(Circulation. 2003;108:6.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorials |
From the HarvardMIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass (E.R.E., H.D.D.); Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Womens Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (E.R.E.); and Department of Cardiology, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel (H.D.D.).
Correspondence to Elazer R. Edelman, MD, PhD, MIT Bldg 16-343, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139. E-mail ere@mit.edu
Key Words: Editorials transplantation rejection vasculature
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Pour faire dune pierre deux coups1
Heart transplantation can now be routinely performed. Acute rejection has been significantly reduced, and the limitations to the use of this procedure include the availability of organs, chronic rejection, and a late reaction that is driven by a unique vasculopathy. Post-transplant vasculopathy (PTV) shares features with the lipoprotein-driven native atherosclerosis and proliferation-driven postangioplasty restenosis, but it has been thought to be more sensitive to immune forces. These distinctions are critical, for they dictate our choice of therapy. Hypercholesterolemia dictates treatments that lower lipoproteins or their effects; thrombotic events require antiplatelet agents, antithrombotics, and even agents that interfere with the clotting cascade; proliferative and migratory events can be inhibited by directed agents; and an immune disease would suggest use of immunosuppressants. To date, statins and immunosuppressants have been the mainstay of therapy for patients with heart transplants. These drugs were intended to simultaneously reduce rejection and post-transplant vasculopathy by limiting excessive lipid accumulation and exuberant inflammation. Recent reports, including the findings by Mancini et al2 reported in this issue of Circulation, suggest that although reduction in rejection may directly follow from direct control of the immune response, the same is not true for the vasculopathy. Vascular disease in heart transplant patients is effectively controlled by an agent classified as an immunosuppressant but not because of immune modulation, rather because of antiproliferative effects.2
See p 48
Post-Transplant Vasculopathy
PTV is an aggressive and diffuse coronary arteriopathy that occurs in heart transplant recipients. With an annual incidence rate
Related Article:
Circulation 2003 108: 48-53.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Yang, J. Ge, H. Liu, K. Zhao, X. Liu, X. Qu, W. Li, Y. Huang, A. Sun, and Y. Zou Arsenic trioxide eluting stent reduces neointima formation in a rabbit iliac artery injury model Cardiovasc Res, December 1, 2006; 72(3): 483 - 493. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Wiggins and S. Spinler Antiplatelet and Antithrombin Therapy for Early Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes Journal of Pharmacy Practice, October 1, 2004; 17(5): 347 - 369. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Banai, S.D. Gertz, L. Gavish, M. Chorny, L. S. Perez, G. Lazarovichi, M. Ianculuvich, M. Hoffmann, M. Orlowski, G. Golomb, et al. Tyrphostin AGL-2043 eluting stent reduces neointima formation in porcine coronary arteries Cardiovasc Res, October 1, 2004; 64(1): 165 - 171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |