(Circulation. 2002;106:162.)
© 2002 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From the Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Md.
Correspondence to Claude Lenfant, MD, Dept of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail lenfantc@nhlbi.nih.gov
Key Words: Editorials genetics cardiovascular diseases
An extract of the first 250 words of the full text is provided, because this article has no abstract. |
In the spring of 1998, as members of both the House and Senate were signaling their interest in increasing National Institutes of Health (NIH) appropriations substantially over the next several years, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) convened the "SPARK Working Group, " a panel of prominent scientists, to identify extraordinary opportunities that should be funded with any significant increase in Institute resources.
With that objective in mind, the SPARK group set to work and ultimately identified four broad areas of scientific opportunity, as well as a number of enabling approaches. The areas are (1) Functional Genomics, (2) Gene-Gene and Gene-Environment Interactions, (3) Tissuegenesis/Organogenesis, and (4) Immunobiology. (See http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/fromdir/sparkweb.htm for a copy of the SPARK report.)
As the research community is well aware, the Congress did its part. The NHLBI has already received four substantial increases in its budget and, if the Presidents current budget proposal for fiscal year 2003 is approved by the Congress, the NIH budget will be double what it was in 1998.
The purpose of this editorial is to demonstrate that the Institute, in partnership with the community it serves, did its part, as well. Although the innovative programs developed in response to the SPARK report are too numerous to describe in detail, a few of the major ones are highlighted herein. They are testimony to the extraordinary vision of the SPARK participantsmuch of the focus of what they recommended and what was, in turn, implemented was on developing resources that would enable the
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. O. Cheng and C. Lenfant The SPARK That Burns Me Up * Response Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107 (3): e28 - e28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2002 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |