This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Google Scholar Articles by Cakulev, I. Articles by Waldo, A. L. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cakulev, I. Articles by Waldo, A. L. Related Collections Ablation/ICD/surgery

(Circulation. 2009;120:1623-1632.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.

Historical Perspectives in Cardiology

Cardioversion

Past, Present, and Future

Ivan Cakulev, MD; Igor R. Efimov, PhD; Albert L. Waldo, MD

From the Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio (I.C., A.L.W.); and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, Mo (I.R.E.).

Correspondence to Ivan Cakulev, MD, Division of Cardiology, MS LKS 5038, University Hospitals of Cleveland Case Medical Center, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44106-5038. E-mail ivan.cakulev@case.edu

Key Words: cardioversion • defibrillation • fibrillation • heart arrest • tachyarrhythmias

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

	Introduction

 

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.

— —Leonardo da Vinci

Recent years have seen rapid proliferation of ablative and antiarrhythmic therapies for treating various ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. Yet cardioversion and defibrillation remain the main modalities to restore normal sinus rhythm. Their simplicity, reliability, safety, and, most important, their efficacy in promptly restoring normal sinus rhythm are unmatched in our current treatment armamentarium.

	History

 
The Early Work
Contemporary cardiology has been significantly affected by the ready availability of this simple method for terminating atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias. However, fascination with electricity and its use in biological systems is hardly contemporary. The first capacitor that was able to store electric energy in a glass container was discovered in 1745. It was named the Leyden jar, and its use was shortly thereafter tested in the electrocution of small animals. There is a large body of literature in Italy, France, and England on biological and medical application of electricity dating from the 17th and 18th centuries. Although physicians across Europe started using electricity as an experimental treatment, the earliest recorded scientific approach with the use of electric shocks was that of Peter Abildgaard in 1775.¹ He systematically shocked hens, delivering electric charges in different parts of their body. Electric stimuli applied anywhere across the body of the hen, particularly in the head, could render the animal lifeless, but subsequent shocks delivered to the chest could revive the heart.

Abildgaard was only one of the several scientists who studied the effects of electricity on animals. Some reported similar findings, . . . [Full Text of this Article]