Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 31, 2008

Circulation. 2008
Published online before print March 31, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740167
A more recent version of this article appeared on April 8, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/14/1864    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.740167v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ramires, J. A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gonzalez, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ramires, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Contractile function
Right arrow Arrhythmias, clinical electrophysiology, drugs
Right arrow Other heart failure
Right arrow Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Right arrow CPR and emergency cardiac care
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on September 13, 2007
Accepted on February 7, 2008

Left Ventricular Systolic Function and Outcome After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Maria M. Gonzalez MD, Robert A. Berg MD*, Vinay M. Nadkarni MD, Caio B. Vianna MD, PhD, Karl B. Kern MD, Sergio Timerman MD, PhD, and Jose A. Ramires MD, PhD

From the Heart Institute (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil (M.M.G., C.B.V., S.T., J.A.R.); University of Arizona Sarver Heart Center, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson (R.A.B., K.B.K.); and Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia (V.M.N.).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: rberg{at}email.arizona.edu.

Background—The effect of prearrest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on outcome after cardiac arrest is unknown.

Methods and Results—During a 26-month period, Utstein-style data were prospectively collected on 800 consecutive inpatient adult index cardiac arrests in an observational, single-center study at a tertiary cardiac care hospital. Prearrest echocardiograms were performed on 613 patients (77%) at 11±14 days before the cardiac arrest. Outcomes among patients with normal or nearly normal prearrest LVEF (≥45%) were compared with those of patients with moderate or severe dysfunction (LVEF <45%) by {chi}2 and logistic regression analyses. Survival to discharge was 19% in patients with normal or nearly normal LVEF compared with 8% in those with moderate or severe dysfunction (adjusted odds ratio, 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 9.9; P<0.001) but did not differ with regard to sustained return of spontaneous circulation (59% versus 56%; P=0.468) or 24-hour survival (39% versus 36%; P=0.550). Postarrest echocardiograms were performed on 84 patients within 72 hours after the index cardiac arrest; the LVEF decreased 25% in those with normal or nearly normal prearrest LVEF (60±9% to 45±14%; P<0.001) and decreased 26% in those with moderate or severe dysfunction (31±7% to 23±6%, P<0.001). For all patients, prearrest {beta}-blocker treatment was associated with higher survival to discharge (33% versus 8%; adjusted odds ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8 to 8.2; P<0.001).

Conclusions—Moderate and severe prearrest left ventricular systolic dysfunction was associated with substantially lower rates of survival to hospital discharge compared with normal or nearly normal function.


Key words: cardiopulmonary resuscitation • echocardiography • heart arrest • heart diseases • survival


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 1769. [Full Text]