Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2006;113:2784-2786
doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.632711
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Samuels, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Samuels, M. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - treatment
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - CV surgery
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - stroke
Right arrow Cerebrovascular disease/stroke
Right arrow CT and MRI
Right arrow CV surgery: aortic and vascular disease
Right arrow CV surgery: coronary artery disease
Right arrow CV surgery: valvular disease
Right arrow Acute Cerebral Infarction
Right arrow Acute Stroke Syndromes
Right arrow Behavioral Changes and Stroke
Right arrow Brain Circulation and Metabolism
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Computerized tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Right arrow Doppler ultrasound, Transcranial Doppler etc.
Right arrow Primary and Secondary Stroke Prevention

(Circulation. 2006;113:2784-2786.)
© 2006 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorial

Can Cognition Survive Heart Surgery?

Martin A. Samuels, MD

From the Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Correspondence to Dr Martin A. Samuels, Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Professor of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA. E-mail msamuels@partners.org


Key Words: Editorials • cognition • surgery


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

In this issue of Circulation, Jensen et al1 report that cognitive difficulties were no fewer when off-pump (OPCAB) versus conventional (CCAB) coronary artery bypass grafting was used. This important investigation, a substudy of the Best Bypass Surgery Trial, is a randomized prospective controlled trial that compares OPCAB with CCAB. Although the numbers seem relatively small (ie, 120 elderly patients with a men age of 76 years), the study was carefully powered to show differences in cognitive function at a mean of 103 days of follow-up. Although one could quibble with the details of the neuropsychological tests chosen (mini-mental state examination as a screening test for dementia after randomization but before inclusion, visual verbal learning, concept shifting, Stroop color word interference test, letter-digit coding), the main result is unequivocal. The incidence of cognitive decline was roughly 8%, and no difference between OPCAB and CCAB was found. This disappointing result raises important questions about the mechanisms of neurological injury caused by cardiac surgery and what future strategies might entail.

Article p 2790

Early in the development of cardiac surgery, it was psychiatrists who first reported difficulties with thought content and process. Rizzo et al2 reported on 32 patients under the care of Lewis Dexter (cardiologist) and Dwight Harken (cardiac surgeon) who underwent "finger fracture" valvuloplasty surgery for rheumatic mitral valve disease at the Peter Bent Brigham Hospital in Boston. These psychiatrists applied analytical explanations (eg, hysterical fantasies as the heart as a sexual organ, transference to the surgeon, depersonalization, narcissism) to . . . [Full Text of this Article]