Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Circulation. 1986;73:452-459

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zoghbi, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Quinones, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zoghbi, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Quinones, M. A.

Circulation, Vol 73, 452-459, Copyright © 1986 by American Heart Association


ARTICLES

Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography

WA Zoghbi, KL Farmer, JG Soto, JG Nelson and MA Quinones

Laminar flow through a conduit is equal to the mean velocity times the cross-sectional area of the orifice. Therefore, volume is equal to the time-velocity integral multiplied by the cross-sectional area. In aortic stenosis, flow in the stenotic jet is laminar and the aortic valve area should be equal to the volume of blood ejected through the valve divided by the time-velocity integral of the aortic jet velocity recorded by continuous-wave Doppler echocardiography. To test whether this concept can be used to accurately determine aortic valve area noninvasively by the Doppler method, 39 patients (age 35 to 82 years, mean 63) underwent pulsed Doppler combined with two-dimensional echocardiography for measurement of stroke volume at the aortic, pulmonic, and mitral anulus as well as continuous-wave Doppler recording of the aortic jet. Aortic valve area determined at cardiac catheterization by the Gorlin equation ranged between 0.4 and 2.07 cm2 (mean 0.89 +/- 0.45). Doppler-derived valve area, determined with the stroke volume value from either the aortic, pulmonic, or mitral anulus, correlated well with the area determined at cardiac catheterization (r = .95, .97, and .96, respectively). A simplified method for measuring aortic valve area derived as the cross-sectional area of the aortic anulus times peak velocity just proximal to the aortic valve divided by peak aortic jet velocity correlated well with measurements obtained at cardiac catheterization (r = .94). An excellent separation between critical and noncritical aortic stenosis was seen using either one of the Doppler methods.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
J. L. Gutierrez-Chico, J. L. Zamorano, E. Prieto-Moriche, R. A. Hernandez-Antolin, M. Bravo-Amaro, L. Perez de Isla, M. Sanmartin-Fernandez, J. A. Baz-Alonso, and A. Iniguez-Romo
Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in aortic stenosis: a novel, simple, and reliable method to improve accuracy in area calculation
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2008; 29(10): 1296 - 1306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. K. Poh, R. A. Levine, J. Solis, L. Shen, M. Flaherty, Y.-J. Kang, J. L. Guerrero, and J. Hung
Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography
Eur. Heart J., February 9, 2008; (2008) ehn022v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
A.-C. Pouleur, J.-B. le Polain de Waroux, A. Pasquet, J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde, and B. L. Gerber
Aortic Valve Area Assessment: Multidetector CT Compared with Cine MR Imaging and Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography
Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 745 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S. H Little, K.-L. Chan, and I. G Burwash
Impact of blood pressure on the Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of aortic stenosis
Heart, July 1, 2007; 93(7): 848 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
S. Goland, A. Trento, K. Iida, L. S C Czer, M. De Robertis, T. Z Naqvi, K. Tolstrup, T. Akima, H. Luo, and R. J Siegel
Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach
Heart, July 1, 2007; 93(7): 801 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. H. Ix, G. M. Chertow, M. G. Shlipak, V. M. Brandenburg, M. Ketteler, and M. A. Whooley
Association of Fetuin-A With Mitral Annular Calcification and Aortic Stenosis Among Persons With Coronary Heart Disease: Data From the Heart and Soul Study
Circulation, May 15, 2007; 115(19): 2533 - 2539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
H. Alkadhi, S. Wildermuth, A. Plass, D. Bettex, B. Baumert, S. Leschka, L. M. Desbiolles, B. Marincek, and T. Boehm
Aortic Stenosis: Comparative Evaluation of 16-Detector Row CT and Echocardiography
Radiology, July 1, 2006; 240(1): 47 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
L. A. Cuniberti, P. G. Stutzbach, E. Guevara, G. G. Yannarelli, R. P. Laguens, and R. R. Favaloro
Development of Mild Aortic Valve Stenosis in a Rabbit Model of Hypertension
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 6, 2006; 47(11): 2303 - 2309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Kupfahl, M Honold, G Meinhardt, H Vogelsberg, A Wagner, H Mahrholdt, and U Sechtem
Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques
Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(8): 893 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
W. A. Zoghbi, M. Enriquez-Sarano, E. Foster, P. A. Grayburn, C. D. Kraft, R. A. Levine, P. Nihoyannopoulos, C. M. Otto, M. A. Quinones, H. Rakowski, et al.
American Society of Echocardiography: recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography : A report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee and The Task Force on Valvular Regurgitation, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Echocardiography Committee, The Cardiac Imaging Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology, The American Heart Association, and the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Echocardiography, represented by:
Eur J Echocardiogr, December 1, 2003; 4(4): 237 - 261.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
S. D. Caruthers, S. J. Lin, P. Brown, M. P. Watkins, T. A. Williams, K. A. Lehr, and S. A. Wickline
Practical Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Quantification of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Comparison With Echocardiography
Circulation, November 4, 2003; 108(18): 2236 - 2243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HypertensionHome page
F. Antonini-Canterin, G. Huang, E. Cervesato, P. Faggiano, D. Pavan, R. Piazza, and G. L. Nicolosi
Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis: Does Systemic Hypertension Play an Additional Role?
Hypertension, June 1, 2003; 41(6): 1268 - 1272.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. Palka, S. Harrocks, A. Lange, D. J. Burstow, and M. F. O'Brien
Primary Aortic Valve Replacement With Cryopreserved Aortic Allograft: An Echocardiographic Follow-Up Study of 570 Patients
Circulation, January 1, 2002; 105(1): 61 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
J.-L. Monin, M. Monchi, V. Gest, A.-M. Duval-Moulin, J.-L. Dubois-Rande, and P. Gueret
Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients: Risk stratification by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2101 - 2107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. S. Khan, R. J. Siegel, M. A. DeRobertis, C. E. Blanche, R. M. Kass, W. Cheng, G. P. Fontana, and A. Trento
Regression of hypertrophy after Carpentier-Edwards pericardial aortic valve replacement
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2000; 69(2): 531 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W.A. Schobel, W. Voelker, K.K. Haase, and K.-R. Karsch
Extent, determinants and clinical importance of pressure recovery in patients with aortic valve stenosis
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 1999; 20(18): 1355 - 1363.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J R Gonzalez-Juanatey, M V Fernandez, F G Sampedro, J M Garcia-Acuna, J B Garcia-Bengoechea, A A Cendon, and M G de la Pena
Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots
Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 149 - 155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
M. Arsenault, N. Masani, G. Magni, J. Yao, L. Deras, and N. Pandian
Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry: comparison with traditional Doppler data
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 1931 - 1937.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Asian Cardiovasc. Thorac. Ann.Home page
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter
Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves
Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K Dennig, H J Nesser, D Hall, H U Haase, and A Schömig
Determination of prestenotic flow volume using an automated method based on colour Doppler imaging for evaluating orifice area by the continuity equation: validation in a pulsatile flow model
Heart, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 324 - 330.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. M. Otto, I. G. Burwash, M. E. Legget, B. I. Munt, M. Fujioka, N. L. Healy, C. D. Kraft, C. Y. Miyake-Hull, and R. G. Schwaegler
Prospective Study of Asymptomatic Valvular Aortic Stenosis : Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Exercise Predictors of Outcome
Circulation, May 6, 1997; 95(9): 2262 - 2270.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey, J. M. Garca-Acuna, M. V. Fernandez, A. A. Cendon, V. C. Fuentes, J. B. Garcia-Bengoechea, and M. G. de la Pena
INFLUENCE OF THE SIZE OF AORTIC VALVE PROSTHESES ON HEMODYNAMICS AND CHANGE IN LEFT VENTRICULAR MASS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF AORTIC STENOSIS
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1996; 112(2): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Journal of Diagnostic Medical SonographyHome page
A. D. Waggoner, B. Barzilai, and J. E. Perez
Two-Dimensional Doppler Echocardiographic Derived Aortic Valve Area in Aortic Stenosis
Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, March 1, 1991; 7(2): 64 - 72.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
C. Veyrat, D. S. Beuve, Cl. Gourtchiglouian, S. Legeais, and D. Kalmanson
Quantification of Left-Sided Valvular Stenoses by Color Doppler Imaging of Jets
Angiology, May 1, 1990; 41(5): 352 - 364.
[Abstract] [PDF]