(Circulation. 1999;100:2127.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Brief Rapid Communications |
From the Division of Cardiovascular Medicine (A.J., M.L.K., A.O., M.H., Y.H., N.K., P.G.Y., P.J.F.), the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Transplantation Immunology (T.S.I., J.F.G., R.E.M.), and the Department of Pathology (G.J.B.), Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, Calif.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsThe objective of this study was to test the feasibility of in vivo intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) RF signal analysis in an animal model of allograft rejection. Six cynomolgus monkeys underwent transplantation of 3-cm aortic allograft segments distal to the renal arteries from immunologically mismatched donors. IVUS imaging with a 30-MHz system was performed 84 to 105 days after the operation. RF signals were acquired from cross sections of the recipient and the allograft aortas in real time with a digitizer at 500 MHz with 8-bit resolution. Sixty-five cross sections and 68 regions of interest (31 in host aorta and 37 in allograft) were analyzed in the adventitial layer with a total number of 8568 vectors processed. For each region of interest, a weighted-average attenuation was calculated on the basis of the attenuation and length for each individual vector. Histological examination was performed at every cross section imaged by IVUS. When the gray-scale images of conventional IVUS scored by an independent observer were compared, no distinction between adventitia of the native aorta and allograft was possible. Analysis of the average RF backscatter power also showed no significant difference (70.32±3.55 versus 70.72±3.38 dB). However, the average attenuation of allografts was significantly lower than that of the host aortas (2.64±1.38 versus 4.02±1.16 dB/mm, P<0.001). Histology demonstrated a marked adventitial inflammatory response in all allografts, with no inflammation observed in the host aortas.
ConclusionsIn vivo IVUS tissue characterization can be performed during routine imaging. In this model of transplant vasculopathy, RF attenuation measurements were more sensitive than visual or quantitative gray-scale analysis.
Key Words: ultrasonics aorta transplantation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
RF Signal Acquisition
IVUS imaging was performed 84 to 105 days after the
operation via a 5F femoral sheath with an automated pullback system at
a speed of 0.5 mm/s. A 2.9F imaging catheter with a 30-MHz
transducer (Ultra, BSC/CVIS) was used to obtain cross-sectional images
of the vessel wall. Multiple cross sections for RF analysis
were acquired in each animal during the IVUS pullback from the host
aorta proximal (at distances of 3, 2, and 1 cm of the proximal
anastomosis site) and distal (1 and 2 cm of the distal anastomosis) to
the allograft as well as from the graft itself (at 5-mm intervals
including both anastomosis sites). The RF ultrasound signals from each
cross section were sampled in real time at a rate of 500 MHz with 8-bit
resolution with a personal computerbased digitizer (Gauge Inc). The
unprocessed signal was obtained after preamplification but before
time-gain compensation or any other signal manipulation. For each cross
section, complete 360° scans, consisting of 256 vectors (received
signal from a single acoustic pulse), were acquired digitally and
stored to hard disk. IVUS images were recorded on videotape for
further analysis.
RF Signal Analysis
By use of the digitized ultrasound RF signals, regions of
interest (ROIs) were selected in the adventitial layer of the host
aorta and the allograft. Each ROI was made as large as possible
(6.7±3.2 in host aorta and 10.9±6.4 mm2 in
allografts) so that maximum accuracy for attenuation measurements was
realized. For each vector within an ROI, the RF signal envelope was
determined by a Hilbert transform method. Attenuation was calculated by
curve-fitting the envelope data to the following equation by use of
linear regression analysis: envelope sample=
Cx10-(1/10)
z, where C is a scaling constant,
is the attenuation of the medium in dB/mm, and z is the distance
from the catheter. Attenuation is defined as the spatial rate of change
of reflected ultrasonic energy. It represents a measurement of
relative energy change for an ROI and is not greatly influenced by
interposed tissue along the propagation path of the signal. On the
basis of the individual vectors attenuation and length within the
ROI, a weighted-average attenuation was calculated for each ROI. The
weighting accounts for the fact that longer vectors provide more
accurate attenuation estimates. To rule out any bias in the
analysis, the distance of the ROIs from the catheter and the
average length of vectors within the ROIs were calculated and compared
for the host aorta and the allograft. In addition, average backscatter
power of the ultrasonic signal was computed by a time-domain
approach5 for each ROI in both the recipient and graft
aorta.
Pathological Studies
After data collection, the allografts and the proximal and
distal host aortas were pressure-fixed in situ with formalin and
excised. The aorta was cross-sectioned at the sites corresponding to RF
data acquisition. The positions of these sites were determined by
computation of the length with respect to a reference point (branch or
edge of graft segment) based on a known motorized pullback rate. The
tissue was immediately processed, embedded in paraffin wax, and stained
with hematoxylin-eosin. The perivascular tissue was evaluated for the
presence, intensity, and distribution of inflammatory infiltrates, and
the intimal layer was assessed for intimal fibroproliferation by a
pathologist blinded to the RF data.
Statistical Analysis
Data are given as mean±SD. Students t test was
used to compare parameters among the groups, and a value of
P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In comparisons of the gray-scale images of conventional IVUS by
an independent observer, no distinction of the ROIs in the adventitial
layer between the 2 vessel types was possible (Figure 2
). Average backscatter power in the host
aortas and the allografts also showed no significant difference
(70.32±3.55 versus 70.72±3.38 dB). However, attenuation of the
allografts was significantly lower than in the host aortas (2.64±1.38
versus 4.02±1.16 dB/mm, P<0.001) (Figure 2
, Table
).
Histological examination of the allografts showed
concentric intimal proliferation indicative of transplant vasculopathy.
The adventitial and periadventitial layers were thickened and
infiltrated by a moderate to severe lymphoplasmacytic cell infiltrate.
Sections of the host aortas did not show inflammation or fibrointimal
proliferation (Figure 1
). The sensitivity of the method in
determining allograft rejection was 76%, with a specificity of 71%,
based on single cross sections. This could be further improved to a
sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 100% when multiple cross
sections (temporal averaging) in the individual animals were included
in the analysis.
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
IVUS displays the structure of arterial walls qualitatively and has become a standard imaging modality for the assessment of vessel size and general plaque composition.2 Quantitative evaluation of IVUS images has been performed in vitro using integrated backscatter as an objective index of tissue scattering.3 4 Lockwood et al6 investigated the acoustic properties of human vascular tissues with an ultrasound backscatter microscope measuring both backscatter and attenuation. The average attenuation in the artery wall at 30 MHz was 4 dB/mm. This correlates very well with our measurements of attenuation in normal aorta (4.02±1.16 dB/mm) using a 30-MHz IVUS device, indicating that in vivo IVUS RF analysis of average attenuation may be comparable to acoustic microscopy for this parameter.
The relationship between collagen and ultrasonic attenuation in myocardial tissue has been studied by Mimbs et al.7 Regions of infarcted and normal myocardium were investigated in 2 animal models. A close relationship between increased collagen content in zones of infarction and increased attenuation could be demonstrated. This finding confirms that changes in tissue composition can result in altered ultrasonic attenuation. In the present study, a significant association between a decrease in average attenuation and the presence of inflammatory cells could be shown. The decrease in attenuation in the presence of increased cellularity may be best explained by an increase in water content accompanying the aggressive inflammatory response, because attenuation is dependent on the protein and water content. In a model of myocardial ischemia, OBrien et al8 demonstrated that an increase in water content results in a significant reduction of attenuation coefficient.
A potential limitation of our study is the averaging of vectors in each individual ROI. Although it accurately reflects attenuation of the entire ROI, small heterogeneities of the tissue may remain undetected. This factor limits this application to fairly homogeneous tissue types. Native atherosclerosis, which is more heterogeneous in nature, may be difficult to distinguish by this technique. Furthermore, there are certain practical limitations of applying this method in the clinical setting, because it requires a special acquisition unit (personal computer with digitizer) and additional trained personnel to run the system.
In conclusion, this study demonstrates that in vivo IVUS tissue characterization is feasible and in this model is able to differentiate vasculopathic adventitial tissue changes.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received May 24, 1999; revision received September 7, 1999; accepted September 24, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Nissen SE, Gurley JC, Grines CL, Booth DC, McClure R,
Berk M, Fischer C, DeMaria AN. Intravascular ultrasound assessment of
lumen size and wall morphology in normal subjects and patients with
coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1991;84:10871099.
3. Wilson LS, Neale ML, Talhami HE, Appleberg M. Preliminary results from attenuation-slope mapping of plaque using intravascular ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1994;20:529542.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Linker DT, Yock PG, Gronningsaether A, Johansen E, Angelsen BA. Analysis of backscattered ultrasound from normal and diseased arterial wall. Int J Card Imaging. 1989;4:177185.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Rijsterborgh H, Mastik F, Lancee CT, Verdouw P, Roelandt J, Bom N. Ultrasound myocardial integrated backscatter signal processing: frequency domain versus time domain. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1993;19:211219.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
6. Lockwood GR, Ryan LK, Hunt JW, Foster FS. Measurement of the ultrasonic properties of vascular tissues and blood from 3565 MHz. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1991;17:653666.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7.
Mimbs JW, ODonnell M, Bauwens D, Miller JW, Sobel
BE. The dependence of ultrasonic attenuation and backscatter on
collagen content in dog and rabbit hearts. Circ Res. 1980;47:4958.
8.
OBrien WD, Sagar KB, Warltier DC, Rhyne TL. Acoustic
propagation properties of normal, stunned, and infarcted
myocardium: morphological and biochemical determinants.
Circulation. 1995;91:154160.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Murashige, T. Hiro, T. Fujii, K. Imoto, T. Murata, Y. Fukumoto, and M. Matsuzaki Detection of Lipid-Laden Atherosclerotic Plaque by Wavelet Analysis of Radiofrequency Intravascular Ultrasound Signals: In Vitro Validation and Preliminary In Vivo Application J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 21, 2005; 45(12): 1954 - 1960. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Schaar, C. L. de Korte, F. Mastik, C. Strijder, G. Pasterkamp, E. Boersma, P. W. Serruys, and A. F.W. van der Steen Characterizing Vulnerable Plaque Features With Intravascular Elastography Circulation, November 25, 2003; 108(21): 2636 - 2641. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Naghavi, P. Libby, E. Falk, S. W. Casscells, S. Litovsky, J. Rumberger, J. J. Badimon, C. Stefanadis, P. Moreno, G. Pasterkamp, et al. From Vulnerable Plaque to Vulnerable Patient: A Call for New Definitions and Risk Assessment Strategies: Part I Circulation, October 7, 2003; 108(14): 1664 - 1672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hiro, T. Fujii, K. Yasumoto, T. Murata, A. Murashige, and M. Matsuzaki Detection of Fibrous Cap in Atherosclerotic Plaque by Intravascular Ultrasound by Use of Color Mapping of Angle-Dependent Echo-Intensity Variation Circulation, March 6, 2001; 103(9): 1206 - 1211. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |