| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Circulation, Vol 72, 810-818, Copyright © 1985 by American Heart Association
T Skjaerpe, L Hegrenaes and L Hatle
In 30 patients with aortic stenosis, 14 of whom also had significant aortic
regurgitation, the velocities in the stenotic jet (V') and below the valve
(V) were recorded by Doppler ultrasound. With two-dimensional
echocardiography, two subvalvular areas (A) were calculated from
leading-to-leading edge ("large") and trailing-to-leading edge ("inner")
diameter measurements. The aortic valve area was calculated by the equation
of continuity (A' = A X peak V/peak V') and by calculating stroke volume
below the valve [A X integral of V (t) and dividing by the integral of V'
(t) (= A"). Based on cardiac output estimations from single-plane
angiographic images, Gorlin's formula was used to calculate invasive valve
areas. In patients with no or mild aortic regurgitation a second invasive
estimate was based on cardiac output measured by the Fick method. The best
correlation was found when A' (with "large" diameter) was compared with
invasive results based on cardiac output measured by the Fick method (r =
.89, SEE +/- 0.12, n = 16); the worst was found when A" (with "large"
diameter) was compared with invasive results based on cardiac output
measurements by single- plane angiography (r = .80, SEE +/- 0.20, n = 30).
The results indicate that valve area in patients with aortic stenosis can
be reliably estimated noninvasively, even in those with significant aortic
regurgitation.
ARTICLES
Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Gutierrez-Chico, J. L. Zamorano, E. Prieto-Moriche, R. A. Hernandez-Antolin, M. Bravo-Amaro, L. Perez de Isla, M. Sanmartin-Fernandez, J. A. Baz-Alonso, and A. Iniguez-Romo Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in aortic stenosis: a novel, simple, and reliable method to improve accuracy in area calculation Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2008; 29(10): 1296 - 1306. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Kojodjojo, N. Gohil, D. Barker, P. Youssefi, T.V. Salukhe, A. Choong, M. Koa-Wing, J. Bayliss, D.R. Hackett, and M.A. Khan Outcomes of elderly patients aged 80 and over with symptomatic, severe aortic stenosis: impact of patient's choice of refusing aortic valve replacement on survival QJM, April 27, 2008; (2008) hcn052v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Levy, M. Laurent, J. L. Monin, J. M. Maillet, A. Pasquet, T. Le Tourneau, H. Petit-Eisenmann, M. Gori, Y. Jobic, F. Bauer, et al. Aortic Valve Replacement for Low-Flow/Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Operative Risk Stratification and Long-Term Outcome: A European Multicenter Study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1466 - 1472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Poh, R. A. Levine, J. Solis, L. Shen, M. Flaherty, Y.-J. Kang, J. L. Guerrero, and J. Hung Assessing aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by continuity equation: a novel approach using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography Eur. Heart J., February 9, 2008; (2008) ehn022v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Enriquez-Sarano, V. T. Nkomo, and H. Michelena Principles and Practice of Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 315 - 348. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A.-C. Pouleur, J.-B. le Polain de Waroux, A. Pasquet, J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde, and B. L. Gerber Aortic Valve Area Assessment: Multidetector CT Compared with Cine MR Imaging and Transthoracic and Transesophageal Echocardiography Radiology, September 1, 2007; 244(3): 745 - 754. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Goland, A. Trento, K. Iida, L. S C Czer, M. De Robertis, T. Z Naqvi, K. Tolstrup, T. Akima, H. Luo, and R. J Siegel Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach Heart, July 1, 2007; 93(7): 801 - 807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Ix, G. M. Chertow, M. G. Shlipak, V. M. Brandenburg, M. Ketteler, and M. A. Whooley Association of Fetuin-A With Mitral Annular Calcification and Aortic Stenosis Among Persons With Coronary Heart Disease: Data From the Heart and Soul Study Circulation, May 15, 2007; 115(19): 2533 - 2539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-P. Quere, J.-L. Monin, F. Levy, H. Petit, S. Baleynaud, C. Chauvel, C. Pop, P. Ohlmann, C. Lelguen, P. Dehant, et al. Influence of Preoperative Left Ventricular Contractile Reserve on Postoperative Ejection Fraction in Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis Circulation, April 11, 2006; 113(14): 1738 - 1744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Josa, M. Castella, C. Pare, J. L. Bedini, R. Cartana, C. A. Mestres, J. L. Pomar, and J. Mulet Hemolysis in Mechanical Bileaflet Prostheses: Experience With the Bicarbon Valve Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2006; 81(4): 1291 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Probst, S. Le Scouarnec, A. Legendre, V. Jousseaume, P. Jaafar, J.-M. Nguyen, A. Chaventre, H. Le Marec, and J.-J. Schott Familial Aggregation of Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis in the Western Part of France Circulation, February 14, 2006; 113(6): 856 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sadik, B. Rundqvist, N. Selimovic, and O. Bech-Hanssen Improved stroke volume assessment in the aortic and mitral valves with a new method in subjects without regurgitation Eur J Echocardiogr, June 1, 2005; 6(3): 210 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Nash, E. Vitvitsky, J. Li, D. M. Cosgrove III, G. Pettersson, and R. A. Grimm Feasibility of Valve Repair for Regurgitant Bicuspid Aortic Valves--An Echocardiographic Study Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1473 - 1479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lim, J. L. Monin, M. Monchi, J. Garot, A. Pasquet, L. Hittinger, J. L. Vanoverschelde, A. Carayon, and P. Gueret Predictors of outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis and normal left ventricular function: role of B-type natriuretic peptide Eur. Heart J., November 2, 2004; 25(22): 2048 - 2053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C Kupfahl, M Honold, G Meinhardt, H Vogelsberg, A Wagner, H Mahrholdt, and U Sechtem Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques Heart, August 1, 2004; 90(8): 893 - 901. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Caruthers, S. J. Lin, P. Brown, M. P. Watkins, T. A. Williams, K. A. Lehr, and S. A. Wickline Practical Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Clinical Quantification of Aortic Valve Stenosis: Comparison With Echocardiography Circulation, November 4, 2003; 108(18): 2236 - 2243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. M. Novaro, R. Sachar, G. L. Pearce, D. L. Sprecher, and B. P. Griffin Association Between Apolipoprotein E Alleles and Calcific Valvular Heart Disease Circulation, October 14, 2003; 108(15): 1804 - 1808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G J Morgan-Hughes, P E Owens, C A Roobottom, and A J Marshall Three dimensional volume quantification of aortic valve calcification using multislice computed tomography Heart, October 1, 2003; 89(10): 1191 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. S. John, T. Dill, R. R. Brandt, M. Rau, W. Ricken, G. Bachmann, and C. W. Hamm Magnetic resonance to assess the aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: How does it compare to current diagnostic standards? J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., August 6, 2003; 42(3): 519 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Monin, J.-P. Quere, M. Monchi, H. Petit, S. Baleynaud, C. Chauvel, C. Pop, P. Ohlmann, C. Lelguen, P. Dehant, et al. Low-Gradient Aortic Stenosis: Operative Risk Stratification and Predictors for Long-Term Outcome: A Multicenter Study Using Dobutamine Stress Hemodynamics Circulation, July 22, 2003; 108(3): 319 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. W.T. Sawchuk, D. T. Wong, B. P. Kavanagh, and S. C. Siu Transthoracic echocardiography does not improve prediction of outcome over APACHE II in medical-surgical intensive care: [L'echocardiographie transthoracique n'ameliore pas la prediction des resultats par rapport au score APACHE II a l'unite des soins intensifs medicaux chirurgicaux] Can J Anesth, March 1, 2003; 50(3): 305 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Garcia, J. G. Dumesnil, L.-G. Durand, L. Kadem, and P. Pibarot Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 435 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Levine and E. Schwammenthal Stenosis is in the eye of the observer: impact of pressure recovery on assessing aortic valve area J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 5, 2003; 41(3): 443 - 445. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.A Glader, L.S Birgander, S Soderberg, H.P Ildgruben, P Saikku, A Waldenstrom, and G.H Dahlen Lipoprotein(a), Chlamydia pneumoniae, leptin and tissue plasminogen activator as risk markers for valvular aortic stenosis Eur. Heart J., January 2, 2003; 24(2): 198 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Dellgren, M.J. Eriksson, L.A. Brodin, and K. Radegran Eleven years' experience with the Biocor stentless aortic bioprosthesis: clinical and hemodynamic follow-up with long-term relative survival rate Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 22(6): 912 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Braunschweig, C. Linde, M.J. Eriksson, C. Hofman-Bang, and L. Ryden Continous haemodynamic monitoring during withdrawal of diuretics in patients with congestive heart failure Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2002; 23(1): 59 - 69. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, I. Wallentin, P. Ask, and B. Wranne Assessment of effective orifice area of prosthetic aortic valves with Doppler echocardiography: An in vivo and in vitro study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2001; 122(2): 287 - 295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Veyrat Those who faced turbulence and launched the era of flow dynamic concepts for cardiac investigation Cardiovasc Res, August 1, 2001; 51(2): 205 - 216. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Siu, M. Sermer, J. M. Colman, A. N. Alvarez, L.-A. Mercier, B. C. Morton, C. M. Kells, M. L. Bergin, M. C. Kiess, F. Marcotte, et al. Prospective Multicenter Study of Pregnancy Outcomes in Women With Heart Disease Circulation, July 31, 2001; 104(5): 515 - 521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Monin, M. Monchi, V. Gest, A.-M. Duval-Moulin, J.-L. Dubois-Rande, and P. Gueret Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients: Risk stratification by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 15, 2001; 37(8): 2101 - 2107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Schwammenthal, Z. Vered, Y. Moshkowitz, B. Rabinowitz, Z. Ziskind, A. K. Smolinski, and M. S. Feinberg Dobutamine Echocardiography in Patients With Aortic Stenosis and Left Ventricular Dysfunction : Predicting Outcome as a Function of Management Strategy Chest, June 1, 2001; 119(6): 1766 - 1777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Takakura, T. Sasaki, K. Hashimoto, T. Hachiya, K. Onoguchi, M. Oshiumi, and S. Takeuchi Hemodynamic evaluation of 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2001; 71(2): 609 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Becassis, M. Hayot, J.-M. Frapier, F. Leclercq, L. Beck, J.e. Brunet, E. Arnaud, C. Prefaut, P.-A. Chaptal, J. M. Davy, et al. Postoperative exercise tolerance after aortic valve replacement by small-size prosthesis: Functional consequence of small-size aortic prosthesis J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., September 1, 2000; 36(3): 871 - 877. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Schafers, F. Langer, D. Aicher, T. P. Graeter, and O. Wendler Remodeling of the aortic root and reconstruction of the bicuspid aortic valve Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2000; 70(2): 542 - 546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Vrandecic, F. A. Fantini, B. G. Filho, O. C. de Oliveira, I. M. da Costa Junior, and E. Vrandecic Retrospective clinical analysis of stented vs. stentless porcine aortic bioprostheses Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2000; 18(1): 46 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Enriquez-Sarano, A.-J. Basmadjian, A. Rossi, K. R. Bailey, J. B. Seward, and A. J. Tajik Progression of mitral regurgitation: A prospective Doppler echocardiographic study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1999; 34(4): 1137 - 1144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B J Bouma, R B A van den Brink, J H P van der Meulen, H A Verheul, E C Cheriex, H P M Hamer, E Dekker, K I Lie, and J G P Tijssen To operate or not on elderly patients with aortic stenosis: the decision and its consequences Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 143 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J R Gonzalez-Juanatey, M V Fernandez, F G Sampedro, J M Garcia-Acuna, J B Garcia-Bengoechea, A A Cendon, and M G de la Pena Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots Heart, August 1, 1999; 82(2): 149 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bech-Hanssen, K. Caidahl, B. Wall, P. Myken, S. Larsson, and I. Wallentin INFLUENCE OF AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT, PROSTHESIS TYPE, AND SIZEON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AND VENTRICULAR MASS IN PATIENTS WITH AORTIC STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 1999; 118(1): 57 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Takeda, H Rimington, and J Chambers The relation between transaortic pressure difference and flow during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis Heart, July 1, 1999; 82(1): 11 - 14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. L. Thomson, M. F. O'Brien, A. A. Almeida, P. J. Tesar, M. B. Davison, and D. J. Burstow Haemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression: a comparison of the stentless, stented and mechanical aortic valve replacement Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 1999; 13(5): 572 - 575. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Bech-Hanssen, I. Wallentin, E. Houltz, M. Beckman Suurkula, S. Larsson, and K. Caidahl Gender differences in patients with severe aortic stenosis: impact on preoperative left ventricular geometry and function, as well as early postoperative morbidity and mortality Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 1999; 15(1): 24 - 30. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Arsenault, N. Masani, G. Magni, J. Yao, L. Deras, and N. Pandian Variation of anatomic valve area during ejection in patients with valvular aortic stenosis evaluated by two-dimensional echocardiographic planimetry: comparison with traditional Doppler data J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 1, 1998; 32(7): 1931 - 1937. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-J. Schafers, R. Fries, F. Langer, N. Nikoloudakis, T. Graeter, and U. Grundmann VALVE-PRESERVING REPLACEMENT OF THE ASCENDING AORTA: REMODELING VERSUS REIMPLANTATION J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 1998; 116(6): 990 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Eriksson, G.o. Kallner, S. Rosfors, T. Ivert, and L.-A. Brodin Hemodynamic performance of cryopreserved aortic homograft valves during midterm follow-up J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 1, 1998; 32(4): 1002 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Cam, H. Gercekoglu, S. Celik, M. Gursurer, G. Tayyareci, H. Karabulut, A. Narin, T. Tezel, and B. Yigiter Dobutamine Stress Test to Evaluate Different Sizes of Prosthetic Aortic Valves Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 1998; 6(3): 166 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Isaaz, A. da Costa, J. P. de Pasquale, A. Cerisier, and M. Lamaud Use of the continuity equation for transesophageal Doppler assessment of severity of proximal left coronary artery stenosis: a quantitative coronary angiography validation study J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., July 1, 1998; 32(1): 42 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Tam, R. G. Masters, I. G. Burwash, A. D. Mayhew, and K.-L. Chan Management of Patients With Mild Aortic Stenosis Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 1998; 65(5): 1215 - 1219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. G. DeGroff, R. Shandas, and L. Valdes-Cruz Analysis of the Effect of Flow Rate on the Doppler Continuity Equation for Stenotic Orifice Area Calculations : A Numerical Study Circulation, April 28, 1998; 97(16): 1597 - 1605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K Dennig, H J Nesser, D Hall, H U Haase, and A Schömig Determination of prestenotic flow volume using an automated method based on colour Doppler imaging for evaluating orifice area by the continuity equation: validation in a pulsatile flow model Heart, April 1, 1998; 79(4): 324 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Maffei, M. Baroni, M. Terrazzi, F. Paoli, P. Ferrazzi, and A. Biagini Preoperative Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Aortic Stenosis: A Dipyridamole Echocardiographic Study Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 1998; 65(2): 397 - 402. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. S. SM, M. Sermer, D. A. Harrison, E. Grigoriadis, G. Liu, S. Sorensen, J. F. S. BS, D. Farine, K. S. Amankwah, J. C. Spears, et al. Risk and Predictors for Pregnancy-Related Complications in Women With Heart Disease Circulation, November 4, 1997; 96(9): 2789 - 2794. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. M. Otto, I. G. Burwash, M. E. Legget, B. I. Munt, M. Fujioka, N. L. Healy, C. D. Kraft, C. Y. Miyake-Hull, and R. G. Schwaegler Prospective Study of Asymptomatic Valvular Aortic Stenosis : Clinical, Echocardiographic, and Exercise Predictors of Outcome Circulation, May 6, 1997; 95(9): 2262 - 2270. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. Peteiro, F. Redondo, R. Calvino, J. Cuenca, G. Pradas, and A. C. Beiras DIFFERENCES IN HEART TRANSPLANT PHYSIOLOGY ACCORDING TO SURGICAL TECHNIQUE J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 1996; 112(3): 584 - 589. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Gonzalez-Juanatey, J. M. Garca-Acuna, M. V. Fernandez, A. A. Cendon, V. C. Fuentes, J. B. Garcia-Bengoechea, and M. G. de la Pena INFLUENCE OF THE SIZE OF AORTIC VALVE PROSTHESES ON HEMODYNAMICS AND CHANGE IN LEFT VENTRICULAR MASS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE SURGICAL MANAGEMENT OF AORTIC STENOSIS J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 1996; 112(2): 273 - 280. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
C. Veyrat, D. S. Beuve, Cl. Gourtchiglouian, S. Legeais, and D. Kalmanson Quantification of Left-Sided Valvular Stenoses by Color Doppler Imaging of Jets Angiology, May 1, 1990; 41(5): 352 - 364. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
Circulation Home | Subscriptions | Archives | Feedback | Authors | Help | AHA Journals Home | Search Copyright © 1985 American Heart Association, Inc. All rights reserved. Unauthorized use prohibited. |