J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., August 1, 2002; 57(8): M483 - 486. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. P. Selker, J. R. Beshansky, J. L. Griffith, and for the TPI Trial Investigators* Use of the Electrocardiograph-Based Thrombolytic Predictive Instrument To Assist Thrombolytic and Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Effectiveness Trial Ann Intern Med, July 16, 2002; 137(2): 87 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sicari, P. Landi, E. Picano, S. Pirelli, G. Chiaranda, M. Previtali, G. Seveso, N. Gandolfo, F. Margaria, O. Magaia, et al. Exercise-electrocardiography and/or pharmacological stress echocardiography for non-invasive risk stratification early after uncomplicated myocardial infarction. A prospective international large scale multicentre study Eur. Heart J., July 1, 2002; 23(13): 1030 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Kanamasa, T. Hayashi, A. Kimura, A. Ikeda, K. Ishikawa, and secondary prevention group Long-term, Continuous Treatment with Both Oral and Transdermal Nitrates Increases Cardiac Events in Healed Myocardial Infarction Patients Angiology, July 1, 2002; 53(4): 399 - 408. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. J. Goswami, J. M. Moody Jr, and S. R. Bailey Percutaneous Mechanical Reperfusion During Acute Myocardial Infarction J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2002; 17(4): 162 - 173. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Allaqaband and T. K. Bajwa "Time Is Muscle" Only in Experienced Hands and High-Volume Centers J Intensive Care Med, July 1, 2002; 17(4): 199 - 201. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Van de Werf and D. S. Baim Reperfusion for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Overview of Current Treatment Options Circulation, June 18, 2002; 105(24): 2813 - 2816. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Pfeffer and J. J.V. McMurray Myocardial Infarct: No One Size Fits All Circulation, June 4, 2002; 105(22): 2577 - 2579. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. van de Werf ASSENT-3: implications for future trial design and clinical practice Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2002; 23(12): 911 - 912. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Ghosh, V. Ziesmer, and W. S. Aronow Underutilization of Aspirin, Beta Blockers, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, and Lipid-Lowering Drugs and Overutilization of Calcium Channel Blockers in Older Persons With Coronary Artery Disease in an Academic Nursing Home J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2002; 57(6): M398 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. P. Cannon Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for All? JAMA, April 17, 2002; 287(15): 1987 - 1989. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sciagra, S. Sestini, L. Bolognese, G. Cerisano, P. Buonamici, and A. Pupi Comparison of Dobutamine Echocardiography and 99mTc-Sestamibi Tomography for Prediction of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Outcome After Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated with Successful Primary Coronary Angioplasty J. Nucl. Med., January 1, 2002; 43(1): 8 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Van de Werf, H.V. Barron, P.W. Armstrong, C.B. Granger, S. Berioli, G. Barbash, K. Pehrsson, F.W.A. Verheugt, J. Meyer, A. Betriu, et al. Incidence and predictors of bleeding events after fibrinolytic therapy with fibrin-specific agents. A comparison of TNK-tPA and rt-PA Eur. Heart J., December 2, 2001; 22(24): 2253 - 2261. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. M. Ohman and E. Peterson Implications and Challenges Using Practice Guidelines for Chronic Angina Ann Intern Med, October 2, 2001; 135(7): 527 - 529. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |