Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 2000;101:e205-e206

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Czernin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rosen, S. D.
Right arrow Articles by Czernin, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nuclear cardiology and PET
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrow Endothelium/vascular type/nitric oxide

(Circulation. 2000;101:e205.)
© 2000 American Heart Association, Inc.


Circulation Electronic Pages

Endothelium-Dependent and -Independent Perfusion Reserve and the Effect of L-Arginine on Myocardial Perfusion in Patients With Syndrome X

Stuart D. Rosen, MA, MD, MRCP, FESC, FACC; Paolo G. Camici, MD, FRCP, FESC, FACC

MRC Cyclotron Unit, Imperial College School of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Du Cane Road, London W12 0NN, SDandA.Rosen@btinternet.com


*    Introduction
 
To the Editor:

We read the recent article by Bøttcher et al1 with interest. Unfortunately, the authors do not discuss their findings in the light of a previous study by our group.2 This study is quite relevant to their work and was published in Circulation 5 years ago. In our experiment, we also used positron emission tomography to measure myocardial blood flow (MBF) at rest and after the administration of intravenous dipyridamole in patients with syndrome X (n=29) and in a substantial control group (n=20). Our principal finding was that no significant differences existed between patients and controls with respect to myocardial blood flow (Figure 1Down). With a broader range of controls, Bøttcher et al’s corresponding figure (Figure 2Down) would probably not be distinguishable from ours.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Graph shows myocardial blood flow at rest and after dipyridamole (Dip.) in syndrome X patients and normal control subjects. Reproduced with permission from Reference 2.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Resting myocardial blood flow in mL · g-1 · min-1 and hyperemic myocardial blood flow after infusion of dipyridamole (DIP) 0.56 mL · kg-1 · min-1 in patients with syndrome X (n=25) and normal controls (group A, age-matched [n=15]; group B, young [n=15]). *P<0.05 rest vs DIP; +P<0.05 vs control group A; ¤P<0.05 vs control group B. Reproduced with permission from Reference 1.

Although Bøttcher et al’s data are quite consistent with ours in a number of respects, their interpretation of the data is perplexing. For example, on 2 occasions in . . . [Full Text of this Article]

Morten Bøttcher, MD; Hans Erik Bøtker, MD, PhD; Helle Sonne, MD; Torsten Toftegaard Nielsen, MD; Johannes Czernin, MD

Department of Cardiology B, University Hospital of Aarhus (SKS), DK-8200 Aarhus N, Denmark