This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jones, R. H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Jones, R. H. Related Collections CV surgery: coronary artery disease

(Circulation. 2006;114:2090-2091.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorial

Does Government Regulation Enhance Quality of Cardiovascular Procedures?

Robert H. Jones, MD

From the Department of Surgery/Duke, Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Correspondence to Robert H. Jones, MD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715. E-mail jones060@mc.duke.edu

Key Words: Editorials • bypass • morbidity • mortality • statistics

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

Cardiovascular specialists encumbered with excessive intrusion into the patient-doctor relationship will likely agree with the conclusion of DiSesa et al¹ that the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) mortality rate was not different between the 26 states with certificate-of-need (CON) programs and the 24 states without CON regulation. Data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons’ (STS) National Cardiac Database (NCD) on 595 200 patients undergoing isolated CABG procedures for 4 consecutive years ending in 2003 used the STS NCD risk-stratification algorithm to predict an equivalent occurrence of death after CABG during hospitalization or within 30 days for both the 280 512 patients treated in non-CON states and the 314 710 patients treated CON states (Table 5 in DiSesa et al¹). The observed perioperative CABG mortality rate was 2.52% for CON states and 2.62% for states without CON regulations (odds ratio [OR]=0.97, P=0.32).

Article p 2122

Text in italics below represents the reflections of a hypothetical potential CABG patient. This artificial dialog was created to help cardiovascular specialists keep the patient at the center of our frame of reference when evaluating any quality-of-patient-care program. Although Dr Jones penned these words, he is not now and hopes never to be a potential CABG patient.

From the perspective of an informed patient in need of CABG, my concern is that before operation, patients in both CON and non-CON states were expected to have the same operative risk, and yet an additional 1 out of 1000 patients died in non-CON states compared with . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. J. Ryan To Understand Cardiac Surgical Report Cards: Look Both Ways Circulation, March 27, 2007; 115(12): 1508 - 1510. [Full Text] [PDF]