(Circulation. 1999;100:1635-1638.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Clinical Investigation and Reports |
From the Division of Nephrology, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan, and Department of Medicine and Pathophysiology, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe studied 21 patients with essential hypertension during both a baseline period and a period of treatment with hydrochlorothiazide (25 mg daily). The periods lasted 4 weeks each. Twenty-four hour ambulatory blood pressures were measured on the same day of the week at the end of the each period. In nondippers (n=11), but not in dippers (n=10), a significant interaction existed between diuretic therapy and nocturnal fall in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, which indicated that the degree of nocturnal blood pressure fall was affected by diuretic therapy. Nocturnal fall, which was diminished in nondippers, was restored by diuretic therapy with hydrochlorothiazide, indicating that the circadian rhythm of blood pressure shifted from nondipper to dipper patterns.
ConclusionsThe present study demonstrated that diuretics can restore nocturnal blood pressure decline in a manner similar to sodium restriction, which suggests that the kidneys and sodium metabolism may play important roles in the genesis of the circadian rhythm of blood pressure. Diuretic-based treatment may have an additional therapeutic advantage of reducing the risk for cardiovascular complications by transforming the circadian rhythm of blood pressure.
Key Words: blood pressure circadian rhythm diuretics kidney
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, therefore, we examined the effect of hydrochlorothiazide on the circadian BP rhythm in patients with essential hypertension who were classified into 2 groups according to the degree of their nocturnal BP reduction.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
140 mm Hg and/or a
diastolic BP
90 mm Hg on at least 3 different
visits to outpatient clinics of the hospital (office BP readings were
used). Patients were excluded if they had a history of cardiac disease,
stroke, hepatic disease, renal disease, or diabetes mellitus.
Study Protocol
After the 6- to 12-week run-in period during which BP was
recorded by mercury sphygmomanometer in the sitting position,
patients were subjected to the respective study protocols. Previous
antihypertensive drugs were withdrawn before the study, and any other
medication was maintained at the same dosage throughout the study. The
patients entered a baseline period without antihypertensive drugs
lasting for 4 weeks, and then a diuretic,
hydrochlorothiazide, was administered for 4 weeks. No
placebo was given during the baseline period, and patients received 25
mg of hydrochlorothiazide at 7:00 AM during
the treatment period. Twenty-four hour ambulatory BPs were measured
every half-hour noninvasively with an automatic device (model ES-A531,
Terumo) on the same day of the week at the end of the each period. The
mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as the
diastolic BP plus 1/3 of pulse BP. The daytime BP was
calculated as the average of the 33 readings between 6:00
AM and 10:30 PM, and nighttime BP was the
average of the remaining 15 readings. The nocturnal fall in MAP was
calculated as the difference between daytime and nighttime MAP.
Patients whose nocturnal fall in MAP was more than 10% from day to
night during the baseline period were classified as dipper, whereas the
remaining patients were classified as nondipper, as described in our
previous report.9 Blood samples were collected at the end
of the baseline period.
Statistical Analysis
Results are expressed as mean±SD. Significances of differences
in parameters between dippers and nondippers were
determined by Student's t test for nonpaired samples and by
2 test when appropriate. The significance of
the effects of diuretic therapy and nocturnal fall on BP and
their interaction were tested by 2-way ANOVA and ANCOVA with repeated
measures. The presence of the alternating action by this
analysis was considered evidence of an interaction between
diuretic therapy and nocturnal fall. The significance of
difference in BP and heart rate between dippers and nondippers was also
tested by 2-way ANOVA.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The average values of BP during the day and night, before and
after diuretic therapy, are shown in Table 2
. During the baseline period, daytime BP
values were all higher and nighttime BP values were all lower in
dippers than in nondippers. Hydrochlorothiazide therapy
significantly lowered only systolic BP in dippers, whereas it
lowered both systolic and diastolic BP in
nondippers. Nocturnal falls of MAP from day to night were significant
in both groups, although during the baseline period, the degree of
nocturnal MAP fall was significantly greater in dippers than in
nondippers (20±10 versus 3±5 mm Hg, respectively;
P<0.001). In nondippers, but not in dippers, a significant
interaction existed between diuretic therapy and nocturnal fall
in systolic and diastolic BP, indicating that
degree of nocturnal BP fall was affected by diuretic therapy.
In dippers, heart rates during the day and night were as follows:
baseline, 75±13 and 64±11 bpm, respectively; diuretic
therapy, 73±14 and 62±13 bpm, respectively. Heart rates during the
day and night in nondippers were as follows: baseline, 71±15 and
60±12 bpm; diuretic therapy, 74±14 and 65±13 bpm,
respectively. In both types of essential hypertension, heart rates were
significantly (P<0.001) reduced from day to night.
|
The Figure
compares the effects of
diuretic therapy and nocturnal fall on MAP and the interaction
of these variables between dippers and nondippers. In dippers,
nocturnal MAP fall was not affected by
hydrochlorothiazide therapy. In nondippers, however,
nocturnal MAP fall was significantly enhanced by diuretic
therapy; an interaction (alternating action, P<0.001)
existed between the effects of diuretic therapy on MAP and
nocturnal fall. These findings showed that nocturnal fall, which was
diminished in nondippers, was restored by diuretic therapy,
indicating that the circadian rhythm of BP shifted from nondipper to
dipper patterns. However, the nocturnal fall of dippers was not
affected.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It is reported that the antihypertensive response to diuretic
therapy differs on the basis of the patient's classification as dipper
or nondipper.20 These authors also showed that
hydrochlorothiazide effectively lowered 24-hour BP in
nondippers and blacks, whose elevated salt sensitivity has been
previously described.3 4 9 10 12 In the present study,
similar to the previous report,20 the response to
hydrochlorothiazide therapy in nondippers was greater
than that in dippers. These findings, together with the present
study, indicate that diuretics lower nighttime BP, especially
in salt-sensitive hypertensives, and shift the circadian rhythm of BP
in these patients from nondipper to dipper.
Hydrochlorothiazide is thought to exert its hypotensive
efficacy through a combined vasodilator and diuretic effect.
However, the vascular action of hydrochlorothiazide in
humans is reported to be small, and it occurs only at concentrations
higher than those normally reached with oral treatment.21
Because we treated patients with a relatively lower dose (25 mg daily)
of hydrochlorothiazide in this study, the hypotensive
effect of hydrochlorothiazide seemed to be based on its
diuretic action on the kidney. In our previous
report,4 sodium restriction (mean reduction in sodium
intake of 176 mmol/day) lowered 24-hour MAP
16.9 mm Hg in
patients with salt-sensitive essential hypertension. In this study, the
mean value of 24-hour MAP reduction with 25 mg of
hydrochlorothiazide was 7.8 mm Hg. Thus, adding
25 mg of hydrochlorothiazide may have a similar effect
as a reduction in sodium intake of roughly 82 mmol/day in patients
who are nondippers and/or have salt-sensitive essential
hypertension.
Recently, we examined the circadian rhythm of urinary sodium excretion and the effects of sodium restriction on it in both dipper and nondipper types of essential hypertension. We found the circadian rhythm of natriuresis is disturbed in nondippers.9 These findings indicated that renal sodium handling may play a key role in determining the circadian rhythm of BP. When sodium intake is relatively high, the defect in sodium excretory capability becomes evident, which elevates BP at night to compensate for diminished natriuresis during the day and to cause enhanced-pressure natriuresis at night. When sodium intake is low, however, the defect remains latent, allowing BP to lower at night. These speculations, together with the well-known fact that in patients with renal dysfunction, nocturnal BP fall is lost,22 23 24 suggest that the circadian rhythm of BP is determined, at least in part, by the kidneys. The importance of the kidneys in the genesis of circadian BP rhythm is consistent with a recent report determining that the circadian rhythm of BP normalizes after kidney transplantation.25 These findings forced us to postulate that a renal defect in excreting sodium into the urine and the resulting sodium retention might be important determinants for impairments in nocturnal BP fall. The fact that diuretic therapy normalized the circadian BP rhythm of nondippers also supports the importance of the kidney and its sodium excretory capability in the loss of nocturnal BP dip.
In patients with essential hypertension, it has been proposed that the lack of the nocturnal fall in BP is associated with more serious end-organ damage.1 2 Patients with a sodium-sensitive type of essential hypertension are also more likely to manifest end-organ damages, such as left ventricular hypertrophy and microalbuminuria, than those who do not have the sodium-sensitive type.26 Furthermore, we found the sodium sensitivity of BP was an independent cardiovascular risk factor in patients with essential hypertension.27 Diuretic-based treatment of patients with hypertension prevents the development of cardiovascular complications,6 7 and diuretics have been recommended as 1 of the first-choice medications for the management of hypertension.8 Diuretic-based therapy may relieve these cardiovascular risks by systemic BP reduction and the normalization of the circadian BP rhythm.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated for the first time that the nocturnal BP decline, which is diminished in patients with the nondipper type of essential hypertension, was restored by diuretic therapy with hydrochlorothiazide, and their circadian rhythm of BP shifted from nondipper to dipper. Diuretic-based treatment may have an additional therapeutic advantage by reducing the risk of cardiovascular complications by transforming the circadian rhythm of BP.
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received April 27, 1999; revision received June 15, 1999; accepted June 23, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. Bankir, M. Bochud, M. Maillard, P. Bovet, A. Gabriel, and M. Burnier Nighttime Blood Pressure and Nocturnal Dipping Are Associated With Daytime Urinary Sodium Excretion in African Subjects Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 891 - 898. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Kimura Kidney and Circadian Blood Pressure Rhythm Hypertension, April 1, 2008; 51(4): 827 - 828. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Agarwal Relationship between circadian blood pressure variation and circadian protein excretion in CKD Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): F655 - F659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Z. Ben-Dov and M. Bursztyn Letter by Ben-Dov and Bursztyn Regarding Article, "Role of Diuretics in the Prevention of Heart Failure: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial" Circulation, January 16, 2007; 115(2): e18 - e18. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Z. Ben-Dov and M. Bursztyn Nondipping and impaired kidney function: which is the cause? Arch Intern Med, October 23, 2006; 166(19): 2158 - 2158. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sachdeva and A. B. Weder Nocturnal Sodium Excretion, Blood Pressure Dipping, and Sodium Sensitivity Hypertension, October 1, 2006; 48(4): 527 - 533. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yamamoto, I. Akiguchi, K. Oiwa, M. Hayashi, T. Kasai, and K. Ozasa Twenty-four-Hour Blood Pressure and MRI as Predictive Factors for Different Outcomes in Patients With Lacunar Infarct Stroke, January 1, 2002; 33(1): 297 - 305. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. H. Klungel, S. R. Heckbert, W. T. Longstreth Jr, C. D. Furberg, R. C. Kaplan, N. L. Smith, R. N. Lemaitre, H. G. M. Leufkens, A. de Boer, and B. M. Psaty Antihypertensive Drug Therapies and the Risk of Ischemic Stroke Arch Intern Med, January 8, 2001; 161(1): 37 - 43. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |