(Circulation. 1999;100:2353.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases and the Section of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (P.B.B., H.V.F.); Division of Cardiology, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif (E.L.A.); and Bayer Corporation, West Haven, Conn (A.N.).
Correspondence to Peter B. Berger, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail berger.peter{at}mayo.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsData were analyzed from the
International Multicenter Aprotinin Graft Patency Experience (IMAGE)
trial in which 617 patients underwent conventional CABG of the LAD with
a LIMA between April 1993 and May 1995. Coronary angiography
was performed a mean of 10.8 days postoperatively. Patients were
randomized to receive intraoperative aprotinin, an
inhibitor of several serine proteinases, or placebo.
Because no differences existed in patency rates of LIMA grafts between
patients who received aprotinin and placebo, both groups were
analyzed collectively. On coronary angiography, the
LIMA was widely patent (<50% stenosis) in 561 patients
(91%), had
50% and <99% stenosis in 48 patients (7.8%),
and was occluded in 8 patients (1.3%). Therefore, the LIMA was patent
in 609 patients (98.7%).
ConclusionsIn the IMAGE trial, the largest and most contemporary early angiographic analysis of CABG available, early patency of the LIMA was >98% when anastomosed to the LAD. These data provide an important benchmark for less invasive surgical approaches in which the LIMA is anastomosed to the LAD.
Key Words: cardiopulmonary bypass angiography trials coronary disease revascularization
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The true frequency of early patency after a LIMA is anastomosed to the LAD through a sternotomy with conventional CABG is important for comparison with less invasive surgical approaches, such as minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB). With MIDCAB, the operation is performed through a smaller incision than a conventional sternotomy and without cardiopulmonary bypass. Harvest of the LIMA, exposure and stabilization of the LAD, and control of blood flow through the LAD are more difficult, in general, with MIDCAB than with the conventional operation, and these potential problems may increase the risk of early graft occlusion. Few studies of MIDCAB have reported early patency rates, and routine postoperative angiographic follow-up has been obtained in only a minority of cases.4 5 6 7
We performed this analysis to determine the frequency of early patency and subtotal stenosis when a LIMA is anastomosed to the LAD through a sternotomy with conventional CABG.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients were eligible if they required elective myocardial revascularization and did not require noncoronary procedures, such as aneurysm resection or valve repair or replacement. The trial had no upper age limit. Exclusion criteria included known or suspected allergy to aprotinin or contrast media, a known bleeding disorder or hematologic abnormality, refusal to use allogenic blood products, predonation of autologous blood, or a preoperative red blood cell mass so low that homologous blood would be required in the prime fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass. Additional exclusion criteria included a previous median sternotomy, diabetes mellitus with a serum creatinine level >1.5 mg/dL, nondiabetics with a serum creatinine level >1.9 mg/dL, inadequate vascular access for postoperative angiography, treatment with an investigational drug within the preceding 30 days, and known or suspected pregnancy.
The IMAGE trial enrolled 870 patients at 10 US sites and 3 additional sites within Israel (2) and Denmark (1). Patients were randomized by clinical center using a computer-generated randomization code (Bayer Corporation): 436 were given aprotinin and 434, placebo. The 10 US sites randomized 471 patients (54%; range, 2 to 95 patients per site), and the 3 sites within Israel and Denmark randomized 126 (14.5%), 168 (19.3%), and 105 (12.1%) patients. In addition, randomization was stratified on the basis of whether or not patients received aspirin within 5 days preoperatively or a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug within 3 serum half-lives preoperatively (50% in each group). The random code was generated in blocks within clinical center and stratum. Patients and physicians were blinded to randomization assignment throughout the study.
Study Population
A LIMA was anastomosed to the LAD in 760 of the 870 patients
(87%). Patients in whom a sequential or Y-LIMA graft was used (n=27)
were excluded. Of the remaining 733 patients who received a single LIMA
to the LAD, 617 (84%) underwent follow-up angiography of the LIMA and
116 (16%) did not. The lack of follow-up angiography was due to
patient refusal after previously having consented to undergo the
procedure in most cases. The 617 patients who underwent follow-up
angiography form the study population.
No differences existed in the patency of the LIMA in aprotinin- versus placebo-treated patients.8 Therefore, both groups were analyzed collectively.
Operative Procedures
Anesthesia, cardiopulmonary bypass, and
postoperative intensive care procedures were performed according to
standard protocols at each study site. Each center endeavored to adhere
to the same procedures and regimens for all patients. The heparin
loading dose for cardiopulmonary bypass was
350 IU/kg, which
included the heparin administered before aortic cannulation and that
added to the prime volume of the cardiopulmonary bypass
circuit. Additional doses of heparin were given as needed to maintain
an activated clotting time above 400 s and to maintain
whole-blood heparin levels
2.7 U/mL, as determined using a
heparin-protamine titration test performed with a heparin measurement
system (Medtronic-Hemotec). Patients in the aprotinin group received a
loading dose of 2 000 000 KIU followed by continuous infusion
at a rate of 500 000 KIU/h. In addition, aprotinin (2 000 000 KIU)
was added to the prime volume of the cardiopulmonary bypass
circuit. Postoperatively, all patients received 325 mg of aspirin
daily. The first dose was administered via a nasogastric tube 6 hours
postoperatively.
During the operation, the surgeon assessed the quality of the distal vessel and the diameter of the distal vessel and graft.
Follow-up Angiography
Repeat coronary angiography, which was required by the
protocol to be performed within 90 days postoperatively, was performed
a mean of 10.8 days postoperatively (median, 7 days). If serum
creatinine levels were >1.9 mg/dL within the preceding 2
days, angiography was postponed. Among patients who had postoperative
angiography, 85% underwent angiography within 2 weeks. Nonionic
contrast was used, and sublingual nitroglycerin (0.6
mg) was given before angiography unless contraindicated.
Angiographic Analysis
Cineangiograms were interpreted both at the Central
Radiographic Laboratory at Stanford University and at the
clinical sites. The Central Radiographic Laboratory review
used the same criteria as the clinical sites, but the review was
blinded to clinical site and site interpretations. The Central
Radiographic Laboratory and site readings were then
compared to identify discrepancies. Discrepancies were referred
to an independent reader for adjudication.
Dynamic kinks and anastomotic stenoses were not considered
stenoses unless a thrombus obstructing
50% of the lumen
diameter was clearly evident within the graft at these sites; in these
cases, they were considered to be obstructing stenoses. Smooth,
tubular stenoses within the graft that narrowed the lumen by
50% and that had the appearance of spasm, nonetheless, also were
considered to represent obstructing stenoses if they
did not resolve when additional nitroglycerin was
administered. If thrombus was present within the graft at the site
of a stenosis >50%, the graft was considered occluded, even
if some antegrade blood flow was present beyond the
obstruction.
Detection of Myocardial Infarction
A standard 12-lead ECG was acquired preoperatively and
postoperatively on days 3, 5, and 7 or hospital discharge. In patients
experiencing a suspected ischemic cardiac event outside the
protocol window, the ECG associated with that event was examined.
Myocardial infarction was diagnosed on a blinded basis by the Core ECG
Laboratory at St Louis University Medical Center. All ECGs were
classified according to the Minnesota Code.19 20 21 22 The
diagnosis of definite myocardial infarction was based on the new
development of a 2-step worsening Minnesota code Q-wave change, the new
development of persistent left bundle branch block patterns, and the
presence of acute necrosis at autopsy.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Procedural Characteristics
Procedural characteristics are shown in Table 2
. Patients received a median of 3.0
graft insertions. The segment of the LAD to which the LIMA was
anastomosed was
1.5 mm in 43% of cases. In a separate
analysis of vessel quality, the segment of LAD to which the
LIMA was anastomosed was characterized as being of fair or poor quality
in 53% of cases.
|
Comparison of Patients Who Did and Did Not Undergo
Follow-Up Angiography
The primary reason for follow-up angiography not being obtained
was patient refusal. However, the baseline clinical and procedural
characteristics of patients who did and did not undergo follow-up
angiography of the LIMA were compared to determine if evidence existed
that the LIMA patency rate may have been lower in patients who did not
undergo follow-up angiography. Patients who did not undergo follow-up
angiography were older (64 versus 61 years; P=0.007),
received less total protamine (316 versus 338 mg; P=0.021),
and had lower preoperative hemoglobin levels (13.7 versus 14.1 g/dL;
P=0.006). However, no significant differences existed
between the 2 groups in any of the other clinical or procedural
characteristics listed in Tables 1 or 2.
Clinical Outcome
One death (0.2%) occurred among the 617 patients in the study.
Fifteen patients (2.5%) suffered a definite myocardial infarction; the
LIMA was occluded in 1 of these patients. Forty percent of myocardial
infarction patients who underwent angiography had
1 occluded vein
graft.
There were 11 deaths among the 116 patients (9.5%) who did not undergo follow-up angiography. Four of the 11 patients who died had a postoperative ECG indicating that a myocardial infarction had occurred, and a fifth patient who died was thought to have had a myocardial infarction, although an ECG could not be obtained. The 6 remaining patients who died were not thought to have had a postoperative myocardial infarction. Seven deaths occurred within 8 days, and the remainder occurred between 15 and 50 days after surgery. Therefore, the overall mortality among the 733 patients who received a single LIMA graft to the LAD was 1.6%.
Among the 116 patients without follow-up angiography, 111 had an evaluable postoperative ECG, and 9 of these (8%) showed evidence of myocardial infarction.
Patency Rates
The LIMA was patent, without
50% stenosis anywhere in
the graft or distal anastomosis in 561 of 617 patients (91%). In 48
patients (7.8%), the LIMA was patent, but a stenosis
50%
but <99% was present. The LIMA was occluded (
99%
stenosis) in 8 patients (1.3%). Therefore, the LIMA was patent
in 609 patients (98.7%), although a
50% stenosis was
present in 7.8% of them. No differences existed in LIMA patency
between aprotinin-treated patients (98.2%) and placebo-treated
patients (99.0%).
The sites of the
50% stenoses included the distal
anastomosis, fixed kinks within the graft, and smooth tubular
stenoses within the graft that had the appearance of spasm but
were refractory to nitroglycerin. In the 48 patients
with a patent LIMA with a
50% stenosis, the mean
stenosis was 60% by quantitative analysis. The
severity of stenoses in these 48 patients ranged from 50% in
13 (27%) to 75% in 1 patient.
Potential Impact of Early Mortality on the
Analysis
Some early deaths before the performance of angiography
may have been the result of graft failure, particularly of the LIMA
graft. In some patients, death seemed to result from the failure of
other organ systems. However, even if all 11 patients who did not
undergo follow-up angiography and died had an occluded LIMA, the
overall patency rate among the 733 patients with a single LIMA graft to
the LAD would still be 97.4%.
Comparison of Occluded and Nonoccluded LIMAs
To determine why the LIMA was occluded in some patients and
remained patent in others, we compared clinical and procedural
characteristics in the patients with occluded and patent grafts
(Figure
). Although differences in
clinical and procedural characteristics were seen, few reached
statistical significance due to the small number of patients with an
occluded LIMA. Although an ejection fraction <50%, a distal vessel
1.5 mm, and a distal vessel that was qualitatively fair or poor
tended to be more frequent in patients whose LIMA was occluded at
follow-up angiography, most patients with these characteristics had a
patent LIMA on follow-up angiography. There were 158 patients (26%)
with diabetes mellitus. The occlusion rates in nondiabetics (6 of 459,
1.3%) and diabetics (2 of 158, 1.3%) were similar.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50% within the LIMA graft. The
LIMA was occluded in only 1.3% of patients.
Comparison With Prior Studies
Several studies showed that patients in whom a LIMA is grafted to
the LAD have better survival and freedom from recurrent infarction,
severe angina, and repeat revascularization than
patients in whom the LAD is bypassed with a vein
graft.23 24 25 26 The duration of benefit extends for
10
years, and the magnitude of benefit increases in the years after
surgery.23 24 25 26
Many studies evaluating early patency of the LIMA graft have been limited by their retrospective nature, biased selection of patients in whom a LIMA was placed, and incomplete angiographic follow-up. In several prospective studies of CABG, a sternotomy was performed, conventional cardiopulmonary bypass was used, and a high proportion of patients underwent early angiographic follow-up. Goldman et al1 reported the results of 224 patients in whom a LIMA was placed to the LAD; 72% of these patients underwent angiography a mean of 8 days postoperatively. The LIMA was occluded in 3 of 224 patients (1.3%). All of the occlusions were in patients who did not receive preoperative aspirin. The frequency of a significant stenosis without occlusion was not reported. A 96.4% early patency rate was reported for 494 patients in whom an internal mammary artery graft was used.2 Little information was provided about the percentage of patients undergoing follow-up angiography, the timing of angiography, the vessels to which the graft was placed, or the percentage of patients with a significant stenosis without occlusion.
Van der Meer et al3 found that 5.4% of 494 internal mammary artery grafts were occluded at 1 year. In their study, 1.4 distal anastomoses existed per internal mammary artery graft, and the distal anastomosis was to the LAD in only 68% of patients, which limits the comparability of that study with the current study. Other studies in which angiography was performed 1 year after bypass surgery have reported patency rates of 88% to 94% for the LIMA, which are generally higher than the patency rates of vein grafts in the same patients.25 27 28 29 30 31 These studies provide evidence of the advantages of arterial grafting.
Comparison With MIDCAB
A paucity of early patency data exists after less invasive
surgical procedures in which the LIMA is anastomosed to the LAD. In the
CardioThoracic Systems registry, the qualitative patency rate was 97%
among the 219 patients who had MIDCAB.6 However, this
represented <15% of the >1400 patients in the registry.
Furthermore, a core angiographic laboratory was not used to assess
qualitative patency. Many studies have shown that angiographic
analyses performed at clinical sites and core laboratories
differ substantially, with site analyses invariably more
"optimistic" than analyses conducted at core laboratories
by investigators who are not involved with the clinical care of the
patients undergoing analysis.32 33
The results of the current study provide an important benchmark for assessing the results of minimally invasive approaches to internal mammary graft placement. However, all patients in this study had multivessel disease, in contrast with MIDCAB procedures, which are usually performed in patients with single vessel disease. Indeed, patients with single vessel disease having LIMA grafting would be expected to have similar or even better patency than those in this study. With multivessel disease, some patients will be accepted for surgery who have a poor-quality LAD but other good target vessels. In contrast, all patients with single vessel disease selected for surgery should have an adequate distal LAD for bypass. Clearly, the outcome of patients undergoing LAD bypass with a LIMA using conventional techniques, including cardiopulmonary bypass, is excellent, and MIDCAB techniques should be rigorously evaluated with postoperative angiography to assess the operative results.
Limitations of the Study
Patients who had an acute myocardial infarction or who required
emergency CABG surgery were not eligible for the IMAGE trial. The early
patency rates observed in this study may not reflect patency rates of
the LIMA in patients with these high-risk characteristics.
The patency rate of the LIMA may have been different in the 116 patients (16%) who did not undergo repeat angiography. However, no important differences in clinical or procedural characteristics were identified between patients who did and did not undergo angiography. Although the most common reason that follow-up angiography was not performed was patient refusal, the rate of myocardial infarction was higher in patients who did not undergo the procedure. The possible impact of early deaths on the observed patency rates was discussed.
Conclusions
In the IMAGE trial, the largest and most contemporary early
angiographic analysis of CABG available, early patency of the
LIMA was >98% when it was anastomosed to the LAD through a sternotomy
with conventional bypass; 7.8% of patients had a stenosis of
50% but <99% within the LIMA graft. Only 1.3% of LIMAs were
occluded. These data provide an important benchmark for the minimally
invasive surgical approaches for anastomosis of the LIMA to the LAD.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Appendix 1 |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Received March 5, 1999; revision received July 22, 1999; accepted July 29, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Sethi GK, Copeland JG, Moritz T, Henderson W, Zadina K, Goldman S. Comparison of postoperative complications between saphenous vein and IMA grafts to left anterior descending coronary artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;51:733738.[Abstract]
3. Van de Meer J, de la Riviere AB, van Gilst WH, Hillege HL, Pfisterer M, Kootstra GJ, Dunselman PHJM, Mulder BJM, Lie KI, for the CABADAS Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands. Effects of low dose aspirin (50 mg/day), low dose aspirin plus dipyridamole, and oral anticoagulant agents after internal mammary artery bypass grafting: patency and clinical outcome at 1 year. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:11811188.[Abstract]
4. Benetti FJ, Ballester C, Sani G, Doonstra P, Grandjean J. Video-assisted mini-invasive coronary surgery without cardiopulmonary bypass: a multicenter study. J Thorac Surg. 1995;10:620625.
5. Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, Mariana MA. Improved method for direct coronary grafting without CPB via anterolateral small thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997;3:567569.
6. Holubkov R, Zenati M, Akin JJ, Erb L, Courcoulas A. MIDCAB characteristics and results: the CardioThoracic Systems (CTS) registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14(Suppl 1):S25S30.
7.
Mariani MA, Boonstra PW, Grandjean JG, Peels JOJ,
Monnink SHJ, Heijer PD, Crijns JJGM. Minimally invasive
coronary artery bypass grafting versus coronary
angioplasty for isolated type C stenosis of the left anterior
descending artery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:434439.
8.
Alderman EL, Levy JH, Rich J, Nili M, Vidne B, Schaff
H, Uretzky G, Pettersson G, Thiis JJ, Hantler CB, Chaitman B, Nadel A,
on behalf of the IMAGE Investigators. Analyses of
coronary graft patency after aprotinin use: results from the
International Multicenter Aprotinin Graft Patency Experience (IMAGE)
trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116:716730.
9. Laskowski M Jr, Kato I. Protein inhibitors of proteinases. Annu Rev Biochem. 1980;49:593626.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10.
Havel M, Grabenwoger F, Schneider J, Laufer G, Wollenek
G, Owen A, Simon P, Teufelsbauer H, Wolner E. Aprotinin does not
decrease early graft patency after coronary artery bypass
grafting despite reducing postoperative bleeding and use of donated
blood. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:807810.
11. Verstraete M. Clinical applications of inhibitors of fibrinolysis. Drugs. 1985;29:236242.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Royston D, Bidstrup BP, Taylor KM, Sapsford RN. Effect of aprotinin on need for blood transfusion after repeat open-heart surgery. Lancet. 1987;2:12891291.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Van Oeveren W, Jansen NJ, Bidstrup BP, Royston D, Westaby S, Neuhof H, Wildevuur CRH. Effects of aprotinin on hemostatic mechanisms during cardiopulmonary bypass. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44:640645.[Abstract]
14. Bidstrup BP, Royston D, Taylor KM, Sapsford RN. Reduction in blood loss and blood use after cardiopulmonary bypass with high dose aprotinin (Trasylol). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;97:364372.[Abstract]
15. Cosgrove DM, Heric B, Lytle BW, Taylor PC, Novoa R, Golding LA, Stewart RW, McCarthy PM, Loop FD. Aprotinin therapy for reoperative myocardial revascularization: a placebo-controlled study. Ann Thorac Surg. 1992;6:10311036.
16.
Lemmer J, Stanford W, Bonney S, Breen J, Chomka E,
Eldredge WJ, Holt WW, Karp RB, Laub GW, Lipton MJ, Schaff HV, Tatooles
CJ, Rumberger JA. Aprotinin for coronary bypass operations:
efficacy, safety, and influence on early saphenous vein graft patency.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:543553.
17.
Lemmer JH Jr, Dilling EW, Morton JR, Rich JR, Robicsek
F, Bricker DL, Hantler CB, Copeland JG III, Ochsner JL, Daily PO,
Whitten CW, Noon GP, Maddi R. Aprotinin for primary coronary
artery bypass grafting: a multicenter trial of 3 dose regimens.
Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;62:16591668.
18.
Levy JH, Pifarre R, Schaff HV, Horrow JC, Albus R,
Spiess B, Rosengart TK, Murray J, Clark RE, Smith P, Nadel A, Bonney
SL, Kleinfield R. A multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
of aprotinin for reducing blood loss and the requirement for
donor-blood transfusion in patients undergoing repeat coronary
artery bypass grafting. Circulation. 1995;92:22362244.
19. Prinieas RJ, Crow RS, Blackburn H. The Minnesota Code Manual of Electrocardiograph Findings: Standards and Procedures for Measurement and Classification. Boston, Mass: Wright-PSG; 1982:1229.
20. Rautaharju PM, Calhoun HP, Chaitman BR. Novacode serial ECG classification system for clinical trials in epidemiological studies. J Electrocardiol. 1992;24:179187.
21.
Chaitman BR, Alderman EL, Sheffield LT, Tong T, Fisher
L, Mock MB, Wiens RD, Kaiser GC, Roitman D, Berger R, Gersh B, Schaff
H, Bourassa MG, Killip T, and participating CASS medical centers. Use
of survival analysis to determine the clinical significance of
new Q waves after coronary bypass surgery.
Circulation. 1983;67:302309.
22. Chaitman BR, Zhaou SH, Tamesis B, Rosen A, Terry AB, Zumbehl KM, Stocke K, Takase EB, Gussak I, Rautaharju PM. Methodology of serial ECG classification using an adaptation of the Novacode for Q wave myocardial infarction in the bypass angioplasty revascularization investigation (BARI). J Electrocardiol. 1996;29:265277.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Cameron AAC, Green GE, Brogno DA, Thornton J. Internal thoracic artery grafts: 20-year clinical follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:188192.[Abstract]
24.
Boylan MJ, Lytle BW, Loop FD, Taylor PC, Borsh JA,
Goormastic M, Cosgrove DM. Surgical treatment of isolated left anterior
descending coronary artery stenosis: comparison of left
internal mammary artery and venous autograft at 18 to 20 years
follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;107:657662.
25. Okies JE, Page US, Bigelow JC, Krause AH, Salomon NW. The left internal mammary artery: the graft of choice. Circulation. 1986;74(suppl I):I-213I-221.
26.
Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV.
Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts:
effects of survival over a 15-year period. N Engl J
Med. 1996;334:216219.
27. Barner HB, Standeven JW, Reese J. Twelve-year experience with internal mammary artery for coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985;90:668675.[Abstract]
28. Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM, Stewart RW, Goormastic M, Williams GW, Golding LAR, Gill CC, Taylor PC, Sheldon WC, Prouditt WL. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:16.[Abstract]
29. Bjork VO, Ivert T, Landou C. Angiographic changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts, 2 weeks, 1 year, and 5 years after coronary bypass surgery. Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1981;15:2330.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
30. Grondin CM, Campeau L, Lesperance J, Enjalbert M, Bourassa MG. Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in 2 consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation. Circulation. 1984;70(suppl I):I-208I-212.
31. Goldman S, Copeland J, Moritz T, Henderson W, Zadina K, Ovitt T, Kern KB, Sethi G, Sharma GV, Khuri S, Richards K, Grover F, Morrison D, Johnston M, Chesler E, Sako Y, Pacold I, Montoya A, DeMots H, Floten S, Doherty J, Read R, Scott S, Spooner T, Masud Z, Haakenson C, Harker LA. Internal mammary artery and saphenous vein graft patency: effects of aspirin. Circulation. 1990;82(suppl IV):IV-237IV-242.
32.
The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded
Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO
IIb) Angioplasty Substudy Investigators. A clinical trial comparing
primary coronary angioplasty with tissue
plasminogen activator for acute myocardial
infarction. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:16211628.
33. Fleming RM, Kirkeeide RL, Smalling RW, Gould KL. Patterns in visual interpretation of coronary angiograms as detected by quantitative coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:945951.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. K. Singh, N. D. Desai, G. Chikazawa, H. Tsuneyoshi, J. Vincent, B. M. Zagorski, V. Pen, F. Moussa, G. N. Cohen, G. T. Christakis, et al. The Graft Imaging to Improve Patency (GRIIP) clinical trial results J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2010; 139(2): 294 - 301. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gyongyosi, G. Christ, I. Lang, G. Kreiner, H. Sochor, P. Probst, T. Neunteufl, R. Badr-Eslam, S. Winkler, N. Nyolczas, et al. 2-Year Results of the AUTAX (Austrian Multivessel TAXUS-Stent) Registry: Beyond the SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., August 1, 2009; 2(8): 718 - 727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Brinker The left main facts: faced, spun, but alas too few. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 4, 2008; 51(9): 893 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Argenziano, M. Katz, J. Bonatti, S. Srivastava, D. Murphy, R. Poirier, D. Loulmet, L. Siwek, U. Kreaden, D. Ligon, et al. Results of the prospective multicenter trial of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2006; 81(5): 1666 - 1675. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P.J. Budde, P. F. A. Bakker, R. Meijer, C. Borst, and P. F. Grundeman Ultrasound Mini-Transducer with Malleable Handle for Coronary Artery Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 322 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Izumi, H. Hayashi, Y. Ueda, M. Matsumoto, Y. Himura, H. Gen, and T. Konishi Late regression of left internal thoracic artery graft stenosis at the anastomotic site without intervention therapy J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2005; 130(6): 1661 - 1667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Hoenig, G. R. Campbell, B. E. Rolfe, and J. H. Campbell Tissue-Engineered Blood Vessels: Alternative to Autologous Grafts? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, June 1, 2005; 25(6): 1128 - 1134. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. P.J. Budde, R. Meijer, T. C. Dessing, C. Borst, and P. F. Grundeman Detection of construction errors in ex vivo coronary artery anastomoses by 13-MHz epicardial ultrasonography J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2005; 129(5): 1078 - 1083. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A Black, S. Ghosh, K. Sin, T. Spyt, and R. Pillai Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2004; 12(4): 379 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Widimsky, Z. Straka, P. Stros, K. Jirasek, J. Dvorak, J. Votava, L. Lisa, T. Budesinsky, M. Kolesar, T. Vanek, et al. One-Year Coronary Bypass Graft Patency: A Randomized Comparison Between Off-Pump and On-Pump Surgery Angiographic Results of the PRAGUE-4 Trial Circulation, November 30, 2004; 110(22): 3418 - 3423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Hamman and C. H. White Interrupted distal anastomosis: the interrupted "porcupine" technique Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2004; 78(2): 722 - 724. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Drenth, N. J.G.M. Veeger, J. G. Grandjean, M. A. Mariani, A. J. van Boven, and P. W. Boonstra Isolated high-grade lesion of the proximal LAD: a stent or off-pump LIMA? Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 567 - 571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. B. Berger, M. H. Sketch Jr, and R. M. Califf Choosing Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Patients With Multivessel Disease: What Can We Learn From the Arterial Revascularization Therapy Study (ARTS)? Circulation, March 9, 2004; 109(9): 1079 - 1081. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. P. Carrel, F. S. Eckstein, L. Englberger, P. A. Berdat, and J. Schmidli Clinical experience with devices for facilitated anastomoses in coronary artery bypass surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 77(3): 1110 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. K. Wolf, E. L. Alderman, M. P. Caskey, A. R. Raczkowski, M. K. Dullum, D. C. Lundell, A. C. Hill, N. Wang, and M. A. Daniel Clinical and six-month angiographic evaluation of coronary arterial graft interrupted anastomoses by use of a self-closing clip device: a multicenter prospective clinical trial J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2003; 126(1): 168 - 177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. T.R. Grapow, T. Kern, D. C. Reineke, W. Brett, F. Bernet, F. Rueter, E. Muller-Schweinitzer, and H.-R. Zerkowski Improved endothelial function after a modified harvesting technique of the internal thoracic artery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., June 1, 2003; 23(6): 956 - 961. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Drenth, J. B. Winter, N. J. G. M. Veeger, S. H. J. Monnink, A. J. van Boven, J. G. Grandjean, M. A. Mariani, and P. W. Boonstra Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty with stenting in isolated high-grade stenosis of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery: Six months' angiographic and clinical follow-up of a prospective randomized study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2002; 124(1): 130 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Cleveland Jr, A. L. W. Shroyer, A. Y. Chen, E. Peterson, and F. L. Grover Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting decreases risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2001; 72(4): 1282 - 1289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. C. Hill, T. P. Maroney, and R. Virmani Facilitated coronary anastomosis using a nitinol U-clip device: Bovine model J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2001; 121(5): 859 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. O. Vetter, R. Driever, H. Mertens, U. Kempkes, and B. M. Cramer Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of mammary artery grafts after minimally invasive coronary bypass surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2001; 71(4): 1229 - 1232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Stamou and P. J. Corso Coronary revascularization without cardiopulmonary bypass in high-risk patients: a route to the future Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2001; 71(3): 1056 - 1061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Lichtenberg, U. Klima, A. Ruhparwar, A. Haverich, P. B. Berger, H. V. Schaff, E. L. Alderman, and A. Nadel Graft Patency Rate and Clinical Outcome After Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Response Circulation, January 16, 2001; 103 (2): e10 - e10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Mehran, G. Dangas, S. C. Stamou, A. J. Pfister, M. K. C. Dullum, M. B. Leon, and P. J. Corso One-Year Clinical Outcome After Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Circulation, December 5, 2000; 102(23): 2799 - 2802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
99% Early LIMA-LAD Patency Journal Watch Cardiology, January 21, 2000; 2000(121): 6 - 6. [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |