| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Circulation. 2001;103:483.)
© 2001 American Heart Association, Inc.
Editorial |
From the Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, and the Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Womens Hospital, Boston, Mass.
Correspondence to Lawrence H. Cohn, MD, Chief, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Womens Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail lcohn@partners.org
Key Words: Editorials bypass coronary disease
The use of the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is the "gold standard" of coronary artery revascularization, recognized by interventionalists and surgeons alike. The better size match with the coronary artery, the single anastomosis, and the biochemical and physical qualities of this conduit for the most important coronary artery in the human circulation, the LAD, are clear advantages over the saphenous vein graft.1 The seminal paper by Loop et al2 showed the important influence of this operation on the longevity of patients who are operated on for coronary artery disease, and their data have been substantiated by others.3 4
Nevertheless, the IMA has not been generally used by
surgeons in the variety of clinical coronary artery syndromes requiring
coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) because of some relative
contraindications. These have included left ventricular hypertrophy,
severe left ventricular dysfunction, emergency operations, chronic
obstructive pulmonary disease with enlarged lungs, advanced age, and an
obstructed left subclavian
artery.4 Theoretically,
increased conduit blood flow is considered necessary in these
situations, and this was thought best provided by a saphenous vein
graft to the LAD rather than a LIMA. Thus, the LIMA was not recommended
for emergent/urgent situations or in patients with the above
complications. Also, the longer harvest time of the IMA and the
increased bleeding tendency of the emergent patient, especially those
undergoing interventional procedures in the cardiac catheterization
laboratory who may be on some form of anticoagulation and in the
fragile elderly, were also considered
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Berroeta, A. Benbara, S. Provenchere, N. Ajzenberg, J. Benessiano, J.-P. Depoix, J.-M. Desmonts, B. Iung, and I. Philip A Comparison of Bilateral with Single Internal Mammary Artery Grafts on Postoperative Mediastinal Drainage and Transfusion Requirement Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2006; 103(6): 1380 - 1385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Karthik, A. K. Srinivasan, A. D. Grayson, T. Friede, and B. M. Fabri Effect of the Left Internal Mammary Artery to the Left Anterior Descending Artery on Mortality and Morbidity After Combined Coronary and Valve Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. H. Edwards, V. A. Ferraris, D. M. Shahian, E. Peterson, A. P. Furnary, C. K. Haan, and C. R. Bridges Gender-Specific Practice Guidelines for Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: Perioperative Management Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2005; 79(6): 2189 - 2194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Karthik, A. K. Srinivasan, A. D. Grayson, M. Jackson, and N. K. Mediratta Left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery: effect on morbidity and mortality and reasons for nonusage Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2004; 78(1): 142 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 2001 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |