This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grayburn, P. A. Articles by Eichhorn, E. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Grayburn, P. A. Articles by Eichhorn, E. J. Related Collections Valvular heart disease CV surgery: valvular disease

(Circulation. 2002;106:763.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.

Editorial

Dobutamine Challenge for Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis

Paul A. Grayburn, MD; Eric J. Eichhorn, MD

From the Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, VA Medical Center, and the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex.

Correspondence to Paul A. Grayburn, MD, Cardiology (111A), VA Medical Center, 4500 S Lancaster Rd, Dallas, TX 75216. E-mail paul.grayburn@ utsouthwestern.edu

Key Words: Editorials • stenosis • cardiomyopathy • inotropic agents • hemodynamics

An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract.

In adults with valvular aortic stenosis (AS), valve replacement is recommended in the presence of symptoms and severely reduced aortic valve area (AVA).¹ In such patients, valve replacement improves symptoms and survival, even in the setting of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. LV dysfunction in severe AS is usually due to afterload mismatch; valve replacement relieves the afterload excess imposed by the stenotic valve and improves LV performance. ² However, a subset of patients with " severe" AS, LV dysfunction, and low-transvalvular gradient has been reported to have a relatively high operative mortality and poor prognosis.^2–4 This clinical scenario has been termed "low-flow, low-gradient AS." Accurate assessment of AVA in such patients is difficult because (1) calculated AVA is directly proportional to forward stroke volume, and (2) the Gorlin constant varies at low-flow states. ^5–7 Some patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS have a reduced AVA as a result of inadequate forward stroke volume rather than anatomic stenosis, a situation analogous to reduced anterior mitral leaflet excursion in dilated cardiomyopathy where there is not enough forward flow to fully open the valve. For example, Cannon et al ⁸ showed that some patients with low-gradient AS were found to have only mild AS at surgery despite a Gorlin AVA indicating critical AS. Obviously, surgical therapy is unlikely to benefit such patients because their primary pathology is a cardiomyopathy. On the other hand, patients with severe anatomic AS may benefit from valve replacement despite the increased operative risk associated with a low-flow, low-gradient hemodynamic state. The recent . . . [Full Text of this Article]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Wachtell Left ventricular systolic performance in asymptomatic aortic stenosis Eur. Heart J. Suppl., July 1, 2008; 10(suppl_E): E16 - E22. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J.-L. Monin, M. Monchi, M. E.W. Kirsch, H. Petit-Eisenmann, S. Baleynaud, C. Chauvel, D. Metz, C. Adams, J.-P. Quere, P. Gueret, et al. Low-gradient aortic stenosis: impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on survival Eur. Heart J., November 1, 2007; 28(21): 2620 - 2626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A. Carabello Aortic Stenosis: Two Steps Forward, One Step Back Circulation, June 5, 2007; 115(22): 2799 - 2800. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. A Pierard and P. Lancellotti Stress testing in valve disease Heart, June 1, 2007; 93(6): 766 - 772. [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. A. Lange and L. D. Hillis Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in Patients With Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1718 - 1720. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. A. Grayburn Assessment of Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis With Dobutamine Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 604 - 606. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Blais, I. G. Burwash, G. Mundigler, J. G. Dumesnil, N. Loho, F. Rader, H. Baumgartner, R. S. Beanlands, B. Chayer, L. Kadem, et al. Projected Valve Area at Normal Flow Rate Improves the Assessment of Stenosis Severity in Patients With Low-Flow, Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: The Multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) Study Circulation, February 7, 2006; 113(5): 711 - 721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. C. Roberts and J. M. Ko Relation of weights of operatively excised stenotic aortic valves to preoperative transvalvular peak systolic pressure gradients and to calculated aortic valve areas J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1847 - 1855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. P. Aurigemma and W. H. Gaasch Low flow-low gradient aortic stenosis: The pathologist weighs in J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 2, 2004; 44(9): 1856 - 1858. [Full Text] [PDF]