Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on September 21, 2009

Circulation. 2009
Published online before print September 21, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.866269
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 6, 2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
120/14/1355    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.109.866269v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Meier, P.
Right arrow Articles by Seiler, C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Meier, P.
Right arrow Articles by Seiler, C.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Coronary Artery Disease
Related Collections
Right arrow Angiogenesis
Right arrow Pathophysiology
Right arrow Growth factors/cytokines
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow Chronic ischemic heart disease
Right arrow Coronary circulation
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on March 17, 2009
Accepted on July 27, 2009

Myocardial Salvage Through Coronary Collateral Growth by Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in Chronic Coronary Artery Disease. A Controlled Randomized Trial

Pascal Meier MD, Steffen Gloekler MD, Stefano F. de Marchi MD, Andreas Indermuehle MD, PhD, Tobias Rutz MD, Tobias Traupe MD, Hélène Steck RN, Rolf Vogel MD, PhD, and Christian Seiler MD*

From the Department of Cardiology, University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: christian.seiler{at}insel.ch.

Background—The efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for coronary collateral growth promotion and thus impending myocardial salvage has not been studied so far, to our best knowledge.

Methods and Results—In 52 patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease, age 62±11 years, the effect on a marker of myocardial infarct size (ECG ST segment elevation) and on quantitative collateral function during a 1-minute coronary balloon occlusion was tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind fashion. The study protocol before coronary intervention consisted of occlusive surface and intracoronary lead ECG recording as well as collateral flow index (CFI, no unit) measurement in a stenotic and a ≥1 normal coronary artery before and after a 2-week period with subcutaneous G-CSF (10 µg/kg; n=26) or placebo (n=26). The CFI was determined by simultaneous measurement of mean aortic, distal coronary occlusive, and central venous pressure. The ECG ST segment elevation >0.1 mV disappeared significantly more often in response to G-CSF (11/53 vessels; 21%) than to placebo (0/55 vessels; P=0.0005), and simultaneously, CFI changed from 0.121±0.087 at baseline to 0.166±0.086 at follow-up in the G-CSF group, and from 0.152±0.082 to 0.131±0.071 in the placebo group (P<0.0001 for interaction of treatment and time). The absolute change in CFI from baseline to follow-up amounted to +0.049±0.062 in the G-CSF group and to -0.010±0.060 in the placebo group (P<0.0001).

Conclusions—Subcutaneous G-CSF is efficacious during a short-term protocol in improving signs of myocardial salvage by coronary collateral growth promotion.


Key words: arteries • coronary circulation • collateral circulation • granulocyte colony-stimulating factor


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2009 120: 1337-1338. [Extract] [Full Text]