Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;120:1927-1932
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.844779
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitlock, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitlock, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Connolly, S. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coumarins
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow CV surgery: other
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Anticoagulants
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Surgical

(Circulation. 2009;120:1927-1932.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Controversies in Cardiovascular Medicine

Does left atrial appendage occlusion eliminate the need for warfarin?

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Does Not Eliminate the Need for Warfarin

Richard P. Whitlock, MD, MSc; Jeff S. Healey, MD; Stuart J. Connolly, MD

From the Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Correspondence to Dr Richard Whitlock, Suite 4E-422, 237 Barton St E, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. E-mail richard.whitlock@phri.ca


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    Introduction
 
A trial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained heart rhythm disorder. It is increasing in incidence, which has major societal implications for our aging population.1–3 It is estimated to affect 1% to 1.5% of the developed world, and the incidence increases with age to a rate of 19.2 per 1000 patient-years in those 65 years of age and older. The most important aspect of the treatment of patients with AF is the prevention of stroke. The average annual stroke rate across risk groups is 5%, and AF-associated strokes confer worse outcomes than those occurring in the absence of AF.1,4 Furthermore, Stroke Prevention in Nonrheumatic Atrial Fibrillation (SPINAF) data suggest that 15% of patients with AF suffer silent cerebral infarctions on computed tomography, the implications of which are unknown.5

Response by Holmes and Schwartz on p 1932

Oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy with warfarin has been established as the standard for stroke prevention in patients with AF and more than 1 risk factor for stroke.6 Hart et al have summarized this literature in meta-analyses that include 29 trials and 28 044 patients.7,8 Compared with placebo, warfarin reduced the rate of stroke by 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49% to 74%), and in trials of warfarin versus antiplatelet, warfarin reduced the rate of stroke by 37% (95% CI, 23% to 48%). This is a large treatment effect when compared with other drug therapies in cardiovascular medicine. Further, even with an absolute risk increase in intracerebral hemorrhage and major hemorrhage of 0.2% per . . . [Full Text of this Article]