Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on March 3, 2008

Circulation. 2008
Published online before print March 3, 2008, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727271
A more recent version of this article appeared on March 18, 2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Circulation: March 18, 2008, Volume 117, Number 11
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
117/11/1397    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727271v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dowson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rickards, A.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dowson, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rickards, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Ethics and Policy
Right arrow Primary prevention
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow Echocardiography
Right arrow CV surgery: other
Right arrow Pediatric and congenital heart disease, including cardiovascular surgery
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on July 12, 2007
Accepted on December 6, 2007

Migraine Intervention With STARFlex Technology (MIST) Trial. A Prospective, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure With STARFlex Septal Repair Implant to Resolve Refractory Migraine Headache

Andrew Dowson MBBS, PhD*, Michael J. Mullen MBBS, MRCP, MD, Richard Peatfield MD, FRCP, Keith Muir MD, FRCP, Arif Anis Khan MBBS, FCPS, Christopher Wells MB, ChB, FRCA, Susan L. Lipscombe MB, ChB, MRCP, Trevor Rees MB, ChB, Joseph V. De Giovanni MD, FRCP, FRCPCH, MOM, W. Lindsay Morrison MD, FRCP, David Hildick-Smith MD, FRCP, Giles Elrington MD, W. Stewart Hillis MB, ChB, FRCP, FRCS, Iqbal S. Malik MA, MRCP, PhD, and Anthony Rickards MBBS, FRCP, FESC

From Kings College Hospital, London (A.D.); Royal Brompton Hospital, London (M.J.M., A.A.K, A.R); Princess Margaret Migraine Clinic Charing Cross Hospital, London (R.P.); Division of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow (K.M); Pain Research Institute, Liverpool (C.W.); Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton (D.H.-S., S.L.L.); Hawthorn Surgery, Sutton Coldfield (T.R.); University Hospital, Birmingham (J.V.D.G.); Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool (W.L.M.); Barts and the London NHS Trust, London (G.E.); Western Infirmary, Glasgow (W.S.H.); and St Mary's Hospital, London (I.S.M.), UK.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dr.dowson{at}btopenworld.com.

Background—Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is prevalent in patients with migraine with aura. Observational studies show that PFO closure resulted in migraine cessation or improvement in {approx}80% of such patients. We investigated the effects of PFO closure for migraine in a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

Methods and Results—Patients who suffered from migraine with aura, experienced frequent migraine attacks, had previously failed ≥2 classes of prophylactic treatments, and had moderate or large right-to-left shunts consistent with the presence of a PFO were randomized to transcatheter PFO closure with the STARFlex implant or to a sham procedure. Patients were followed up for 6 months. The primary efficacy end point was cessation of migraine headache 91 to 180 days after the procedure. In total, 163 of 432 patients (38%) had right-to-left shunts consistent with a moderate or large PFO. One hundred forty-seven patients were randomized. No significant difference was observed in the primary end point of migraine headache cessation between implant and sham groups (3 of 74 versus 3 of 73, respectively; P=0.51). Secondary end points also were not achieved. On exploratory analysis, excluding 2 outliers, the implant group demonstrated a greater reduction in total migraine headache days (P=0.027). As expected, the implant arm experienced more procedural serious adverse events. All events were transient.

Conclusions—This trial confirmed the high prevalence of right-to-left shunts in patients with migraine with aura. Although no significant effect was found for primary or secondary end points, the exploratory analysis supports further investigation. The robust design of this study has served as the model for larger trials that are currently underway in the United States and Europe.


Key words: foramen ovale, patent • heart septal defects • migraine disorders • migraine with aura • treatment


Related Article:

Clinical Summaries
Circulation 2008 117: 1353. [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal Watch CardiologyHome page
Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale for Migraine Relief: A Study Headache
Journal Watch Cardiology, March 26, 2008; 2008(326): 1 - 1.
[Full Text]