(Circulation. 1999;100:E1-E7.)
© 1999 American Heart Association, Inc.
Circulation Electronic Pages |
From Service d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique. INSERM U508, Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire, et Institut Pasteur de Lille, Lille, France.
Correspondence to Philippe Amouyel, MD, PhD, INSERM U508, Institut Pasteur de Lille, 1, Rue Calmette, 59019 Lille Cedex, France. E-mail philippe.amouyel{at}pasteur-lille.fr
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods and ResultsThe impacts of atmospheric temperature (in Celsius) and pressure (in millibars) on daily rates of myocardial infarction (MI) and coronary deaths were studied. Percentages of variation of event rates according to meteorological variations were derived from the relative risks estimated with a Poisson regression model. During the 10-year longitudinal survey, 3616 events occurred. Rates of events decreased linearly with increasing atmospheric temperature. For atmospheric pressure, we detected a V-shaped relationship, with a minimum of daily event rates at 1016 mbar. A 10°C decrease was associated with a 13% increase in event rates (P<0.0001); a 10-mbar decrease <1016 mbar and a 10-mbar increase >1016 mbar were associated with a 12% increase (P=0.001) and an 11% increase (P=0.01) in event rates, respectively. These effects were independent and influenced both coronary morbidity and mortality rates, with stronger effects in older age groups and for recurrent events.
ConclusionsThis longitudinal study is the first to estimate the attributable effect of meteorological variables on MI morbidity in population and strongly argues for a systematic fight against cold in cardiovascular disease prevention, particularly in older ages and after a first MI.
Key Words: registries myocardial infarction temperature, atmospheric pressure, atmospheric prevention
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To clarify the possible associations between coronary artery diseases and meteorological variables, large population-based studies are needed, with exhaustive registration of morbidity and mortality events over long periods of time in geographical places where meteorological variables are homogeneous. We addressed the question of relationships between coronary event rates and meteorological variables in 10-year data obtained from the Urban Community of Lille Ischemic Heart Disease Registry. This epidemiological program monitors coronary events in 522 000 men and women living in the north of France. This morbidity registry collaborates to the Multinational Monitoring of Trends and Determinants of Cardiovascular Disease (MONICA) project developed under the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO). The impacts of meteorological variables on daily incident and recurrent rates of MI, fatal or nonfatal, occurring between 1985 and 1994 in men 25 to 64 years of age were explored.
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Meteorological Data
Meteorological data of the area were obtained from Meteo-France,
the French national meteorological institute. Daily mean atmospheric
temperature (in Celsius) and daily mean atmospheric pressure (in
millibars) were used.
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed with SAS software
release 6.11 (SAS Institute Inc). For each age group, means of daily
morbidity rates were calculated for 1°C atmospheric temperature and
1-mbar atmospheric pressure according to year of occurrence; the annual
midyear population of each age group was used as a denominator. To
determine the pattern of distributions, we plotted the mean of daily
event rates (per 100 000) according to the values of the
meteorological variables. Relations between mean daily event rates
and atmospheric temperature or pressure were analyzed for the 3
age groups separately. Relative risks (RRs) of event occurrence,
approximated by the OR, were computed for 5°C atmospheric temperature
and for 10-mbar atmospheric pressure variations by use of a Poisson
regression model. All RRs were adjusted for age group and year of
occurrence. Percentages of variation in event rates according to
meteorological variations were derived from RR. For a given increase in
a meteorological variable, the percentage of variation in event
rates was estimated by 100x(RR-1). For a given decrease in a
meteorological variable, the percentage of variation in event rates
was estimated by 100x(1-RR)/RR. This approach assumes that events are
rare in the population (as observed for MI and coronary deaths)
and that a log linear relation exists between event rates and
meteorological variables.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
The effect of atmospheric pressure on the occurrence of MI and
coronary deaths was also more pronounced in the 45-to-54-year
and 54-to-64-year groups. Increases and decreases in atmospheric
pressure from 1016 mbar were both associated with increases in daily
event rates. When atmospheric pressure was <1016 mbar, a 10-mbar
decrease was associated with a 12% increase in event rates
(P<0.001). When atmospheric pressure was >1016 mbar, a
10-mbar increase was associated with an 11% increase in event rates
(P<0.01). Influences of atmospheric pressure on event rates
were consistent for fatal, incident, and recurrent cases. As
with temperature, the impact of atmospheric pressure was higher in
recurrent events and for older ages (Table 2
).
Because of the correlation between temperature and atmospheric pressure
(r=0.24 for low pressures and r=-0.44 for high
pressures), meteorological events were adjusted for each other. After
this adjustment, the effects of both meteorological factors remained
significant (Table 3
). Thus, a 10°C
decrease in atmospheric temperature was associated with an 11%
increase in event rates for MI and coronary deaths
(P=0.001), whereas a 10-mbar decrease in atmospheric
pressure <1016 mbar was associated with a 9% increase in event rates
(P<0.01), and a 10-mbar increase >1016 mbar was associated
with a 5% increase (P=NS).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The geographical area studied, located on the 50th parallel, enjoys an oceanic, temperate climate. In this flat region, the meteorological conditions are homogeneous throughout the area studied. Thus, daily climatic conditions are similar in all sites of the area, limiting the variability observed in larger geographical areas often considered in mortality studies. The MI and coronary death events were exhaustively collected and verified. Completeness of registration and standardization was ascertained according to the MONICA protocol.7 For 90 subjects (2.7% of the total population), history of MI was missing. For these patients, however, the monthly distribution of events according to their diagnostic category (MI or coronary death) was similar to that of the other patients, suggesting that these missing values did not affect results.
The potential deleterious effect of low temperatures on cardiovascular mortality and coronary deaths is supported by numerous studies in various countries. Our results are consistent with these observations. Conversely, the rare morbidity studies conducted in a population failed to demonstrate any consistent association between the occurrence of incident and nonfatal MI and low temperatures. The statistical power of our study allowed us to detect an effect of low temperatures on incident, recurrent, and fatal coronary event rates. Moreover, convincing arguments about the increase in cardiovascular risks with cold exist. Increases in blood pressure and viscosity may underlie the effect of cold on coronary event occurrence.8 9 Seasonal and temperature variations of blood pressure, serum lipid, and fibrinogen levels have been also described.9 10 11 12 Reduced physical activity and diet modifications in winter may also be involved in these relationships.
Other reports suggested an increase in cardiovascular mortality associated with heat. Kunst et al4 in the Netherlands found that 26% of heat-related mortality was due to cardiovascular disease, and Pan et al1 in Taiwan described higher coronary death rates for cold and heat with a minimum death rate occurring at 26°C. In our study, although the highest temperature was 28°C, mean daily atmospheric temperatures of >25°C were unusual (<10 days in 10 years of survey) and did not allow us to confirm this observation on morbidity rates.
The consequences of atmospheric pressure on cardiovascular diseases have been studied less frequently, probably because most studies analyzed only monthly or seasonal variations of event rates. Indeed, variability of monthly atmospheric pressure is weaker than daily variations, often leading to inconclusive results. One study reported higher daily rates of MI cases with atmospheric pressures <1000 mbar.5 Chen and colleagues13 found an association between intracerebral hemorrhage and atmospheric pressures >1022 mbar, whereas Lejeune et al14 found that atmospheric pressure was lower the day before the occurrence of subarachnoid hemorrhages. Finally, 1 hospital-based study showed that atmospheric pressure might be a discriminant factor between MI, more often associated with low pressures, and intracerebral hemorrhage, more often associated with high pressures.15 The V-like relationship observed in the present study needs to be confirmed. However, the consistency of our results regardless of category, the detection of the lowest rate of events at the point that commonly defined low and high atmospheric pressures, and the persistence of the effects after adjustment of atmospheric temperature strongly argued for a specific and independent effect of atmospheric pressure on MI mortality and morbidity. A weak negative effect of atmospheric pressure (range, 720 to 750 mbar) on blood pressure levels has been reported in hypertensive patients who did not respond to treatments16 ; this association between atmospheric pressure and a common risk factor of coronary artery disease may offer a clue in our exploration of a biological mechanism underlying the effect of atmospheric pressure on coronary heart disease.
We reported stronger effects of meteorological variables on recurrent case rates. This group of cases is composed of patients who resisted a first MI. In this subgroup, the control of classic risk factors of MI with secondary prevention, even limited,17 and development of a chronic cardiac disease afterward may explain their increased vulnerability to other less common noncontrolled risk factors such as meteorological variables. The increasing influence of atmospheric temperature and atmospheric pressure as age increased in all subgroups has previously been described for temperature.1 The predominance of the effects of the meteorological factors after 55 years of age could be explained both by the impact of strong genetic determinants of MI before 55 years of age18 and by body temperature control mechanisms becoming less efficient with age.19
Finally, our results indicating a relationship between meteorological variables and coronary event rates, particularly for recurrent event rates, strongly suggest that fighting against cold is important in cardiovascular prevention. Individual prevention with clothes suited to cold weather in winter and collective prevention with the improvement of heat insulation of living quarters may be implemented. This advice is supported by the results of 2 recent studies. The Eurowinter group observed that increases in mortality rates with decreases in temperatures were higher in warmer regions of Europe than in colder. This may be due to inadequate individual and collective protection against cold in those countries with mild winters.20 Moreover, Seretakis et al21 showed that changes in seasonal patterns in coronary mortality in the United States were compatible with gradual expansion of adequate heating and use of air conditioning. Other population studies in different countries based on similar designs should be developed to further confirm and detail the influences of meteorological variables on coronary heart disease occurrence. These reports should emphasize the importance of adequate temperature conditions as prevention.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P Dilaveris, A Synetos, G Giannopoulos, E Gialafos, A Pantazis, and C Stefanadis CLimate Impacts on Myocardial infarction deaths in the Athens TErritory: the CLIMATE study Heart, December 1, 2006; 92(12): 1747 - 1751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Murakami and M. Ono Myocardial infarction deaths after high level exposure to particulate matter. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, March 1, 2006; 60(3): 262 - 266. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. G Barnett, A. J Dobson, P. McElduff, V. Salomaa, K. Kuulasmaa, S. Sans, and for the WHO MONICA project Cold periods and coronary events: an analysis of populations worldwide J. Epidemiol. Community Health, July 1, 2005; 59(7): 551 - 557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1999 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |