| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2003;107:2525.)
© 2003 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From the Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.
Correspondence to Bertram Pitt, MD, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical Center, 1500 East Medical Center Drive, 3910 Taubman Center, Ann Arbor, MI 30306. E-mail bpitt@umich.edu
Key Words: Editorials myocardial infarction ventricles
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
Aldosterone blockade (AB) has found increasing use in patients with severe heart failure due to systolic left ventricular dysfunction based on the results of the Randomized ALdactone Evaluation Study (RALES).1 The role of AB in patients with acute myocardial infarction has been uncertain, however. This situation is about to change with the availability of the results of the Eplerenone Post acute myocardial infarction Heart failure Efficacy and SUrvival Study (EPHESUS)2 and the results of the study by Hayashi et al3 in this issue of Circulation.
See p 2559
The EPHESUS study2 of over 6600 patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by evidence of systolic left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction
40%) and signs of heart failure showed that the selective AB with eplerenone, when administered at a dose of up to 50 mg daily (mean dose 42 mg daily) between days 3 and 14 after infarction (mean 7.3 days) in addition to standard therapy which could include reperfusion, aspirin, statins, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), and a ß-blocker, resulted in a 15% reduction in total mortality (P=0.008) and a 17% reduction in cardiovascular mortality (P=0.005), mainly due to a 21% reduction in sudden cardiac death (P=0.03). There was also a 13% (P=0.002) reduction in the co-primary endpoint of cardiovascular mortality/cardiovascular hospitalization (including hospitalization for non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, heart failure, and ventricular arrhythmias). The reduction in cardiovascular hospitalizations was mainly attributable to a 15% (P=0.03)
Related Article:
Circulation 2003 107: 2559-2565.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. M. Kaplan The Choice of Thiazide Diuretics: Why Chlorthalidone May Replace Hydrochlorothiazide Hypertension, November 1, 2009; 54(5): 951 - 953. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pitt, A. Ahmed, T. E. Love, H. Krum, J. Nicolau, J. S. Cardoso, A. Parkhomenko, M. Aschermann, R. Corbalan, H. Solomon, et al. History of Hypertension and Eplerenone in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Heart Failure Hypertension, August 1, 2008; 52(2): 271 - 278. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Solomon and B. Pitt Aldosterone Blockade in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction * Response Circulation, December 23, 2003; 108 (25): e173 - e173. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2003 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |