Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2002;106:2296-2298
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000038412.38399.D5
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faxon, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Faxon, D. P.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary interventions: stents
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2002;106:2296.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Systemic Drug Therapy for Restenosis

"Déjà Vu All Over Again"

David P. Faxon, MD

From the Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill.

Correspondence to David P. Faxon, MD, Section of Cardiology, University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Ave, Room B-608, MC 6080, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail dfaxon@medicine.bsd.uchicago.edu


Key Words: Editorials • restenosis • stents • drugs


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

The problem of restenosis, a major limitation of angioplasty since its introduction in 1978, may finally be under control. The rate of restenosis has fallen from 30% to 40% to 15% to 20% with the advent and widespread use of coronary stents. Now, with the introduction of intravascular radiation therapy, in-stent restenosis seems to be reduced by 50%, and with the almost unbelievable preliminary results of drug-eluting stents, the rate of restenosis may be reduced to less than 5% in de novo lesions. Although these outcomes are truly remarkable, both intravascular radiation therapy and drug-eluting stents have a number of significant limitations.

See p 2379

Radiation has safety issues and is limited by geographical miss, edge restenosis, and late stent thrombosis. Drug-eluting stents are likely to be expensive and are unproven in unfavorable anatomy. Even in optimal patients, restenosis can still occur with both types of treatment. A continued search for a simpler and effective means of controlling this problem seems reasonable given these limitations. In this issue of Circulation, Farb et al1 present evidence that everolimus, an oral analog of rapamycin, can reduce neointimal thickness by more than 40% after stent placement in a rabbit model of restenosis. Rapamycin is a naturally occurring macrolide antibiotic produced by the actinomycete Streptomyces hygroscopicus found on Eastern Island. It has been shown to be a potent inhibitor of cytokine and growth factor-mediated cell-proliferation.2 It is known to bind to a cellular receptor FKBP-12 and to inhibit the target of rapamycin (TOR), . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Oral Everolimus Inhibits In-Stent Neointimal Growth
Andrew Farb, Michael John, Eduardo Acampado, Frank D. Kolodgie, Margaret Forney Prescott, and Renu Virmani
Circulation 2002 106: 2379-2384. [Abstract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. S. Douglas Jr, D. R. Holmes Jr, D. J. Kereiakes, C. L. Grines, E. Block, Z. M.B. Ghazzal, D. C. Morris, H. Liberman, K. Parker, C. Jurkovitz, et al.
Coronary Stent Restenosis in Patients Treated With Cilostazol
Circulation, November 1, 2005; 112(18): 2826 - 2832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. S. Schwartz, N. A. Chronos, and R. Virmani
Preclinical restenosis models and drug-eluting stents: Still important, still much to learn
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 6, 2004; 44(7): 1373 - 1385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Casey and D. P Faxon
Multi-vessel coronary disease and percutaneous coronary intervention
Heart, March 1, 2004; 90(3): 341 - 346.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
J. George, J. Sack, I. Barshack, P. Keren, I. Goldberg, R. Haklai, G. Elad-Sfadia, Y. Kloog, and G. Keren
Inhibition of Intimal Thickening in the Rat Carotid Artery Injury Model by a Nontoxic Ras Inhibitor
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, February 1, 2004; 24(2): 363 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
Y. Matsumoto, T. Uwatoku, K. Oi, K. Abe, T. Hattori, K. Morishige, Y. Eto, Y. Fukumoto, K.-i. Nakamura, Y. Shibata, et al.
Long-Term Inhibition of Rho-Kinase Suppresses Neointimal Formation After Stent Implantation in Porcine Coronary Arteries: Involvement of Multiple Mechanisms
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, January 1, 2004; 24(1): 181 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
H. D. Danenberg, G. Golomb, A. Groothuis, J. Gao, H. Epstein, R. V. Swaminathan, P. Seifert, and E. R. Edelman
Liposomal Alendronate Inhibits Systemic Innate Immunity and Reduces In-Stent Neointimal Hyperplasia in Rabbits
Circulation, December 2, 2003; 108(22): 2798 - 2804.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
D. F. Denny Jr
Prediction of Restenosis after Carotid Artery Stent Implantation
Radiology, May 1, 2003; 227(2): 316 - 318.
[Full Text] [PDF]