(Circulation. 2006;113:333-335.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From the Department of Medicine (Division of General Medicine and Primary Care), Brigham and Womens Hospital, and the Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to John Z. Ayanian, MD, MPP, Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, 180 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail ayanian@hcp.med.harvard.edu
Key Words: Editorials angioplasty bypass catheterization stents
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Publicly funded Medicare programs in the United States and Canada face daunting fiscal challenges in the decades ahead. Since 1965, the US Medicare program has provided access to physicians and hospitals for elderly Americans, and the Canadian Medicare program has provided similar coverage for Canadians of all ages since 1967. Paying for growing numbers of enrollees in these Medicare programs to receive effective but expensive tests and treatments has begun to strain government budgets and the tax systems that support them.
Article pp 374 and 380
The stakes are particularly high for patients with coronary heart disease (CHD). As a leading cause of mortality and morbidity in both countries, CHD remains a fertile field of innovation to improve health outcomes. If new tests and treatments are used indiscriminately, however, their impact may be minimal for many patients, deleterious for some patients, and costly for society.
Two studies in this issue of Circulation document the dramatic rise in cardiac procedures since 1992 in the United States and Canada, respectively.1,2 Each of these studies used claims data from its Medicare program to assess rates of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cardiac procedures through 2001 and to estimate the diagnostic "yield" of stress tests and cardiac catheterizations that led to subsequent procedures. The US study included all elderly adults receiving fee-for-service care in the US Medicare program,1 and the Canadian study included adults of all ages residing in Ontario.2
In both countries, increases in procedure rates over time were most pronounced for stress
Related Articles:
Circulation 2006 113: 374-379.
Circulation 2006 113: 380-387.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. K. Nallamothu and J. D. Birkmeyer Specialty Cardiac Hospitals and Coronary Revascularization Rates--Reply JAMA, June 27, 2007; 297(24): 2696 - 2696. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. T. Yan, R. T. Yan, M. Tan, A. Fung, E. A. Cohen, D. H. Fitchett, A. Langer, S. G. Goodman, and for the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes 1 and 2 Management Patterns in Relation to Risk Stratification Among Patients With Non-ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Arch Intern Med, May 28, 2007; 167(10): 1009 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Singh, P. C. Austin, A. Chong, and D. A. Alter Coronary Angiography Following Acute Myocardial Infarction in Ontario, Canada Arch Intern Med, April 23, 2007; 167(8): 808 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Bittl Reply J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 18, 2006; 48(2): 416 - 416. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Use of Cardiac Tests and Procedures: U.S. and Canada Journal Watch Cardiology, March 16, 2006; 2006(316): 5 - 5. [Full Text] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2006 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |