Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2003;107:3121-3123
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000074243.02378.80
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gould, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carabello, B. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gould, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Carabello, B. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Hypertrophy
Right arrow Valvular heart disease
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrowRelated Article

(Circulation. 2003;107:3121.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.


Editorials

Why Angina in Aortic Stenosis With Normal Coronary Arteriograms?

K. Lance Gould, MD; Blase A. Carabello, MD

From the Department of Medicine, Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Baylor College of Medicine (B.A.C.), and Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, The University of Texas–Houston Medical School (K.L.G.).

Correspondence to Blase A. Carabello, MD, Chief, Medical Service (111), Houston Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 2002 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030. E-mail blaseanthony.carabello@med.va.gov


Key Words: Editorials • stenosis • angina • myocardium • hypertrophy


An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.
 

Hypertrophy is considered one of the major mechanisms of the myocardium for adapting to hemodynamic overload. More muscle mass provides more contractile elements for generating the extra work required by the overload. In pressure overload of aortic valve stenosis, concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) normalizes wall stress, a key determinant of ejection performance.1 Afterload is often expressed as wall stress (pressurexradius/thickness). As the pressure term in the numerator increases, it is offset by an increase in the thickness term of the denominator. In this way, the high systolic pressure required to drive blood through even a very stenotic aortic valve can be consistent with normal afterload and normal ejection fraction.

See p 3170

Unfortunately, hypertrophy not only provides benefits but also has many pathological consequences. One of these is myocardial ischemia and the attendant angina reported by patients with aortic stenosis despite normal epicardial coronary arteries. The onset of angina greatly increases the risk of sudden death compared with the risk in asymptomatic patients with aortic valve stenosis.2,3

Angina occurs when myocardial oxygen demand exceeds supply. Demand is proportional to heart rate and wall stress, and the latter can be elevated in cases of aortic stenosis when hypertrophy is inadequate to normalize stress.1 After aortic valve replacement, there is marked regression of hypertrophy that may occur over the next several months to years,4 but angina is relieved immediately. Relief of angina immediately after surgery is probably due to the combination of sudden decreased oxygen demand after removal of . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Related Article:

Functional Changes in Coronary Microcirculation After Valve Replacement in Patients With Aortic Stenosis
Kim Rajappan, Ornella E. Rimoldi, Paolo G. Camici, Nicholas G. Bellenger, Dudley J. Pennell, and Desmond J. Sheridan
Circulation 2003 107: 3170-3175. [Abstract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
D. Garcia, P. G. Camici, L.-G. Durand, K. Rajappan, E. Gaillard, O. E. Rimoldi, and P. Pibarot
Impairment of coronary flow reserve in aortic stenosis
J Appl Physiol, January 1, 2009; 106(1): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. Rev.Home page
N. Westerhof, C. Boer, R. R. Lamberts, and P. Sipkema
Cross-talk between cardiac muscle and coronary vasculature.
Physiol Rev, October 1, 2006; 86(4): 1263 - 1308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
P Pibarot and J G Dumesnil
Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention
Heart, August 1, 2006; 92(8): 1022 - 1029.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
Z. B. Popovic, U. N. Khot, G. M. Novaro, F. Casas, N. L. Greenberg, M. J. Garcia, G. S. Francis, and J. D. Thomas
Effects of sodium nitroprusside in aortic stenosis associated with severe heart failure: pressure-volume loop analysis using a numerical model
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, January 1, 2005; 288(1): H416 - H423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Weerasinghe, M. Yusuf, T. Athanasiou, A. Wood, P. Magee, and R. Uppal
Role of transvalvular gradient in outcome from valve replacement for aortic stenosis
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2004; 77(4): 1266 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]