Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1999;100:1346-1353

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Janse, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Janse, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs

(Circulation. 1999;100:1346-1353.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.


Basic Science Reports

Reentrant Pathway During Ventricular Echoes Is Confined to the Atrioventricular Node

High-Resolution Mapping and Dissection of the Triangle of Koch in Isolated, Perfused Canine Hearts

Peter Loh, MD; Jacques M. T. de Bakker, PhD; Mélèze Hocini, MD; Bernard Thibault, MD; Richard N. W. Hauer, MD; Michiel J. Janse, MD, PhD

From the Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands (P.L., J.M.T.d.B., M.H., B.T., M.J.J.); the Department of Cardiology, Heart-Lung Institute, University Hospital Utrecht, The Netherlands (P.L., R.N.W.H.); and the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands, Utrecht, The Netherlands (J.M.T.d.B., R.N.W.H.).


*    Abstract
up arrowTop
*Abstract
down arrowIntroduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Background—During ventricular echoes, reentrant excitation is supposed to involve 2 functionally distinct pathways in the atrioventricular (AV) nodal area. The exact pathway of reentrant excitation is unknown. The objectives of this study were to analyze electrical activity in the AV nodal area after ventricular stimulation and during ventricular echoes and to assess the role of perinodal atrial tissue in AV nodal reentry.

Methods and Results—In 16 isolated, blood-perfused canine hearts, multiterminal electrodes were used to map electrical activity in Koch's triangle after ventricular stimulation and during ventricular echoes. The subendocardial cell layers were chemically destroyed in 3 hearts. Incisions in the posterior approach to the compact node were made in 6 hearts. The apex of the triangle of Koch was surgically dissociated from the perinodal atrial tissue in 5 hearts. Retrograde atrial activation occurred via 2 distinct endocardial exit sites. Ventricular echoes could be induced in all hearts irrespective of the atrial activation pattern. Simultaneous retrograde activation of both exit sites often preceded reciprocation. Ventricular echoes were demonstrable after chemical destruction of the endocardium and after surgical dissociation of the perinodal atrial tissue from the AV node.

Conclusions—Our data show that the reentrant pathway during ventricular echoes is confined to the AV node. The tissue that connects the node to the endocardial exit sites has to be excluded from the reentrant circuit responsible for single echoes.


Key Words: atrioventricular node • reentry • mapping • electrophysiology


*    Introduction
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
*Introduction
down arrowMethods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
During ventricular echoes, reentrant excitation is supposed to involve 2 functionally distinct pathways in the AV nodal area, an anterior "fast" pathway that has a long refractory period and a posterior "slow" pathway with a shorter refractory period. This widely accepted concept of dual AV nodal physiology provides a theoretical basis for AV nodal reentry manifesting as atrial or ventricular echoes, as well as for sustained AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Although AV nodal reentry has been subjected to clinical and experimental investigation since it was described by Mines in 1913,1 controversy continues regarding the precise pathway of reentrant excitation and the participation of perinodal atrial tissue in the circuit. Literature provides evidence suggesting that the reentrant pathway involves atrial tissue well outside the specialized area.2 In 1981, Sung et al3 demonstrated earliest atrial activation in the anterior AV nodal area close to the His bundle during retrograde fast-pathway conduction, whereas earliest activation was found near the coronary sinus (CS) orifice during retrograde slow-pathway conduction. Jackman et al4 suggested that these exit sites represent the atrial insertions of the slow and fast pathways. Observations made by other investigators support an intranodal location of the reentrant circuit.5 Detailed reviews on this issue have recently been published by Janse et al6 and McGuire et al.7

The aims of the present study were to analyze electrical activity in the triangle of Koch and the perinodal atrial tissue after ventricular stimulation and during ventricular echoes and to assess the role of perinodal atrial tissue in AV nodal reentry.


*    Methods
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
*Methods
down arrowResults
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
This study conformed to the guiding principles of the American Physiological Society. Studies were performed in isolated, blood-perfused hearts obtained from 27 mature mongrel dogs (weight 18 to 30 kg) of either sex.

Preparation of Hearts
The methods of preparation and perfusion of isolated hearts have been described elsewhere.8 Briefly, after deep anesthesia, the heart was excised and the aortic root was cannulated to permit Langendorff perfusion. Interference from sinus rhythm during pacing was avoided by resection of the sinus node.

Bipolar hook electrodes (interelectrode distance 1 mm) were placed in the right atrium and right ventricle. Stimulation was achieved with 2-ms-long pulses at twice diastolic threshold. Recording electrodes were placed in the high right atrium and over the His bundle. Diacetyl monoxime(10 to 15 mmol/L) was added to the perfusate to dampen contraction.8

Experimental Protocol
In 16 hearts, multiterminal electrodes were used to map electrical activity in the AV nodal area. The left atrial septum was mapped with a single roving electrode in 4 hearts. In 3 of the 16 hearts, the endocardial cell layers were destroyed by phenol application. In a second group of experiments, incisions were made in the posterior approach to the compact node in 6 hearts. In 5 hearts, the compact AV node was surgically dissociated from the surrounding atrial tissue. After the study, the hearts were preserved for histological analysis.

Stimulation Protocol
Programmed atrial and ventricular extrastimulation and incremental pacing were performed. Up to 2 programmed extrastimuli after every eighth beat of a paced rhythm were introduced to induce AV nodal echoes. Whereas antegrade AV nodal conduction was stable throughout the experiment, ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction sometimes deteriorated during the course of the experiment. In those cases, isoproterenol was added to the perfusate and titrated upward (0.05 to 0.5 µg/min) until stable VA conduction was achieved.

Mapping Plaques
Two multiterminal electrodes were used. One contained 84 terminals (silver wire, diameter 200 µm) arranged in a 12x7 matrix at interelectrode distances of 2.5 mm. Ten additional terminals were positioned at distances of 2.5 mm along a silicone tube (5 mm diameter), which was inserted into the proximal CS. The indifferent pole was placed either at the aortic root or, to reach a high level of common-mode rejection, in the middle of the matrix 1 mm from the endocardial surface.

The second electrode contained 96 terminals arranged in a 12x8 matrix at interelectrode distances of 1 mm. Each terminal consisted of a recording and a reference electrode (silver wire, diameter 100 µm). The reference electrodes were cut 1.5 mm shorter. In this way, 96 quasi-unipolar recordings were obtained.9 Remote signals were attenuated, and unipolar characteristics were preserved.

Signal Processing
A customized data-acquisition system allowed simultaneous recording of 96 channels at a sample frequency of 1 kHz/channel. Signals were amplified 256-fold and band-pass–filtered with lower and upper cutoff frequencies of 0.1 and 500 Hz, respectively. The registrations were stored on a hard disk of an IBM-compatible computer system. The signals from the bipolar atrial and His bundle electrodes were amplified with a gain of 500 to 1000, band-pass filtered between 0.1 and 500 Hz, and stored on an 8-channel digital audiotape recorder (DTR 1801, Biologic).

Analysis of Electrical Activation
The dV/dt was calculated for each electrogram by use of a computer algorithm. The point of maximum negative dV/dt was selected as the time of local activation. In case of doubt, recordings from contiguous sites were taken into consideration to determine the activation times. Isochronal maps were constructed manually by connecting points with the same time of local activation.

Phenol Application
Small (5x5 mm) pieces of filter paper were soaked with phenol (75%) and applied on the endocardium in the triangle of Koch, the perinodal tissue, and the floor of the proximal CS for 2 minutes. In this concentration, phenol causes necrosis to a depth of {approx}300 µm.10 After application of each piece of filter paper, the effects on conduction parameters and ventricular echoes were determined.

Dissection of Triangle of Koch
Before dissection, unipolar and bipolar recordings from a single roving bipolar electrode (electrode distance 0.5 mm) were used to localize the most proximal part of the His bundle and therewith the approximate position of the compact AV node, which in dogs has a length of 1 to 1.5 mm.11 The site with the largest H-V interval in the bipolar and unipolar recordings and an initially negative His deflection in the unipolar recording was considered the compact node–penetrating bundle interface.12

Incisions (1.5 to 3 mm deep) were made in the posterior approach to the compact node in 6 hearts. The first incision was made at the base of the triangle of Koch, extending from the tricuspid valve annulus (TVA) to the posterior edge of the CS orifice and into the floor of the CS. Consecutive incisions were made, each {approx}2 mm more anterior than the last. After each incision, the effects on conduction and reentry were determined. In 4 hearts, the most anterior incision was made close to the presumed location of the posterior aspect of the compact AV node. In the other 2 hearts, additional incisions were made until ventricular echoes could no longer be induced.

In 5 hearts, the roof of the CS and the upper part of the interatrial septum were cut away. The interatrial septum was carefully trimmed down to the muscular AV septum. The interatrial groove lying posterior to the aorta was trimmed down to the right atrial trigone (central fibrous body). The anterior walls of the right and left atria were cut away down to the parietal right and left AV junctions, respectively. An incision was made at the presumed position of the posterior aspect of the compact AV node, extending from the mitral valve annulus to the TVA. These dissections circumscribe the anterior part of the muscular AV septum corresponding to the apex of the triangle of Koch (Figure 1Down). Electrodes were positioned inside the truncated area and on the right and left atrial walls. Switching between stimulation of the remaining atrial tissue, the truncated area, and ventricular stimulation, the incisions were carefully extended or deepened until complete electrical dissociation between the truncated area and the remaining atrial tissue was achieved in both antegrade and retrograde directions.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Septal surface of right atrium. Hatched lines (1, 2, and 3) illustrate dissections circumscribing the apex of the triangle of Koch. (a) indicates approximate position of compact node–penetrating bundle interface; (b), site of His bundle recording; AO, aorta; CFB, central fibrous body; CS, CS orifice; FO, oval fossa; IVC, inferior caval vein; MVA, mitral valve annulus; SVC, superior caval vein; and RAA, right atrial appendage.

Histology
In the hearts that were used for activation mapping, the position of the mapping electrode was marked. The endocardial exits were identified and marked with fine needles. Serial sections (5 µm) were cut perpendicular to the TVA and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and elastic van Gieson and were examined with light microscopy.

In the 6 hearts in which the posterior approach to the AV node was incised, serial sections were cut parallel to the TVA. In the 5 hearts in which the triangle of Koch was dissected, serial sections were again cut perpendicular to the TVA.

For the histological definition of the compact AV node and the transitional cells, we applied the criteria of Anderson et al13 that the compact node is a well-recognized half-oval of small cells closely adherent to the central fibrous body. Transitional cells are usually palely staining and are frequently separated into small fascicles by connective tissue septa.13


*    Results
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
*Results
down arrowDiscussion
down arrowReferences
 
Atrial Activation Sequence During Ventricular Stimulation
The 16 hearts in which activation mapping was performed revealed 2 distinct atrial exit sites during ventricular stimulation. One was in the anterior area toward the apex of the triangle of Koch, close to the site where His signals were recorded. The other exit site was located posteriorly between the TVA and the orifice of the CS. Activation in the CS ran from the proximal electrode (orifice) to the distal electrode. Earliest activation of the left atrium occurred later (12±4 ms [mean±SD]) than earliest activation of the right AV junction.

In 5 of the 16 hearts, earliest atrial activation was found at the anterior site during pacing at long cycle lengths (>=600 ms). As illustrated in Figure 2Down, during incremental pacing (steps of 20 ms), the sequence of atrial activation changed gradually until earliest atrial activation was recorded at the posterior site. Although the change in the activation pattern suggests a shift from retrograde fast- (Figure 2ADown) to retrograde slow-pathway conduction, earliest atrial activation was delayed by only 4 ms (Figure 2CDown).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Activation maps during incremental ventricular pacing. Dashed lines indicate anatomic landmarks of mapped area. Isochrones are drawn at 4-ms intervals (A and C) and 2-ms intervals (B), respectively, with ventricular stimulus as time zero. Atrial electrograms are shown in the approximate position of recording. A, Cycle length (CL) 600 ms; earliest atrial activation is at anterior site (*). B, CL 460 ms; a second endocardial breakthrough manifests at a posterior site. C, CL 360 ms; earliest atrial activation is now at posterior site (*). Note that electrogram at site of anterior exit now reveals a positive deflection (marked with #). TT indicates Todaro's tendon; other abbreviations as in Figure 1Up.

In the other 10 hearts, the retrograde impulse activated the atrium using both exit sites concurrently over a wide range of paced cycle lengths. The activation maps revealed 2 early sites with intrinsic negative deflections, indicative of areas where activation arises, separated by recording sites with later local activation times. An example is shown in Figure 3Down. The site of earliest atrial activation was recorded in the posterior area. The activation spread posteriorly, toward the orifice of the CS, and anteriorly. A second exit site, activated 12 ms after the posterior exit site, was in the anterior area near the apex of the triangle of Koch.



View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Activation map in heart with 2 atrial exit sites after ventricular pacing (CL 1000 ms). Dashed lines indicate anatomic landmarks of mapped area. Isochrones are drawn at 4-ms intervals, with ventricular stimulus as time zero. Atrial electrograms are shown in approximate position of recording. TT indicates Todaro's tendon. Tracing in lower right shows His bundle recording: S indicates stimulus artifact; H, retrograde His deflection; V, ventricular depolarization; and A, atrial depolarization. *Shows site of earliest-atrial activation and #, second exit site in anterior area near apex of Koch's triangle. See text for discussion.

In 6 of these 10 hearts, the posterior exit site was activated slightly before the anterior exit site during pacing at long cycle lengths (>=600 ms). During incremental ventricular pacing or after closely coupled ventricular extrastimuli, activation of the anterior exit site occurred increasingly later than activation of the posterior exit site. In some cases, the posterior exit site could completely mask the anterior site. In 2 of the 10 hearts, the anterior exit site was activated before the posterior site even at shorter cycle lengths. In the 2 remaining hearts, activation of the exit sites occurred at random, independently of the paced cycle length.

Dual-Pathway Physiology
Single ventricular echoes were consistently induced in all hearts. Atrial echoes occurred only sporadically and could not be reproducibly induced to allow mapping. Sustained AVNRT could not be induced in any of the hearts. None of the investigated hearts showed discontinuous AV nodal function curves during baseline study.

Atrial Activation Sequence During Ventricular Echoes
A critical delay in VA conduction was mandatory for the appearance of ventricular echoes. Figure 4Down shows atrial activation and atrial electrograms preceding a ventricular echo in the heart shown in Figure 2Up. Earliest atrial activation occurred 14 ms later than in Figure 2CUp. The activation pattern and signal morphology, however, match those seen in Figure 2CUp. The tracings in the lower right of Figure 4Down show His bundle recordings of the ventricular echo and baseline atrial stimulation. The He-Ve interval, as well as the morphology of the ventricular electrogram of the echo (Ve), matches that during baseline antegrade conduction, which indicates that the antegrade limb of the circuit used the AV node–His-Purkinje system.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Activation map in heart shown in Figure 2Up after ventricular extrastimulus (S1-S2 280 ms, BCL 500 ms) followed by ventricular echo (Ve). Dashed lines indicate anatomic landmarks of mapped area. Isochrones are drawn at 4-ms intervals, with S2 as time zero. Atrial electrograms are shown in the approximate position of recording. He and H indicate His bundle electrogram during ventricular echo (a) and during baseline atrial stimulation (b), respectively. Other abbreviations as in Figure 3Up.

Figure 5Down illustrates atrial activation and atrial electrograms preceding a ventricular echo in the heart shown in Figure 3Up. VA conduction delay compared with Figure 3Up is 25 ms. Again, the activation pattern and signal morphology match those in Figure 3Up. The tracings in the lower right of Figure 5Down show His bundle electrograms of the ventricular echo and baseline atrial stimulation.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Activation map in heart shown in Figure 3Up after ventricular extrastimulus (S1-S2 520 ms, BCL 800 ms) followed by ventricular echo (Ve). Isochrones are drawn at 4-ms intervals, with S2 as time zero. Atrial electrograms are shown in the approximate position of recording. The anterior exit was close to the site where antegrade Hisdeflections (H) were recorded. His bundle electrograms of (a) ventricular echo and (b) baseline atrial stimulation. See text for discussion. Abbreviations and symbols as in Figure 3Up.

Mapping was also performed with the high-resolution, quasi-unipolar electrode. Although this electrode was specifically designed to unveil low-frequency signals, no distinct potentials were discerned that could be attributed to activation of the compact node or the transitional cell zone.

Histology of Exit Sites
The sites of endocardial breakthrough were found to be in atrial myocardium, well away from the compact AV node and the transitional cell zone. The myocardium between the exit sites and the AV node was not specialized in terms of histological characteristics, nor were histologically discrete or insulated tracts identified.

Phenol Application
Ventricular echoes were still inducible after application of phenol. Retrograde and antegrade AV nodal conduction parameters did not differ before and after phenol application. Light microscopy of histological sections revealed a mean zone of necrosis to a depth of 475 µm (range 350 to 600 µm).

Incisions in Posterior Approach to Compact AV Node
In 4 of the 6 hearts, the most anterior incision was made at the presumed location of the posterior aspect of the compact node. Antegrade and retrograde conduction parameters were only slightly affected: the A-H interval increased by 5±3.8 ms (mean±SD) and the V-A interval by 11±6.5 ms (mean±SD).

Ventricular echoes were still inducible after the most anterior incision. Figure 6ADown shows electrograms of ventricular echoes before and after dissection. Note that the third and fourth incisions were made anteriorly relative to the location of the posterior exit site. Figure 6BDown shows a serial section from the same heart. The distance between the most anterior incision and the compact node is <2 mm. In 1 of the 2 hearts in which additional incisions were made, histology could not be interpreted because the area of interest was destroyed by the incisions. In the other heart, the incision that abolished echo responses passed through the compact node.



View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Evidence that dissection of posterior approach to compact AV node only marginally affected reentrant circuit during ventricular echoes. A, Schematic of triangle of Koch. Dashed lines indicate 4 incisions, and concentric circles indicate AV nodal exits. Tracings at right show His bundle recordings during atrial stimulation (1) and of ventricular echoes (Ve) at baseline (2) (BCL 700 ms, S1-S2 480 ms) and after most anterior incision (3) (BCL 600 ms, S1-S2 440 ms). Abbreviations as in Figure 3Up. B, Histological section from same heart, cut parallel to TVA. The most anterior incision is indicated by open arrow. Note that the incision cuts through all atrial cell layers and reaches the ventricular myocardium (solid arrows). CN indicates long axis of compact node, and V, ventricular myocardium.

Dissection of Triangle of Koch
Electrophysiology
Ventricular echoes occurred after dissection in all 5 hearts. Figure 7Down shows recordings from the right and left atria and the His bundle during programmed ventricular extrastimulation before and after dissection. The ventricular echo in Figure 7ADown was induced by an extrastimulus with a coupling interval (S1-S2) of 330 ms during a paced cycle length of 600 ms. Figure 7BDown shows a ventricular echo after dissection (S1-S2 540 ms, basic cycle length [BCL] 800 ms). Note that the recordings from the right and left atria show no electrical activity, which demonstrates that the atrial tissue outside the truncated area was electrically dissociated.



View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Ventricular echoes (Ve) before (A) and after (B) dissection of triangle of Koch. In A, atrial electrogram is recorded from high right atrium (HRA). In B, recordings from right (RA) and left (LA) atria demonstrate electrical dissociation of truncated area. See text for further discussion. HBE indicates His bundle electrogram; other abbreviations as in Figure 3Up.

Antegrade functioning of the AV node was preserved in the 5 hearts after dissection (TableDown). Interestingly, after dissection, 1 heart revealed discontinuous AV conduction, with an A-H jump of 170 ms (Figures 8Down, 9ADown, and 9BDown). The antegrade effective refractory period of the fast pathway lengthened from 220 to 260 ms, thereby exposing the slow pathway, which was concealed before dissection. As shown in Figure 9CDown, an atrial extrastimulus with a coupling interval of 240 ms induced an atrial echo, which then reciprocated to the ventricles. Recordings from the left and right atria demonstrate that the truncated area was electrically isolated from the perinodal atrial tissue.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Antegrade AV Nodal Conduction Parameters in 5 Hearts Before and After Dissection



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Antegrade AV nodal conduction (A2-H2) in response to progressively premature atrial extrastimuli (A1-A2) after every eighth beat of a BCL of 600 ms during baseline and after dissection of triangle of Koch. Extrastimuli with coupling intervals of 240 and 230 ms (*) were followed by atrial echoes.



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. A and B, Dual AV nodal pathways after dissection of triangle of Koch manifested by a sudden prolongation of AH interval (145 to 315 ms) after 10-ms decrease in coupling interval (A1-A2) at BCL of 600 ms. C, Further decrease of A1-A2 interval induced an atrial echo (Ae), which reciprocated to the ventricles. Recordings from right (RA) and left (LA) atria demonstrate electrical dissociation of truncated area. Abbreviations as in Figure 7Up.

Histology
Histology is illustrated in Figure 10Down on the basis of the heart discussed in Figures 7 through 9UpUpUp. Progressing from posterior to anterior, the sections at the site of the incision between the TVA and the mitral valve annulus show remnants of atrial tissue at the mitral and tricuspid valve annuli. The atrial surface of the muscular AV septum is depleted of atrial and specialized tissue (Figure 10ADown). Sections immediately anterior to the incision pass through the posterior part of the compact node. A zone of transitional cells extends to the TVA and to the mitral valve annulus (Figure 10BDown). Approaching the middle of the compact node, almost all the tissue at the atrial surface of the muscular AV septum is histologically specialized (compact and transitional cells), with only a narrow rim of overlying atrial myocardium (Figure 10CDown). At the anterior exit site, transitional cells still connect the distal compact node to the atrial myocardium (Figure 10DDown). More anteriorly, the contact between compact node and atrial myocardium is lost, which indicates the junction between compact node and penetrating bundle (Figure 10EDown).14



View larger version (133K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 10. Composite figure of histology of heart shown in Figures 7Up, 8Up, and 9Up. Upper right, AV junction after dissection. Arrows A, B, C, D, and E indicate levels of histological sections. AVL indicates aortic valve leaflet; CN, compact AV node; CN-PB, compact node–penetrating bundle junction; TC, transitional cell zone; and V, ventricular myocardium. Other abbreviations as in Figure 1Up.


*    Discussion
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
*Discussion
down arrowReferences
 
New Observations
In this study, high-resolution mapping of atrial activation after ventricular stimulation shows 2 AV nodal exit sites. These sites are situated in atrial myocardium, well away from the AV node. The exit sites and the atrial tissue that connect the node to these sites have to be excluded from the reentrant pathway during ventricular echoes for the following reasons: (1) ventricular echoes occurred irrespective of the atrial activation pattern; (2) synchronous retrograde activation of both exit sites often preceded ventricular echoes; and (3) ventricular echoes occurred after chemical destruction of the endocardial and subendocardial tissue, as well as after surgical dissociation of the perinodal atrial tissue, including both exit sites, from the AV node.

Dual Atrial Exit Sites Versus Dual Pathways
Activation of the right atrium after ventricular stimulation occurred via 2 distinct endocardial exit sites. During ventricular pacing with short cycle lengths or after closely coupled ventricular extrastimuli, the preferential route of atrial activation was via the posterior exit site, which suggests functional differences between the 2 distinct areas.

The exit sites observed in the present study correspond to the sites of earliest atrial activation described both in animal studies and in clinical settings. The studies of Sung et al3 and of McGuire et al15 16 suggest that during VA conduction, strands of atrial cells that connect the AV node with the endocardial exit sites are the substrate of the fast and slow pathways. The results of the present study, however, show clearly that these hypothetical pathways could be completely disconnected from the compact node without abolishment of the ventricular echoes.

Canine Dual AV Nodal Physiology
Although dual AV nodal pathways manifested as ventricular echoes, none of the hearts showed discontinuous AV nodal function curves during baseline electrophysiological study. Because discontinuous AV nodal conduction can be observed in the majority of patients undergoing electrophysiological study,17 this might indicate a substantial difference between human and canine AV nodal physiology. A possible explanation for this apparent discrepancy is provided by the observation made in the heart discussed in Figures 8Up and 9Up: dual pathways are present, but if the differences in effective refractory periods between the fast and slow pathways are not sufficiently distinct, slow-pathway conduction will be concealed.

A study by Moe et al18 emphasized the significance of vagal-sympathetic interactions for AV nodal functioning. Differences in antegrade AV nodal electrophysiology compared with clinical findings might therefore also be due to denervation of the isolated hearts.

The occurrence of ventricular echoes with smooth AV nodal function curves is a common finding in experimental and clinical settings,18 19 and patients presenting with AVNRT do not necessarily demonstrate discontinuous AV conduction.20 Thus, conduction delay due to decremental conduction properties, rather than differences in conduction velocities, is essential for AV nodal reentry to occur.

Where is the Site of AV Nodal Reentry?
One of the objectives of the present study was to assess the role of perinodal atrial tissue in AV nodal reentry. This intent is complicated by the fact that the anatomic definition of the AV nodal area is still subject to controversy. Transitional cells, separated from each other by connective tissue septa, surround the more closely packed midnodal cells. This zone of midnodal cells is called the compact node.6 21 Some investigators only consider this compact part of the specialized area. Anatomic and electrophysiological studies of the AV junction, however, suggest that the AV node comprises all the different cell groups that determine its functional properties.11 13

In the present study, progressive restriction of the reentrant circuit excluded the perinodal atrial tissue. The anatomic and functional potentials for a dual-transmission system within the AV node certainly exist. In their original study, Mendez and Moe22 suggested that "... the upper region of the node was functionally and spatially split into two effective pathways." Techniques such as extensive mapping with (multiple) microelectrodes and high-resolution extracellular mapping after resection of the endocardium and the subendocardial atrial tissue should be helpful in the attempt to locate the exact site of reentry within the AV node.

Study Limitations
It is generally thought that atrial or ventricular echoes represent a "single-beat expression" of AVNRT. In contrast to the findings of the present study, the recent results of surgical and catheter ablation techniques in humans with AVNRT suggest that damage to the AV node is not a prerequisite for cure.4 23 24 25 There are several possible explanations for this discrepancy: (1) The persistence of single echoes after selective slow-pathway ablation in patients with AVNRT is a common finding. If successful ablation for AVNRT could only be achieved by complete destruction of the circuit, this should equate with eradication of the echo beat. Radiofrequency or surgical lesions, even if placed well away from the compact AV node, certainly modify the complex architecture of the AV junction. This might disturb the delicate balance that seems to be necessary to sustain circus movement, while the circuit is still intact and allows single echoes. (2) The success of radiofrequency ablation in abolishing AVNRT at sites well away from the compact AV node can be attributed to remote effects on the transitional cells or the compact node itself. It has been shown that sequences of 60-second 25-W radiofrequency pulses increase myocardial temperature to >50°C at distances as great as 10 mm.26 (3) Recent concepts suggest intranodal microreentry as the basis for single AV nodal echoes, whereas some forms of AVNRT are ascribed to macroreentry with the participation of perinodal atrial tissue.27 (4) The mechanism of the ventricular echoes induced in dog heart is different from the mechanism of AVNRT in humans.

Despite the fact that dual AV nodal physiology seems to be a normal property of the dog heart, sustained AVNRT could not be induced. Although it has been shown that the conduction system in dog and in humans is basically similar,11 extrapolation of the results of the present study to the pathophysiology of human hearts with AVNRT should be considered with care. The question whether single echoes and sustained AV nodal reentry use the same substrate remains to be elucidated. Comprehensive understanding of the arrhythmogenesis in the AV junction is hampered by the lack of an accurate model of AVNRT in an experimental setting.


*    Acknowledgments
 
This study was funded in part by the Dutch Heart Foundation (grant 94.137). Dr Loh was supported by a fellowship from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bonn, Germany. Dr Thibault was supported by a fellowship from the McLaughlin Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. We are grateful to Charly Belterman and Wim ter Smitte for expert technical assistance and to Sara Tasseron for the preparation of the histological sections.


*    Footnotes
 
Reprint requests to Dr Peter Loh, Department of Experimental Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, Meidbergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Received September 14, 1998; revision received May 19, 1999; accepted May 19, 1999.


*    References
up arrowTop
up arrowAbstract
up arrowIntroduction
up arrowMethods
up arrowResults
up arrowDiscussion
*References
 
1. Mines GR. On dynamic equilibrium in the heart. J Physiol (Lond). 1913;46:349–383.

2. Iinuma H, Dreifus LS, Mazgalev T, Price R, Michelson EL. Role of the perinodal region in atrioventricular nodal reentry: evidence in an isolated rabbit heart preparation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983;2:465–473.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

3. Sung RJ, Waxman HL, Saksena S, Juma Z. Sequence of retrograde atrial activation in patients with dual atrioventricular nodal pathways. Circulation. 1981;64:1059–1067.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Jackman WM, Beckman KJ, McClelland JH, Wang X, Friday KJ, Roman CA, Moulton KP, Twidale N, Hazlitt HA, Prior MI, Oren J, Overholt ED, Lazzara R. Treatment of supraventricular tachycardia due to atrioventricular nodal reentry by radiofrequency catheter ablation of slow-pathway conduction. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:313–318.[Abstract]

5. Josephson ME, Miller JM. Atrioventricular nodal reentry: evidence supporting an intranodal location. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1993;16:599–614.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

6. Janse MJ, Anderson RH, McGuire MA, Siew Yen Ho. "AV nodal" reentry, I: "AV nodal" reentry revisited. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:561–572.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

7. McGuire MA, Janse MJ, Ross DL. "AV nodal" reentry, II: AV nodal, AV junctional, or atrionodal reentry? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1993;4:573–586.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

8. McGuire MA, De Bakker JMT, Vermeulen JT, Opthof T, Becker AE, Janse MJ. Origin and significance of double potentials near the atrioventricular node: correlation of extracellular potentials, intracellular potentials, and histology. Circulation. 1994;89:2351–2360.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Veenstra RD, Joyner RW, Rawling DA. Purkinje and ventricular activation sequences of canine papillary muscle: effects of quinidine and calcium on the Purkinje-ventricular conduction delay. Circ Res. 1984;54:500–515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

10. Lack W, Lang S, Brand G. Necrotizing effect of phenol on normal tissues and on tumors: a study on postoperative and cadaver specimens. Acta Orthop Scand. 1994;65:351–354.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

11. Ho SY, Kilpatrick L, Kanai T, Germroth PG, Thompson RP, Anderson RH. The architecture of the atrioventricular conduction axis in dog compared to man: its significance to ablation of the atrioventricular nodal approaches. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1995;6:26–39.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

12. De Bakker JMT, Hauer RNW, Simmers TA. Activation mapping: unipolar versus bipolar recording. In: Zipes DP, Jalife J, eds. Cardiac Electrophysiology: From Cell to Bedside. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1995:1068–1078.

13. Anderson RH, Becker AE, Brechenmacher C, Davies MJ, Rossi L. The human atrioventricular junctional area: a morphological study of the A-V node and bundle. Eur J Cardiol. 1975;3:11–25.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

14. Becker AE, Anderson RH. Morphology of the human atrioventricular junctional area. In: Wellens HJJ, Lie KI, Janse MJ, eds. The Conduction System of the Heart: Structure, Function and Clinical Implications. Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1976:263–286.

15. McGuire MA, Robotin M, Yip ASB, Bourke JP, Johnson DC, Dewsnap BI, Grant P, Uther JB, Ross DL. Electrophysiologic and histologic effects of dissection of the connections between the atrium and posterior part of the atrioventricular node. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23:693–701.[Abstract]

16. McGuire MA, Bourke JP, Robotin MC, Johnson DC, Meldrum Hanna W, Nunn GR, Uther JB, Ross DL. High-resolution mapping of Koch's triangle using sixty electrodes in humans with atrioventricular junctional (AV nodal) reentrant tachycardia. Circulation. 1993;88:2315–2328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Denes P, Wu D, Dhingra R, Amat-y-Leon F, Wyndham C, Rosen KM. Dual atrioventricular nodal pathways: a common electrophysiological response. Br Heart J. 1975;37:1069–1076.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Moe GK, Preston JB, Burlington H. Physiological evidence for a dual A-V transmission system. Circ Res. 1956;4:357–375.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Schuilenburg RM, Durrer D. Further observations on the ventricular echo phenomenon elicited in the human heart: is the atrium part of the echo pathway? Circulation. 1972;45:629–638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Goldreyer BN, Damato AN. The essential role of atrioventricular conduction delay in the initiation of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1971;43:679–687.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Meijler FL, Janse MJ. Morphology and electrophysiology of the mammalian atrioventricular node. Physiol Rev. 1988;68:608–647.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Mendez C, Moe GK. Demonstration of a dual A-V nodal conduction system in the isolated rabbit heart. Circ Res. 1966;19:378–393.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Haissaguerre M, Gaita F, Fischer B, Commenges D, Montserrat P, d'Ivernois C, Lemetayer P, Warin J. Elimination of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia using discrete slow potentials to guide application of radiofrequency energy. Circulation. 1992;85:2162–2175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Keim S, Werner P, Jazayeri M, Akhtar M, Tchou P. Localization of the fast and slow pathways in atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia by intraoperative ice mapping. Circulation. 1992;86:919–925.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Sanchez-Quintana D, Davies W, Ho SY, Oslizlok P, Anderson RH. Architecture of the atrial musculature in and around the triangle of Koch: its potential relevance to atrioventricular nodal reentry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8:1396–1407.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

26. Wittkampf FHM, Simmers TA, Hauer RNW, Robles de Medina EO. Myocardial temperature response during radiofrequency catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995;18:307–317.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]

27. Scherlag BJ, Patterson E, Nakagawa H, Hirao K, Jackman WM, Lazzara R. Changing concepts of A-V nodal conduction: basic and clinical correlates. Prim Cardiol. 1995;21:13–21.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Loh, S. Y. Ho, T. Kawara, R. N.W. Hauer, M. J. Janse, G. Breithardt, and J. M.T. de Bakker
Reentrant Circuits in the Canine Atrioventricular Node During Atrial and Ventricular Echoes: Electrophysiological and Histological Correlation
Circulation, July 15, 2003; 108(2): 231 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
V. P. Nikolski, S. A. Jones, M. K. Lancaster, M. R. Boyett, and I. R. Efimov
Cx43 and Dual-Pathway Electrophysiology of the Atrioventricular Node and Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry
Circ. Res., March 7, 2003; 92(4): 469 - 475.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. N. Mazgalev, S. Y. Ho, and R. H. Anderson
Anatomic-Electrophysiological Correlations Concerning the Pathways for Atrioventricular Conduction
Circulation, June 5, 2001; 103(22): 2660 - 2667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
V. Nikolski and I. R. Efimov
Fluorescent Imaging of a Dual-Pathway Atrioventricular-Nodal Conduction System
Circ. Res., February 16, 2001; 88 (3): e23 - e30.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
J. Wu, J. Wu, J. Olgin, J. M. Miller, and D. P. Zipes
Mechanisms Underlying the Reentrant Circuit of Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia in Isolated Canine Atrioventricular Nodal Preparation Using Optical Mapping
Circ. Res., June 8, 2001; 88(11): 1189 - 1195.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Janse, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Loh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Janse, M. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Electrophysiology
Right arrow Animal models of human disease
Right arrow Arrythmias-basic studies
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs