(Circulation. 1999;100:628-634.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Ft Worth, Tex (M.L.S., S.L.W.); Division of Cardiology, UT-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (J.A.J., P.J.W., M.H.H., R.L.P.); and Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (M.L.S., M.D.C., K.Q.).
Correspondence to Michael L. Smith, PhD, Department of Integrative Physiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Ft Worth, TX 76107. E-mail msmith{at}hsc.unt.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsTwo experiments were performed in which SNA and hemodynamic responses to ventricular pacing were compared with nitroprusside infusion (NTP) in 12 patients and studied with and without head-up tilt or phenylephrine to normalize the stimuli to either the arterial or cardiopulmonary baroreceptors in 9 patients. In experiment 1, the slope of the relation between SNA and mean arterial pressure was greater during NTP (-4.7±1.4 U/mm Hg) than during ventricular pacing (-3.4±1.1 U/mm Hg). Comparison of NTP doses and ventricular pacing rates that produced comparable hypotension showed that SNA increased more during NTP (P=0.03). In experiment 2, normalization of arterial pressure during pacing resulted in SNA decreasing below baseline (P<0.05), whereas normalization of cardiac filling pressure resulted in a greater increase in SNA than pacing alone (212±35% versus 189±37%, P=0.04).
ConclusionsThese data demonstrate that in humans arterial baroreflex control predominates in mediating sympathoexcitation during ventricular tachyarrhythmias and that cardiopulmonary baroreceptors contribute significant inhibitory modulation.
Key Words: nervous system, autonomic death, sudden arrhythmia pressure pacing
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We determined the relative roles of cardiopulmonary and arterial baroreceptors in controlling SNA and arterial pressure during VT simulated by rapid ventricular pacing in humans by comparing the response to hypotension caused by ventricular pacing with that produced by nitroprusside infusion (NTP). In addition, the effect of isolated changes in the stimuli to arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors was evaluated by manipulating either the arterial pressure (with phenylephrine infusion) or central venous pressure (CVP; head-up tilt) during concurrent ventricular pacing.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental Design
Experiment 1
We measured SNA, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and
CVP responses during ventricular pacing at 3 pacing cycle
lengths ranging from 300 to 500 ms. Pacing rates were determined by the
patient's hemodynamic tolerance of the pacing so that
a full minute of pacing data could be acquired for each pacing rate
without excessive sustained hypotension. Mean±SEM pacing rates for all
patients were 406±8, 357±6, and 328±7 ms. The responses to pacing
were compared with the responses to 3 doses of NTP (0.2 to 1.0
µg · kg-1 ·
min-1) that produced similar decreases in MAP.
NTP was given to simulate the unloading of arterial
baroreceptors without the significant loading (increased CVP) of
cardiopulmonary baroreceptors produced by
ventricular pacing. Although SNA is usually thought to be
inversely related to diastolic pressure during sinus
rhythm, this does not appear to hold true during rapid
tachyarrhythmias. The SNA and diastolic
pressure responses to VT vary considerably and often do not correlate
significantly during tachyarrhythmias. Therefore, MAP
was used as the primary stimulus for the arterial
baroreceptors in this study.
Experiment 2
We measured SNA, MAP, cardiac filling pressure (as either
pulmonary artery pressure [PAP] or pulmonary
capillary wedge pressure), and cardiac output responses during
ventricular pacing at a cycle length of 400 ms under 3
conditions: pacing alone, pacing plus head-up tilt
(20o to 30o) to a level
that returned cardiac filling pressure to prepacing baseline levels,
and pacing plus phenylephrine infusion sufficient to return
MAP to prepacing baseline levels. Pacing was sustained for 4 to 5
minutes. The role of cardiopulmonary baroreceptors was
evaluated by comparing SNA and hemodynamic data during
pacing with and without head-up tilt in which the cardiac filling
pressure was normalized. Similarly, the role of arterial
baroreceptors was assessed by comparing the responses to pacing with
and without phenylephrine infusion so that the stimulus to
the arterial baroreceptors (arterial pressure)
was normalized.
Measurements
Arterial pressure was measured by use of an
in-dwelling catheter inserted through the femoral artery in all but 3
patients (experiment 2). In those 3 patients, beat-to-beat
arterial pressure was measured noninvasively with a
photoplethysmographic device, and automated cuff pressures were
obtained to corroborate the average beat-to-beat measures from the
photoplethysmographic device. Cardiac filling pressures were measured
in experiment 1 by placing a pigtail catheter in the right atrium
advanced from the femoral vein and in experiment 2 by advancing a
Swan-Ganz thermodilution catheter from the jugular vein to a
pulmonary artery or wedge position. PAP was measured
continuously, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was
obtained briefly during each perturbation. Changes in PAP correlated
strongly with the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
(r=0.98, P<0.0001); therefore, PAPs measured for
the duration of the protocol were used for all analyses. In
experiment 2, cardiac outputs were measured in triplicate by
thermodilution during each condition.
Sympathetic Nerve Recordings
Muscle SNA was measured by a microelectrode inserted into a
branch of the peroneal nerve near the fibular head by standard
microneurographic techniques.3 SNA was identified by its
association with cardiac activity, respiratory activity, and response
to single extra electrical stimuli to the heart. SNA was averaged over
30- to 60-second data segments and quantified from the area under the
curve of sympathetic bursts. Data were normalized for each control
period by determining the average area per burst and assigning that
area a value of 100. Burst areas during the subsequent pacing were
normalized to this standard. Burst area was used because
ventricular pacing often produces broad
arterial pressure oscillations that provoke
broad bursts of sympathetic activity. Under these conditions, burst
amplitude alone does not correlate well with burst area4
and does not account for the prolonged activation of sympathetic nerve
traffic associated with periods of protracted hypotension.
Electrophysiological Techniques
Two or 3 multipolar catheters were introduced
percutaneously into the femoral vein and positioned in
the high right atrium and right ventricular apex as a site
for pacing. Ventricular pacing was performed at a pulse
width of 2 ms and an amplitude twice the diastolic
threshold from the right ventricular apex. A surface ECG
was recorded continuously.
All data were recorded online to a personal computer and were
analyzed post hoc by custom programs. Student's t
test was used for comparisons between pacing and NTP. An ANOVA with a
repeated-measures design was used to compare responses during pacing
with head-up tilt or phenylephrine infusion. Statistical
significance was defined by
=0.05. All data are presented as
mean±SEM.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 minute, arterial pressure usually
returned toward baseline, whereas cardiac filling pressure remained
elevated at a relatively constant level. Sympathetic activity usually
achieved a steady state and then varied with fluctuations in
arterial pressure. In all but 2 patients, SNA increased
above baseline during sustained ventricular pacing; in
those 2 patients, SNA actually decreased modestly (between 4% and
12%) from baseline values that were very high (865 and 981 U/10 s,
respectively, versus 539±97 U/10 s for all patients).
|
Experiment 1
The responses to 3 rates of ventricular pacing were
compared in each patient with the responses to 3 NTP rates to produce
similar decreases in arterial pressure. Figure 2
illustrates the average increase in SNA
for a given decrease in MAP caused by 3 pacing rates and 3 NTP rates.
The slope of this relationship was determined for each patient; the
mean slope was greater during NTP (-4.68±1.37) than during
ventricular pacing (-3.36±1.14, P<0.01). The
profile of the baroreceptor stimuli differed between pacing and NTP, as
shown in Figure 3
; Figure 3A
shows
the responses during graded NTP infusion rates, and Figure 3B
shows the responses during graded rates of ventricular
pacing. The decrease in arterial pressure was uniform
during NTP for systolic and diastolic pressures and
MAP, whereas diastolic pressure tended to be slightly
increased during ventricular pacing. Pulse pressure
decreased more during pacing than during NTP (-38±5 versus
-14±3 mm Hg for the middle NTP dose versus middle pacing rate,
P<0.01). CVP increased during pacing at all pacing rates
(P<0.0001) and decreased slightly during the higher NTP
doses (P<0.05). SNA and CVP data also were compared
between a pacing rate (which produced a mean decrease in MAP of
13.6±2.7 mm Hg) and a 1-minute time segment during NTP in which
MAPs were similar, as shown in the Table
(13.2±1.8 mm Hg,
P=0.82). Despite similar decreases in MAP, CVP increased
during ventricular pacing (4.8±0.4 mm Hg) and
decreased during NTP (-1.8±0.5 mm Hg); the difference was
significant (P<0.01). In addition, the SNA increase was
greater (P=0.029) during NTP than during pacing (Figure 4
).
|
|
|
|
Experiment 2
Responses to ventricular pacing were compared with
pacing and either concomitant infusion of phenylephrine to
normalize MAP or concomitant head-up tilt to normalize cardiac filling
pressure. Figure 5
illustrates the data
for pacing with and without phenylephrine infusion and
head-up tilt. The responses of all variables to pacing in each
repetition (with and without head-up tilt or phenylephrine)
were not different (P>0.47). MAP decreased during pacing
and returned to near baseline levels during phenylephrine
infusion (P=0.23). PAP increased during pacing (16.8±1.1 to
21.2±2.3 mm Hg, P<0.01) and increased
insignificantly more when phenylephrine was infused (to
22.4±2.5 mm Hg, P=0.17). SNA increased significantly
during ventricular pacing (to 189±37% of baseline) and
decreased to below baseline (81±6% of baseline, P<0.05)
during phenylephrine infusion. During pacing and head-up
tilt, PAP was returned to prepacing baseline values by head-up tilt
(17.1±0.9 mm Hg, P>0.05), and SNA increased further
to 212±35% of baseline (P<0.05). MAP decreased slightly
more during head-up tilt and pacing; however, this was not significant
(P=0.09). Cardiac output decreased significantly during
pacing (P<0.05; Figure 6
).
Cardiac output did not change during head-up tilt (3.7±0.7 versus
3.4±0.8 L/min) and tended to decrease during phenylephrine
infusion (to 3.1±0.8 L/min), although this difference was not
significant from pacing alone (P>0.05). The estimated total
peripheral resistance increase was predictably greater
during phenylephrine infusion (because of the direct effect
of the vasoactive drug) and was slightly greater during head-up tilt
(Figure 6
).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Ventricular Pacing as a Model of VT
Ventricular pacing is not a perfect surrogate for the
electrophysiological profile of a
particular VT; the site of origin and the conducting pathways determine
this profile. Although pacing from other sites may produce somewhat
varied hemodynamic outcomes,6 7 these
differences are subtle. Although differences (albeit small) in cardiac
index have been observed, there were no differences in MAP. We have
found that standard pacing from the right ventricular apex
reproduces the hemodynamic and sympathetic neural
responses of septal or anterior wall tachycardias very
consistently in both humans and dogs.1 5 These
previous studies clearly demonstrate that right ventricular
apical pacing is a physiological model of VT and
thus can be used as a clinically relevant surrogate for VT.
Reflex Control of Sympathetic Activity During VT
Under most physiological stressors,
arterial pressure and cardiac filling pressure change in
parallel and thus evoke complementary responses from the
arterial and cardiopulmonary baroreceptors. VT
represents a unique and complex
physiological stressor in that arterial
pressure decreases, often profoundly, while cardiac filling pressures
increase. Thus, the afferent inputs to the brainstem have conflicting
effects on efferent SNA, the principal mediator of reflex control of
circulatory function. Therefore, during VT, 2 fundamental questions
arise: What is the nature of the interaction of these conflicting
inputs, and which reflex mechanism predominates? Two previous studies
addressed this question in dogs using similar paradigms to evaluate the
sympathetic neural responses to rapid ventricular
pacing.5 8 However, the results are not consistent
and may be due to 2 key differences in experimental design. Halliwill
et al8 found that during rapid pacing at 214 bpm, there
was a tendency for a net reduction of SNA, whereas Smith et
al5 showed that SNA increased during
ventricular pacing or tachycardia at 220 to 280
bpm and that this response was eliminated by arterial
baroreceptor denervation. Halliwill and colleagues studied healthy dogs
in an open-chest preparation, whereas Smith et al studied dogs in a
closed-chest preparation. Thoracic surgery produces a significant
stress to the animal that is known to produce large increases in basal
sympathetic activity; thus, a likely explanation for the differing
responses of these 2 studies was that basal activity was extremely high
in the Halliwill et al study, thereby favoring a
sympathoinhibitory response.
Although the same reflex mechanisms are operational in humans, there is evidence that cardiopulmonary baroreflex mechanisms operate somewhat differently in humans, probably because of the predominant upright posture of humans. For example, the Bainbridge reflex (observed in several species), which produces significant cardiac acceleration with increased atrial pressure in many animal species, appears to be negligible in humans.9 10 The present study was designed to address similar questions regarding arterial versus cardiopulmonary control of SNA and arterial pressure during ventricular pacing in humans. In this study, ventricular pacing at 120 to 200 bpm usually resulted in elevations in SNA, although the magnitude of this response varied widely. Two patients with very high basal SNA demonstrated a sympathoinhibitory response during ventricular pacing. This is consistent with our interpretation of the results of Halliwill et al8 : A high basal sympathetic activity favors an inhibitory response. Nevertheless, these data are consistent with a previous study that showed that ventricular pacing or VT usually produces a significant sympathoexcitatory response in humans.1
In the present study, we addressed the question of how SNA is
controlled in humans under these conditions of conflicting inputs. In
experiment 1, we found that a comparable decrease in
arterial pressure, without an increase in CVP, produced a
greater sympathoexcitatory response. These data
also suggest that cardiopulmonary baroreceptors may impart an
inhibitory effect because the increase in SNA was greater
when CVP was not increased. However, this is a guarded conclusion
because CVP tended to decrease slightly during NTP. This decreased CVP
would be expected to unload the cardiopulmonary baroreceptors
and potentially increase SNA.11 In experiment 2, we used 2
conditions to normalize the stimulus to either arterial
baroreceptors (by returning arterial pressure to prepacing
baseline with infusion of phenylephrine) or
cardiopulmonary baroreceptors (by decreasing cardiac filling
pressure back to prepacing baseline with head-up tilt). Normalizing
arterial pressure resulted in SNA decreasing below
baseline. These support the conclusion that the cardiopulmonary
baroreceptors contribute a significant inhibitory
modulation of SNA. Furthermore, when cardiac filling pressure was
normalized by head-up tilt, SNA increased
20% more. This occurred
without a significant change in arterial pressure; thus,
these data provide the most compelling evidence that
cardiopulmonary baroreceptors impart a modest modulatory effect
during simulated VT. In each experimental paradigm, we were unable to
control the stimuli to the 2 baroreceptor populations perfectly, but
the responses were consistent among the different conditions
and strongly support the conclusion of our previous study in dogs that
arterial baroreceptors play the primary role in mediating
sympathetic neural responses to ventricular
tachyarrhythmias and are modulated importantly by
cardiopulmonary baroreceptors.5
Why does the net effect usually favor arterial baroreflexmediated sympathoexcitation rather than cardiopulmonary baroreflexmediated sympathoinhibition? During orthostatic stress, cardiopulmonary baroreceptors clearly play an important role in increasing SNA11 12 and producing vasoconstriction.13 Cardiopulmonary baroreceptor loading also produces sympathoinhibition14 and peripheral vasodilation.13 15 The magnitude of increased cardiac filling pressures is often greater during VT than that usually imposed by volume loading or leg raising used in previous studies; thus, it would be expected that the cardiopulmonary baroreflex would impart significant sympathoinhibition. In addition, cardiopulmonary unloading has been shown to enhance arterial baroreflex gain in the control of heart rate and vascular resistance, and these studies implied that cardiopulmonary loading would inhibit arterial baroreflex gain.16 17 18 In the face of these inhibitory effects, it appears that the balance of the stimuli during VT, unloading of arterial baroreceptors and loading of cardiopulmonary baroreceptors, is weighted toward the effects of the arterial baroreflex. The initial hypotension at the onset of VT is very profound and typically remains much greater than the elevation of cardiac filling pressures. Therefore, our data suggest that this hypotension produces a much greater sympathoexcitation than the sympathoinhibition produced by the increase in CVP. Despite the predominance of the arterial baroreflex to produce sympathoexcitation, our data also show that cardiopulmonary baroreflex inhibition does occur and can play a significant modulatory role. One reason that a greater effect was not observed could be that many patients had impaired cardiopulmonary baroreflex function. Several studies have shown that cardiopulmonary baroreflex function is impaired in patients or animals after myocardial infarction with left ventricular dysfunction or congestive heart failure.19 20 21
Clinical Implications
Several factors contribute to the hemodynamic
outcome of a VT, including ventricular rate, left
ventricular pump function, and reflex sympathetic
activation. Each plays a role, yet it remains unclear how important
each is in determining the net outcome. Previously, we developed a
predictive model based on data from 16 patients that suggested that
each factor plays an important role.1 The present
study, together with our previous studies,1 5 suggests
that normal reflex-mediated sympathetic activation is beneficial during
VT by helping to maintain stable hemodynamic status. We
predict that in patients with significantly impaired
arterial baroreflex function, the prognosis for stable
hemodynamic responses to VT is poor. Impaired
arterial baroreflex function has been shown to correlate
with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and
mortality.22 23 24 Is this a causal relation? If so, what is
the mechanism? The answers to these questions are unknown; however, we
speculate that a mechanism for this increased risk involves impaired
reflex support of arterial pressure during VT, a common
precursor to ventricular fibrillation. It is clear that
poor hemodynamic tolerance of VT is often accompanied
by a downward spiral to polymorphic VT and ventricular
fibrillation. This is consistent with the observation that
patients with heart failure do not tolerate VT well and often die from
sudden cardiac death when VT occurs.25
Conclusions
In conclusion, these data are generally consistent with
the findings in the previous dog study that arterial
baroreflex control predominates in mediating sympathoexcitation during
VT. Cardiopulmonary modulation during VT functions to inhibit
SNA and appears to play a greater role in humans. The net importance of
these reflex mechanisms in determining hemodynamic
stability during VT is still not clear; however, preliminary results
from our laboratory suggest that arterial baroreflex gain
is predictive of hemodynamic outcome.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received October 21, 1998; revision received April 28, 1999; accepted May 19, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Crozier IG, Ikram H, Nicholls MG. Hemodynamic and hormone changes during induced ventricular tachycardia secondary to coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1989;63:618621.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3.
Smith ML, Beightol LA, Fritsch-Yelle JM, Ellenbogen
KA, Porter TR, Eckberg DL. Valsalva's maneuver revisited: a
quantitative method yielding insights into human autonomic control.
Am J Physiol. 1996;271:H1240H1249.
4. Welch WJ, Smith ML, Rea RF, Bauernfeind RA, Eckberg DL. Enhancement of sympathetic nerve activity by single premature ventricular beats in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989;130:6975.
5.
Smith ML, Kinugawa T, Dibner-Dunlap ME. Reflex control
of sympathetic activity during ventricular
tachycardia in dogs: primary role of arterial
baroreflexes. Circulation. 1996;93:10331042.
6. Cock CC, Meyer A, Kamp O, Visser CA. Hemodynamic benefits of right ventricular outflow tract pacing: comparison with right ventricular apex pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21:536541.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Barold SG, Linhart J, Hildner F. Hemodynamic comparison of endocardial pacing of outflow and inflow tracts of the right ventricle. Am J Cardiol. 1969;23:697701.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8.
Halliwill JR, Minisi AJ, Smith ML, Eckberg DL.
Sympathetic responses to conflicting baroreceptor inputs: rapid
ventricular pacing in dogs. J Physiol. 1993;471:365378.
9.
Hainsworth R. Reflexes from the heart. Physiol
Rev. 1991;71:617658.
10. Smith ML, Thames MD. Cardiac receptors: discharge characteristics and reflex effects. In: Armour JA, Ardell JL, eds. Neurocardiology. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1994:1952.
11.
Victor RG, Leimbach WN Jr. Effects of lower body
negative pressure on sympathetic discharge to leg muscles in humans.
J Appl Physiol. 1987;63:25582562.
12.
Sundlof G, Wallin BG. Effect of lower body negative
pressure on human muscle nerve sympathetic activity. J
Physiol. 1978;278:525532.
13. Mark AL, Mancia G. Cardiopulmonary baroreflexes in humans. In: Shepherd JT, Abboud FM, eds. Handbook of Physiology, Section 2: The Cardiovascular System. Bethesda, Md: American Physiological Society; 1983;3:795813.
14.
Vissing SF, Scherrer U, Victor RG. Relation between
sympathetic outflow and vascular resistance in the calf during
perturbations in central venous pressure: evidence for
cardiopulmonary afferent regulation of calf vascular resistance
in humans. Circ Res. 1989;65:17101717.
15. Roddie IC, Shepherd JT. Receptors in the high-pressure and low-pressure vascular systems: their role in the reflex control of the human circulation. Lancet. 1958;1:493496.
16. Victor RG, Mark AL. Interaction of cardiopulmonary and carotid baroreflex control of vascular resistance in humans. J Clin Invest. 1985;76:15921598.
17.
Pawelczyk JA, Raven PB. Reductions in central venous
pressure improve carotid baroreflex responses in conscious men.
Am J Physiol. 1989;257:H1389H1395.
18.
Ludbrook J, Graham WF. The role of cardiac receptor and
arterial baroreceptor reflexes in control of the
circulation during acute change of blood volume in the conscious
rabbit. Circ Res. 1984;54:424435.
19.
Minisi AJ, Thames MD. Effect of chronic myocardial
infarction on vagal cardiopulmonary baroreflex. Circ
Res. 1989;65:396405.
20. Zucker IH, Earle AM, Gilmore JP. The mechanism of adaptation of left atrial stretch receptors in dogs with chronic congestive heart failure. J Clin Invest. 1977;60:323331.
21.
Dibner-Dunlap ME, Thames MD. Control of sympathetic
nerve activity by vagal mechanoreflexes is blunted in heart failure.
Circulation. 1992;86:19291934.
22.
Billman GE, Schwartz PJ, Stone HL. Baroreceptor reflex
control of heart rate: a predictor of sudden cardiac death.
Circulation. 1982;66:874880.
23.
LaRovere MT, Specchia G, Mortara A, Schwartz PJ.
Baroreflex sensitivity, clinical correlates, and
cardiovascular mortality among patients with a first
myocardial infarction: a prospective study. Circulation. 1988;78:816824.
24.
Farrell TG, Paul V, Malik M, Bennett ED, Ward D, Camm
AJ. Baroreflex sensitivity and
electrophysiological correlates in patients
after acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1991;83:945952.
25. Bigger JT Jr. Why patients with congestive heart failure die: arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Circulation. 1987;75(suppl IV):IV-28IV-35.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Botvinick, J. Davis, M. Dae, J. O'Connell, N. Schechtmann, J. Abbott, F. Morady, P. Lanzer, J. Iskikian, and M. Scheinman Localization of ventricular tachycardia exit site and subsequent contraction sequence and functional effects with bedside radionuclide angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Img., September 1, 2008; 1(5): 605 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. M. Segerson, S. L. Wasmund, M. Daccarett, M. L. Fabela, C. H. Hammond, G. Stoddard, M. L. Smith, and M. H. Hamdan The acute effect of atrioventricular pacing on sympathetic nerve activity in patients with normal and depressed left ventricular function Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, September 1, 2008; 295(3): H1076 - H1080. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Velez-Roa, J. Neubauer, M. Wissing, A. Porta, V. K. Somers, P. Unger, and P. van de Borne Acute arterio-venous fistula occlusion decreases sympathetic activity and improves baroreflex control in kidney transplanted patients Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., June 1, 2004; 19(6): 1606 - 1612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Wasmund, J.-M. Li, R. L. Page, J. A. Joglar, R. C. Kowal, M. L. Smith, and M. H. Hamdan Effect of Atrial Fibrillation and an Irregular Ventricular Response on Sympathetic Nerve Activity in Human Subjects Circulation, April 22, 2003; 107(15): 2011 - 2015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |