Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;108:1534-1536
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000094408.38603.7E
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mark, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lauer, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mark, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Lauer, M. S.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Coronary Artery Disease
Related Collections
Right arrow Exercise testing
Right arrow Behavioral/psychosocial - CV surgery
Right arrow Exercise/exercise testing/rehabilitation
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2003;108:1534.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Focused Perspective

Exercise Capacity

The Prognostic Variable That Doesn’t Get Enough Respect

Daniel B. Mark, MD, MPH; Michael S. Lauer, MD

From the Outcomes Research and Assessment Group, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC (D.B.M.), and the Department of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio (M.S.L.)

Correspondence to Daniel B. Mark, MD, MPH, Professor of Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, PO Box 17969, Durham, NC 27715. E-mail daniel.mark@duke.edu


Key Words: Editorials • exercise • coronary disease • prognosis


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Clinicians have long been aware that patients capable of high levels of physical exertion have a better prognosis than those with limited exercise capacity. Although the initial clinical encounter usually suffices to gain a qualitative appreciation of functional capacity, more precision can be obtained from formal graded exercise testing. In both asymptomatic subjects and patients with clinical coronary artery disease (CAD), exercise-based measures of functional capacity repeatedly have been shown to provide powerful independent prognostic information.1,2 Yet when decisions are made about the role and value of exercise testing in clinical cardiology, the focus is inevitably on measures believed to reflect the state of the coronary arterial circulation and the potential need for angiography and revascularization. The widespread tendency to ignore exercise capacity in clinical management seems to be a function of a general uncertainty about its therapeutic implications. Stress-induced ischemia may be less important prognostically, but its message seems clear: Fix the plumbing.

See p 1554

In symptomatic CAD patients, exercise capacity typically is used to provide the context in which ischemic responses are interpreted.3 Thus, ischemia in the setting of poor exercise capacity means high risk, whereas in the setting of good exercise capacity, ischemia (even when measured with nuclear perfusion techniques) has little prognostic impact.4 In asymptomatic subjects, in whom evidence of ischemia is quite infrequent, the utility of exercise capacity has been more of a puzzle. In the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Exercise Testing Guidelines,5 exercise testing for routine screening of asymptomatic men and . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Exercise Capacity and the Risk of Death in Women: The St James Women Take Heart Project
Martha Gulati, Dilip K. Pandey, Morton F. Arnsdorf, Diane S. Lauderdale, Ronald A. Thisted, Roxanne H. Wicklund, Arfan J. Al-Hani, and Henry R. Black
Circulation 2003 108: 1554-1559. [Abstract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
A. Kumar and C. P. Cannon
Acute Coronary Syndromes: Diagnosis and Management, Part II
Mayo Clin. Proc., November 1, 2009; 84(11): 1021 - 1036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Myers
Exercise Capacity and Prognosis in Chronic Heart Failure
Circulation, June 30, 2009; 119(25): 3165 - 3167.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. N. Peterson, D. J. Magid, C. Ross, P. M. Ho, J. S. Rumsfeld, M. S. Lauer, E. E. Lyons, S. S. Smith, and F. A. Masoudi
Association of Exercise Capacity on Treadmill With Future Cardiac Events in Patients Referred for Exercise Testing
Arch Intern Med, January 28, 2008; 168(2): 174 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
N. Spielmann, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, T. Rice, J. S. Skinner, T. Rankinen, and C. Bouchard
Genome-wide linkage scan for submaximal exercise heart rate in the HERITAGE family study
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2007; 293(6): H3366 - H3371.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
C. L. Greenstone
Clinician's Corner: Type 2 Diabetes: A Disease of Epidemic Proportion That Is Largely Preventable But How?
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, October 1, 2007; 1(5): 335 - 338.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
N. Spielmann, A. S. Leon, D. C. Rao, T. Rice, J. S. Skinner, C. Bouchard, and T. Rankinen
CETP genotypes and HDL-cholesterol phenotypes in the HERITAGE Family Study
Physiol Genomics, September 11, 2007; 31(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. A. Slentz, J. A. Houmard, J. L. Johnson, L. A. Bateman, C. J. Tanner, J. S. McCartney, B. D. Duscha, and W. E. Kraus
Inactivity, exercise training and detraining, and plasma lipoproteins. STRRIDE: a randomized, controlled study of exercise intensity and amount
J Appl Physiol, August 1, 2007; 103(2): 432 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
L. J. Ignarro, M. L. Balestrieri, and C. Napoli
Nutrition, physical activity, and cardiovascular disease: An update
Cardiovasc Res, January 15, 2007; 73(2): 326 - 340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. Mora, R. F. Redberg, A. R. Sharrett, and R. S. Blumenthal
Enhanced Risk Assessment in Asymptomatic Individuals With Exercise Testing and Framingham Risk Scores
Circulation, September 13, 2005; 112(11): 1566 - 1572.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. E. Kraus and P. S. Douglas
Where Does Fitness Fit In?
N. Engl. J. Med., August 4, 2005; 353(5): 517 - 519.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. S. Leon, B. A. Franklin, F. Costa, G. J. Balady, K. A. Berra, K. J. Stewart, P. D. Thompson, M. A. Williams, and M. S. Lauer
Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity), in Collaboration With the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Circulation, January 25, 2005; 111(3): 369 - 376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. T. Levy, A. J. Hartz, P. A. James, M. Gulati, D. K. Pandey, M. F. Arnsdorf, D. S. Lauderdale, R. A. Thisted, R. H. Wicklund, and H. R. Black
Exercise Capacity and the Risk of Death in Women * Response
Circulation, May 25, 2004; 109(20): e224 - e224.
[Full Text] [PDF]