This Article Full Text Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by White, C. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by White, C. W. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Heart Attack

(Circulation. 1996;93:853-856.)
© 1996 American Heart Association, Inc.

Articles

Simplicity's Virtue Scorned

Precision Comes to TIMI Flow Grading and the Results Are . . . Surprising

Carl W. White, MD

From the Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis.

Correspondence to Carl W. White, MD, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota Medical School, Box 508 UMHC, 420 Delaware St SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail white001@maroon.tc.umn.edu.

Key Words: Editorials • thrombolysis • coronary disease • angioplasty

	Introduction

 
Utilization of a simple method for the angiographic characterization of coronary flow after thrombolytic therapy for myocardial infarction has become a hallmark of research efforts in this field since its introduction by the TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) investigators in 1985.¹ TIMI flow grades 0 (no flow), 1 (minimal flow), 2 (partial flow), or 3 (complete flow) are now an integral part of the unique vocabulary of cardiologists the world over. This flow characterization has the virtue of being as accessible as the nearest video monitor or cineangiographic viewer and can be obtained quickly, at no additional cost. TIMI flow measurements have appeared to be extremely useful as prognostic indicators of the long-term success or failure of thrombolysis,² to risk-stratify patients,³ and to compare the efficacy of various thrombolytic regimens.⁴ Since large mortality trials are expensive and difficult to perform, the 90-minute TIMI flow grade often has been used as a surrogate end point. Early investigators subdivided patients into two groups: TIMI flow grades 0 and 1 at 90 minutes (an undesirable outcome) and TIMI flow grades 2 and 3 (a favorable outcome). More recent investigators have shown considerable differences in the clinical results achieved between TIMI flow grades 2 and 3. A retrospective analysis of four German multicenter thrombolytic trials by Vogt et al⁵ showed that only patients achieving TIMI flow grade 3 after thrombolysis fared better than TIMI grades 0 and 1. Similar outcomes were obtained by the TEAM-2 investigators, who found that only TIMI flow grade 3 . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. K. French, T. A. Hyde, I. T. Straznicky, J. Andrews, M. Lund, D. J. Amos, A. Zambanini, C. J. Ellis, B. J. Webber, S. C. McLaughlin, et al. Relationship between corrected TIMI frame counts at three weeks and late survival after myocardial infarction J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 1, 2000; 35(6): 1516 - 1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J K French, I T Straznicky, B J Webber, P E Aylward, M J Frey, A A J Adgey, B F Williams, S C McLaughlin, and H D White Angiographic frame counts 90 minutes after streptokinase predict left ventricular function at 48 hours following myocardial infarction Heart, February 1, 1999; 81(2): 128 - 133. [Abstract] [Full Text]