Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;114:2575-2577
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.668707
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudette, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, I. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudette, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, I. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Contractile function
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Heart failure - basic studies

(Circulation. 2006;114:2575-2577.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Cardiac Regeneration

Materials Can Improve the Passive Properties of Myocardium, but Cell Therapy Must Do More

Glenn R. Gaudette, PhD; Ira S. Cohen, MD, PhD

From the Department of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, Mass (G.R.G.), and Department of Physiology and Biophysics and Institute for Molecular Cardiology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY (I.S.C.).

Correspondence to Glenn R. Gaudette, PhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, 100 Institute Road, Worcester, MA 01609. E-mail gaudette@wpi.edu


Key Words: Editorials • myocardium • cells • mechanics


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Cellular therapy to replace lost myocardial mass with new, contractile myocardium has the potential to revolutionize the treatment of myocardial infarction and heart failure. Studies have shown small but consistent improvements in mechanical function, largely independent of the cell type chosen. The reasons for this lack of specificity are presently unknown. In the current issue of Circulation, Wall et al1 present computational models that suggest that the injection of passive materials alone may improve ejection fraction and reduce wall stress in the ventricle. The present study raises the possibility that some cellular therapies contribute to increased heart function purely through a passive mechanism rather than through active contraction associated with the addition of new myocytes. Because materials lack many of the uncertainties associated with cellular therapies (eg, mode of delivery, homing, immune rejection, arrhythmias), and because they can be engineered to have a number of inherent advantages (eg, uniformity, reliability, greater safety, reduced cost), one conclusion of the current finding is that biomaterials alone may be important for future cardiac therapy.

Article p 2627

Given the results of this study by Wall and colleagues,1 it is also clear that passive contribution must be separated from active contribution to evaluate the efficacy of any cell therapy approach. Passive contribution can result from replacing a stiff material, such as an infarct, with a more compliant material. Completely replacing the infarcted tissue with a compliant scaffold can accomplish this task. Matsubayashi and colleagues2 demonstrated that passive properties can improve global heart function . . . [Full Text of this Article]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CirculationHome page
N. Landa, L. Miller, M. S. Feinberg, R. Holbova, M. Shachar, I. Freeman, S. Cohen, and J. Leor
Effect of Injectable Alginate Implant on Cardiac Remodeling and Function After Recent and Old Infarcts in Rat
Circulation, March 18, 2008; 117(11): 1388 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]