(Circulation. 1999;100:1354-1360.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Basic Science Reports |
From the Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University and the University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio.
Correspondence to Albert L. Waldo, MD, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44106-5038. E-mail alw2{at}po.cwru.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsWe studied 10 episodes of induced, sustained (>5 minutes) atrial flutter in 9 dogs. In all episodes, the reentrant circuit included a septal component. In 6 episodes, there were 2 reentrant circuits, one in the right atrial free wall and the second involving the atrial septum, Bachmann's bundle, and the right atrial free wall; both circuits shared a pathway in the right atrial free wall (figure-of-eight). The direction (superior or inferior) of the septal wave front of the second circuit correlated with the direction (clockwise or counterclockwise, respectively) of the right atrial free-wall circuit. A line of functional block in the right atrial free wall was part of both reentrant circuits. In the other 4 atrial flutter episodes, only 1 reentrant circuit was present, with activation in an inferior-to-superior direction in the septum and a superior-to-inferior direction in the right atrial free wall in 2 episodes and in the opposite direction in the other 2 episodes. In all atrial flutter episodes, the flutter wave polarity in ECG lead II was determined by the direction of activation in the left atrium; polarity was positive when the direction was superior to inferior and negative when the direction was inferior to superior.
ConclusionsIn this model of atrial flutter, the reentrant circuit (1) always included a septal component, (2) did not always require a right atrial free-wall reentrant circuit, (3) demonstrated figure-of-eight reentry when a reentrant circuit was present in the right atrial free wall, and (4) was associated with a line of functional block in the right atrial free wall.
Key Words: atrial flutter mapping pericarditis reentry
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
More recently, we demonstrated that the sterile pericarditis canine model can serve as a model for atrial fibrillation.10 The latter study included simultaneous, multisite mapping of both atria and the interatrial septum from 384 to 396 electrodes. While using the latter recording techniques to understand why sometimes atrial flutter is induced and sometimes atrial fibrillation is induced in this model, it became clear that septal activation was an important part of the atrial flutter reentrant circuit. This article is a more complete characterization of the reentrant circuit in this model, and it provides important new insights into the mechanism of atrial flutter.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Creation of the Sterile Pericarditis Model
Sterile pericarditis was created as described previously by our
laboratory.11 At the initial surgery, 3 pairs of
stainless-steel wire electrodes, Teflon-coated except at the tip, were
sutured on Bachmann's bundle, the right atrial appendage, and the
posterior-inferior left atrium close to the proximal
portion of the coronary sinus.1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 A fourth
pair was sutured on the right ventricular apex for
ventricular pacing after His-bundle ablation was performed
during subsequent studies. These electrodes were then brought out
through the chest wall and exteriorized posteriorly in the midline of
the neck. After completion of surgery, the dogs were given antibiotics
and analgesics and allowed to recover.
Mapping Studies
Standard Procedures
On the second (4 dogs), third (2 dogs), or fourth (3 dogs)
postoperative day, the heart was exposed for placement of the electrode
arrays using standard techniques. Each dog's body temperature was kept
within the normal physiological range throughout
the study by using a heating pad and keeping intravenous
saline administration at body temperature. Before opening the chest but
during the anesthetized state, radiofrequency ablation of the
His bundle was performed10 to create complete AV block to
minimize temporal superimposition of ventricular activation
with atrial activation during atrial flutter. Then,
ventricular pacing (60 to 100 bpm) was
initiated.10
Induction of Atrial Flutter
Atrial flutter induction was attempted using previously
described pacing protocols.1 11 12 During these studies,
ECG lead II and bipolar electrograms obtained from the stainless-steel
wire electrodes were recorded and monitored.10 Atrial
flutter was identified using standard criteria.2 3 4 5 7 Only
episodes of sustained atrial flutter (>5 minutes) were studied. After
successful induction of sustained atrial flutter and
simultaneous multisite mapping, the pacing protocol was
repeated to confirm the reproducibility of the arrhythmia
induction.
Simultaneous Multisite Mapping
Our multiplexing system can record continuously for 30
minutes.10 For studies of the sequence of right and left
atrial activation, an electrode array containing 372 unipolar
electrodes arranged in 186 bipolar pairs was used.10 There
were 95 pairs for the right atrium and 91 pairs for the left atrium;
the latter included 14 pairs placed separately on Bachmann's
bundle.10 The interatrial septum was mapped
simultaneously with the atrial epicardium using a 24-pole
electrode catheter (interelectrode distance, 1 mm).10
The distal tip of the electrode catheter was placed in the orifice of
the coronary sinus for stability, so we only used 22 of the 24
electrodes.10 Thus, using 394 electrodes, electrograms
were simultaneously recorded for up to 30 minutes from
the right atrial free wall (190 electrodes), the left atrial free wall
(154 electrodes), Bachmann's bundle (28 electrodes), and the atrial
septum (22 electrodes).
Data Acquisition and Analysis
For all studies, atrial electrograms from all electrode sites in
both atria, the interatrial septum, a marker channel, and ECG lead II
were recorded during induced, stable atrial flutter. Data
recording and processing were performed using 2 cardiac mapping
systems, as previously described.10 Mapping data were also
analyzed as previously described.2 3 4 5 10
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Atrial Flutter Reentrant Circuit(s)
The location and course of the atrial flutter reentrant circuits
were identified by analyzing each activation map in each atrial flutter
episode. A reentrant circuit was present on the right atrial free
wall in 6 of the 10 atrial flutter episodes studied, as
we2 3 4 5 12 and others6 7 8 9 previously
described. However, in these 6 episodes, a second reentrant circuit
involving the atrial septum and the right atrial free wall was also
present. These 2 reentrant circuits shared activation of the
pectinate muscle region of the right atrial free wall in common,
thereby forming a figure-of-eight reentrant circuit. In the other 4
episodes, a right atrial free-wall circuit was not observed. Rather,
only a single reentrant circuit involving the atrial septum,
Bachmann's bundle, and the right atrial free wall was
observed.
Representative Examples
Figure
-of-Eight Type Reentry
Figure 1A
shows a
representative example of the activation sequence map
during induced, sustained atrial flutter due to a figure-of-eight
reentry in dog 1. A counterclockwise reentrant circuit in the right
atrial free wall circulates around a line of functional block. Also,
another reentrant circuit exists; it includes atrial septal activation
in a superior-to-inferior direction and epicardial
breakthrough at 94 ms in the peri-inferior vena caval
region (near site a). The latter wave front then proceeds in an
anterior-superior direction, joining the free-wall reentrant circuit in
the pectinate muscle region. Thus, site b is a part of the shared
pathway of the reentrant circuits. Then, activation from this shared
reentrant pathway bifurcates (point c), with 1 limb continuing toward
Bachmann's bundle, where it reenters the atrial septum to complete the
reentrant circuit (superior-to-inferior septal activation
and inferior-superior right free-wall activation). The left
atrium is activated by daughter waves from the figure-of-eight
reentrant circuit, as is the right atrial appendage.
|
Figure 1B
shows a representative example of the
activation sequence map during induced, sustained atrial flutter due to
figure-of-eight reentry (in dog 8) in which the reentrant circuits
travel in the opposite direction shown in Figure 1A
. The shared
pathway remains in the pectinate muscle region of the right atrial free
wall.
Note in both Figures 1A
and 1B
that the location of the
line of functional block is similar but not the same. The length and
location of this line of functional block permitted a pivot point at
either end. Also, the line of functional block was never straight.
Similar findings were present for the other 4 figure-of-eight
reentrant circuits. Figure 1C
shows the relative activation
sequence, recorded from selected sites, in the right atrial
free-wall reentrant circuit for the episode of atrial flutter shown in
Figure 1A
. Figure 1D
shows the relative sequence of
activation recorded from selected sites in the other reentrant
circuit during the same episode.
Of the 6 figure-of-eight reentry episodes (Table 1
), 4 had clockwise rotation of the right
atrial free wall reentrant circuit. The other reentrant circuit
demonstrated superior-to-inferior activation of the atrial
septum and inferior-to-superior activation in the right
atrial free wall; epicardial breakthrough from the septum was always in
the peri-inferior vena caval region, septal "reentry"
was always at Bachmann's bundle, and the shared portion of the
reentrant circuits was in the pectinate muscle region of the right
atrial free wall (Table 1
). In the other 2 episodes, the
figure-of-eight reentrant circuits were reversed. In all 6 of the
figure-of-eight reentrant circuits, the shared pathway was in the
pectinate muscle region of the right atrial free wall, and the
functional line of block in the right atrial free wall served both
reentrant circuits, one as a central line of block around which one
reentrant circuit circulated, and the other as a boundary for that
portion of the other reentrant circuit that was in the right atrial
free wall.
|
Single Reentrant Circuit
Figure 2A
illustrates a
representative example of the activation sequence
during induced, sustained atrial flutter in dog 5, in which no right
atrial free wall reentrant circuit existed. Rather, atrial flutter was
caused by a reentrant circuit that traveled in a
superior-to-inferior direction in the atrial septum and in
an inferior-to-superior direction in the right atrial free
wall. The latter reentrant wave front reenters the atrial septum via
Bachmann's bundle, and the septal reentrant activation wave front
breaks through to the atrial epicardium in the
peri-inferior vena caval region. Note the presence of a
line of functional block that once again acts critically as a boundary
for the reentrant circuit. However, the location of this line of block
is more posterior than in the examples of figure-of-eight reentry. Note
also that the inferior aspect of the functional block is
located so that an inferior pivot point, such as was seen
during figure-of-eight reentry, is not possible. This likely explains
why a free-wall reentrant circuit does not form.
|
Figure 2B illustrates the atrial flutter
reentrant circuit in dog 7a. In this example, reentrant activation is
in the opposite direction to that shown in Figure 2A
. Figure 2C
shows electrograms recorded from the selected epicardial
atrial sites A-H in Figure 2B
. Note that activation proceeds
from site H, low in the right atrium, to left atrial site G, from which
point it travels in an inferior-to-superior direction via
sites F, E, and D. The wave then collides with a wave front that
started at site A on Bachmann's bundle, traveled to site B in the high
right atrium, and then to site C just inferior to the
superior vena cava. Because of the collision of these 2 wave fronts,
the superior end of the line of block could not be a pivot point for a
reentrant circuit.
There were 4 episodes of induced, sustained atrial flutter in which
only 1 reentrant circuit existed (Table 2
). In 2 episodes, activation of the
septum was in an inferior-to-superior direction, epicardial
breakthrough was at Bachmann's bundle, reentry into the septum was in
the peri-inferior vena caval region, and right atrial
free-wall activation was in a superior-to-inferior
direction. In the other 2 episodes, the reverse was true. In all 4
episodes, the line of functional block provided an important boundary
for the atrial flutter circuit.
|
F Wave Polarity During Atrial Flutter
We previously related the sequence of atrial activation during
induced, sustained atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis
model to flutter wave polarity in the ECG, but septal mapping was not
performed.1 Data from the present study are completely
consistent with what was previously shown. Thus, a positive
flutter wave in ECG lead II (Figure 3A
)
was associated with early activation of Bachmann's bundle compared
with the posterior-inferior left atrium, with the left
atrium being activated mainly in a
superior-to-inferior direction (Figure 2A
). A
negative flutter wave in ECG lead II (Figure 3B
) was associated
with early activation of the posterior-inferior left atrium
compared with Bachmann's bundle, and activation of a considerable
portion of the left atrium was in an inferior-to-superior
direction (Figure 3B
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The demonstration that a reentrant circuit involving the atrial septum is always present during atrial flutter in the sterile pericarditis model and that septal activation may be either inferior-to-superior or superior-to-inferior in direction suggests a similarity with the atrial flutter reentrant circuit in humans. Importantly, it also suggests the possibility that a free-wall reentrant circuit may also be present in some patients with atrial flutter, but it simply has not yet been recognized due to limitations of the mapping resolution using available techniques.
Role of the Line of Functional Block
Lewis and colleagues13 recognized the difficulty of
inducing atrial flutter in the normal canine heart. In fact, as
previously summarized,14 all reliable models of atrial
flutter have had to alter the underlying atrial substrate, either by
administering exogenous substrates15 16 or by creating
selected lesions.17 18 19 20 21 Nevertheless, Lewis et
al13 mapped a few selected sites during induced atrial
flutter in 4 canine atria and showed that the reentrant circuit
traveled either up (inferior to superior) or down (superior
to inferior) the right atrial free wall. The remainder of
the reentrant circuit was assumed to include left atrial activation and
activation around one or both of the great veins (superior and
inferior vena cavae). However, Lewis' group never mapped
the atrial septum, and the only sites on the left side that they mapped
were the left atrial appendage and a site on Bachmann's
bundle.13
Later, Rosenblueth and Garcia-Ramos17 postulated that the infrequency of atrial flutter induction resulted because "...a bridge of conduction tissue between the 2 vessels [superior and inferior vena cava]..." existed. They created a crush lesion between the cavae and, subsequently, could reliably induce atrial flutter. When they created temporary block between the cavae using cocaine, atrial flutter was initially inducible, but it lasted only for the duration of the functional block between the cavae. Implicit in their study is that the difficulty Lewis et al13 had in inducing atrial flutter in normal canine atria was the absence of stable block between the vena cavae. Five subsequent limited mapping studies15 18 19 20 21 in which either a crush lesion or an incisional lesion was made between the cavae also permitted reliable induction of atrial flutter, again suggesting the importance of a line of block between the cavae to achieve stable atrial flutter. Of note, in one of these studies,18 incomplete intercaval block in 1 dog resulted in failure of atrial flutter induction.
In the canine sterile pericarditis model, a line of functional block in the right atrial free wall was always present during atrial flutter. Of interest, when the line of block was posterior, with the inferior portion ending on the inferior vena cava, only a single reentrant circuit was present, but when the line of block was more anterior, pivoting around either end of the line of block was possible, and figure-of-eight reentry was present. In both instances, this line of functional block provided an important, in fact, apparently vital boundary that, like the above described intercaval block studies, ensured the integrity of the atrial flutter reentrant circuit. Again, because of apparent similarities only now appreciated between the canine sterile pericarditis model of atrial flutter and atrial flutter in humans, it is reasonable to suggest, if not expect, that a similar observation will be made in patients. Furthermore, the presence of a functional line of block and its variability in location and extent support the notion that our findings are likely true in humans as well.
Role of Bachmann's Bundle in the Atrial Flutter
Reentrant Circuit
This study provides new insights into the superior turn-around or
pivot point of the atrial flutter reentrant circuit. For the right
atrial free wall reentrant circuit, when it is present, the
superior pivot point is as previously described.1 2 3 For
the reentrant circuit that includes activation of the atrial septum,
activation of Bachmann's bundle plays an important role. When atrial
septal activation is in an inferior-to-superior direction,
as it is in most patients with so-called common or typical type I
atrial flutter, epicardial breakthrough is at Bachmann's bundle;
superior-to-inferior activation of the right atrial free
wall follows. When atrial septal activation is superior to
inferior, reentry into the atrial septum of the reentrant
wave front that has travelled in an inferior-to-superior
direction in the right atrial free wall is via Bachmann's bundle.
These observations are likely to be relevant to atrial flutter in
patients, as the nature of the superior aspect of the atrial flutter
reentrant circuit in patients has not been well worked
out.22
Flutter Wave Polarity
As summarized previously,23 we have shown that the
polarity of the P wave in ECG leads II, III, and aVF depends
principally on the direction of the activation wave front(s) in the
left atrium. A prior study from our laboratory on the polarity of the
flutter wave in the ECG during induced atrial flutter in the canine
sterile pericarditis model was completely consistent with that
concept, but presumably during figure-of-eighttype reentry.
The present study confirmed this finding and extended it to atrial
flutter with only a single reentrant circuit.
Study Limitations
A limitation of this study was that activation of the atrial
septum was determined from only one multipolar catheter electrode.
Clearly, better resolution of septal activation is desirable. However,
because of the excellent electrode density and, therefore, resolution
provided by the epicardial electrode arrays, correlation with the data
from the septal electrodes permitted adequate understanding of atrial
septal activation. Nevertheless, during atrial flutter, it would have
been desirable to map more of the atrial septum, particularly the
endocardial aspect of the posterior-inferior region of the
right atrium between the inferior vena cava, the
coronary sinus ostium, and the tricuspid valve annulus and
compare the data with what is known of activation of this area during
atrial flutter in patients. With the techniques used in this study,
that was not possible.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Received December 31, 1998; revision received May 19, 1999; accepted May 19, 1999.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2.
Shimizu A, Nozaki A, Rudy Y, Waldo AL. Multiplexing
studies of effects of rapid atrial pacing on the area of slow
conduction during atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis
model. Circulation. 1991;83:983994.
3. Shimizu A, Nozaki A, Rudy Y, Waldo AL. Characterization of double potentials in a functionally determined reentrant circuit. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:20222032.[Abstract]
4.
Niwano S, Ortiz J, Abe H, Gonzalez X, Rudy Y, Waldo
AL. Characterization of the excitable gap in a functionally determined
reentrant circuit: studies in the sterile pericarditis model of atrial
flutter. Circulation. 1994;90:19972014.
5.
Ortiz J, Nozaki A, Shimizu A, Khrestian C, Waldo AL.
Mechanism of interruption of atrial flutter by morcizine:
electrophysiological and multiplexing
studies in the canine sterile pericarditis model of atrial flutter.
Circulation. 1994;89:28602869.
6.
Schoels W, Gough WB, Restivo M, El-Sherif N. Circus
movement atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model:
activation patterns during initiation, termination, and sustained
reentry in vivo. Circ Res. 1990;67:3550.
7. Schoels W, Offner B, Brachmann J, Kuebler W, El-Sherif N. Circus movement atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:799808.[Abstract]
8. Pagé PL, Hassanalizadeh H, Cardinal R. Transitions among atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and sinus rhythm during procainamide infusion and vagal stimulation in dogs with sterile pericarditis. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 1990;69:1524.
9. Olshansky B, Euler D, Wang Y, Kall JG, Hariman RJ. Autonomic innervation is present and affects atrial flutter in canine sterile pericarditis model. Circulation. 1991;84:II-266. Abstract.
10.
Kumagai K, Khrestian C, Waldo AL.
Simultaneous multisite mapping studies during induced
atrial fibrillation in the canine sterile pericarditis model: insights
into the mechanism of its maintenance. Circulation. 1997;95:511521.
11. Pagé PL, Plumb VJ, Okumura K, Waldo AL. A new model of atrial flutter. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1986;8:872879.[Abstract]
12. Shimizu A, Nozaki A, Rudy Y, Waldo AL. Onset of induced atrial flutter in the canine sterile pericarditis model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;17:12231234.[Abstract]
13. Lewis T, Feil HS, Stroud WD. Observations upon flutter and fibrillation: part II: the influence of artificial obstacles on experimental auricular flutter. Heart. 1920;7:191233.
14. Waldo AL. Mechanism of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, and ectopic atrial tachycardia: a brief review. Circulation. 1987;75:III-37III40.
15. Kimura E, Kato K, Murao S, Ajisaka H, Koyama S, Omiya Z. Experimental studies on the mechanism of auricular flutter. Tohoku J Exp Med. 1954;60:197207.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16.
Allessie MA, Lammers WJEP, Bonke IM, Hollen J.
Intraatrial reentry as a mechanism for atrial flutter induced by
acetylcholine and rapid pacing in the dog. Circ Res. 1984;70:123133.
17. Rosenblueth A, Garcia-Ramos J. Studies on flutter and fibrillation: II: the influence of artificial obstacles on experimental auricular flutter. Am Heart J. 1947;33:677684.
18.
Hayden WG, Hurley EJ, Rytand DA. The mechanism of
canine atrial flutter. Circ Res. 1967;20:496505.
19. Boineau JP, Schuessler RB, Mooney CR, Miller CB, Wylds AC, Hudson RD, Borremans JM, Brockus CW. Natural and evoked atrial flutter due to circus movement in dogs. Am J Cardiol. 1980;45:11671181.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
20. Inoue H, Matsuo H, Takayanagi K, Murao S. Clinical and experimental studies of the effects of atrial extrastimulation and rapid pacing on atrial flutter cycle. Am J Cardiol. 1981;48:623631.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
21. Yamashita T, Inoue H, Nozaki A, Sugimoto T. Role of anatomic architecture in sustained atrial reentry and double potentials. Am Heart J. 1992;124:938946.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Arribas F, Lopez-Gil M, Cosio FG, Nunez A. The upper link of human common atrial flutter circuit: definition by multiple endocardial recordings during entrainment. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol.. 1997;20:29242929.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
23. Waldo AL, Hoffman BF, James TN. The relationship of atrial activation to P wave polarity and morphology. In: Little RC, ed. Physiology of Atrial Pacemakers and Conductive Tissues. Mt. Kisco, NY: Futura Publishing Company; 1980:261289.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. L. Waldo and G. K. Feld Inter-Relationships of Atrial Fibrillation and Atrial Flutter: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 26, 2008; 51(8): 779 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Ryu, L. Li, C. M. Khrestian, N. Matsumoto, J. Sahadevan, M. L. Ruehr, D. R. Van Wagoner, I. R. Efimov, and A. L. Waldo Effects of sterile pericarditis on connexins 40 and 43 in the atria: correlation with abnormal conduction and atrial arrhythmias Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, August 1, 2007; 293(2): H1231 - H1241. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Narayan, A. Hassankhani, G. K. Feld, and V. Bhargava Separating non-isthmus- from isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using wavefront variability J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 19, 2005; 45(8): 1269 - 1279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-T. Tai, T.-Y. Liu, P.-C. Lee, Y.-J. Lin, M.-S. Chang, and S.-A. Chen Non-contact mapping to guide radiofrequency ablation of atypical right atrial flutter J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2004; 44(5): 1080 - 1086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bochoeyer, Y. Yang, J. Cheng, R. J. Lee, E. C. Keung, N. F. Marrouche, A. Natale, and M. M. Scheinman Surface Electrocardiographic Characteristics of Right and Left Atrial Flutter Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108(1): 60 - 66. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L.-M. Rodriguez, C. Timmermans, A. Nabar, L. Hofstra, and H. J.J. Wellens Biatrial Activation in Isthmus-Dependent Atrial Flutter Circulation, November 20, 2001; 104(21): 2545 - 2550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Matsuo, K. Uno, C. M. Khrestian, and A. L. Waldo Conduction left-to-right and right-to-left across the crista terminalis Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, April 1, 2001; 280(4): H1683 - H1691. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tomita, K. Matsuo, J. Sahadevan, C. M. Khrestian, and A. L. Waldo Role of Functional Block Extension in Lesion-Related Atrial Flutter Circulation, February 20, 2001; 103(7): 1025 - 1030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Jais, D. C. Shah, M. Haissaguerre, M. Hocini, J. T. Peng, A. Takahashi, S. Garrigue, P. Le Metayer, and J. Clementy Mapping and Ablation of Left Atrial Flutters Circulation, June 27, 2000; 101(25): 2928 - 2934. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |