Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:e20-e28

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Epstein, S. E.
Right arrow Articles by Zhu, J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Chlamydia Infections
*Cytomegalovirus Infections
Related Collections
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Risk Factors

(Circulation. 1999;100:e20-e28.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Circulation Electronic Pages

Infection and Atherosclerosis

Emerging Mechanistic Paradigms

Stephen E. Epstein, MD; Yi Fu Zhou, MD; Jianhui Zhu, MD, PhD

From the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

Correspondence to Dr Stephen E. Epstein, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, Washington Hospital Center, 110 Irving St NW, Suite 4B-1, Washington, DC 20010. E-mail sxe2{at}mhg.edu


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowInfection as a Contributor...
down arrowPresence of Pathogens in...
down arrowDirect Effects of Infectious...
down arrowSystemic Alterations Produced by...
down arrowIndividual Variations in Host...
down arrowPathogen Burden as a...
down arrowSummary and Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Abstract—Although definitive proof of a causal role of infection contributing to atherogenesis is lacking, multiple investigations have demonstrated that infectious agents evoke cellular and molecular changes supportive of such a role. Moreover, both Chlamydia pneumoniae and cytomegalovirus exacerbate lesion development in animal models of atherosclerosis and restenosis. The fact that multiple pathogens have been associated with atherosclerosis implies that many "atherogenic" pathogens exist, and recent data suggest that the risk of atherosclerosis conveyed by infection relates to the number of atherogenic pathogens with which an individual is infected. It also is evident that variability in host susceptibility to the atherogenic effects of pathogens exists; this variability appears to be related at least in part to whether the host can generate an immune response that successfully controls pathogen inflammatory activity and in part to the specific pattern of immune response—humoral or cellular. The latter may relate to host capacity to control pathogen activity and to a pathogen-induced autoimmune component of the atherogenic process. Additional animal and human studies are necessary to further test the validity of the infection/atherosclerosis link and to provide more insight into the mechanisms by which infection may contribute to atherosclerosis, information critical for devising strategies to reduce or eliminate any contribution to atherosclerosis caused by infection.


Key Words: cytomegalovirus • Chlamydia pneumoniae • immune system • risk factors • coronary disease • atherosclerosis


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowInfection as a Contributor...
down arrowPresence of Pathogens in...
down arrowDirect Effects of Infectious...
down arrowSystemic Alterations Produced by...
down arrowIndividual Variations in Host...
down arrowPathogen Burden as a...
down arrowSummary and Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
As many as 50% of patients with atherosclerosis lack currently identified risk factors (such as hypertension, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes), an observation indicating that additional factors predisposing to atherosclerosis are as yet undetected. Discovery of such factors, along with their accompanying mechanisms of action, would have profound implications for the development of new therapeutic strategies that could reduce the devastating impact this disease is having in the western world and is beginning to have in countries where the populations are adopting western lifestyles.

Injury to the vessel wall and the associated inflammatory response to injury are now generally recognized as the essential components of atherogenesis.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 However, the triggers that initiate and sustain the inflammatory process have not been definitively identified, a fact that has fueled efforts to discover the inflammatory triggers. Among the candidate triggers are oxidized LDL and heat shock proteins (HSPs). These components of the atherosclerotic wall are believed by some investigators to elicit an inflammatory response.11 12 13 14 Antibodies to these proteins also develop, and although controversial, some studies suggest that these antibodies may play a role in causing autoimmune-induced damage to the vessel wall.15 Another candidate trigger of both inflammatory and autoimmune responses—the subject of this perspective—is infection.

Several excellent reviews on the roles of infection16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 and autoimmunity25 in atherogenesis have appeared recently. The purpose of the present article is not to repeat these extensive efforts but to focus more on the cellular, molecular, and immune mechanisms by which infection might contribute to atherosclerosis. We also explore the concept that if autoimmunity is involved in the development of atherosclerosis, the stimuli eliciting the autoimmune responses are probably triggered, at least in part, by infection.


*    Infection as a Contributor to Atherosclerosis
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Infection as a Contributor...
down arrowPresence of Pathogens in...
down arrowDirect Effects of Infectious...
down arrowSystemic Alterations Produced by...
down arrowIndividual Variations in Host...
down arrowPathogen Burden as a...
down arrowSummary and Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Evidence began accumulating >25 years ago suggesting that herpesviruses may possibly play a role in the development of atherosclerosis. It was found that Marek's disease virus, an avian herpesvirus, caused typical atherosclerotic lesions in chickens,26 and when smooth muscle cells (SMCs) were infected with the virus in vitro, cholesterol accumulated.27


*    Presence of Pathogens in the Vessel Wall and Seroepidemiological Studies
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowInfection as a Contributor...
*Presence of Pathogens in...
down arrowDirect Effects of Infectious...
down arrowSystemic Alterations Produced by...
down arrowIndividual Variations in Host...
down arrowPathogen Burden as a...
down arrowSummary and Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Evidence in humans suggesting that infection predisposes to atherosclerosis derived from studies demonstrating that infectious agents reside in the wall of atherosclerotic vessels (initially, cytomegalovirus [CMV] and later Chlamydia pneumoniae), and seroepidemiological studies demonstrating an association between the pathogen-specific IgG antibodies and atherosclerosis.24 28 29 30 31 The first such seroepidemiological associations published related to CMV, which were later followed by the publication of similar associations between atherosclerosis and herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2, C pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, and most recently, hepatitis A virus.32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Moreover, prospective studies of the relation between CMV seropositivity and the subsequent development of restenosis after coronary angioplasty revealed increased incidence of restenosis in patients seropositive for CMV.44 45

The data demonstrating a serological or anatomic association between each of these pathogens and atherosclerosis are not entirely consistent. Although some studies show a significant association with coronary artery disease (CAD) or restenosis,24 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 others do not.24 39 43 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 Moreover, a pathogen resident in an atherosclerotic vessel may be just an "innocent bystander" rather than a causally relevant agent.


*    Direct Effects of Infectious Agents on Cellular Components of the Vessel Wall That Could Predispose to Atherosclerosis
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowInfection as a Contributor...
up arrowPresence of Pathogens in...
*Direct Effects of Infectious...
down arrowSystemic Alterations Produced by...
down arrowIndividual Variations in Host...
down arrowPathogen Burden as a...
down arrowSummary and Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Additional evidence favoring causality has derived from investigations demonstrating that infection of cells residing in the vessel wall cause cellular and molecular changes conducive to atherogenesis.

SMC Accumulation
Stimulation of SMC Proliferation
Because SMCs in vitro are permissive for CMV replication, which is followed by cell death, it has not been possible to demonstrate any direct effect of infection on SMC proliferation. However, many of the important cellular effects of CMV derive from expression of its immediate-early (IE) gene products in the absence of early and late gene expression and of viral replication. In this type of infection, called an abortive infection, death of the host cell does not occur. It is likely that abortive infections are of biological relevance, providing a mechanism whereby intracellular pathogens contribute to disease progression.

In vitro models of abortive infection can be achieved by infecting cells of 1 species with CMV derived from another. (There are several related types of CMV, and the ability of the different types of CMV to replicate in cells is specific for each host species.) For example, Albrecht and associates54 demonstrated that when hamster embryo fibroblasts are infected with human CMV (causing an abortive infection), the rate of DNA replication and mitotic activity is increased. Moreover, it recently has been shown that infection of rat SMCs with human CMV (also causing an abortive infection) leads to SMC replication.55 Evidence that CMV infection in vivo leads to cellular proliferation was suggested by studies of a rat model of aortic allograft transplantation. CMV infection was associated with a doubling of the proliferation rate of SMCs in the allograft neointima.56

One molecular mechanism by which CMV may increase cellular proliferation is through inhibition of the tumor suppressor gene, p53; the p53 gene product inhibits cell cycle progression57 and therefore cell proliferation.58 IE2–84, 1 of the IE gene products of CMV, is capable of binding to p53 and inhibiting its transcriptional activity.59 60 The inhibitory effect of CMV infection on p53 activity appears to be mediated, at least in part, by the exclusion of p53 from the nucleus by cytoplasmic sequestration.61

Another mechanism by which CMV infection could lead to cellular proliferation is stimulating the secretion of growth factors or increasing the expression of growth factor receptors. Human fibroblasts, when infected with CMV, release a factor or factors that stimulate DNA synthesis of BALB/c 3T3 cells62 and proliferation of human endothelial cells.63 In the rat model of aortic allograft transplantation referred to above,56 it was found that CMV infection is associated with an almost doubling of basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; FGF2) mRNA expression, and with increased expression of mRNAs of acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF; FGF1), platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), and epidermal growth factor. CMV infection of SMCs has recently been shown to increase PDGF receptor expression.55

Inhibition of Apoptosis
CMV infection inhibits apoptosis in human endothelial cells61 and in HeLa cells, an effect caused at least partly by the IE gene products of the virus.64 One of the mechanisms by which this occurs is probably inhibition of the p53-modulated apoptotic program.57 Thus, 1 of the IE gene products of CMV, IE2–84, binds to and inhibits the transcriptional activity of p53.59 60 Consistent with this activity was the finding that overexpression of IE2–84 (with an adenoviral vector used for gene transfer) protected human coronary artery SMCs from p53-induced apoptosis.65 That such an effect is not limited to CMV was demonstrated by the finding that Chlamydia-infected cells are resistant to apoptosis induced by a wide variety of agents.66 If inhibition of apoptosis occurred in infected SMCs of the vessel wall, such an effect could lead to excessive accumulation of these cells, thereby contributing to an increase in the mass of restenosis/atherosclerosis lesions.

Increased SMC Migration
One mechanism contributing to increasing neointimal mass in both atherogenesis and restenosis is SMC migration from the media and adventitia to the developing neointima. Using a standard in vitro assay system for cell migration, we previously found that infection of rat SMCs with human CMV (to produce an abortive infection) increases SMC migration.55 This was associated with enhanced SMC PDGF receptor expression, a finding compatible with the demonstration that 1 mechanism responsible for SMCs migrating toward the lumen after vascular injury involves the PDGF system.1

Lipid Accumulation
In the 1970s, Minick and associates26 and Fabricant et al27 demonstrated that infection of chickens with Marek's disease virus (an avian herpesvirus) caused atherosclerosis-like lesions in the coronary arteries and aortas and increased accumulation of cholesterol in both intracellular and extracellular sites. Hajjar et al67 demonstrated a potential mechanism for this effect by showing that HSV infection of human SMCs decreases lysosomal and cytoplasmic cholesterol ester hydrolytic activity.

Enhanced activity of the scavenger receptor represents an additional mechanism by which pathogens could increase lipid accumulation. We demonstrated that infection of human SMCs with CMV increases uptake of oxidized LDL, an effect mediated, at least in part, by the class A (type I and II) scavenger receptor.68 The increased uptake of oxidized LDL appears mediated by an IE gene product, because this effect was also seen when rat SMCs were infected with human CMV (leading to an abortive infection with expression of only the IE genes of CMV). This conclusion was supported by the finding that 1 of the IE gene products (IE1–72) has the capacity to increase the transcriptional activity of the class A scavenger receptor promoter.68 In addition, C pneumoniae infection of monocyte-derived macrophages incubated with LDL increases the number of foam cells and the accumulation of cholesteryl esters.69 Unlike the CMV findings, it appeared that these Chlamydia-induced changes are not mediated by scavenger receptors, because the response was not attenuated by the scavenger receptor ligand fucoidan.

Endothelial Dysfunction
Procoagulant Effects
Thrombosis contributes importantly to the development of atherosclerosis and to the precipitation of acute coronary events. Normal endothelium has multiple antithrombotic mechanisms, among which are the capacity of the cells to synthesize heparin sulfate, prostacyclin, nitric oxide, plasminogen activator, and thrombomodulin. Several studies, particularly those from the laboratories of Hajjar et al67 and Vercellotti et al,21 have now demonstrated that infectious agents can alter endothelial cells from a phenotype that is normally anticoagulant to 1 that is procoagulant. For example, HSV infection of endothelial cells increases endothelial cell synthesis of tissue factor, the rate of thrombin generation on the cell surface, and platelet adherence while it decreases prostacyclin and thrombomodulin generation.70 71 72 CMV infection of endothelial cells also causes procoagulant effects.73

Inhibition of Vasodilator Function
A critical function of endothelial cells is to modulate vascular tone, and loss of this function is believed to be 1 of the earliest manifestations of CAD. A recent study has demonstrated that individuals infected with CMV (as evidenced by anti-CMV antibodies) have impaired endothelium-mediated coronary vasodilator responses.74 The endothelial vasodilatory dysfunction seemed to be related to both nitric oxide– and non–nitric oxide–mediated pathways.

Increased Expression of Cytokines, Chemokines, and Cellular Adhesion Molecules
Atherogenesis is believed to develop and progress in response to a sequence of events triggered by the response to vascular injury.1 Various types of injury have been shown to affect the endothelium, causing increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), cytokines, chemokines, and cellular adhesion molecules. ROS contributes to oxidation of LDL, a primary player in the development of atherosclerosis, and chemokines and cellular adhesion molecules lead to the attraction and adhesion of monocytes to the vessel wall. The adhering monocytes migrate to the subintimal space, where they differentiate into macrophages and produce their own proinflammatory, proatherosclerotic molecules. The processes leading to the expression of these cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules can be augmented by infection, because CMV and HSV infection of cells causes expression of these molecules.75 76 77 Moreover, CMV infection of SMCs leads to the development of ROS.78

Delivery of Pathogen to the Vessel Wall
Both CMV and C pneumoniae are present in atherosclerotic arteries,24 28 29 30 31 and CMV DNA has been found in restenosis lesions.59 It is possible that these and other pathogens directly infect the vessel wall and persist in a latent state, produce an abortive infection, or replicate at a low (and possibly intermittent) level. An alternative possibility focuses on the circulating monocyte as a "Trojan horse," a vehicle for delivery of pathogen to the vessel wall. That this can occur is indicated by the facts that these cells harbor latent CMV79 80 81 82 83 84 and that C pneumoniae is capable of replicating in a macrophage cell line.85 86

With CMV, it is believed that the virus infects monocyte precursors present in bone marrow and that the viral genome persists in these cells.79 80 Given that CMV infection develops in bone marrow transplant recipients seronegative for CMV but whose donors are CMV seropositive, it is likely that myelomonocytic precursor cells act as a reservoir of CMV and that circulating monocytes then act as a vector, delivering the virus to sites of vascular inflammation or injury. For Chlamydia, it is believed that pulmonary alveolar macrophages act as the vector, picking up the pathogen during the course of a pulmonary infection.

Although Chlamydia is capable of replicating in monocytes/macrophages,85 86 this is not the case with CMV. Despite the presence of viral genome in circulating monocytes, viral gene products are not expressed in such cells (ie, the virus is in a latent state). Expression of IE viral gene products occurs only after differentiation of monocytes to form macrophages, which happens after the monocytes have entered the subintimal space.82 83 In this regard, it has been shown that such constituents of the vessel wall as endothelial cells, SMCs, and oxidized LDL increase the activity of the major immediate early promoter of CMV.84 Thus, CMV and perhaps other pathogens may be delivered by circulating monocytes to sites of vascular injury where the vascular milieu contributes to pathogen reactivation, resulting in the induction of pathogen-related effects that contribute to atherogenesis.


*    Systemic Alterations Produced by Infectious Agents That Could Predispose to Atherosclerosis Without the Need for Pathogen Residence in the Vessel Wall
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowInfection as a Contributor...
up arrowPresence of Pathogens in...
up arrowDirect Effects of Infectious...
*Systemic Alterations Produced by...
down arrowIndividual Variations in Host...
down arrowPathogen Burden as a...
down arrowSummary and Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Given the evidence outlined above, it would be reasonable to conclude that a set of mechanisms by which infection contributes to atherosclerosis consists of direct effects of the pathogen on the vessel wall mediated by mechanisms requiring the actual presence of the pathogen locally (the TableDown). However, other mechanisms not requiring local residence are most likely also operative. For example, infection causes a spectrum of systemic effects, producing fever, malaise, myalgias, and a panoply of signs and symptoms, including alterations in the circulating levels of such factors as cytokines, acute-phase reactants, white blood cells, and responses mediated by the immune system, such as an increase in antibodies targeted to the invading pathogen. These systemic manifestations of infection can be either profound or subtle; importantly, however, these changes provide mechanisms other than local residence-requiring direct vascular effects, whereby pathogens could influence the course of atherosclerosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Direct Effects of Infectious Agents on Components of the Vessel Wall

That infection might exert effects on an injured vessel wall that do not necessitate pathogen residence in the vessel is suggested by the results of studies to determine whether CMV infection increases the neointimal response to vascular injury in the rat.87 88 Although rats infected with CMV manifested an increased neointimal response to injury, the virus was essentially absent from the injured segment of the vessel; neither replicating virus nor viral proteins could be detected despite the fact that replicating virus could be isolated from such tissues as the spleen and salivary gland.

In the following section, we discuss the mechanisms by which such indirect effects might occur. Because little experimental data exist, the ensuing discussion is meant to be exploratory and hypothesis generating.

Immune Responses Targeted to Self-Proteins Located in the Vessel Wall: Potential Role of Molecular Mimicry
Molecular mimicry, resulting in the triggering of an immune response targeted to self-proteins, has been proposed as a mechanism responsible for the development of autoimmune diseases.89 90 91 92 93 The concept of molecular mimicry requires infection by a pathogen that contains peptide sequences homologous with host protein. The immune response, although initiated by the invading pathogen and targeted to pathogen antigens, also becomes an autoimmune attack against host tissues containing the cross-reacting peptide sequences. In this model of disease, immune-mediated host tissue injury can occur even if the responsible pathogen is not present in the target tissue, a mechanism confirmed by the elegant studies from Oldstone's laboratory.94 Molecular mimicry, although not definitely proven as a cause of human disease, has been implicated in such autoimmune diseases as type 1 diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome,95 96 97 98 and more recently has been implicated in the development of cardiomyopathies99

The most suggestive evidence to date indicating a role of molecular mimicry–induced autoimmune mechanisms in atherogenesis derives from the important studies of Wick and associates.25 100 101 102 103 They pointed out that the vascular wall is subject to various stresses that induce HSP expression. These stresses include hypercholesterolemia, elevated homocysteine levels, cytokines, free radicals, circulating products derived from smoking, and mechanical stresses such as hypertension. They then hypothesized that although the induction of HSPs is a cellular defense mechanism preventing denaturation of cellular proteins caused by perturbations of the cell's environment, the marked overexpression of HSPs may cause them to act as "cryptic antigens," inducing an autoimmune reaction and thereby contributing to the development of atherosclerosis.

These investigators also emphasized that HSPs are a family of proteins that are highly conserved across all species, including bacteria.25 100 They therefore raised an alternative mechanism by which an autoimmune response to HSPs could occur: The immune response stimulated by infection and targeted to the infecting pathogen could, because of the high degree of amino acid sequence homology between pathogen and host HSPs, also target self-HSPs. Although a series of studies by these and other investigators make a compelling case for a possible role of autoimmunity in atherosclerosis, particularly because the immune response targets HSP,25 100 101 102 103 104 105 there are no direct data implicating infection, via molecular mimicry, as the responsible trigger for this autoimmune response.

Other data indirectly support the molecular mimicry/autoimmunity mechanism as being operative in atherosclerosis. Autoantibodies to certain cytokines have been detected in apparently healthy individuals.106 107 That molecular mimicry may be involved in stimulating the expression of these antibodies is suggested by the fact that Epstein-Barr virus contains a peptide sequence homologous to IL-10, and Kaposi's sarcoma–associated herpesvirus contains an IL-6 homologous sequence.108 CMV contains proteins homologous to chemokine receptors.109 110 111 In addition, in preliminary studies from our laboratory, we demonstrated that susceptibility to CMV-related CAD in women occurs in the subgroup with a humoral immune response to CMV infection, whereas those women with an immunodominant cellular response evidenced no such susceptibility.112 This finding raises the possibility of an infection-driven, autoimmune-mediated antibody component of disease.

Finally, some studies relate increased prevalence of periodontal disease to increased prevalence of CAD.24 113 114 115 116 117 118 One hypothesis driving these studies is that chronic periodontal infection leads to CAD through the production of a long-term inflammatory response. In this regard, elevated levels of specific salivary IgA antibodies against mycobacterial HSP65 were found to be significantly increased in patients with gingivitis.119 Mycobacteria HSP65 is highly homologous to human HSP60. The investigators speculated that the pathogens causing the gingivitis expressed HSP; this then stimulated an IgA antibody response in the host, which they suggested may serve as cross-reactive autoantigens that contribute to the gingivitis. It is equally plausible that the development of IgG antibodies, if present, could contribute to an autoimmune-induced atherosclerotic process.

Circulating Pathogen-Derived or Pathogen-Stimulated Factors That Could Induce Changes in the Vascular Wall
Studies have shown that various circulating pathogen-derived or pathogen-stimulated factors can elicit changes in monocyte/macrophages that could be proatherogenic and that might even contribute to plaque instability. For example, bacterially derived lipopolysaccharide and chlamydial or human HSP induce tissue necrosis factor-{alpha} secretion by macrophages,120 a cytokine that stimulates endothelial cells to express adhesion molecules. These factors also stimulate endothelial cells and SMCs to express interleukin (IL)-1 mRNA121 and IL-6122 and preferentially stimulate endothelial cells to express E-selectin and ICAM-1.122 In addition, several surface antigens of Porphyromonas gingivalis, a Gram-negative bacterium causally related to periodontitis, stimulate BALB/c peritoneal macrophages to secrete IL-1-ß.123 Tissue necrosis factor-{alpha}, IL-1, IL-6, and ICAM-1 have all been related to atherogenesis.

The above responses can be considered as possibly contributing to the development of atherosclerosis. In addition, lipopolysaccharide, chlamydial HSP, and human HSP have also been shown to stimulate the secretion of matrix metalloproteinases.120 These enzymes have the capacity to degrade connective tissue and thereby are believed to predispose, by weakening the fibrous cap of atheromatous lesions, to plaque rupture. Thus, pathogens not only may stimulate responses that are proatherogenic but also may contribute to the precipitation of plaque instability and rupture, the most common cause of death from CAD.

Although elevated circulating C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have usually been taken as a systemic marker for inflammation, some evidence also suggests that this acute-phase reactant may play some causal role in atherogenesis. For example, CRP has been shown to colocalize with the terminal complement complex in the intima of early human atherosclerotic lesions.124 This finding suggests some casual link between elevated levels of this acute-phase reactant and atherogenesis, given that CRP activates complement and that complement activation has been implicated in the development of the atherosclerotic plaque.125

The potential role of some circulating, infection-related factor predisposing to plaque destabilization received additional support from the finding that acute respiratory-tract infections are associated with an increased risk of acute myocardial infarction. The data revealed a relative risk of 2.7 for acute myocardial infarction occurring in relation to an acute respiratory-tract infection in the preceding 10 days.


*    Individual Variations in Host-Pathogen Interactions That Influence Inflammatory Activity and the Susceptibility to Pathogen-Induced Contribution to Vascular Disease
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowInfection as a Contributor...
up arrowPresence of Pathogens in...
up arrowDirect Effects of Infectious...
up arrowSystemic Alterations Produced by...
*Individual Variations in Host...
down arrowPathogen Burden as a...
down arrowSummary and Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
Inflammatory Activity
As noted above, although many epidemiological studies have demonstrated that seropositivity to several infectious agents is associated with increased CAD risk, the data are inconsistent, with other studies showing no increased risk. One possible explanation for this disparity is that whether prior infection, as reflected by seropositivity, contributes to CAD risk may depend, at least in part, on the capacity of the host to suppress pathogen inflammatory activity. The validity of this concept is suggested by a study demonstrating that (1) although some individuals seropositive to CMV have elevated CRP levels, in others, CRP is within the normal range and (2) highest CAD prevalence occurs in the subgroup with combined CMV seropositivity and elevated CRP levels.126 When adjusted for CAD risk factors, the ORs for CAD were 1.3 in the subgroup with CMV seropositivity alone (P=0.7), 2.3 in the subgroup with elevated CRP levels alone (P=0.2), and 4.3 in the subgroup with combined CMV seropositivity and elevated CRP levels (P=0.01).

Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses
A second possible explanation for the disparity in seroepidemiological studies may relate to the type of immune response mounted by the host to CMV infection. Thus, CMV appears to be a significant predictor of CAD in women.112 Importantly, however, the data showed that the type of immune response to CMV determines whether CMV predisposes to CAD. In women evaluated for CAD by coronary angiography, blood samples were tested for humoral (Ab+) and cellular (Tc+) responses to CMV. Susceptibility to CMV-related CAD was limited to those women with a humoral immune response to CMV (Ab+/Tc- or Ab+/Tc+). The prevalence of CAD in those without an antibody response but with a cellular response (Ab-/Tc+) was similar to that in women without apparent prior CMV infection (Ab-/Tc-).


*    Pathogen Burden as a Determinant of Elevated CRP and CAD Risk
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowInfection as a Contributor...
up arrowPresence of Pathogens in...
up arrowDirect Effects of Infectious...
up arrowSystemic Alterations Produced by...
up arrowIndividual Variations in Host...
*Pathogen Burden as a...
down arrowSummary and Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
If infection plays a role in atherogenesis, it would be highly likely that multiple pathogens would be causally involved and, importantly, that CAD risk would relate to the aggregate pathogen load (what we have called pathogen burden). This hypothesis was tested in a group of individuals being evaluated for CAD by coronary angiography. The relationship of pathogen burden (aggregate number of a panel of 5 pathogens to which an individual had been exposed, as determined by seropositivity) to CRP levels and CAD risk was determined.127 The pathogens tested were CMV, Chlamydia, hepatitis A virus, and HSV types 1 and 2. A dose-response relationship was found: As the number of seropositive responses an individual had increased, CRP levels and CAD prevalence increased. Although these results must be confirmed in a prospective study, it appears that insofar as infection does predispose to the development of atherosclerosis, CAD risk is related to the aggregate number of potentially atherogenic pathogens to which an individual has been exposed.

Animal Models of Atherosclerosis and Infection
Given that atherosclerosis is a multifactorial disease, Koch's postulates to establish causality will never be satisfied. These postulates were based on infectious diseases caused by a single pathogen, requiring that all patients with the disease must have evidence of being infected with the casual agent and that all individuals infected with the agent develop the disease. In contrast, the concept developed in this article is that infectious agents are risk factors for atherosclerosis, neither necessary nor sufficient for disease development. With this disease paradigm, proof of causality can be achieved only in terms of probability rather than as certainty.

One way to determine a higher probability of causality is to establish that the cellular and molecular changes induced by infection predispose to atherosclerosis. The studies detailed in this review, in aggregate, present a compelling case. However, the only direct evidence that can prove a particular infectious agent has the capacity to contribute to atherosclerosis is to demonstrate causality in an animal model of atherosclerosis. This has been achieved by several investigations.

C pneumoniae has been shown to increase atherosclerosis in both a rabbit model and a mouse apoE knockout model of atherosclerosis.128 129 Similar results have been demonstrated for CMV infection in the apoE knockout model.130 In addition, as noted above, in an acute injury model (balloon injury of a rat carotid artery), infection with CMV increases the resulting neointimal response.87 88


*    Summary and Conclusions
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowInfection as a Contributor...
up arrowPresence of Pathogens in...
up arrowDirect Effects of Infectious...
up arrowSystemic Alterations Produced by...
up arrowIndividual Variations in Host...
up arrowPathogen Burden as a...
*Summary and Conclusions
down arrowReferences
 
In summary, there is an increasing body of information compatible with the concept that infectious agents contribute to the development of atherosclerosis and to plaque instability and rupture. These possibilities are strengthened by the multiple investigations providing cellular and molecular mechanistic support for such roles and by investigations demonstrating that certain pathogens can exacerbate lesion development in animal models. It is equally clear, however, that no simple relationship exists between infection and atherogenesis. As with other infectious diseases, the propensity for a given infectious agent to contribute to the development of atherosclerosis will depend on host-pathogen interactions. This in turn will determine susceptibility to pathogen inflammatory activity and therefore to atherogenic potential. And if additional studies support an important autoimmune component to atherogenesis, the type of humoral and cellular immune responses mounted by the host to infection may determine whether a particular pathogen will contribute to atherosclerotic lesion development in a particular host (the FigureDown).



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Mechanisms potentially contributing to infection/atherosclerosis link other than those resulting from direct infection of vessel wall.

As the case for a role of infection grows, the existing paradigms to explain the natural history of the clinical manifestations of CAD can be expanded. For example, it was appreciated many years ago that atherosclerosis does not progress as a slow gradual process; rather, the underlying progressive nature of the disease is punctuated by intermittent acute exacerbations. This has been appreciated both clinically and by morphological investigations of atherosclerotic plaques. The concept that infection plays a role in atherosclerosis fits this model very well. Thus, by producing persistent subclinical infections causing a chronic inflammatory state (leading to activation of inflammatory cells and of immune processes), infectious agents could contribute to gradual plaque enlargement. However, punctuation of this low-grade persistent activity by recurrent acute infections or intermittent reactivation of latent infections, whether clinically overt or silent, could cause acute exacerbations of the atherosclerotic process, including plaque rupture and thrombotic occlusion.

It must be emphasized that evidence definitively proving a causal role of infection in atherosclerosis is lacking. Although the temptation is great to initiate clinical trials testing whether interventions targeted to pathogens will decrease progression of atherosclerosis or its complications, we cannot loose sight of the importance of performing additional animal and human studies that can further test the validity of the concept and provide more mechanistic information as to how pathogens may predispose to atherogenesis. This additional information will be critical for devising intelligent and effective future strategies to reduce or eliminate any contribution to atherosclerosis caused by infection.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowInfection as a Contributor...
up arrowPresence of Pathogens in...
up arrowDirect Effects of Infectious...
up arrowSystemic Alterations Produced by...
up arrowIndividual Variations in Host...
up arrowPathogen Burden as a...
up arrowSummary and Conclusions
*References
 

  1. Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s. Nature. 1993;362:801–908.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Mach F, Schoenbeck U, Bonnefoy JY, Pober J, Libby P. Activation of monocyte/macrophage functions related to acute atheroma complication by ligation of CD40: induction of collagenase, stromelysin, and tissue factor. Circulation. 1997;96:396–399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Schoenbeck U, Mach F, Sukhova GK, Murphy C, Bonnefoy JY, Fabunmi RP, Libby P. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expression in human vascular smooth muscle cells by T lymphocytes: a role for CD40 signaling in plaque rupture? Circ Res. 1997;81:448–454.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Hannson GK, Holm J, Jonasson L. Detection of activated T lymphocytes in the human atherosclerotic plaque. Am J Pathol. 1989;135:169–175.[Abstract]
  5. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:973–979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Berk BC, Weintraub WS, Alexander RW. Elevation of C-reactive protein in "active" coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1990;65:168–172.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. de Beer FC, Hind CR, Fox KM, Allan RM, Maseri A, Pepys MB. Measurement of serum C-reactive protein concentration in myocardial ischemia and infarction. Br Heart J. 1982;47:239–243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Pietila K, Harmoinen A, Hermens W, Simoons ML, Van de Werf F, Verstraete M. Serum C-reactive protein and infarct size in myocardial infarct patients with a closed versus an open infarct-related coronary artery after thrombolytic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1993;14:915–919.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Liuzzo G, Biasucci LM, Gallimore JR, Grillo RL, Rebuzzi A, Pepys MB, Maseri A. The prognostic value of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A protein in severe unstable angina. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:417–424.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Thompson SG, Kienast J, Pyke SDM, Haverkate F, van de Loo JCW. Hemostatic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:635–641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Stemme S, Faber B, Holm J, Wiklund O, Witztum JL, Hansson GK. T lymphocytes from human atherosclerotic plaques recognize oxidized LDL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:3892–3897.
  12. Hansson GK. Cell-mediated immunity in atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol. 1997;8:301–311.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Kleindienst R, Xu Q, Willeit J, Waldenberger FR, Wimann S, Wick G. Immunology of atherosclerosis demonstration of heat shock protein and T-lymphocytes bearing {alpha}/ß or {gamma}/{delta} receptor in human atherosclerotic lesions. Am J Pathol. 1993;142:1927–1937.[Abstract]
  14. Xu Q, Luef G, Weimann S, Gupta RS, Wolf H, Wick G. Staining of endothelial cells and macrophages in atherosclerotic lesions with human heat-shock protein-reactive antisera. Arterioscler Thromb. 1993;13:1763–1769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wick G, Kleindienst R, Dietrich H, Xu Q. Is atherosclerosis an autoimmune disease? Trends Food Sci Technol. 1992;3:114–119.
  16. Kuller LH, Tracy RP, Shaten J, Meilahn EN. Relation of C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease in the MRFIT nested case-control study. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144:537–547.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Haverkate F, Thompson SG, Pyke SD, Gallimore JR, Pepys MB. Production of C-reactive protein and risk of coronary events in stable and unstable angina: European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. Lancet. 1997;349:462–466.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Cook PJ, Lip GY. Infectious agents and atherosclerotic vascular disease. QJM. 1996;89:727–735.[Abstract]
  19. Mattila KJ, Valtonen VV, Nieminen MS, Asikainen S. Role of infection as a risk factor for atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:719–734.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Mehta JL, Saldeen TG, Rand K. Interactive role of infection, inflammation and traditional risk factors in atherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:1217–1225.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Vercellotti GM. Effects of viral activation of the vessel wall on inflammation and thrombosis. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 1998;9(suppl 2):S3–S6.
  22. Nicholson AC, Hajjar DP. Herpesvirus in atherosclerosis and thrombosis: etiologic agents or ubiquitous bystanders? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1998;18:339–348.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Libby P, Egan D, Skarlatos S. Roles of infectious agents in atherosclerosis and restenosis: an assessment of the evidence and need for future research. Circulation. 1997;98:4095–4103.
  24. Danesh J, Appleby P. Persistent infection and vascular disease: a systematic review. Exp Opin Invest Drugs. 1998;7:691–671.
  25. Wick G, Schett G, Amberger A, Kleindienst R, Xu Q. Is atherosclerosis an immunologically mediated disease? Immunol Today. 1995;16:27–33.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Minick CR, Fabricant CG, Fabricant J, Litrenta MM. Atheroarteriosclerosis induced by infection with a herpesvirus. Am J Pathol. 1979;96:673–706.[Abstract]
  27. Fabricant CG, Fabricant J, Minick CR, Litrenta MM. Herpesvirus-induced atherosclerosis in chickens. Fed Proc. 1983;42:2476–2479.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Kuo CC, Shor A, Campbell LA, Fukushi H, Patton DL, Grayston JT. Demonstration of Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerotic lesions of coronary arteries. J Infect Dis. 1993;167:841–849.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Chuib B, Viira E, Tucker W, Fong IW. Chlamydia pneumoniae, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus in atherosclerosis of the carotid artery. Circulation. 1997;96:2144–2148.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Yamashiroya HM, Ghosh L, Yang R, Robertson AL Jr. Herpesviridae in coronary vessels and aorta of young trauma victims. Am J Pathol. 1988;130:71–78.[Abstract]
  31. Melnick JL, Petrie BL, Dreesman GR, Burek J, McCollum CH, DeBakey ME. Cytomegalovirus antigen within human arterial smooth muscle cells. Lancet. 1983;2:644–647.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Adam E, Probtsfield JL, Burek J, McCollum CH, Melnick JL, Petrie BL, Bailey KR, Debakey ME. High levels of cytomegalovirus antibody in patients requiring vascular surgery for atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1987;2:291–293.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  33. Grattan MT, Moreno-Cabral CE, Starnes VA, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Shumway NE. Cytomegalovirus infection is associated with cardiac allograft rejection and atherosclerosis. JAMA. 1989;261:3561–3566.[Abstract]
  34. Saikku P, Leinonen M, Mattila K, Ekman MR, Nieminen MS, Makela PH, Huttunen JK, Valtonen V. Serological evidence of an association of a novel Chlamydia, TWAR, with chronic coronary heart disease and acute myocardial infarction. Lancet. 1988;2:983–986.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Thom DM, Grayston JT, Siscovitch DS, Wang SP, Weiss NS, Daling JR. Association of prior infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae and angiographically demonstrated coronary artery disease. JAMA. 1992;268:68–72.[Abstract]
  36. Mendall MA, Goggin PM, Molineaux N, Levy J, Toosy T, Strachan D, Camm AJ, Northfield TC. Relation of Helicobacter pylori infection and coronary heart disease. Br Heart J. 1994;71:437–439.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Rathbone B, Martin D, Stephens J, Thompson JR, Samani NJ. Helicobacter pylori seropositivity in subjects with acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 1996;76:308–311.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Sorlie PD, Adam E, Melnick SL, Folsom A, Skelton T, Chambless LE, Barnes R, Melnick J, for the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Cytomegalovirus/herpesvirus and carotid atherosclerosis: the ARIC study. J Med Virol. 1994;42:33–37.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  39. Ossewaarde JM, Feskens EJ, De Vries A, Vallinga CE, Kromhout D. Chlamydia pneumoniae is a risk factor for coronary heart disease in symptom-free elderly men, but Helicobacter pylori and cytomegalovirus are not. Epidemiol Infect. 1998;120:93–99.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  40. Zhu J, Quyyumi A, Norman JE, Csako GA, Epstein SE. Potential role of hepatitis A virus in coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33(suppl):4A. Abstract.
  41. Ossei-Gerning N, Moayyedi P, Smith S, Braunholtz D, Wilson JI, Axon AT, Grant PJ. Helicobacter pylori infection is related to atheroma in patients undergoing coronary angiography. Cardiovasc Res. 1997;35:120–124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Pasceri VP, Cammarota G, Patti G, Cuoco L, Gasbarrini A, Grillo RL, Fedeli G, Gasbarrini G, Maseri A. Association of virulent Helicobacter pylori strains with ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 1998;97:1675–1679.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Danesh J, Collins R, Peto R. Chronic infections and coronary heart disease: is there a link? Lancet. 1997;350:430–436.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  44. Zhou YF, Leon MB, Waclawiw MA, Popma JJ, Yu ZX, Finkel T, Epstein SE. Association between prior cytomegalovirus infection and the risk of restenosis after coronary atherectomy. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:624–630.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Blum A, Giladi M, Weinberg M, Kaplan G, Pasternack H, Laniado S, Miller H. High anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) IgG antibody titer is associated with coronary artery disease and may predict post-coronary balloon angioplasty restenosis. Am J Cardiol. 1998;81:866–868.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  46. Havlik RJ, Blackwelder WC, Kaslow R, Castelli W. Unlikely association between clinically apparent herpesvirus infection and coronary incidence at older ages. Arteriosclerosis. 1989;9:877–880.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Weiss SW, Roblin PM, Gaydos CA, Cummings P, Patton DL, Schulhoff N, Shani J, Frankel R, Penney K, Quinn T, Hammerschlag MR, Schachter J. Failure to detect Chlamydia pneumoniae in coronary atheromas of patients undergoing atherectomy. J Infect Dis. 1996;173:957–963.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  48. Folsom AR, Nieto FJ, Sorlie P, Chambless L, Graham DY, for the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. Helicobacter pylori seropositivity and coronary heart disease incidence. Circulation. 1998;98:845–850.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Regnstrom J, Jovinge S, Bavenholm P, Ericsson CG, De Faire U, Hamsten A, Hellenius ML, Nilsson J, Tornvall P. Helicobacter pylori seropositivity is not associated with inflammatory parameters, lipid concentrations and degree of coronary artery disease. J Intern Med. 1998;243:109–113.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  50. Adler SP, Hur JK, Wang JB, Vetrovec GW. Prior infection with cytomegalovirus is not a major risk factor for angiographically demonstrated coronary artery atherosclerosis. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:209–212.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  51. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Stampfer MJ, Wang F. Prospective study of herpes simplex virus, cytomegalovirus, and the risk of future myocardial infarction and stroke. Circulation. 1998;98:2796–2799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Ridker PM, Kundsin RB, Stampfer MJ, Poulin S, Hennekens CH. Prospective study of Chlamydia pneumoniae IgG seropositivity and risks of future myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1999;99:1161–1164.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Muhlestein JB, Carlquist JF, Horne BD, King GJ, Elmer SP, Anderson JL. No association between prior cytomegalovirus infection and the risk of clinical restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. Circulation. 1997;96(suppl I):I-650. Abstract.
  54. Albrecht P, Nachtigal M, St Jeor SC, Rapp F. Induction of cellular DNA synthesis and increased mitotic activity in Syrian hamster embryo cells abortively infected with human cytomegalovirus. J Gen Virol. 1976;30:167–177.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Zhou YF, Yu ZX, Wanishsawad C, Shou M, Epstein SE. The immediate early gene products of human cytomegalovirus increase vascular smooth muscle cell migration, proliferation, and expression of PDGF ß-receptor. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1999;256:608–613.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  56. Lemstrom KB, Aho PT, Bruggeman CA, Hayry PJ. Cytomegalovirus infection enhances mRNA expression of platelet-derived growth factor-BB and transforming growth factor-beta 1 in rat aortic allografts: possible mechanism for cytomegalovirus-enhanced graft arteriosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb. 1994;12:2042–2052.
  57. Levine AJ. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell. 1997;88:323–331.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  58. Yonemitsu Y, Kaneda Y, Tanaka S, Nakashima Y, Komori K, Sugimachi K, Sueishi K. Transfer of wild-type p53 gene effectively inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. Circ Res. 1998;82:147–156.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  59. Speir E, Modali R, Huang ES, Leon MB, Shawl F, Finkel T, Epstein SE. Potential role of human cytomegalovirus and p53 interaction in coronary restenosis. Science. 1994;256:391–394.
  60. Tsai HL, Kou GH, Chen SC, Wu CW, Lin YS. Human cytomegalovirus immediate-early protein IE2 tethers a transcriptional repression domain to p53. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:3534–3540.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Kovacs A, Weber ML, Burns LJ, Jacob HS, Vercellotti GM. Cytoplasmic sequestration of p53 in cytomegalovirus-infected human endothelial cells. Am J Pathol. 1996;149:1531–1539.[Abstract]
  62. Gonczol E, Plotkin SA. Cells infected with human cytomegalovirus release a factor(s) that stimulates cell DNA synthesis. J Virol. 1984;65:1833–1837.
  63. Alcami J, Barzun T, Michelson S. Induction of an endothelial cell growth factor by human cytomegalovirus infection of fibroblasts. J Gen Virol. 1991;72:2765–2770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  64. Zhu H, Shen Y, Shenk T. Human cytomegalovirus IEl and 1E2 proteins block apoptosis. J Virol. 1995;69:7960–7970.[Abstract]
  65. Tanaka K, Zou JP, Takeda K, Ferrans VJ, Sandford GR, Johnson TM, Finkel T, Epstein SE. Effects of human cytomegalovirus immediate-early proteins on p53-mediated apoptosis in coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Circulation. 1999;99:1656–1659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. Fan T, Lu H, Hu H, Shi L, McClarty GA, Nance DM, Greenberg AH, Zhong G. Inhibition of apoptosis in chlamydia-infected cells: blockade of mitochondrial cytochrome c release and caspase activation. J Exp Med. 1998;187:487–496.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Hajjar DP, Pomerantz KB, Falcone DJ, Weksler BB, Grant AJ. Herpes simplex virus infection in human arterial cells: implications in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest. 1987;80:1317–1321.
  68. Zhou YF, Guetta E, Yu ZX, Finkel T, Epstein SE. Human cytomegalovirus increases modified low density lipoprotein uptake and scavenger receptor mRNA expression in vascular smooth muscle cells. J Clin Invest. 1996;98:2129–2138.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  69. Kalayoglu MV, Byrne GI. Induction of macrophage foam cell formation by Chlamydia pneumoniae. J Infect Dis. 1998;177:725–729.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  70. Visser MR, Tracy PB, Vercellotti GM, Goodman JL, White JG, Jacob HS. Enhanced thrombin generation and platelet binding on herpes simplex virus infected endothelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988;85:8227–8230.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Key NS, Vercellotti GM, Winkelmann JC, Moldow CF, Goodman JL, Esmon NL, Esmon CT, Jacob HS. Infection of vascular endothelial cells with herpes simplex virus enhances tissue factor activity and reduces thrombomodulin expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:7095–7099.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Etingin OR, Silverstein RL, Friedman HM, Hajjar DP. Viral activation of the coagulation cascade: molecular interactions at the surface of infected endothelial cells. Cell. 1990;61:657–662.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  73. van Dam-Mieras MCD, Muller AD, van Hinsbergh VWM, Muller WJ, Bomans PH, Bruggeman CA. The procoagulant response of cytomegalovirus infected endothelial cells. Thromb Haemost. 1992;68:364–370.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  74. Prasad A, Zhu J, Mincemoyer R, Schenke WH, Epstein SE, Quyyumi AA. Cytomegalovirus infection is a determinant of endothelial dysfunction and coronary flow reserve. Circulation. 1998;98(suppl I):I-244. Abstract.
  75. Grundy JE, Downes KL. Up-regulation of LFA-3 and ICAM- I on the surface of fibroblasts infected with cytomegalovirus. Immunology. 1993;78:405–412.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  76. Span AHM, Mullers W, Miltenburg AHM, Bruggeman CA. Cytomegalovirus-induced PMN adherence in relation to an ELAM-I antigen present on infected endothelial cell monolayers. Immunology. 1991;72:355–360.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  77. Burns LJ, Pooley JC, Walsh DJ, Vercellotti GM, Weber ML, Kovacs A. Intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression in endothelial cells is activated by cytomegalovirus immediate early proteins. Transplantation.. 1999;67:137–144.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  78. Speir E, Yu ZX, Ferrans VJ, Huang ES, Hla T, Epstein SE. Aspirin attenuates cytomegalovirus infectivity and gene expression mediated by cyclooxygenase-2 in coronary artery smooth muscle cells. Circ Res. 1998;83:210–216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  79. Maciejewski JP, Bruening EB, Donahue RB, Mocarski ES, Young NS, St Jeor SC. Infection of hematopoietic progenitor cells by human cytomegalovirus. Blood. 1992;80:170–178.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  80. Minton BJ, Tysoe C, Sinclair JH, Cessans JPG. Human cytomegalovirus infection of the monocyte/macrophage lineage in bone marrow. J Virol. 1994;68:4017–4021.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  81. Kondo K, Kaneshima H, Mocarski ES. Human cytomegalovirus latent infection of granulocyte-macrophage progenitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994;91:11879–11883.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  82. Taylor-Wiedeman J, Sissons JP, Sinclair JH. Induction of endogenous cytomegalovirus gene expression after differentiation of monocytes from healthy carriers. J Virol. 1994;68:1597-l604.