Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on September 24, 2007

Circulation. 2007
Published online before print September 24, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.696310
A more recent version of this article appeared on October 9, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
116/15/1701    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.107.696310v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sievert, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wunderlich, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sievert, H.
Right arrow Articles by Wunderlich, N.
Related Collections
Right arrow Ablation/ICD/surgery
Right arrow Other Treatment
Right arrow CV surgery: other
Right arrow Embolic stroke
Right arrow Cardiac development
Right arrow Other Stroke Treatment - Surgical
Right arrow Transient Ischemic Attacks

Submitted on November 15, 2006
Accepted on July 19, 2007

Transcatheter Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale Without an Implant. Initial Clinical Experience

Horst Sievert MD*, Evelyn Fischer , Corinna Heinisch , Nico Majunke , Albrecht Roemer MD, and Nina Wunderlich MD

From the Cardiovascular Center Frankfurt, Sankt Katharinen, Frankfurt, Germany. Dr Sievert is also currently affiliated with Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: horstsievertmd{at}aol.com.

Background—Currently available catheter techniques for closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) rely on the placement of an implantable closure device. The objective of the Paradigm I study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transcatheter closure of PFO using radiofrequency energy without an implanted device in patients with cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack.

Methods and Results—Thirty patients were enrolled (15 females; mean age 48 years). Mean PFO size was 8.5±2.7 mm. Technical success (ie, successful application of radiofrequency energy) was achieved in 27 patients. The remaining 3 patients received an implantable closure device. All 30 patients were free from serious procedure-related adverse events. No recurrent strokes, deaths, or perforations occurred as a result of the procedure. The mean follow-up was 6 months, and 13 (43%) of the 30 patients experienced PFO closure after the first procedure. Nine of the patients whose PFOs remained patent after the first procedure elected to receive a second procedure using radiofrequency. The PFO was closed for 6 of those patients after the second procedure, which resulted in a secondary closure rate of 63%.

Conclusions—This study demonstrates that transcatheter closure of an intracardiac defect without a permanent implant is technically feasible. Achievement of improved primary closure rates through technique and device modifications will warrant randomized clinical comparison to permanently implanted devices.


Key words: heart defects, congenital • stroke • embolism • catheterization • catheter ablation




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2355 - 2369.
[Full Text] [PDF]