on October 5, 2009
Published online before print October 5, 2009, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.834739
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submitted on November 9, 2008
From the Cardiovascular Institute (J.E., A.F., F.A., R.H., D.J.A., F.J.-Q., C.B., C.M.) and Department of Pathology (P.A.), Hospital Clínico San Carlos, and Departments of Cardiology (P.G.-P., J.S., J.J., L.A.-P.) and Pathology (C.S.), Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, Spain. * To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: escaned{at}secardiologia.es.
Background—Intracoronary physiology techniques have been validated extensively for the assessment of epicardial stenoses but not for the lone study of coronary microcirculation. We performed a comparison between 4 intracoronary physiological indices with the actual structural microcirculatory changes documented in transplanted hearts. Methods and Results—In 17 cardiac allograft patients without coronary stenoses, ECG, intracoronary Doppler flow velocity, and aortic pressure were digitally recorded before and during maximal hyperemia with a dedicated system. Postprocessing of data yielded 4 indices of microcirculatory status: coronary flow velocity reserve (2.13±0.59), instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity pressure slope (2.33±1.25 cm · s · -1mm Hg-1), coronary resistance index (1.65±0.88 mm Hg · cm-1 · s-1), and coronary resistance reserve (2.36±0.65). Quantitative morphometry was performed in endomyocardial biopsies during the same hospital intake; arteriolar obliteration (76.57±6.95%) and density (2.00±1.22 arterioles per 1 mm2) and capillary density (645±179 capillaries per 1 mm2) were measured. Univariate regression analysis between intracoronary measurements and histological findings revealed that instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope correlated with arteriolar obliteration (r=0.58, P=0.014) and capillary density (r=0.60, P=0.012). Statistical adjustment revealed an independent contribution of arteriolar obliteration ( Conclusions—Intracoronary indices derived from pressure and flow, particularly instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope, appear to be superior to coronary flow velocity reserve in detecting structural microcirculatory changes. Both arteriolar obliteration and capillary rarefaction seem to influence microcirculatory hemodynamics independently.
Accepted on July 31, 2009
Assessment of Microcirculatory Remodeling With Intracoronary Flow Velocity and Pressure Measurements. Validation With Endomyocardial Sampling in Cardiac Allografts
Javier Escaned MD, PhD*,
=0.61, P=0.0009) and capillary density (=-0.60, P=0.0008) to instantaneous hyperemic diastolic velocity-pressure slope values, resulting in an excellent predictive model (r=0.84, P=0.0002). Coronary resistance index correlated only with capillary density (r=0.70, P=0.019). Relative indices (coronary flow velocity reserve and coronary resistance reserve) did not correlate significantly with arteriolar obliteration, capillary density, or arteriolar density.
Key words: blood flow • capillaries • microcirculation • physiology • transplantation
Related Articles:
Circulation 2009 120: 1553-1554.
Circulation 2009 120: 1555-1557.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  P. Ganz and P. Y. Hsue Assessment of Structural Disease in the Coronary Microvasculature Circulation, October 20, 2009; 120(16): 1555 - 1557. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|