Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on December 8, 2008

Circulation. 2008
Published online before print December 8, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789800
A more recent version of this article appeared on December 16, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
118/25/2803    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.108.789800v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jneid, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jneid, H.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
Medline Plus Health Information
*Heart Attack
Related Collections
Right arrow Health policy and outcome research
Right arrow Secondary prevention
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrow Acute myocardial infarction
Right arrow Epidemiology
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on April 30, 2008
Accepted on September 17, 2008

Sex Differences in Medical Care and Early Death After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Hani Jneid MD*, Gregg C. Fonarow MD, Christopher P. Cannon MD, Adrian F. Hernandez MD, Igor F. Palacios MD, Andrew O. Maree MD, Quinn Wells MD, Biykem Bozkurt MD, Kenneth A. LaBresh MD, Li Liang PhD, Yuling Hong MD, PhD, L. Kristin Newby MD, MHS, Gerald Fletcher MD, Eric Peterson MD, MPH, Laura Wexler MD, for the Get With the Guidelines Steering Committee and Investigators

From the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (H.J., B.B.); University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center (G.C.F.); Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Group and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass (C.P.C.); Duke Clinical Research Institute and Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC (L.L., L.K.N., A.F.H., E.P.); Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (H.J., I.F.P., A.O.M., Q.W.); MassPro, Inc, Waltham, Mass (K.A.L.); American Heart Association National Center, Dallas, Tex (Y.H.); Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla (G.F.); and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio (L.W.).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jneid{at}bcm.tmc.edu.

Background—Women receive less evidence-based medical care than men and have higher rates of death after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). It is unclear whether efforts undertaken to improve AMI care have mitigated these sex disparities in the current era.

Methods and Results—Using the Get With the Guidelines–Coronary Artery Disease database, we examined sex differences in care processes and in-hospital death among 78 254 patients with AMI in 420 US hospitals from 2001 to 2006. Women were older, had more comorbidities, less often presented with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and had higher unadjusted in-hospital death (8.2% versus 5.7%; P<0.0001) than men. After multivariable adjustment, sex differences in in-hospital mortality rates were no longer observed in the overall AMI cohort (adjusted odds ratio [OR]=1.04; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.10) but persisted among STEMI patients (10.2% versus 5.5%; P<0.0001; adjusted OR=1.12; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.23). Compared with men, women were less likely to receive early aspirin treatment (adjusted OR=0.86; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.90), early {beta}-blocker treatment (adjusted OR=0.90; 95% CI, 0.86 to 0.93), reperfusion therapy (adjusted OR=0.75; 95% CI, 0.70 to 0.80), or timely reperfusion (door-to-needle time ≤30 minutes: adjusted OR=0.78; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.92; door-to-balloon time ≤90 minutes: adjusted OR=0.87; 95% CI, 0.79 to 0.95). Women also experienced lower use of cardiac catheterization and revascularization procedures after AMI.

Conclusions—Overall, no sex differences in in-hospital mortality rates after AMI were observed after multivariable adjustment. However, women with STEMI had higher adjusted mortality rates than men. The underuse of evidence-based treatments and delayed reperfusion among women represent potential opportunities for reducing sex disparities in care and outcome after AMI.


Key words: myocardial infarction • percutaneous coronary intervention • reperfusion • revascularization • sex


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 118: 2667-2668. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
C. Melloni and L K. Newby
Risk factor management after acute coronary syndromes
Heart, September 1, 2009; 95(17): 1382 - 1384.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
A. K. Jacobs
The Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Stents in Women: A Window of Opportunity
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., July 1, 2009; 2(7): 611 - 613.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ Cardiovasc IntervHome page
A. K. Jacobs
Coronary Intervention in 2009: Are Women No Different Than Men?
Circ Cardiovasc Interv, February 1, 2009; 2(1): 69 - 78.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JWatch Emergency Med.Home page
Sex Differences Persist in Treatment for AMI
Journal Watch Emergency Medicine, January 9, 2009; 2009(109): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Sex Differences in AMI Outcomes
Journal Watch Women's Health, January 8, 2009; 2009(108): 3 - 3.
[Full Text]