Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2009;119:3165-3167
Published online before print June 15, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.873430
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
119/25/3165    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.109.873430v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Myers, J.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Myers, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2009;119:3165-3167.)
© 2009 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Exercise Capacity and Prognosis in Chronic Heart Failure

Jonathan Myers, PhD

From the VA Palo Alto Heath Care System and Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.

Correspondence to Jonathan Myers, PhD, VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Cardiology 111C, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA 94304. E-mail drj993@aol.com


Key Words: Editorials • epidemiology • exercise • heart failure


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

The association among fitness, health, and longevity is probably as old as there are historical records. The writings of the classic Greek physicians Herodicus, Hippocrates, and Galen are replete with references to fitness, and each believed that a healthy body was a prerequisite for mental well-being.1 The US founding fathers were also conscious of the importance of fitness. Benjamin Franklin advocated 15 minutes of brisk stair climbing at intervals throughout the day, along with swimming and the use of dumbbells for health purposes.2 Thomas Jefferson recognized the need for fitness, although perhaps to an extreme, when he wrote, "Not less than 2 hours a day should be devoted to exercise and the weather shall be little regarded. If the body is feeble, the mind will not be strong."3 Of course, none of these historical icons was cognizant that we would one day routinely measure an individual’s maximal physiological response to maximal exertion under controlled circumstances. Nor could they have imagined that the exercise test would be a valuable tool to predict the consequences of diseases related to 21st-century lifestyles.

Article see p 3189

The use of the exercise test to stratify risk and optimize clinical management for patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) spans several decades. However, evidence of the importance of exercise capacity as a risk marker in patients with CVD is relatively recent, and clinical practice has yet to embrace this evidence. In a growing number of studies, exercise capacity has been shown to outperform traditional markers of risk . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Importance of Treadmill Exercise Time as an Initial Prognostic Screening Tool in Patients With Systolic Left Ventricular Dysfunction
Eileen Hsich, Eiran Z. Gorodeski, Randall C. Starling, Eugene H. Blackstone, Hemant Ishwaran, and Michael S. Lauer
Circulation 2009 119: 3189-3197. [Abstract] [Full Text]