Donate Help Contact The AHA Sign In Home
American Heart Association
Circulation
Search: search_blue_button Advanced Search
Published Online
on June 11, 2007

Circulation. 2007
Published online before print June 11, 2007, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.671644
A more recent version of this article appeared on June 26, 2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
115/25/3189    most recent
CIRCULATIONAHA.106.671644v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, R. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Solomon, R. J.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Kidney Diseases
Related Collections
Right arrow Catheter-based coronary and valvular interventions: other
Right arrow Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC
Right arrow Acute coronary syndromes
Right arrowRelated Article

Submitted on September 19, 2006
Accepted on April 30, 2007

Cardiac Angiography in Renally Impaired Patients (CARE) Study. A Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Richard J. Solomon MD*, Madhu K. Natarajan MD, Serge Doucet MD, Samin K. Sharma MD, Cezar S. Staniloae MD, Richard E. Katholi MD, Joseph L. Gelormini MD, Marino Labinaz MD, Abel E. Moreyra MD, the Investigators of the CARE Study

From the Department of Renal Services (R.J.S.), Fletcher Allen Health Care, Burlington, Vt.; Division of Cardiology (M.K.N.), Hamilton Health Sciences General Division, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine (S.D.), Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Cardiovascular Institute (S.K.S.), Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY; Comprehensive Cardiovascular Center (C.S.S.), St. Vincent’s Medical Center Manhattan, New York, NY; Department of Medicine (R.E.K.), Southern Illinois University, Springfield; Interventional Cardiology (J.L.G.), Buffalo Heart Group, Buffalo, NY; Department of Medicine (M.L.), Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine (A.E.M.), Division of Cardiology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: richard.solomon{at}vtmednet.org.

Background--No direct comparisons exist of the renal tolerability of the low-osmolality contrast medium iopamidol with that of the iso-osmolality contrast medium iodixanol in high-risk patients.

Methods and Results--The present study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind comparison of iopamidol and iodixanol in patients with chronic kidney disease (estimated glomerular filtration rate, 20 to 59 mL/min) who underwent cardiac angiography or percutaneous coronary interventions. Serum creatinine (SCr) levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate were assessed at baseline and 2 to 5 days after receiving medications. The primary outcome was a postdose SCr increase ≥0.5 mg/dL (44.2 µmol/L) over baseline. Secondary outcomes were a postdose SCr increase ≥25%, a postdose estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease of ≥25%, and the mean peak change in SCr. In 414 patients, contrast volume, presence of diabetes mellitus, use of N-acetylcysteine, mean baseline SCr, and estimated glomerular filtration rate were comparable in the 2 groups. SCr increases ≥0.5 mg/dL occurred in 4.4% (9 of 204 patients) after iopamidol and 6.7% (14 of 210 patients) after iodixanol (P=0.39), whereas rates of SCr increases ≥25% were 9.8% and 12.4%, respectively (P=0.44). In patients with diabetes, SCr increases ≥0.5 mg/dL were 5.1% (4 of 78 patients) with iopamidol and 13.0% (12 of 92 patients) with iodixanol (P=0.11), whereas SCr increases ≥25% were 10.3% and 15.2%, respectively (P=0.37). Mean post-SCr increases were significantly less with iopamidol (all patients: 0.07 versus 0.12 mg/dL, 6.2 versus 10.6 µmol/L, P=0.03; patients with diabetes: 0.07 versus 0.16 mg/dL, 6.2 versus 14.1 µmol/L, P=0.01).

Conclusions--The rate of contrast-induced nephropathy, defined by multiple end points, is not statistically different after the intraarterial administration of iopamidol or iodixanol to high-risk patients, with or without diabetes mellitus. Any true difference between the agents is small and not likely to be clinically significant.


Key words: contrast media • diabetic nephropathy • iodixanol • iopamidol • kidney


Related Article:

Issue Highlights
Circulation 2007 115: 3139. [Extract] [Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CJASNHome page
P. M. Palevsky
Defining Contrast-Induced Nephropathy
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2009; 4(7): 1151 - 1153.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CJASNHome page
R. J. Solomon, R. Mehran, M. K. Natarajan, S. Doucet, R. E. Katholi, C. S. Staniloae, S. K. Sharma, M. Labinaz, J. L. Gelormini, and B. J. Barrett
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy and Long-Term Adverse Events: Cause and Effect?
Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., July 1, 2009; 4(7): 1162 - 1169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
J. H. Ellis and R. H. Cohan
Reducing the Risk of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Perspective on the Controversies
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2009; 192(6): 1544 - 1549.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Treitl, H. Rupprecht, S. Wirth, M. Korner, M. Reiser, and J. Rieger
Assessment of renal vasoconstriction in vivo after intra-arterial administration of the isosmotic contrast medium iodixanol compared to the low-osmotic contrast medium iopamidol
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., May 1, 2009; 24(5): 1478 - 1485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll Cardiol IntvHome page
R. Mehran, E. Nikolsky, A. J. Kirtane, A. Caixeta, S. C. Wong, P. S. Teirstein, W. E. Downey, W. B. Batchelor, P. J. Casterella, Y.-H. Kim, et al.
Ionic Low-Osmolar Versus Nonionic Iso-Osmolar Contrast Media to Obviate Worsening Nephropathy After Angioplasty in Chronic Renal Failure Patients: The ICON (Ionic versus non-ionic Contrast to Obviate worsening Nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) Study
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. Intv., May 1, 2009; 2(5): 415 - 421.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
R. J. Bruce, A. Djamali, K. Shinki, S. J. Michel, J. P. Fine, and M. A. Pozniak
Background Fluctuation of Kidney Function Versus Contrast-Induced Nephrotoxicity
Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2009; 192(3): 711 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mayo Clin Proc.Home page
S. Goldfarb, P. A. McCullough, J. McDermott, and S. B. Gay
Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: Specialty-Specific Protocols for Interventional Radiology, Diagnostic Computed Tomography Radiology, and Interventional Cardiology
Mayo Clin. Proc., February 1, 2009; 84(2): 170 - 179.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. C. Heinrich, L. Haberle, V. Muller, W. Bautz, and M. Uder
Nephrotoxicity of Iso-osmolar Iodixanol Compared with Nonionic Low-osmolar Contrast Media: Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Radiology, January 1, 2009; 250(1): 68 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. S. Brar, A. Y.-J. Shen, M. B. Jorgensen, A. Kotlewski, V. J. Aharonian, N. Desai, M. Ree, A. I. Shah, and R. J. Burchette
Sodium Bicarbonate vs Sodium Chloride for the Prevention of Contrast Medium-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Randomized Trial
JAMA, September 3, 2008; 300(9): 1038 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. A. Baumgarten and J. H. Ellis
Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: Contrast Material Not Required?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2008; 191(2): 383 - 386.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Kimmel and D. M. Alscher
Reply
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., July 1, 2008; 23(7): 2424 - 2425.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. J. Kuhn, N. Chen, D. V. Sahani, D. Reimer, E. J. R. van Beek, J. P. Heiken, and G. J. So
The PREDICT Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparison of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy After Low- or Isoosmolar Contrast Agent Exposure
Am. J. Roentgenol., July 1, 2008; 191(1): 151 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. A. Nguyen, P. Suranyi, J. G. Ravenel, P. K. Randall, P. B. Romano, K. A. Strom, P. Costello, and U. J. Schoepf
Iso-Osmolality versus Low-Osmolality Iodinated Contrast Medium at Intravenous Contrast-enhanced CT: Effect on Kidney Function
Radiology, July 1, 2008; 248(1): 97 - 105.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
S. D. Weisbord, M. K. Mor, A. L. Resnick, K. C. Hartwig, A. F. Sonel, M. J. Fine, and P. M. Palevsky
Prevention, Incidence, and Outcomes of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury
Arch Intern Med, June 23, 2008; 168(12): 1325 - 1332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. R. Dixon, C. L. Grines, and W. W. O'Neill
The year in interventional cardiology.
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., June 17, 2008; 51(24): 2355 - 2369.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
P. A. McCullough
Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 15, 2008; 51(15): 1419 - 1428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
M. Kimmel, M. Butscheid, S. Brenner, U. Kuhlmann, U. Klotz, and D. M. Alscher
Improved estimation of glomerular filtration rate by serum cystatin C in preventing contrast induced nephropathy by N-acetylcysteine or zinc--preliminary results
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2008; 23(4): 1241 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
F. Locatelli
Letter Regarding Article by Solomon et al, "Cardiac Angiography in REnally Impaired Patients (CARE) Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease"
Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): e165 - e165.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. Anselmino, G. Biondi-Zoccai, and I. Sheiban
Letter Regarding Article by Solomon et al, "Cardiac Angiography in REnally Impaired Patients (CARE) Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease"
Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): e166 - e166.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
R. J. Solomon, M. K. Natarajan, S. Doucet, S. K. Sharma, C. S. Staniloae, R. E. Katholi, J. L. Gelormini, M. Labinaz, and A. E. Moreyra
Response to Letters Regarding Article, "Cardiac Angiography in REnally Impaired Patients (CARE) Study: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease"
Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): e167 - e167.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. A. Herzog
Kidney disease in cardiology
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 42 - 46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]