Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2005;111:2865

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles

(Circulation. 2005;111:2865.)
© 2005 American Heart Association, Inc.

Issue Highlights


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 


*    FREEDOM FROM ATRIAL TACHYARRHYTHMIAS AFTER CATHETER ABLATION OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A RANDOMIZED COMPARISON BETWEEN 2 CURRENT ABLATION STRATEGIES, by Karch et al.
 
Catheter ablation for maintaining sinus rhythm increasingly is considered when atrial fibrillation is highly symptomatic despite antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Rapidly activating regions in and around the pulmonary veins are causative in many patients. Ablation techniques targeting these regions, reported results, and complications vary among centers. Comparative data for different approaches are limited. The randomized trial by Karch et al in this issue of Circulation compared 2 more commonly used approaches: ablation encircling a wide area around the pulmonary vein ostia guided by anatomy, versus an electrogram-guided approach ablating only segments of the pulmonary vein ostia. In contrast to a previous trial, the segmental ablation approach was associated with better arrhythmia control. Many recurrences were asymptomatic in both groups. Serious complications included tamponade, pulmonary vein stenosis, and thromboemboli. These findings add fuel to the continuing controversy as to the optimal method and support the practice of confining this procedure to highly symptomatic patients. See p 2875.


*    PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VERSUS CONSERVATIVE THERAPY IN NONACUTE CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE: A META-ANALYSIS, by Katritsis and Ioannidis.
 
Clinicians have often debated the incremental benefit of percutaneous coronary interventions for patients with stable angina. This study sought to synthesize the existing data by conducting a meta-analysis of the 11 randomized clinical trials of medical therapy versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with angiographically documented coronary stenoses in nonacute coronary artery disease settings. The study specifically sought to determine whether PCI was associated with a subsequent reduction in risk of mortality, cardiac death or myocardial infarction, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and coronary artery bypass grafting or PCI. The follow-up was more than 2 . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Articles:

Spontaneous Left Atrial Dissection Presenting as Pulmonary Edema
Jung-Hyun Choi, Jun-Kyu Kang, Kyung-Joo Park, Jo-Won Jung, So-Yeon Choi, Myeong-Ho Yoon, Gyo-Seung Hwang, Seung-Jea Tahk, and Joon-Han Shin
Circulation 2005 111: e372-e373. [Extract] [Full Text]

ST Elevation During Open Heart Surgery: Floating Air Bubble in Saphenous Vein Graft
Ken-ichi Komukai, Keiji Hirooka, Manabu Taneike, Yoshinori Yasuoka, Hiroyoshi Yamamoto, Katsuji Hashimoto, Wakatomi Chin, Yukihiro Koretsune, Hideo Kusuoka, and Yoshio Yasumura
Circulation 2005 111: e374. [Extract] [Full Text]

Fluorine-18–Labeled Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis and Management of Aortitis With Pulmonary Artery Involvement
Lisa Mielniczuk, Robert A. deKemp, Carole Dennie, Keiichiro Yoshinaga, Ian G. Burwash, Francois Bénard, Haissam Haddad, Donald S. Beanlands, and Rob S.B. Beanlands
Circulation 2005 111: e375-e376. [Extract] [Full Text]

Letter Regarding Article by Devereux et al, "Regression of Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy by Losartan Compared With Atenolol: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension (LIFE) Trial"
Michael F. O’Rourke and Michel E. Safar
Circulation 2005 111: e377. [Extract] [Full Text]

Freedom From Atrial Tachyarrhythmias After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Comparison Between 2 Current Ablation Strategies
Martin R. Karch, Bernhard Zrenner, Isabel Deisenhofer, Jürgen Schreieck, Gjin Ndrepepa, Jun Dong, Katrin Lamprecht, Petra Barthel, Etienne Luciani, Albert Schömig, and Claus Schmitt
Circulation 2005 111: 2875-2880. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Reduced Number of Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells Predicts Future Cardiovascular Events: Proof of Concept for the Clinical Importance of Endogenous Vascular Repair
Caroline Schmidt-Lucke, Lothar Rössig, Stephan Fichtlscherer, Mariuca Vasa, Martina Britten, Ulrike Kämper, Stefanie Dimmeler, and Andreas M. Zeiher
Circulation 2005 111: 2981-2987. [Abstract] [Full Text]

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Conservative Therapy in Nonacute Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis
Demosthenes G. Katritsis and John P.A. Ioannidis
Circulation 2005 111: 2906-2912. [Abstract] [Full Text]